PDA

View Full Version : can you answer this?


Petershaw1984
28-11-2012, 12:04 PM
Can you answer this question with 1 word answer?
If a fella met a fella in a fellas field, how many fs in that sentance?

Niamh.
28-11-2012, 12:06 PM
Five?

Jesus.
28-11-2012, 12:07 PM
Can you answer this question with 1 word answer?
If a fella met a fella in a fellas field, how many fs in that sentance?

6.

Niamh.
28-11-2012, 12:07 PM
None

Novo
28-11-2012, 12:08 PM
1

Alf
28-11-2012, 12:10 PM
none in "that sentence"

Petershaw1984
28-11-2012, 12:11 PM
Well done niamh and, wannashag?

Petershaw1984
28-11-2012, 12:11 PM
By the way i was actually offering you a shag niamh pmsl

Niamh.
28-11-2012, 12:11 PM
:amazed:

GypsyGoth
28-11-2012, 12:11 PM
8

Niamh.
28-11-2012, 12:12 PM
By the way i was actually offering you a shag niamh pmsl

:laugh2:

Jesus.
28-11-2012, 12:12 PM
Well done niamh and wannashag

In order for it to be none, the grammar needs to be correct. Which it isn't.

thesheriff443
28-11-2012, 12:15 PM
niamh first guess was wrong and i got it right!,so where is my offer of a shag?:joker:

Alf
28-11-2012, 12:17 PM
In order for it to be none, the grammar needs to be correct. Which it isn't.
stop splitting hair's

Petershaw1984
28-11-2012, 12:19 PM
In order for it to be none, the grammar needs to be correct. Which it isn't.

Oh for christs sake ive just edited it....... not for anyone elses just jesus h christ

Petershaw1984
28-11-2012, 12:21 PM
niamh first guess was wrong and i got it right!,so where is my offer of a shag?:joker:

I cant really offer you a shag.... maybe i could offer you a SHERRY, sheffif but i dont think its works aswell as wannashag

Jesus.
28-11-2012, 12:26 PM
Can you answer this question with 1 word answer?
If a fella met a fella in a fellas field, how many fs in "that sentence?".

That's the only way it works. It's more of a verbal teaser, I'm guessing.

Niamh.
28-11-2012, 12:27 PM
niamh first guess was wrong and i got it right!,so where is my offer of a shag?:joker:

I corrected myself before anyone else got it right though :idc: