View Full Version : Luisa Not cooking for Lionel and Jim
GiRTh
15-01-2014, 10:19 PM
So we can spiteful to the growing list of Luisa negative traits. Its quite a list aggressive, argumentative, self delusional, disrespectful, manipulative, rude etc.....:joker:
Jake.
15-01-2014, 10:24 PM
I know, brilliant stuff
Cherie
15-01-2014, 10:25 PM
I know, brilliant stuff
No extremely spiteful and immature
Jordan.
15-01-2014, 10:25 PM
If they don't show her any respect they don't deserve it back
GiRTh
15-01-2014, 10:26 PM
Self centered, self absorbed.
Jake.
15-01-2014, 10:26 PM
No extremely spiteful and immature
But that's why I think it's brilliant, I don't support Luisa because I think she's a lovely person lol
flamingGalah!
15-01-2014, 10:27 PM
She is just pathetic. And to think she is a mother?!? :shocked:
Jack_
15-01-2014, 10:27 PM
No extremely spiteful and immature
Yes, which is exactly the way I want all housemates to act, because they will thus piss each other off
Of course she was being pathetic, but I would rather that than her go 'oh I am sorry Jim do you know what we should just make up, we all want to get along don't we I mean let's not argue' :sleep:
Cherie
15-01-2014, 10:28 PM
But that's why I think it's brilliant, I don't support Luisa because I think she's a lovely person lol
It was funny will give you that :joker:
Jake.
15-01-2014, 10:28 PM
Jack :worship:
chuff me dizzy
15-01-2014, 10:28 PM
Childish spiteful little bitch ,I shudder to think what type of mother she is ,watch her change now Jasmines gone ,but too late
daniel-lewis-1985
15-01-2014, 10:28 PM
Made me love her even more.
Jake.
15-01-2014, 10:29 PM
It was funny will give you that :joker:
Bring on more of it I say :laugh:
chuff me dizzy
15-01-2014, 10:29 PM
She is just pathetic. And to think she is a mother?!? :shocked:
Great minds Galah
Amy Jade
15-01-2014, 10:31 PM
Why do you people always talk about her parenting?
None of you have seen her around her child so don't be such horrible people suggesting she's a bad parent, would you be happy if somebody here said you may be a bad parent for the way you judge and slag people off on here?
Kazanne
15-01-2014, 10:32 PM
I couldn't do that,if I was in a group and was cooking I'de do it for everyone ,even if I didn't like them,imo she is very spiteful
Jake.
15-01-2014, 10:32 PM
Why do you people always talk about her parenting?
None of you have seen her around her child so don't be such horrible people suggesting she's a bad parent, would you be happy if somebody here said you may be a bad parent for the way you judge and slag people off on here?
I actually have to agree with you on that one
Jack_
15-01-2014, 10:33 PM
Why do you people always talk about her parenting?
None of you have seen her around her child so don't be such horrible people suggesting she's a bad parent, would you be happy if somebody here said you may be a bad parent for the way you judge and slag people off on here?
I was about to make the same post actually but that is a killer analogy
The way someone acts on a TV show gives no one the right to criticise anyones parenting
flamingGalah!
15-01-2014, 10:33 PM
Why do you people always talk about her parenting?
None of you have seen her around her child so don't be such horrible people suggesting she's a bad parent, would you be happy if somebody here said you may be a bad parent for the way you judge and slag people off on here?
If she had any respect for her child she would not admit to having orgies on national TV & snog women in a bath, or let Dappy suck her tits... etc... :xyxwave:
reece(:
15-01-2014, 10:35 PM
SH's post :worship:, close thread.
GiRTh
15-01-2014, 10:50 PM
It was an incredibly spiteful thing to do; I still cant beleive she did it. Its as if she forgot the cameras were rolling; It was incredibly petty. It was also entertaining watching them try to organise the cooking but I dont think that entertainment was necessary at that moment. I dont think the fact she's a mother is out of bounds in this case, I think it was Luisa at her worst. It seems life is about getting one up on people for Luisa even in moments like that. She's an horrendous person, a poor role model. a great reality TV contestants but she need to take a look at herself.
Yes, which is exactly the way I want all housemates to act, because they will thus piss each other off
Of course she was being pathetic, but I would rather that than her go 'oh I am sorry Jim do you know what we should just make up, we all want to get along don't we I mean let's not argue' :sleep:
:worship:
I hope someone pisses in Sam's dinner tomorrow just to get a reaction or any sign of sentient activity out of her
smudgie
15-01-2014, 10:53 PM
No way would I have cooked for them either.
Speak to me like that and you would definitely cook for yourself..or starve.:devil:
I was about to make the same post actually but that is a killer analogy
The way someone acts on a TV show gives no one the right to criticise anyones parenting
I agree on the one hand but on the other hand I would be mortified if there was an archive of footage on the internet of my mum talking about sex and being a complete bitch on the internet for all to see, and I'm 22 years old. Imagine being a 13 year old and having that same problem to face and everybody knowing about it, it going around the school etc... I know that's such a hypothetical 'what if' thing to say because her daughter's what, a toddler? Who's to even say there'll be such a thing as YouTube in 10 years... but still, it's a bit irresponsible I think.
Kazanne
15-01-2014, 10:58 PM
No way would I have cooked for them either.
Speak to me like that and you would definitely cook for yourself..or starve.:devil:
smudgie,your a hard woman:hugesmile:
smudgie
15-01-2014, 10:59 PM
smudgie,your a hard woman:hugesmile:
Haha. Maybe .
I refused to cook Xmas dinner one year because daughter would not set the table.:blush:
optimisticcynic
15-01-2014, 11:11 PM
Not at all surprised by Luisa as have no expectation of civility from the whiny-voiced antithesis of humanity, but was very disappointed that the other housemates didn't pick the mature option of stating they would rather cook their own meal than exclude another. I only heard Dappy and Lee highlight her immaturity and I actually found myself respecting (CANNOT BELIEVE I AM ADMITTING THIS!!!!!) them for standing apart from the spineless lemmings of this house. Was like an extremely lame version of when those passengers got off the plane and took the bus because a blind guy wasn't allowed to board with his guide-dog.
MrWong
15-01-2014, 11:20 PM
Why do you people always talk about her parenting?
None of you have seen her around her child so don't be such horrible people suggesting she's a bad parent, would you be happy if somebody here said you may be a bad parent for the way you judge and slag people off on here?
Well said. It's incredibly nauseating.
Yep said in another thread yesterday, completely immature, petty and selfish.
Jim could be wasting away dying of starvation and Luisa still wouldn't give him a tiny spoonful of whatever she was cooking, she would probably gobble it all up right in front of his eyes cackling away
joeysteele
15-01-2014, 11:24 PM
Horrible girl, really petty and for once I agreed with Lee even as to what he said to her.
Jim could be wasting away dying of starvation and Luisa still wouldn't give him a tiny spoonful of whatever she was cooking, she would probably gobble it all up right in front of his eyes cackling away
Yes she would eat it right in front of him whilst he was laying there starving to death :idc:
Horrible girl, really petty and for once I agreed with Lee even as to what he said to her.
I actually laughed out loud at Lee stomping away Joey, it was funny and unexpected but very true at the same time.
Jack_
15-01-2014, 11:28 PM
Jim could be wasting away dying of starvation and Luisa still wouldn't give him a tiny spoonful of whatever she was cooking, she would probably gobble it all up right in front of his eyes cackling away
Now that'd be amazing TV :joker: :joker: :joker: :joker: :joker:
coolface
16-01-2014, 12:41 AM
time for her to go
I wouldn't make dinner for people who'd been nasty to me
Kizzy
16-01-2014, 12:52 AM
Thankyou zee... I thought I was in another universe then,If someone had spent time berating me to anyone who would listen expected me to me
make them food they would die starving.
That is just subservience, no sorry I couldn't and his beligerance was astounding!
Thankyou zee... I thought I was in another universe then,If someone had spent time berating me to anyone who would listen expected me to me
make them food they would die starving.
That is just subservience, no sorry I couldn't and his beligerance was astounding!
Yeah like maybe it was petty of her not to do it but so what? I wouldn't make someone dinner if they were being nasty to me
Kizzy
16-01-2014, 01:17 AM
Why is it even petty, I real life would you ever be so accommodating to anyone you had just had a confrontation with?...
He's not her father, she is under no obligation to provide him with sustenance.
He's 60, if he can't structure himself a meal by now he's had it! :laugh:
Arrrggghh!
GiRTh
16-01-2014, 01:21 AM
Its petty cuz she cooked for everyone else. It would have been fine if everyone was to cook for themselves but to deliberately exclude them cuz they had a bit of a disagreement. Petty and spiteful IMO
Kizzy
16-01-2014, 01:39 AM
Not at all, she is within her rights to cook for as many as she likes, there's no pressure on her to be the 'mother' of the group and ensure lil jimmy has his din-dins.
Sophiee
16-01-2014, 02:20 AM
I think it was a perfectly reasonable explanation for not cooking for them since they never show her any respect. why should she? it got jim angry too which was great :D.
Slevin
16-01-2014, 04:29 AM
both Luisa and Jim were being petty with Jim twisting and putting words into her mouth. it was stupid on both parts but then again it wouldnt of been as good if it was all happy happy joy joy what a lovely tea party.
both Luisa and Jim were being petty with Jim twisting and putting words into her mouth. it was stupid on both parts but then again it wouldnt of been as good if it was all happy happy joy joy what a lovely tea party.
Yes, it was six of one, half a dozen of the other, in that argument.
..I think it was very childish, she should have either cooked for no one or everyone...I know that they had just had an argument so in a way, she was honest but it's also not a 'real life' situation and love each other or hate each other, they are like a 'community' and it's only a meal..I think the problem is, that one is as bad as each other, the whole chocolate thing was extremely childish as well..but I guess even if you don't normally behave childishly, that whole environment and how these particular housemates are, it all starts become tit for tat and you just get caught up in it....
Rachael1904
16-01-2014, 05:25 AM
It was an incredibly spiteful thing to do; I still cant beleive she did it. Its as if she forgot the cameras were rolling; It was incredibly petty. It was also entertaining watching them try to organise the cooking but I dont think that entertainment was necessary at that moment. I dont think the fact she's a mother is out of bounds in this case, I think it was Luisa at her worst. It seems life is about getting one up on people for Luisa even in moments like that. She's an horrendous person, a poor role model. a great reality TV contestants but she need to take a look at herself.
Agreed. Childish. Petty. Pathetic. And at times I do like her
https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=5186405688884605383#allposts
Cherie
16-01-2014, 06:48 AM
..I think it was very childish, she should have either cooked for no one or everyone...I know that they had just had an argument so in a way, she was honest but it's also not a 'real life' situation and love each other or hate each other, they are like a 'community' and it's only a meal..I think the problem is, that one is as bad as each other, the whole chocolate thing was extremely childish as well..but I guess even if you don't normally behave childishly, that whole environment and how these particular housemates are, it all starts become tit for tat and you just get caught up in it....
Wise words Ammi, and lets be as honest as Luisa here, if Jim was cooking for the group (which he does) and singled her out and refused to cook for her, he would be lambasted on here :laugh:
thesheriff443
16-01-2014, 07:03 AM
Yeah like maybe it was petty of her not to do it but so what? I wouldn't make someone dinner if they were being nasty to me
im in your club aswell.
sampvt
16-01-2014, 07:43 AM
I know, brilliant stuff
That says it all.
sampvt
16-01-2014, 07:45 AM
She is doing anything and everything she can to wind the house and jim up, full well knowing she gets airtime. Jazmine admitted it last night. BB is all about her but not because she is interesting, its because the others are so freekin dull and boring (bar Jim)
joeysteele
16-01-2014, 07:55 AM
In that sort of environment it is usually those who can cook, take turns or someone is even relied on to do the cooking,
Excluding someone for any reason,(and at the time she was also excluding Lionel too), is ridiculous.
In I'm a celebrity for instance, when one person cooks, immaterial of whether they like each other or get on, whoever cooks does so for them all.
She herself will have been given whatever was cooked by someone else even when she had angered them with her noise or giggling or over the top actions.
She was petty and plain wrong.
I now really cannot see anything that is nice at all about Luisa and I hope her time in the house is less pleasnt even more now since Jasmine has gone.
She is a spiteful pathetic individual and the sooner she is out for me the better.
..I think it was very childish, she should have either cooked for no one or everyone...I know that they had just had an argument so in a way, she was honest but it's also not a 'real life' situation and love each other or hate each other, they are like a 'community' and it's only a meal..I think the problem is, that one is as bad as each other, the whole chocolate thing was extremely childish as well..but I guess even if you don't normally behave childishly, that whole environment and how these particular housemates are, it all starts become tit for tat and you just get caught up in it....
Agree with this, in the BB house whatever your disagreements with other people you have to do a lot of things collectively, when you're living communally like that then doing basic acts like cooking and eating should just be done as a group, not used to pettily get one over on someone you don't like.
It's not like they were asking for her to cook them a five star bloody meal, but seeing as she was making one large communal dish it isn't exactly a big ask to make enough for another two people
HBB1508
16-01-2014, 08:06 AM
And this from the woman who proclaims to never hold a grudge....................
MrWong
16-01-2014, 08:13 AM
And this from the woman who proclaims to never hold a grudge....................
You missed this bit..... "with people she actually likes"
minty3
16-01-2014, 08:21 AM
I personally wouldn't cook for someone I didn't like
Patricia4
16-01-2014, 09:16 AM
She's a selfish bitch.
joeysteele
16-01-2014, 09:20 AM
I personally wouldn't cook for someone I didn't like
Sometimes people have to when part of a different environment.When I was at Uni, I regularly cooked for friends and people I didn't like.
In the BB house better to not cook at all than single anyone out for not to get anything she was cooking,that was plainly spiteful and childish.
As it would have been,had Lionel or Jim been doing the cooking and then singled her out for to get none either.
Niamh.
16-01-2014, 09:27 AM
lol so so so childish
Vanessa
16-01-2014, 09:49 AM
If i was there i'd cook for everyone, including the people i don't like. They may not like it though. I'm not exactly chef Ramsey! :joker:
Kizzy
16-01-2014, 10:14 AM
Wise words Ammi, and lets be as honest as Luisa here, if Jim was cooking for the group (which he does) and singled her out and refused to cook for her, he would be lambasted on here :laugh:
They are not a 'community' and they are not in a kibbutz, just a few minor celebs fighting for airtime for a few days.
It's hard to predict what any other celeb would do in that situation.
Cherie
16-01-2014, 10:17 AM
They are not a 'community' and they are not in a kibbutz, just a few minor celebs fighting for airtime for a few days.
It's hard to predict what any other celeb would do in that situation.
No Kizzy it isn't, Jim said he was going to cook for all of them, then when she wasn't having it, he proposed a compromise of him cooking for the boys and her for the girls, and when that wasn't good enough he said he would make do with toast.:laugh:
Vanessa
16-01-2014, 10:18 AM
They are not a 'community' and they are not in a kibbutz, just a few minor celebs fighting for airtime for a few days.
It's hard to predict what any other celeb would do in that situation.
No Kizzy it isn't, Jim said he was going to cook for all of them, then when she wasn't having it, he proposed a compromise of him cooking for the boys and her for the girls, and when that wasn't good enough he said he would make do with toast.:laugh:
Jim last night. He tried, bless him! :joker:
Kizzy
16-01-2014, 10:37 AM
They are not a 'community' and they are not in a kibbutz, just a few minor celebs fighting for airtime for a few days.
It's hard to predict what any other celeb would do in that situation.
No Kizzy it isn't, Jim said he was going to cook for all of them, then when she wasn't having it, he proposed a compromise of him cooking for the boys and her for the girls, and when that wasn't good enough he said he would make do with toast.:laugh:
No jim said he would cook for the boys during the disagreement, making out she had an issue with the men of the house... she didn't, just the two who had been calling her an evil effing bitch all afternoon.
Let him have toast, dry toast! and I hope his crusts drop off!
