Susie is not boring, its just the other housemates aren't interesting enough for her

[AdamArmand]

Susie has been put in a house with a load of personality void individuals with very little to offer (except Pete).

You think she's boring just cause she doesnt join in with their infantile games? You are a fool if you can't see that given the right mix of people, she would come alive. She can't talk to them about anything interesting because THEY are only interested in such things as masturbation and who fancies who.

She's so underrated. I feel for her and Pete cause the rest of them are just so tedious.

[Nowhere]

lol, so what kind of people do you think she should be mixed with? and what personality traits have we not seen? What has she got to offer,other than what we've already witnessed?

[AdamArmand]

Originally posted by Nowhere
lol, so what kind of people do you think she should be mixed with? and what personality traits have we not seen? What has she got to offer,other than what we've already witnessed?

if she was in there with ARTISTS, eccentrics and adventurers and romantics, she'd be pro-active, i can tell you. She's stuck with common boring types.

[Mike]

Susie is boring, the BB house just isn't the place for her, she ruins the whole experience.

[AdamArmand]

Originally posted by Mike
Susie is boring, the BB house just isn't the place for her, she ruins the whole experience.

Give me a break. The people around her are so immature that it would be offputing for anyone.

[Foebane100]

Originally posted by Mike
Susie is boring, the BB house just isn't the place for her, she ruins the whole experience.

You beat me to it that's what I was going to say.

[Deep2]

Originally posted by AdamArmand

if she was in there with ARTISTS, eccentrics and adventurers and romantics, she'd be pro-active, i can tell you. She's stuck with common boring types.

You have hit the nail on the head. Excellent post. She is just a classy lady, who has nothing in common with these commoners and comes across as boring, as she has nothing in common with them.

[AdamArmand]

Originally posted by Deep2
Originally posted by AdamArmand

if she was in there with ARTISTS, eccentrics and adventurers and romantics, she'd be pro-active, i can tell you. She's stuck with common boring types.

You have hit the nail on the head. Excellent post. She is just a classy lady, who has nothing in common with these commoners and comes across as boring, as she has nothing in common with them.

Thank you, i knew there were intelligent people around who would agree with me! I find Susie's little ways very amusing, how she gets tense but retains her cool is hilarious to watch. Like a boiler that could explode.

[Foebane100]

I don't think this is true, but if it is then she is in the wrong place to find these things. So the BB house is not the right place for her.

[Blowout]

Originally posted by AdamArmand
Susie has been put in a house with a load of personality void individuals with very little to offer (except Pete).

You think she's boring just cause she doesnt join in with their infantile games? You are a fool if you can't see that given the right mix of people, she would come alive. She can't talk to them about anything interesting because THEY are only interested in such things as masturbation and who fancies who.

She's so underrated. I feel for her and Pete cause the rest of them are just so tedious.

How do you know this? Do you know her personally outside the house?

[Deep2]

Originally posted by Foebane100
I don't think this is true, but if it is then she is in the wrong place to find these things. So the BB house is not the right place for her.

What makes you decide that this is not the right place for her? An unintelligent post, based purely on subjective opinion.

If the producers put in people with more intellect, more depth and morality, Suzie would not be so isolated.

[babybay]

lol great excuse:laugh:

[AdamArmand]

If the producers put in people with more intellect, more depth and morality, Suzie would not be so isolated.

FANTASTIC POINT Deep. You are so right.:hello:

[Nowhere]

Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by Deep2
Originally posted by AdamArmand

if she was in there with ARTISTS, eccentrics and adventurers and romantics, she'd be pro-active, i can tell you. She's stuck with common boring types.

You have hit the nail on the head. Excellent post. She is just a classy lady, who has nothing in common with these commoners and comes across as boring, as she has nothing in common with them.

Thank you, i knew there were intelligent people around who would agree with me! I find Susie's little ways very amusing, how she gets tense but retains her cool is hilarious to watch. Like a boiler that could explode.

Um excuse me, but just because we aren't a fan of Susie doesn't make us unintelligent! It actually makes you unintelligant for being so small minded... :shocked::sad: Your opinions are your own,unfortunately you seem to want to impose your views on everyone else.. not everybody is going to see things the way you do,so I think you should respect peoples views and hope for the best!

[Dan_]

Here's the woman who came out bottom of the intelligence test but you think she needs more intelligent/less boring people to stimulate her into being entertaining, what a load of baloney.She doesn't really want to get involved and would rather just sit and chat and even the chat's with people on her supposed level are boring as she's clearly lacking in conversation topics.

[Blowout]

Originally posted by Nowhere
Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by Deep2
Originally posted by AdamArmand

if she was in there with ARTISTS, eccentrics and adventurers and romantics, she'd be pro-active, i can tell you. She's stuck with common boring types.

You have hit the nail on the head. Excellent post. She is just a classy lady, who has nothing in common with these commoners and comes across as boring, as she has nothing in common with them.

Thank you, i knew there were intelligent people around who would agree with me! I find Susie's little ways very amusing, how she gets tense but retains her cool is hilarious to watch. Like a boiler that could explode.

Um excuse me, but just because we aren't a fan of Susie doesn't make us unintelligent! It actually makes you unintelligant for being so small minded... :shocked::sad: Your opinions are your own,unfortunately you seem to want to impose your views on everyone else.. not everybody is going to see things the way you do,so I think you should respect peoples views and hope for the best!

I agree, each to there own, let's leave it at that. Your Susie fans and we're not.

[Deep2]

Originally posted by Nowhere

Um excuse me, but just because we aren't a fan of Susie doesn't make us unintelligent! It actually makes you unintelligant for being so small minded... :shocked::sad: Your opinions are your own,unfortunately you seem to want to impose your views on everyone else.. not everybody is going to see things the way you do,so I think you should respect peoples views and hope for the best!

Brainiac, even if the OP was being small minded, this has no causal link with intelligence. And I do not see a view of Suzie being imposed on anyone, just a debate. Your argument is very one dimensional. A

[AdamArmand]

Originally posted by BB fernzy
Here's the woman who came out bottom of the intelligence test but you think she needs more intelligent/less boring people to stimulate her into being entertaining, what a load of baloney.She doesn't really want to get involved and would rather just sit and chat and even the chat's with people on her supposed level are boring as she's clearly lacking in conversation topics.

Practical intelligence... not emotional. She is intelligent. You thinK GLYN doing his creepy 69 **** with that pad is INTELLIGENT?! He's a fcking creep.

[Bells]

Yeah totally. It's fair enough telling us your opinion of a HM - we may or may not agree with it - but don't insult members in the process.

[Deep2]

Originally posted by BB fernzy
Here's the woman who came out bottom of the intelligence test but you think she needs more intelligent/less boring people to stimulate her into being entertaining, what a load of baloney.She doesn't really want to get involved and would rather just sit and chat and even the chat's with people on her supposed level are boring as she's clearly lacking in conversation topics.

This post is a load of cack. The woman came bottom of an intelligence test.....I am amazed at how unbelievably thick people on this forum are.

1) What was the I.Q. test?
2) What is I.Q.?
3) What was the state of the person when taking it?
4) People are intelligent in deifferent ways: audio/visual/verbal/kinaesthetic

Yet you seem to believe that the test demonstrates Suzie is unintelligent, no questions asked.

As for the fact she does not want to get involved, read the original suggestions I and the OP made on this topic.

*Post edited by admin - It's against forum rules as you know to insult other members, any more and a warning will be issued*

[AdamArmand]

I'm sure you are intelligent in a practical sense (like Glyn), but obviously you are not if you are quick to write off and judge Susie as you do.

[Deep2]

Originally posted by ice_maiden02
Yeah totally. It's fair enough telling us your opinion of a HM - we may or may not agree with it - but don't insult members in the process.

Give one example where the OP insulted a member of this forum directly.

[Nowhere]

A debate is a casual discussion, Adam is claiming that anyone who doesn't think the way he does,is automaticlly unintelligant,which is unfair,narrow minded, and obviously ridiculous.. Intelligence is a knowledge of the world and all things in it, and if you can't understand that other people may not agree with you everytime, then you have a lot to learn, and not so knowledgable of the world as you'd like to think...

[Blowout]

Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by BB fernzy
Here's the woman who came out bottom of the intelligence test but you think she needs more intelligent/less boring people to stimulate her into being entertaining, what a load of baloney.She doesn't really want to get involved and would rather just sit and chat and even the chat's with people on her supposed level are boring as she's clearly lacking in conversation topics.

Practical intelligence... not emotional. She is intelligent. You thinK GLYN doing his creepy 69 **** with that pad is INTELLIGENT?! He's a fcking creep.

What has Glyn got to do with this thread, there was no need or point to call him a ********** creep.

[Dan_]

Originally posted by Deep2
Originally posted by BB fernzy
Here's the woman who came out bottom of the intelligence test but you think she needs more intelligent/less boring people to stimulate her into being entertaining, what a load of baloney.She doesn't really want to get involved and would rather just sit and chat and even the chat's with people on her supposed level are boring as she's clearly lacking in conversation topics.

This post is a load of cack. The woman came bottom of an intelligence test.....I am amazed at how unbelievably thick people on this forum are.

1) What was the I.Q. test?
2) What is I.Q.?
3) What was the state of the person when taking it?
4) People are intelligent in deifferent ways: audio/visual/verbal/kinaesthetic

Yet you seem to believe that the test demonstrates Suzie is unintelligent, no questions asked.

As for the fact she does not want to get involved, read the original suggestions I and the OP made on this topic.

Just because you disagree with someone you have no right to call someone's post cack, you cannot have a debate it seems without trying to put someone else down.

My point is she has limited conversational topics.You can blame that on the other housemates but has she tried to start debates?

I wouldn't be so quick to put people down as thick.

[AdamArmand]

Originally posted by Nowhere
A debate is a casual discussion, Adam is claiming that anyone who doesn't think the way he does,is automaticlly unintelligant,which is unfair,narrow minded, and obviously ridiculous.. Intelligence is a knowledge of the world and all things in it, and if you can't understand that other people may not agree with you everytime, then you have a lot to learn, and not so knowledgable of the world as you'd like to think...

Not at all. What i am saying is that anyone who thinks Susie is boring without looking to the FACT that everyone else has failed to inspire her to 'come alive' IS OBVIOUSLY emotionally unintelligent. That is common sense. We are not all black or white my friend. Susie would be engrossing to watch if she was complemented by dynamic personalities. IMO, there are none. They are just kids who want to laugh and be the head of the 'clan'. Susie has amazing self confidance. Do you see her cracking up and crying in the diary room at any of the 'test results' like Aisleyne did?

[Nowhere]

Originally posted by BB fernzy
Originally posted by Deep2
Originally posted by BB fernzy
Here's the woman who came out bottom of the intelligence test but you think she needs more intelligent/less boring people to stimulate her into being entertaining, what a load of baloney.She doesn't really want to get involved and would rather just sit and chat and even the chat's with people on her supposed level are boring as she's clearly lacking in conversation topics.

This post is a load of cack. The woman came bottom of an intelligence test.....I am amazed at how unbelievably thick people on this forum are.

1) What was the I.Q. test?
2) What is I.Q.?
3) What was the state of the person when taking it?
4) People are intelligent in deifferent ways: audio/visual/verbal/kinaesthetic

Yet you seem to believe that the test demonstrates Suzie is unintelligent, no questions asked.

As for the fact she does not want to get involved, read the original suggestions I and the OP made on this topic.

Just because you disagree with someone you have no right to call someone's post cack, you cannot have a debate it seems without trying to put someone else down.

My point is she has limited conversational topics.You can blame that on the other housemates but has she tried to start debates?

You spelt different wrong btw.

exactly, it's almost intimidating the way in which Deep replies to your view and post, which is why i'm led to believe he's imposing his views onto us

[Deep2]

Originally posted by BB fernzy
Originally posted by Deep2
Originally posted by BB fernzy
Here's the woman who came out bottom of the intelligence test but you think she needs more intelligent/less boring people to stimulate her into being entertaining, what a load of baloney.She doesn't really want to get involved and would rather just sit and chat and even the chat's with people on her supposed level are boring as she's clearly lacking in conversation topics.

This post is a load of cack. The woman came bottom of an intelligence test.....I am amazed at how unbelievably thick people on this forum are.

1) What was the I.Q. test?
2) What is I.Q.?
3) What was the state of the person when taking it?
4) People are intelligent in deifferent ways: audio/visual/verbal/kinaesthetic

Yet you seem to believe that the test demonstrates Suzie is unintelligent, no questions asked.

As for the fact she does not want to get involved, read the original suggestions I and the OP made on this topic.

Just because you disagree with someone you have no right to call someone's post cack, you cannot have a debate it seems without trying to put someone else down.

My point is she has limited conversational topics.You can blame that on the other housemates but has she tried to start debates?

You spelt different wrong btw.

I am so sorry I spelt 'different' wrong, what is your point? Have you heard of mistyping before, you ignoramous.

I see you are unable to address my point on I.Q. tests.

Again, you have failed to answer my point on why she has limited conversation topics, and merely reiterated your one dimensional, intellectually stunted post.

It is due to her SITUATION she is not making an effort, as the people in the house are not on her wave length. every human being may interact differently with a given set of people. She is not being given the chance to shine, as the people in there are younger and more common than her. She is shutting herself off.

[AdamArmand]

Originally posted by Nowhere
exactly, it's almost intimidating the way in which Deep replies to your view and post, which is why i'm led to believe he's imposing his views onto us

Is that your answer to everything? This is a discussion forum. Nobody's imposing, just offering views.

[Nowhere]

Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by Nowhere
A debate is a casual discussion, Adam is claiming that anyone who doesn't think the way he does,is automaticlly unintelligant,which is unfair,narrow minded, and obviously ridiculous.. Intelligence is a knowledge of the world and all things in it, and if you can't understand that other people may not agree with you everytime, then you have a lot to learn, and not so knowledgable of the world as you'd like to think...

Not at all. What i am saying is that anyone who thinks Susie is boring without looking to the FACT that everyone else has failed to inspire her to 'come alive' IS OBVIOUSLY emotionally unintelligent. That is common sense. We are not all black or white my friend. Susie would be engrossing to watch if she was complemented by dynamic personalities. IMO, there are none. They are just kids who want to laugh and be the head of the 'clan'. Susie has amazing self confidance. Do you see her cracking up and crying in the diary room at any of the 'test results' like Aisleyne did?

It is only possible to judge someone on what you've witnessed already, anything else ould be a guess or estimation. You cannot say for sure she would be a more interesting character if she were put with different people,unless you've witnessed it.

[Deep2]

[i]Originally posted by Nowhere[/i

exactly, it's almost intimidating the way in which Deep replies to your view and post, which is why i'm led to believe he's imposing his views onto us

Nonsense, nowhere man. I have no distinct opinion on Suzie I am trying to impose. I am just objecting to the clearly limited intellect streaming from some of the posters. My opinion of Suzie is fairly neutral to be honest.

[AdamArmand]

Originally posted by Nowhere
Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by Nowhere
A debate is a casual discussion, Adam is claiming that anyone who doesn't think the way he does,is automaticlly unintelligant,which is unfair,narrow minded, and obviously ridiculous.. Intelligence is a knowledge of the world and all things in it, and if you can't understand that other people may not agree with you everytime, then you have a lot to learn, and not so knowledgable of the world as you'd like to think...

Not at all. What i am saying is that anyone who thinks Susie is boring without looking to the FACT that everyone else has failed to inspire her to 'come alive' IS OBVIOUSLY emotionally unintelligent. That is common sense. We are not all black or white my friend. Susie would be engrossing to watch if she was complemented by dynamic personalities. IMO, there are none. They are just kids who want to laugh and be the head of the 'clan'. Susie has amazing self confidance. Do you see her cracking up and crying in the diary room at any of the 'test results' like Aisleyne did?

It is only possible to judge someone on what you've witnessed already, anything else ould be a guess or estimation. You cannot say for sure she would be a more interesting character if she were put with different people,unless you've witnessed it.

You only have to look at the evidence - them chucking cake around, Mikey trying to intimidate people, Aisleyne becoming disillusioned, Pete going into his shell, Glyn's 'masturbation' woes... to come to the conclusion that Susie will not waste her energy trying to be one of the actors in these scenarios.

Where are the Pete Burns, the Jackie Stallones, the John McWhatsits, to give her something to LIVE for?!

[Deep2]

Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by Nowhere
A debate is a casual discussion, Adam is claiming that anyone who doesn't think the way he does,is automaticlly unintelligant,which is unfair,narrow minded, and obviously ridiculous.. Intelligence is a knowledge of the world and all things in it, and if you can't understand that other people may not agree with you everytime, then you have a lot to learn, and not so knowledgable of the world as you'd like to think...

Not at all. What i am saying is that anyone who thinks Susie is boring without looking to the FACT that everyone else has failed to inspire her to 'come alive' IS OBVIOUSLY emotionally unintelligent. That is common sense. We are not all black or white my friend. Susie would be engrossing to watch if she was complemented by dynamic personalities. IMO, there are none. They are just kids who want to laugh and be the head of the 'clan'. Susie has amazing self confidance. Do you see her cracking up and crying in the diary room at any of the 'test results' like Aisleyne did?

Firstly, a debate is not necessarily a casual discussion. Where do you get that idea from?

Secondly, all Adam did was say he was pleased a like minded intelligent person thought as he did. This has been read into and misinterpreted as an attack on others who do not share the opinion. All it was really, was a compliment and a sign of unity for someone who agrees with him.

Thirdly, you have given a definition of intelligence, I would like to know where you got this, as it is not completely accurate.

Fourthly, your assertion that Adam did not follow your definition, is flawed, as your definition is flawed and secondly, as point two was also flawed and you failed to show a causal link between narrow mindedness and intelligence.

[Deep2]

Originally posted by Nowhere


It is only possible to judge someone on what you've witnessed already, anything else ould be a guess or estimation. You cannot say for sure she would be a more interesting character if she were put with different people,unless you've witnessed it.

Judgement is something that we do all the time. When we guess, we are judging. The only difference is that once we get to know a person, we then make an informed judgement. One can still judge from what one sees, it is one of the fundamentals of human behaviour and to suggest 'we can only judge what we have witnessed' is a pure nonsense, that almost sounds like oppression.

[Nowhere]

Ok maybe she would 'shine' if she were put with a different selection of people, but she may not, who's to say she isn't being herself at the moment? There's no evidence to back up your statement,other than guess work.. Susie entered the house with full knowledge of the kind of people she would be mixing with. It's our job,to vote out the least entertaining, at the moment,she is entertaining me the least, there isn't a point in saying 'It's just the selection of people she's in there with' as we cannot change the people in there, it's her job to shine above all others, yet she is fading into the background. You can't blame the other Housemates for that!

[AdamArmand]

Another thing, dont you find it admirable the way Susie has dealt with people like Mikey when he has tried to rile her so he can scream in her face?! He is so below her, her intelligence when it comes to dealing with him is admirable, thats why i pay no heed to ridiculous 'test results'. I admire her. Not that im captivated or anything but she hasnt tried to BE anyone. Ultimately we go through life trying to find ourselves and put on masks of bravada/pizzaz/eccentricity to cope with the harsh realities. That's cool. Susie is happy, i think. Ultimately. Isnt that what we all want? We should be patting her on the back.

[Dan_]

Originally posted by Deep2
Originally posted by BB fernzy
Originally posted by Deep2
Originally posted by BB fernzy
Here's the woman who came out bottom of the intelligence test but you think she needs more intelligent/less boring people to stimulate her into being entertaining, what a load of baloney.She doesn't really want to get involved and would rather just sit and chat and even the chat's with people on her supposed level are boring as she's clearly lacking in conversation topics.

This post is a load of cack. The woman came bottom of an intelligence test.....I am amazed at how unbelievably thick people on this forum are.

1) What was the I.Q. test?
2) What is I.Q.?
3) What was the state of the person when taking it?
4) People are intelligent in deifferent ways: audio/visual/verbal/kinaesthetic

Yet you seem to believe that the test demonstrates Suzie is unintelligent, no questions asked.

As for the fact she does not want to get involved, read the original suggestions I and the OP made on this topic.

Just because you disagree with someone you have no right to call someone's post cack, you cannot have a debate it seems without trying to put someone else down.

My point is she has limited conversational topics.You can blame that on the other housemates but has she tried to start debates?

You spelt different wrong btw.

I am so sorry I spelt 'different' wrong, what is your point? Have you heard of mistyping before, you ignoramous.

I see you are unable to address my point on I.Q. tests.

Again, you have failed to answer my point on why she has limited conversation topics, and merely reiterated your one dimensional, intellectually stunted post.

It is due to her SITUATION she is not making an effort, as the people in the house are not on her wave length. every human being may interact differently with a given set of people. She is not being given the chance to shine, as the people in there are younger and more common than her. She is shutting herself off.

How about reading your post before submitting it.Yet more name calling from you how predictable, try reading the forum rules about insulting members.

IQ or Intelligence Quotient is an attempt to measure intelligence.I cannot answer the other 2 questions.

She seems to get on well with Richard,has she tried to have debates with him? if not why not? That's making the assumption that just because they are not on her wavelength they cannot have a debate with her, why not try it's not like she has anything else to do. Why bring class into it? You seem to always bring up that people are common.It is her shutting herself off because she's pre-judging the others.

[Deep2]

Originally posted by BB fernzy


How about reading your post before submitting it.Yet more name calling from you how predictable, try reading the forum rules about insulting members.

IQ or Intelligence Quotient is an attempt to measure intelligence.I cannot answer the other 2 questions.

She seems to get on well with Richard,has she tried to have debates with him? if not why not? That's making the assumption that just because they are not on her wavelength they cannot have a debate with her, why not try it's not like she has anything else to do. Why bring class into it? You seem to always bring up that people are common.It is her shutting herself off because she's pre-judging the others.

I love your definiton of an I.Q. test. that is like saying a tree is a tree because it is a tree. So what does measuring intelligence mean then?

I also love the way you admit you cannot answer the other quesitons. Well, hard luck, old chap.

And as for you comment on me using 'class' this is a nonsense. I do not refer to 'class' when I use the expression 'common', but a personality type, this is implicit in my words.

I have read the forum rules on behaviour thank you very much. Very grateful you suggested it.

[AdamArmand]

By classy, im not referring to her being posh, but the way she deals with situations in an admirable manner and doesnt flip out.

[Slartibartfast]

I'm not clear on a few things, are you saying that susie can't interact with this current lot cos she has nothing in common with them, or that she won't interact with them cos they're a bunch of idiots? Is it an inability or a conscious decision not to get involved??

I think it's a conscious decision by her not to get involved, although it has little to do with the actions of the other HMs. I think Susie is boring and does little because that's what she chooses to do. She's a veteran watcher of BB, she knows that the bigger characters, the controversial ones will split public opinion and be evicted early. I remember her saying as much a while back, when she made some comment about the loud ones all being evicted.

She's boring and inactive cos she thinks thats the way to get ahead in BB, and it's worked for her so far. She's survived against some housemates (like Nikki) who probably have a much wider fan base than her but equally have a lot more haters than her. She's going to bore her way into or at least near the final. She'll never win, but thats not her aim. Her aim, as she has stated, is to get publicity so she can try to build some kind of career on the back of her BB appearance. In order to do this, she wants to be relatively popular but more importantly, she needs to be not hated so she can pick up some nice light entertainment TV job when she gets out. I don't think she will, but thats her aim.

I don't think it would matter who she was in with, she would never be a big character in any BB.

[Foebane100]

Originally posted by Deep2
Originally posted by Foebane100
I don't think this is true, but if it is then she is in the wrong place to find these things. So the BB house is not the right place for her.

What makes you decide that this is not the right place for her? An unintelligent post, based purely on subjective opinion.

If the producers put in people with more intellect, more depth and morality, Suzie would not be so isolated.

Have you watched the previous shows?
I doubt you'll find artists and intellectuals in the house.

If Suzie doesn't get on with the housemates and they are beneath her then it is clear she does not fit in with them.

All posts are subjective; if you look at your own you will see they are.

[Deep2]

Originally posted by Slartibartfast
I'm not clear on a few things, are you saying that susie can't interact with this current lot cos she has nothing in common with them, or that she won't interact with them cos they're a bunch of idiots? Is it an inability or a conscious decision not to get involved??

I think it's a conscious decision by her not to get involved, although it has little to do with the actions of the other HMs. I think Susie is boring and does little because that's what she chooses to do. She's a veteran watcher of BB, she knows that the bigger characters, the controversial ones will split public opinion and be evicted early. I remember her saying as much a while back, when she made some comment about the loud ones all being evicted.

She's boring and inactive cos she thinks thats the way to get ahead in BB, and it's worked for her so far. She's survived against some housemates (like Nikki) who probably have a much wider fan base than her but equally have a lot more haters than her. She's going to bore her way into or at least near the final. She'll never win, but thats not her aim. Her aim, as she has stated, is to get publicity so she can try to build some kind of career on the back of her BB appearance. In order to do this, she wants to be relatively popular but more importantly, she needs to be not hated so she can pick up some nice light entertainment TV job when she gets out. I don't think she will, but thats her aim.

I don't think it would matter who she was in with, she would never be a big character in any BB.

I think a bit of both. They are a bunch of idiots, but she is on a different wavelength. I also agree that on another BB she would not be much of a bigger character, but she would be more interesting, if she was compatable with some other housemates. Yes, there is a conscious decision on her part not to get involved, but I would do the same, if in her position, and I am far from boring.

[Blowout]

The whole point of Big Brother is that it's supposed to be a social experiment, by putting in a load of different people from different walks of life and see how they get a long and how far they will go against each other for a prize. Not to put a load of one type of person in (in this instance Susie) and watch them drink tea and have civilised conversation.

[Deep2]

Originally posted by Foebane100
Originally posted by Deep2
Originally posted by Foebane100
I don't think this is true, but if it is then she is in the wrong place to find these things. So the BB house is not the right place for her.

What makes you decide that this is not the right place for her? An unintelligent post, based purely on subjective opinion.

If the producers put in people with more intellect, more depth and morality, Suzie would not be so isolated.

Have you watched the previous shows?
I doubt you'll find artists and intellectuals in the house.

If Suzie doesn't get on with the housemates and they are beneath her then it is clear she does not fit in with them.

All posts are subjective; if you look at your own you will see they are.

There were no intellectuals on previous shows? That is untrue. Eugene, Derek and Jon Tickle for a star, and they were some of the most popular housemates EVER.

[Foebane100]

Originally posted by Blowout
The whole point of Big Brother is that it's supposed to be a social experiment, by putting in a load of different people from different walks of life and see how they get a long and how far they will go against each other for a prize. Not to put a load of one type of person in (in this instance Susie) and watch them drink tea and have civilised conversation.

Yeah it is to see how different types of people get on and interact.

I wouldn't mind if they had some discussions, but then they would probably just dip the sound. I’d like to know the opinions of the various housemates on different topics.

[Nowhere]

Originally posted by Blowout
The whole point of Big Brother is that it's supposed to be a social experiment, by putting in a load of different people from different walks of life and see how they get a long and how far they will go against each other for a prize. Not to put a load of one type of person in (in this instance Susie) and watch them drink tea and have civilised conversation.

:thumbs:

[Foebane100]

Originally posted by Deep2
Originally posted by Foebane100
Originally posted by Deep2
Originally posted by Foebane100
I don't think this is true, but if it is then she is in the wrong place to find these things. So the BB house is not the right place for her.

What makes you decide that this is not the right place for her? An unintelligent post, based purely on subjective opinion.

If the producers put in people with more intellect, more depth and morality, Suzie would not be so isolated.

Have you watched the previous shows?
I doubt you'll find artists and intellectuals in the house.

If Suzie doesn't get on with the housemates and they are beneath her then it is clear she does not fit in with them.

