foster children taken away from UKIP members By Labour Council

[arista]

Council defends taking foster children away from UKIP members
A council has refused to back down over its decision to remove three children from their foster parents because their membership of the UK Independence Party meant that they supported “racist” policies.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ukip/9700321/Council-defends-taking-foster-children-away-from-UKIP-members.html



There is a Stink here
this Couple were Labour
but changed to UKIP.


Ed Miliband says its wrong,

[Livia]

Typical lefty knee-jerk reaction. They acted very quickly to take the children away from people they thought may agree with what they perceived to be racist policies even though they were clearly good foster parents. Pity they didn't act so quickly in the Baby P and other cases where the ineptitude of many social workers leave children in life-threatening situations.

[Jesus.]

This is really bizarre, and unfounded. UKIP is not an illegal party, so I don't get it. Pity they let religious people preach about hellfire to young children, but removing foster children for being temporarily homed with right-leaning parents is absurd.

[arista]

"so I don't get it."


The Labour Council Lady was on BBC News this morning
she claims she got Legal advice?

The Couple ditched Labour for UKIP
SkyNews found out fropm the UKIP leader.

[Vicky.]

****ing ridiculous :bored:

[Kizzy]

It is totally wrong, there is no getting away from that fact.
However all parties are guilty of errors of this nature, didn't Edwina Currie put a dodgy DJ in charge of a high security prison?

[joeysteele]

Amazing where some councils interfere and/or intervene where it is not needed but avoid and near ignore cases that should be intervened and interfered in.
If the decision was solely on the basis that this Council sees UKIP as a racist party then some really strong controls and education as to this Council needs to be done.

[Marcus.]

sill people

[arista]

Amazing where some councils interfere and/or intervene where it is not needed but avoid and near ignore cases that should be intervened and interfered in.
If the decision was solely on the basis that this Council sees UKIP as a racist party then some really strong controls and education as to this Council needs to be done.


Yes the Labour Council.


With a by-election in a week.

[arista]

Being Debated
on Radio 5 Live

And Ch5HD Wright Stuff.

[the truth]

This is really bizarre, and unfounded. UKIP is not an illegal party, so I don't get it. Pity they let religious people preach about hellfire to young children, but removing foster children for being temporarily homed with right-leaning parents is absurd.

Irrelevant preaching.You really never miss a chance for an anti_christian cheap shot.

[the truth]

Typical lefty knee-jerk reaction. They acted very quickly to take the children away from people they thought may agree with what they perceived to be racist policies even though they were clearly good foster parents. Pity they didn't act so quickly in the Baby P and other cases where the ineptitude of many social workers leave children in life-threatening situations.

1000% RIGHT. This highlights why I personally will never ever vote for labour again. Theyre a profoundly dangerous party , this is bordering on communism. Imagine theyd won the last election? we were alreayd bankrupt, the non working class was at an all time high as millions of healthy people miled the benefit system and the champagne socialists cosied up to corrupt bankers, all this in between an illegal invasion. Meanwhile the NHS standards collapsed, as did nursing standards and council corruption reached new levels.

Im not tory either, but new labour were a disgrace and their intrusive culture and abuse of civil rights continues to this day

[Benjamin]

What a total sham of an excuse. They'll let children be put into bad homes with shoddy foster parents who are abusive, abusers, drunks, drug addicts etc. and take their time to realise anything is wrong and remove the children from them, but as soon as they discover a family has a certain political stance they whip these children away from an actual stable environment in a hope to gain support by playing the racism card with a different angle in a bid to look as if they are doing a good deed. Labour haven't done it for the sake of the children at all, they've done it to try and benefit themselves with complete disregard for the childrens lives.

[Jesus.]

Irrelevant preaching.You really never miss a chance for an anti_christian cheap shot.

And Christians never miss an opportunity to be offended when someone holds a mirror up to their bronze-age beliefs.

Swings and roundabouts.