:joker:
Kazanne
16-01-2014, 10:40 AM
[QUOTE=Cherie;6623824]
No jim said he would cook for the boys during the disagreement, making out she had an issue with the men of the house... she didn't, just the two who had been calling her an evil effing bitch all afternoon.
Let him have toast, dry toast! and I hope his crusts drop off!
:joker:
:joker::joker::joker: you're all heart Kiz:wavey:
Vanessa
16-01-2014, 10:42 AM
Jim said he was going to cook for everyone. It was Louisa who made things awkward. She was going to cook for everyone, except Jim and Lionel. Jim said that he could cook for the boys and her for the girls. I thought it was a good compromise.
Kazanne
16-01-2014, 10:43 AM
Jim said he was going to cook for everyone. It was Louisa who made things awkward. She was going to cook for everyone, except Jim and Lionel. Jim said that he could cook for the boys and her for the girls. I thought it was a good compromise.
Correct.
Ellen
16-01-2014, 10:44 AM
Jim said he was going to cook for everyone. It was Louisa who made things awkward. She was going to cook for everyone, except Jim and Lionel. Jim said that he could cook for the boys and her for the girls. I thought it was a good compromise.
This :thumbs:
Vanessa
16-01-2014, 10:46 AM
I don't think Jim is too bothered for himself. He'd be happy with some toast. :laugh: He just didn't want anyone to miss out.
Kizzy
16-01-2014, 10:55 AM
Why make it a gender issue though?
Luisa was cross with lionel and jim due to their verbal assault so as it was her turn to cook she refused.
Why did jim not simply suggest he make himself and lionel some food?
Kizzy
16-01-2014, 10:55 AM
Why make it a gender issue though?
Luisa was cross with lionel and jim due to their verbal assault so as it was her turn to cook she refused.
Why did jim not simply suggest he make himself and lionel some food?
Vanessa
16-01-2014, 10:57 AM
Why make it a gender issue though?
Luisa was cross with lionel and jim due to their verbal assault so as it was her turn to cook she refused.
Why did jim not simply suggest he make himself and lionel some food?
It was just an idea.
Kizzy
16-01-2014, 11:05 AM
Yeah well it was a very silly idea, and quite divisive.
Vanessa
16-01-2014, 11:07 AM
Yeah well it was a very silly idea, and quite divisive.
I tought it was a good idea.
Munchkins
16-01-2014, 11:15 AM
Everyone saying its just food etc and shes being petty, in an enclosed environment like big brother, the cooking situation and food on the whole is a MASSIVE power, its pretty much one of the only things they think of all day...
Tbh i think it was petty, but Jim should not be reliant on needing Luisa to cook for him anyway and she should not be in the situation where she has to be the cook
Vanessa
16-01-2014, 11:17 AM
Everyone saying its just food etc and shes being petty, in an enclosed environment like big brother, the cooking situation and food on the whole is a MASSIVE power, its pretty much one of the only things they think of all day...
Tbh i think it was petty, but Jim should not be reliant on needing Luisa to cook for him anyway and she should not be in the situation where she has to be the cook
That is why he suggested that eh cooked for the boys and her the girls. So she didn't have to do everything herself.
Everyone saying its just food etc and shes being petty, in an enclosed environment like big brother, the cooking situation and food on the whole is a MASSIVE power, its pretty much one of the only things they think of all day...
Tbh i think it was petty, but Jim should not be reliant on needing Luisa to cook for him anyway and she should not be in the situation where she has to be the cook
He wasn't reliant in the slightest? in fact he was going to cook for everyone including Luisa but she wasn't having it so then he offered to cook for the boys and she still wasn't having it, so then he said right sod it I will just have some toast to save any hassle and her face was still like fizz.
Munchkins
16-01-2014, 11:22 AM
He wasn't reliant in the slightest? in fact he was going to cook for everyone including Luisa but she wasn't having it so then he offered to cook for the boys and she still wasn't having it, so then he said right sod it I will just have some toast to save any hassle and her face was still like fizz.
I guess so, making it the gender divide was stupid too though, there was no need for that..
at the end of the day i dont get how people dislike Jim anyway, i must be one of the few who wants Jim & Luisa to stay in as long as possible..