All posts are subjective; if you look at your own you will see they are.

There were no intellectuals on previous shows? That is untrue. Eugene, Derek and Jon Tickle for a star, and they were some of the most popular housemates EVER.

I'll give you Jon Tickle as popular (he should have won), but the others I don't think really were popular.

[AdamArmand]

Originally posted by Blowout
The whole point of Big Brother is that it's supposed to be a social experiment, by putting in a load of different people from different walks of life and see how they get a long and how far they will go against each other for a prize. Not to put a load of one type of person in (in this instance Susie) and watch them drink tea and have civilised conversation.

Evidently THEY DID NOT put people in from different walks of life. Glyn, Mikey, Imogen, Aisleyne, Jennie - all the freakin same with no unique flair. They are the SAME TYPE OF PERSON. They want to be popular, they want to be the star, or something which they are not (Ais trying to be 'ghetto'). BB7 has failed because there are NOT diverse types in the house. Susie and last series' Derek would have been WONDERFUL television in the same house.

You make absolutely no sense to me.

[Deep2]

Originally posted by Blowout
The whole point of Big Brother is that it's supposed to be a social experiment, by putting in a load of different people from different walks of life and see how they get a long and how far they will go against each other for a prize. Not to put a load of one type of person in (in this instance Susie) and watch them drink tea and have civilised conversation.

What a stupid post. I said people she was compatible with. And if BB is about a social experient, with people from different walks of life, why then are they ALL common and unintelligent? Why are so many single? Why are so many young? Why are so many models? Why are so many surgically enhanced? Why no intellectuals/established people?

[Deep2]

Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by Blowout
The whole point of Big Brother is that it's supposed to be a social experiment, by putting in a load of different people from different walks of life and see how they get a long and how far they will go against each other for a prize. Not to put a load of one type of person in (in this instance Susie) and watch them drink tea and have civilised conversation.

Evidently THEY DID NOT put people in from different walks of life. Glyn, Mikey, Imogen, Aisleyne, Jennie - all the freakin same with no unique flair. They are the SAME TYPE OF PERSON. They want to be popular, they want to be the star, or something which they are not (Ais trying to be 'ghetto'). BB7 has failed because there are NOT diverse types in the house. Susie and last series' Derek would have been WONDERFUL television in the same house.

Absoultely. Another excellent post. I said the same thing, just hadn't read yours! :wink:

[Deep2]

Originally posted by Foebane100
Originally posted by Deep2
Originally posted by Foebane100
Originally posted by Deep2
Originally posted by Foebane100
I don't think this is true, but if it is then she is in the wrong place to find these things. So the BB house is not the right place for her.

What makes you decide that this is not the right place for her? An unintelligent post, based purely on subjective opinion.

If the producers put in people with more intellect, more depth and morality, Suzie would not be so isolated.

Have you watched the previous shows?
I doubt you'll find artists and intellectuals in the house.

If Suzie doesn't get on with the housemates and they are beneath her then it is clear she does not fit in with them.

All posts are subjective; if you look at your own you will see they are.

There were no intellectuals on previous shows? That is untrue. Eugene, Derek and Jon Tickle for a star, and they were some of the most popular housemates EVER.

I'll give you Jon Tickle as popular (he should have won), but the others I don't think really were popular.

Eugene almost beat Anthhhony, so he must have been popular. And Derek was popular, just unpopular at the same time.

[Dan_]

Originally posted by Deep2
Originally posted by BB fernzy


How about reading your post before submitting it.Yet more name calling from you how predictable, try reading the forum rules about insulting members.

IQ or Intelligence Quotient is an attempt to measure intelligence.I cannot answer the other 2 questions.

She seems to get on well with Richard,has she tried to have debates with him? if not why not? That's making the assumption that just because they are not on her wavelength they cannot have a debate with her, why not try it's not like she has anything else to do. Why bring class into it? You seem to always bring up that people are common.It is her shutting herself off because she's pre-judging the others.

I love your definiton of an I.Q. test. that is like saying a tree is a tree because it is a tree. So what does measuring intelligence mean then?

Measuring intelligence by general intelligence, a combination of various subjects.

I also love the way you admit you cannot answer the other quesitons. Well, hard luck, old chap.

And as for you comment on me using 'class' this is a nonsense. I do not refer to 'class' when I use the expression 'common', but a personality type, this is implicit in my words.

I have read the forum rules on behaviour thank you very much. Very grateful you suggested it.

How is anyone who was not there able to answer those 2 questions? She might not have been in a good state of mind or maybe she was how are we to know?

That's good you've read the rules.Let's hope you follow them in the future and stop insulting people.

[Deep2]

Originally posted by BB fernzy
Originally posted by Deep2
Originally posted by BB fernzy


How about reading your post before submitting it.Yet more name calling from you how predictable, try reading the forum rules about insulting members.

IQ or Intelligence Quotient is an attempt to measure intelligence.I cannot answer the other 2 questions.

She seems to get on well with Richard,has she tried to have debates with him? if not why not? That's making the assumption that just because they are not on her wavelength they cannot have a debate with her, why not try it's not like she has anything else to do. Why bring class into it? You seem to always bring up that people are common.It is her shutting herself off because she's pre-judging the others.

I love your definiton of an I.Q. test. that is like saying a tree is a tree because it is a tree. So what does measuring intelligence mean then?

Measuring intelligence by general intelligence, a combination of various subjects.

I also love the way you admit you cannot answer the other quesitons. Well, hard luck, old chap.

And as for you comment on me using 'class' this is a nonsense. I do not refer to 'class' when I use the expression 'common', but a personality type, this is implicit in my words.

I have read the forum rules on behaviour thank you very much. Very grateful you suggested it.

How is anyone who was not there able to answer those 2 questions? She might not have been in a good state of mind or maybe she was how are we to know?

That's good you've read the rules.Let's hope you follow them in the future and stop insulting people.

I read the rules before I posted, fool.

[Deep2]

And you answered my point. How is anyone to know her emotional state, etc....that's why it is not always a valid test! Well done, you answered the wuestion correctly on your own. See what private study can do. Award yourself one star.

[James]

Originally posted by Deep2
An unintelligent post, based purely on subjective opinion.

Originally posted by Deep2
Your argument is very one dimensional.
Originally posted by Deep2
This post is a load of cack. .....I am amazed at how unbelievably thick people on this forum are.


It's against the rules of the forum to make comments like these. We're here to discuss Big Brother and the housemates, not make disparaging remarks about other forum members.

These type of comments just turn discussions into arguments.

Originally posted by AdamArmand
Thank you, i knew there were intelligent people around who would agree with me!

That was the starting point for the bickering on this thread. It is not a great idea to make assumptions about someone else's intelligence based on the fact you disagree with them. Opinions about housemates are all subjective anyway.

Okay, point made. Let's get back on-topic.

[Nowhere]

Can you not hold a civilised conversation without being derogatory Deep2?

[Deep2]

Personally, I believe a few insults are not harmful to anyone. Calling a post a load of cack isn't exactly getting personal is it?

And the starting point for the bickering on this thread was merely a sign of unity of two people agreeing with each other, not an attack on anyone else.

