View Full Version : James Arthur pays 1K for 2 call girls
Apple202
08-05-2013, 09:24 PM
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/tv/4915547/X-Factor-winner-James-Arthur-in-socks-romp-with-2-hookers.html
:laugh2:
such a gimp
Marcus.
08-05-2013, 09:25 PM
oh dear oh dear
Kazanne
08-05-2013, 09:25 PM
It's a buggar when your the 'next big thing'(in his head) and still have to pay for it:joker::joker:
Vanessa
08-05-2013, 09:26 PM
:laugh2:
Black Dagger
08-05-2013, 09:27 PM
Who'd want to have sex with it?
Black Dagger
08-05-2013, 09:27 PM
I'd want more than 1k, that is for ****ing sure.
Cherie
08-05-2013, 09:28 PM
Ria is a size 10. The camera must had a few sizes then.
Cherie
08-05-2013, 09:29 PM
It's a buggar when your the 'next big thing'(in his head) and still have to pay for it:joker::joker:
:joker:
Jordan.
08-05-2013, 09:31 PM
This is what happens when you reward a tramp with a load of money. Can't wait for him flop.
Kazanne
08-05-2013, 09:31 PM
Who'd want to have sex with it?
:joker::joker::joker:
Vicky.
08-05-2013, 09:40 PM
Who on earth would pay to have sex with that blonde. She looks like a man in drag.
LOL at James still having to pay for it though :D
Edit. Nevermind, I thought she was one of the hookers :laugh:
Brother Leon
08-05-2013, 09:43 PM
Should of spent more and got better quality at least.
Marsh.
08-05-2013, 10:05 PM
The Sun previously revealed that he refused to take off his grey socks when he romped with 18-year-old blonde Danielle Withey during a fling in January.
Omg. :laugh2:
Vicky.
08-05-2013, 10:12 PM
Omg. :laugh2:
That sounds like they are making something out of nothing to me actually..'refused' to take them off..did she specifically ask him to take his socks off and he said no?
If that did actually happen though, I would love to be a fly on the wall. NO I WILL NOT TAKE MY SOCKS OFF!!!!! :laugh:
Jake.
08-05-2013, 10:16 PM
Well, even sloths have to shag at some point I suppose
Marsh.
08-05-2013, 10:18 PM
That sounds like they are making something out of nothing to me actually..'refused' to take them off..did she specifically ask him to take his socks off and he said no?
If that did actually happen though, I would love to be a fly on the wall. NO I WILL NOT TAKE MY SOCKS OFF!!!!! :laugh:
Reading the rest if he article it is a bit silly. I laughed because I thought he left nothing but his socks on :laugh:
But by the sounds of it they "performed acts" on him whilst he was fully clothed and they never went to bed so it sounds strange to pick out his socks. Lmao.
Vicky.
08-05-2013, 10:21 PM
Reading the rest if he article it is a bit silly. I laughed because I thought he left nothing but his socks on :laugh:
But by the sounds of it they "performed acts" on him whilst he was fully clothed and they never went to bed so it sounds strange to pick out his socks. Lmao.
I have been with men who actually did that..I didnt realise it was strange :joker:
Reading the rest if he article it is a bit silly. I laughed because I thought he left nothing but his socks on :laugh:
But by the sounds of it they "performed acts" on him whilst he was fully clothed and they never went to bed so it sounds strange to pick out his socks. Lmao.
I think they are playing on the fact that during x factor he was supposed to have said he likes to keep his socks on whilst doing the deed.
Jack_
08-05-2013, 10:22 PM
Why is this even a story? What a disgusting invasion of privacy
I have been with men who actually did that..I didnt realise it was strange :joker:
Same Vicky.
Was also his friend that booked them according to the article...
Marsh.
08-05-2013, 11:13 PM
I think they are playing on the fact that during x factor he was supposed to have said he likes to keep his socks on whilst doing the deed.
Did he? Lmao, I smell BS in that case. Or maybe Cowell paid them to get him in the papers. :laugh:
Ninastar
08-05-2013, 11:16 PM
Why is this even a story? What a disgusting invasion of privacy
i totally agree.
although i do find it hard to think a girl wouldn't sleep with him without getting paid for it.
he's not ugly at all
Jack_
08-05-2013, 11:24 PM
I just...don't get how people can care about this, a newspaper can be allowed to print it or how it'd affect anyone's opinion of him. It's just...irrelevant. Who cares what he does in his spare time and with his own money?
Just another tabloid trying to pull somebody apart and tarnish their (in this case developing) career over nothing
Shaun
08-05-2013, 11:25 PM
i hate to be that guy but is it just me or if a female XF winner did it, they'd be dropped and chastised?
Jack_
08-05-2013, 11:29 PM
i hate to be that guy but is it just me or if a female XF winner did it, they'd be dropped and chastised?
Well yeah I agree but I just think the fact that this can even be a story in the first place is baffling...just...who cares?
Apple202
09-05-2013, 02:33 PM
it proves the point of everyone who's been saying a desperate loser so they care
He's a great guy. Stop being jealous pls
Apple202
09-05-2013, 03:32 PM
cant tell if seer
look at his face for 1 sec plz
why would i be jel
Niamh.
09-05-2013, 03:39 PM
Bet Matt Cardle doesn't have to pay for it James :idc:
Patrick
09-05-2013, 04:00 PM
I thought this was about Jamie Archer for a moment. :laugh:
I just...don't get how people can care about this, a newspaper can be allowed to print it or how it'd affect anyone's opinion of him. It's just...irrelevant. Who cares what he does in his spare time and with his own money?
Just another tabloid trying to pull somebody apart and tarnish their (in this case developing) career over nothing
This.
It's all because these Journalists obviously haven't had sex in a year.
GiRTh
09-05-2013, 04:18 PM
Good lad. I always liked him.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.