Luisa was using the role as power though so clearly she was going to be annoyed when Jim would have just made toast, as that would have given her no power over him to make him suffer :')
Kizzy
16-01-2014, 11:24 AM
She was already making food for everyone else.... she told him there was room on the stove for his, then he suggested he cook for half the house... Why? she didn't have an issue with half the house.
Niamh.
16-01-2014, 11:27 AM
She was already making food for everyone else.... she told him there was room on the stove for his, then he suggested he cook for half the house... Why? she didn't have an issue with half the house.
Because she was being a childish little bitch and why should he let her single him out like that and act like she's dishing out the punishments? I think he wanted to take some control back from her hissy fit
Vanessa
16-01-2014, 11:28 AM
Because she was being a childish little bitch and why should he let her single him out like that and act like she's dishing out the punishments? I think he wanted to take some control back from her hissy fit
I agree no one should be left out. Jim idea was good. He was going to cook for half of the housemates, Louisa for the rest. Sounds reasonable to me. :shrug:
MrWong
16-01-2014, 11:29 AM
Jim said he was going to cook for everyone. It was Louisa who made things awkward. She was going to cook for everyone, except Jim and Lionel. Jim said that he could cook for the boys and her for the girls. I thought it was a good compromise.
No, he said he was going to cook for the boys.
MrWong
16-01-2014, 11:29 AM
She was already making food for everyone else.... she told him there was room on the stove for his, then he suggested he cook for half the house... Why? she didn't have an issue with half the house.
.... because he's a **** stirrer.
Vanessa
16-01-2014, 11:30 AM
No, he said he was going to cook for the boys.
He suggested this after Louisa refused to cook for Jim and Lionel.
MrWong
16-01-2014, 11:31 AM
He suggested this after Louisa refused to cook for Jim and Lionel.
Which is **** stirring as she was going to cook for Ollie, Lee and Dappy.
Munchkins
16-01-2014, 11:31 AM
Someone on neutral ground should have just stepped in and cooked.. surely the other nine cannot be completely pathetic on the cooking ground lol
No, he said he was going to cook for the boys.
Before that in the bedroom he said he was going to cook for everyone cos Luisa had stomped off to bed in a mood but as soon as she heard Jim was cooking she decided to jump up and take over the cooker.
And he probably offered to cook for the boys because she wasn't cooking for Lionel either, Lee was already pissed off with the pettiness and had said that to Luisa but she was still adamant that she was cooking.
Even if people do like Luisa I honestly can't see how the pettiness of her antics can be denied.
Vanessa
16-01-2014, 11:32 AM
Which is **** stirring as she was going to cook for Ollie, Lee and Dappy.
No, she said she was not going to cook for Jim and Lionel.
Niamh.
16-01-2014, 11:32 AM
Someone on neutral ground should have just stepped in and cooked.. surely the other nine cannot be completely pathetic on the cooking ground lol
Seems like they are
Gusto Brunt
16-01-2014, 11:32 AM
So we can spiteful to the growing list of Luisa negative traits. Its quite a list aggressive, argumentative, self delusional, disrespectful, manipulative, rude etc.....:joker:
An utterly self-centred, revolting human being. Thank God for fast forward. I now fast forward every single part of her appearances in the HLs.:dance:
One of the worst housemates EVER.
Vanessa
16-01-2014, 11:33 AM
Someone on neutral ground should have just stepped in and cooked.. surely the other nine cannot be completely pathetic on the cooking ground lol
But sharing the cooking like Jim has suggested seems a good idea. Why should one person do everything?
Kizzy
16-01-2014, 11:33 AM
Because she was being a childish little bitch and why should he let her single him out like that and act like she's dishing out the punishments? I think he wanted to take some control back from her hissy fit
He and lionel had been insulting her, she gave him the power back... the power to make his own dinner! :laugh:
Jim was childish for not just accepting she was angry and hurt and see to his and lionels without attempting to create more drama.
MrWong
16-01-2014, 11:33 AM
No, she said she was not going to cook for Jim and Lionel.