[Deep2]

Originally posted by Nowhere
Can you not hold a civilised conversation without being derogatory Deep2?

Yes, if I wish, it is not out opf my control. But I do so when I choose. Are you able to have an intelligent conversation, Nowhere Man?

[James]

It's against the rules of the forum to make comments like these......

Originally posted by Deep2
I read the rules before I posted, fool.

That one also... we will have to give warnings if it continues.

Back on-topic or thread will have to be locked.

[Deep2]

Originally posted by James
It's against the rules of the forum to make comments like these......

Originally posted by Deep2
I read the rules before I posted, fool.

That one also... we will have to give warnings if it continues.

Back on-topic or thread will have to be locked.

Fair enough. I bow to the rules of the forum, but do so whilst claiming them to be too regimental and leaving little room for real sarcastic and witty banter.

[Nowhere]

Oh yes I'm very able Deep2, thankyou for the interest :thumbs: However I wouldn't like to discuss anything with you,as I don't feel you can accept that people don't agree with you, which is very unattractive,and I feel, not worthy of a reply. :hugesmile:

[Deep2]

Originally posted by Nowhere
Oh yes I'm very able Deep2, thankyou for the interest :thumbs: However I wouldn't like to discuss anything with you,as I don't feel you can accept that people don't agree with you, which is very unattractive,and I feel, not worthy of a reply. :hugesmile:

I am happy for people to disagree with me, it is what makes the enjoyment of the argument more bloodthirsty. :devil:

[AdamArmand]

Some of you guys have called Susie chronically boring and thats NOT an insult? Please, you're guilty of the same thing.

[texbex]

I think people percieve her as boring becuase she is the oldest 1 and she has a very mature life settled down wif her husband plenty ov money etc etc and she comes from a very wealthy background who just drink tea all day lol

[BBleed--x]

SUSIE IS BORING - BUT I HATE MIKEY AND JENNIE MORE :mad:

[AdamArmand]

People shoot themselves in the foot when they say that it isnt a show 'her type' should be on. BB is about contrasting all different types. The problem is that this year they have failed to find many of these contrasts and put some run of the mill/superficial people in there like Mikey, Aisleyne etc.

[Deep2]

Originally posted by AdamArmand
People shoot themselves in the foot when they say that it isnt a show 'her type' should be on. BB is about contrasting all different types. The problem is that this year they have failed to find many of these contrasts and put some run of the mill/superficial people in there like Mikey, Aisleyne etc.

Agreed. Practically all of them are superficial people. It is such a shame. I was really hoping for some likeable characters this year. I would be like Suzie in the house. I wouldn't want to mix with any of them, except for Richard.

[InTheFade]

Well, if she's not boring, she's certainly very stupid to blow thousands on getting into a house full of (according to you) idiots...

[Foebane100]

Originally posted by AdamArmand
People shoot themselves in the foot when they say that it isnt a show 'her type' should be on. BB is about contrasting all different types. The problem is that this year they have failed to find many of these contrasts and put some run of the mill/superficial people in there like Mikey, Aisleyne etc.

Stop putting your spin on what people have said, if she is not going to partake then she should have decided to leave, if the housemates are so offensive.

You are putting a very morally upright intellectual view of Suzie forward which may not be true.

[AdamArmand]

Originally posted by Foebane100
You are putting a very morally upright intellectual view of Suzie forward which may not be true.

Well, better to put it out there than to follow the sheep and condemn her as merely 'boring'.

[Smeggypants]

Originally posted by Deep2
Originally posted by Foebane100
I don't think this is true, but if it is then she is in the wrong place to find these things. So the BB house is not the right place for her.

What makes you decide that this is not the right place for her? An unintelligent post, based purely on subjective opinion.

If the producers put in people with more intellect, more depth and morality, Suzie would not be so isolated.

Now that is FUNNY!!!

Suzie would be more isolated if the house was full of intellectuals. It may have excaped your noticed, but Suzie isn't really that bright.

And depth? Come on?

Morality? Suzies a snob. Shes a dull prudish clean freak and a snob

[AdamArmand]

Originally posted by Smeggypants
Originally posted by Deep2
Originally posted by Foebane100
I don't think this is true, but if it is then she is in the wrong place to find these things. So the BB house is not the right place for her.

What makes you decide that this is not the right place for her? An unintelligent post, based purely on subjective opinion.

If the producers put in people with more intellect, more depth and morality, Suzie would not be so isolated.

Now that is FUNNY!!!

Suzie would be more isolated if the house was full of intellectuals. It may have excaped your noticed, but Suzie isn't really that bright.

And depth? Come on?

Morality? Suzies a snob. Shes a dull prudish clean freak and a snob

what a vicious, BASELESS post. If Susie wasnt bright, she would have been crumbling and simpering when Mikey went for her the other night. She would be a snob if she was slagging off her housemates constantly, which she does not.

[xcharleyx]

yeahh, but she should've known who she'd be put against
She can't expect everyone to kiss her feet etc...

[Smeggypants]

Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by Smeggypants
Originally posted by Deep2
Originally posted by Foebane100
I don't think this is true, but if it is then she is in the wrong place to find these things. So the BB house is not the right place for her.

What makes you decide that this is not the right place for her? An unintelligent post, based purely on subjective opinion.

If the producers put in people with more intellect, more depth and morality, Suzie would not be so isolated.

Now that is FUNNY!!!

Suzie would be more isolated if the house was full of intellectuals. It may have excaped your noticed, but Suzie isn't really that bright.

And depth? Come on?

Morality? Suzies a snob. Shes a dull prudish clean freak and a snob

what a vicious, BASELESS post.

You call my post baseless ( even though there's lots of video evidence of it being true ), and worse your counter arguments have NOTHING to do with whether she is bright/snobbish or not....




If Susie wasnt bright, she would have been crumbling and simpering when Mikey went for her the other night.

You're mistaking intelligence with assertiveness.


She would be a snob if she was slagging off her housemates constantly, which she does not.

You're mistaking snobbery with bitchyness.

[InTheFade]

Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by Smeggypants
Originally posted by Deep2
Originally posted by Foebane100
I don't think this is true, but if it is then she is in the wrong place to find these things. So the BB house is not the right place for her.

What makes you decide that this is not the right place for her? An unintelligent post, based purely on subjective opinion.


If the producers put in people with more intellect, more depth and morality, Suzie would not be so isolated.

Now that is FUNNY!!!

Suzie would be more isolated if the house was full of intellectuals. It may have excaped your noticed, but Suzie isn't really that bright.

And depth? Come on?

Morality? Suzies a snob. Shes a dull prudish clean freak and a snob

what a vicious, BASELESS post. If Susie wasnt bright, she would have been crumbling and simpering when Mikey went for her the other night. She would be a snob if she was slagging off her housemates constantly, which she does not.

Nah. 'Vicious' would be to call her a stupid ****ing **** - which, by the way, is not my personal opinion of her - and it's true that she's not very bright, she seems to want the other HMs to think she is though. She's nice, sure, but 'bright' isn't a word I'd usually associate with someone who blows piles of money on plastic surgery and getting on TV.

[Smeggypants]

Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by Foebane100
You are putting a very morally upright intellectual view of Suzie forward which may not be true.

Well, better to put it out there than to follow the sheep and condemn her as merely 'boring'.

Well I am as far away from being a sheep as you can get.


I've made my OWN conclusions about Suzie from the way she has acted in the house.

None of us ( Unless we know her personally ) can say she's anything other than how she's acted in the house.


Now dont' get me wrong. I don't dislike Suzie. I actually find her attractive too. HOWEVER, from her behaviour in the house I have found her to be

1] Dull - Limited and shallow topics of converstion. All she talks about is tea and make-up. A lot of the other housemates, which some of you are accusing of as being boring have had much deeper conversations than Suzie.

Suzie is NOT thick, but she's not highly intelligent either. She's certainly no more intelligent than most of the other Housemates. Don't confuse the way she carries herself as an indication of her being intelligent

2] Prude/Snob - She has come across as being very prudish/snobby over sexual matters. Which is rather odd as she's enhanced her sexuality by installing larger than life breast implants.

3] Clean Freak. - She's obsessed with hygiene. There's a high correlation with dullness and prudishness and clean freaks. Imogen is of similar character btw

[Smeggypants]

Originally posted by AdamArmand
People shoot themselves in the foot when they say that it isnt a show 'her type' should be on. BB is about contrasting all different types. The problem is that this year they have failed to find many of these contrasts and put some run of the mill/superficial people in there like Mikey, Aisleyne etc.

I do agree with you that Aisleyne is superficial. Imogen is also very superficial too.

Richard was right to coin the phrase "The plastics"

In fact gimme Suzie over Aisleyne and Imogen anyday. But I still stand behind my opinion of Suzie being a dull prudish clean freak. I mgith add that I fidn that a sham too.

[Deep2]

Originally posted by Smeggypants
Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by Foebane100
You are putting a very morally upright intellectual view of Suzie forward which may not be true.

Well, better to put it out there than to follow the sheep and condemn her as merely 'boring'.

Well I am as far away from being a sheep as you can get.


I've made my OWN conclusions about Suzie from the way she has acted in the house.

None of us ( Unless we know her personally ) can say she's anything other than how she's acted in the house.


Now dont' get me wrong. I don't dislike Suzie. I actually find her attractive too. HOWEVER, from her behaviour in the house I have found her to be

1] Dull - Limited and shallow topics of converstion. All she talks about is tea and make-up. A lot of the other housemates, which some of you are accusing of as being boring have had much deeper conversations than Suzie.

Suzie is NOT thick, but she's not highly intelligent either. She's certainly no more intelligent than most of the other Housemates. Don't confuse the way she carries herself as an indication of her being intelligent

2] Prude/Snob - She has come across as being very prudish/snobby over sexual matters. Which is rather odd as she's enhanced her sexuality by installing larger than life breast implants.

3] Clean Freak. - She's obsessed with hygiene. There's a high correlation with dullness and prudishness and clean freaks. Imogen is of similar character btw

I agree with much of what you say, except the dullness comment. I have seen her look after many of the housemates when they were down and provide a shoulder to cry on. This to me, automatically elevates her above Mikeh who has shown no humility or depth of personality whatsoever.

I don't think Suzie should be accused of dull, when 50% at least of the housemates left are also just as dull, in their own ways.

[Smeggypants]

Originally posted by texbex
I think people percieve her as boring becuase she is the oldest 1 and she has a very mature life settled down with her husband plenty ov money etc etc and she comes from a very wealthy background who just drink tea all day lol

With respect that is a silly post.

I am a couple of years older than Suzie and let me tell you than being that age doesn't automatically mean you have to be boring like Suzie.

There are people who are 20 who are just as boring as Suzie ( look at Imogen for example ) and I know people Suzies age who act as crazy and funlike as Nikki or Pete or even Glyn. I do myself in fact :)

Maturity and Levels of Boringness are two different things :)

[Sam]

i love susie please keep her in

[AdamArmand]

I don't think Suzie should be accused of dull, when 50% at least of the housemates left are also just as dull, in their own ways.

That is EXACTLY IT. I mean, its not like we've all got a hard on for Susie and will present the pope with a petition for her canonization, we just know that the rest of them are pretty much EQUALLY as boring in the sense of what people have come to expect of BB every year.

They hide their mundane characteristics behind false reactions, absurd expressions and errr... playfights.

[Smeggypants]

Originally posted by AdamArmand


I don't think Suzie should be accused of dull, when 50% at least of the housemates left are also just as dull, in their own ways.

That is EXACTLY IT. I mean, its not like we've all got a hard on for Susie and will present the pope with a petition for her canonization, we just know that the rest of them are pretty much EQUALLY as boring in the sense of what people have come to expect of BB every year.

They hide their mundane characteristics behind false reactions, absurd expressions and errr... playfights.


It sounds completely ridiculous to suggest we can't call Suzie dull just because others are also dull.

Just doesn't make sense. I agree that at least 50% of the other Hms are also dull, but that doesn't mean Suzie isn't dull.

[AdamArmand]

Originally posted by Smeggypants
Originally posted by AdamArmand


I don't think Suzie should be accused of dull, when 50% at least of the housemates left are also just as dull, in their own ways.

That is EXACTLY IT. I mean, its not like we've all got a hard on for Susie and will present the pope with a petition for her canonization, we just know that the rest of them are pretty much EQUALLY as boring in the sense of what people have come to expect of BB every year.

They hide their mundane characteristics behind false reactions, absurd expressions and errr... playfights.


It sounds completely ridiculous to suggest we can't call Suzie dull just because others are also dull.

Just doesn't make sense. I agree that at least 50% of the other Hms are also dull, but that doesn't mean Suzie isn't dull.

alright boy, im going to get you turned onto the ways of Jackie Kennedy Onassis and Audrey Hepburn... you will find Susie has a lot going for her once you study them, her OBVIOUS role models in posture, manner and pizzaz.

[Smeggypants]

Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by Smeggypants
Originally posted by AdamArmand


I don't think Suzie should be accused of dull, when 50% at least of the housemates left are also just as dull, in their own ways.

That is EXACTLY IT. I mean, its not like we've all got a hard on for Susie and will present the pope with a petition for her canonization, we just know that the rest of them are pretty much EQUALLY as boring in the sense of what people have come to expect of BB every year.

They hide their mundane characteristics behind false reactions, absurd expressions and errr... playfights.


It sounds completely ridiculous to suggest we can't call Suzie dull just because others are also dull.

Just doesn't make sense. I agree that at least 50% of the other Hms are also dull, but that doesn't mean Suzie isn't dull.

alright boy, Im going to get you turned onto the ways of Jackie Kennedy Onassis and Audrey Hepburn... you will find Susie has a lot going for her once you study them, her OBVIOUS role models in posture, manner and pizzaz.

No need sonny :) I'm well aware of the beauty ( both inner and outer ) of Jackie Onassis and her ilk.

Indeed I would take a woman like that anyday over the likes of the superficial plastics we see in the guise of Imogen, aisleyne and, vomit, the repulsive Grace!!!

And fact I would go fuirther and say there is absolutely no contest.

In fact it is the Jackie Onassis part of Suzie that turns me ON.

What I'm explaining in return is that the dull, prudish and clean freak part of suzie is the part that turns me OFF.

A woman can emulate the character of Jackie Onassis and also be sexually liberated and fun ya know :)

[Red Moon]

Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by Mike
Susie is boring, the BB house just isn't the place for her, she ruins the whole experience.

Give me a break. The people around her are so immature that it would be offputing for anyone.

I have to agree with Mike here she gives very little to the house, other than the odd cup of tea. And we can't even be sure she makes a good cuppa they could be awful!

[AdamArmand]

Originally posted by Red Moon
Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by Mike
Susie is boring, the BB house just isn't the place for her, she ruins the whole experience.

Give me a break. The people around her are so immature that it would be offputing for anyone.

I have to agree with Mike here she gives very little to the house, other than the odd cup of tea. And we can't even be sure she makes a good cuppa they could be awful!

You are too harsh! Imagine if Derek was in there... they would have a fabulous rollicking time. Or if psycho Craig saw her as a mother figure, how she would cope with him and his Anthony obsession? HIlarious!

[Smeggypants]

Ahhh now Derek WAS a real intellectual. I Loved Derek!!!

You are right, it would be great to stick Derek in the house with Suzie.

They would be a good match in elegance, but you'd soon see just how non-intellectual Suzie really is when put beside Derek for comprison.

[Red Moon]

Originally posted by AdamArmandYou are too harsh! Imagine if Derek was in there... they would have a fabulous rollicking time. Or if psycho Craig saw her as a mother figure, how she would cope with him and his Anthony obsession? HIlarious!

She would sit around holding court and drinking tea.... but saying that I would love to see her with Derek telling her she is a waste of space!

[Dan_]

Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by Red Moon
Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by Mike
Susie is boring, the BB house just isn't the place for her, she ruins the whole experience.

Give me a break. The people around her are so immature that it would be offputing for anyone.

I have to agree with Mike here she gives very little to the house, other than the odd cup of tea. And we can't even be sure she makes a good cuppa they could be awful!

You are too harsh! Imagine if Derek was in there... they would have a fabulous rollicking time. Or if psycho Craig saw her as a mother figure, how she would cope with him and his Anthony obsession? HIlarious!

Just because Derek and Susie are both posh it doesn't mean he would bring something else out of her.Why is it that assume she is intelligent?

[AdamArmand]

Originally posted by Red Moon
Originally posted by AdamArmandYou are too harsh! Imagine if Derek was in there... they would have a fabulous rollicking time. Or if psycho Craig saw her as a mother figure, how she would cope with him and his Anthony obsession? HIlarious!

She would sit around holding court and drinking tea.... but saying that I would love to see her with Derek telling her she is a waste of space!

that is so rude.

[bbrocks-x]

yeah right susie is just plain boring and nothing else

[sgouldbourn]

Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by Mike
Susie is boring, the BB house just isn't the place for her, she ruins the whole experience.

Give me a break. The people around her are so immature that it would be offputing for anyone.

Are you watching the right show? This is the strangest post ever

[DizzyLizzy]

Suzie is dull, the house has gone down hill since she arrived in my opinion and shes choosing to evict jennie because she swears too much which is a stupid reason. I dont see why everyone should walk on egg shells around her

[AdamArmand]

Originally posted by sgouldbourn
Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by Mike
Susie is boring, the BB house just isn't the place for her, she ruins the whole experience.

Give me a break. The people around her are so immature that it would be offputing for anyone.

Are you watching the right show? This is the strangest post ever

You obviously are.

[AdamArmand]

Originally posted by bbrocks-x
yeah right susie is just plain boring and nothing else

mm, thank you for that interesting observation. I wonder what you'd be like to chat with if this is all you have to offer to the discussion.

Admin: That's out of order... members of this forum should be allowed to express their opinion without belittling comments like this.

You've been told about this numerous times now. Warning given for this and other occasions where you have broken the rules about treating other forum members opinions with respect. James.

[Foebane100]

Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by bbrocks-x
yeah right susie is just plain boring and nothing else

mm, thank you for that interesting observation. I wonder what you'd be like to chat with if this is all you have to offer to the discussion.

That is their opinion and there is no need to attack it.

[AdamArmand]

Originally posted by Foebane100
Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by bbrocks-x
yeah right susie is just plain boring and nothing else

mm, thank you for that interesting observation. I wonder what you'd be like to chat with if this is all you have to offer to the discussion.

That is their opinion and there is no need to attack it.

It adds NOTHING to the debate. I wish people would be a bit more dynamic.

[Dan_]

Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by Foebane100
Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by bbrocks-x
yeah right susie is just plain boring and nothing else

mm, thank you for that interesting observation. I wonder what you'd be like to chat with if this is all you have to offer to the discussion.

That is their opinion and there is no need to attack it.

It adds NOTHING to the debate. I wish people would be a bit more dynamic.

That is all he/she think's of Susie though, people are entilted to post what they like.You could disagree with that point and add why it is you don't think she is boring to continue the debate.

[AdamArmand]

Originally posted by BB fernzy

That is all he/she think's of Susie though, people are entilted to post what they like.

not in my discussion - i want to read other side of the argument and if all you have to contribute is "she's boring", sorry, thats not making me understand your POV AT ALL.

[Dan_]

Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by BB fernzy

That is all he/she think's of Susie though, people are entilted to post what they like.

not in my discussion - i want to read other side of the argument and if all you have to contribute is "she's boring", sorry, thats not making me understand your POV AT ALL.

What gives you the right to say what can and cannot be put in this thread? The poster just said what he thought of Susie.

[AdamArmand]

Originally posted by BB fernzy
Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by BB fernzy

That is all he/she think's of Susie though, people are entilted to post what they like.

not in my discussion - i want to read other side of the argument and if all you have to contribute is "she's boring", sorry, thats not making me understand your POV AT ALL.

What gives you the right to say what can and cannot be put in this thread? The poster just said what he thought of Susie.

I already said, i'd love to read dynamic replies with specific reasons why Susie is in fact the sole reason for her own solitude. Whatever happened to interesting discussion?

[Dan_]

Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by BB fernzy
Originally posted by AdamArmand
Originally posted by BB fernzy

That is all he/she think's of Susie though, people are entilted to post what they like.

not in my discussion - i want to read other side of the argument and if all you have to contribute is "she's boring", sorry, thats not making me understand your POV AT ALL.

What gives you the right to say what can and cannot be put in this thread? The poster just said what he thought of Susie.

I already said, i'd love to read dynamic replies with specific reasons why Susie is in fact the sole reason for her own solitude. Whatever happened to interesting discussion?

I'd also love to read replies as to why Susie is not boring and the evidence to suggest she would be better entertainment with different housemates.

[AdamArmand]

Originally posted by BB fernzy

I'd also love to read replies as to why Susie is not boring and the evidence to suggest she would be better entertainment with different housemates.

we've already posted a few theories.

[James]

Whatever happened to interesting discussion?


:sad: Thread locked.