:conf::conf::conf:
Which means she was cooking for everyone apart from Jim/Lionel.
Vanessa
16-01-2014, 11:34 AM
:conf::conf::conf:
Which means she was cooking for everyone apart from Jim/Lionel.
And that is not fair. No one should be singled out.
Vanessa
16-01-2014, 11:34 AM
Why not share the cooking? Seems like the easiest solution here.
Munchkins
16-01-2014, 11:35 AM
But sharing the cooking like Jim has suggested seems a good idea. Why should one person do everything?
Yeah but on this situation separately that wouldn't have worked, Luisa would have caused an argument, so someone should have just stepped in said ffs, ill do it to stop all the arguments between the two of them
Seen how pathetic Ollie was coming in asking Luisa about the bread, i guess you can add inept at cooking alongside wallflower and bore:hugesmile:
Niamh.
16-01-2014, 11:35 AM
He and lionel had been insulting her, she gave him the power back... the power to make his own dinner! :laugh:
Jim was childish for not just accepting she was angry and hurt and see to his and lionels without attempting to create more drama.
And she had been insulting them as well.
Vanessa
16-01-2014, 11:36 AM
Yeah but on this situation separately that wouldn't have worked, Luisa would have caused an argument, so someone should have just stepped in said ffs, ill do it to stop all the arguments between the two of them
Seen how pathetic Ollie was coming in asking Luisa about the bread, i guess you can add inept at cooking alongside wallflower and bore:hugesmile:
I don't think one person should do all the cooking. They could help each other or share.
Niamh.
16-01-2014, 11:37 AM
Pity there are aren't more people in there with a set of balls to say to Luisa, if you're not cooking for everyone then piss off and let Jim do it, if you don't want to eat his food that's your problem
Vanessa
16-01-2014, 11:38 AM
Pity there are aren't more people in there with a set of balls to say to Luisa, if you're not cooking for everyone then piss off and let Jim do it, if you don't want to eat his food that's your problem
This lot can't do anything together without arguing. :joker:
Jemal
16-01-2014, 11:41 AM
I dont understand how her not cooking for jim and lionel is "good tv" :s..
Kizzy
16-01-2014, 11:42 AM
And she had been insulting them as well.
All she said to lionel was 'you wanted the effing chocolate'
Then we were shown lionel screeching about her being an evil selfish bitch in the kitchen, and jim and lionel repeating that to anyone who would listen in the garden.
Niamh.
16-01-2014, 11:44 AM
All she said to lionel was 'you wanted the effing chocolate'
Then we were shown lionel screeching about her being an evil selfish bitch in the kitchen, and jim and lionel repeating that to anyone who would listen in the garden.
So she wasn't bitching about them in bed with Jasmine then?
Munchkins
16-01-2014, 11:45 AM
I dont understand how her not cooking for jim and lionel is "good tv" :s..
How is Dappy, licking Luisas nipple good entertainment, or any other of the things he does:conf:
Vanessa
16-01-2014, 11:45 AM
How is Dappy, licking Luisas nipple good entertainment, or any other of the things he does:conf:
I know it was a bit cinge, but they were very drunk. :laugh:
Northern Monkey
16-01-2014, 11:55 AM
She is a selfish little bastard but the series would'nt be the same without her!Her and Jim need to stay until the end for sure.
Jemal
16-01-2014, 11:57 AM
How is Dappy, licking Luisas nipple good entertainment, or any other of the things he does:conf:
Did i say that was good entertainment?
So please stop saying what you presume i said and actually say something that i've actually said in future circumstances pls.
Thanks x
MrWong
16-01-2014, 11:59 AM
Before that in the bedroom he said he was going to cook for everyone cos Luisa had stomped off to bed in a mood but as soon as she heard Jim was cooking she decided to jump up and take over the cooker.
And he probably offered to cook for the boys because she wasn't cooking for Lionel either, Lee was already pissed off with the pettiness and had said that to Luisa but she was still adamant that she was cooking.
Even if people do like Luisa I honestly can't see how the pettiness of her antics can be denied.
Can I have a copy of the highlights that you watched please? :D
Initially Luisa did say that she wasn't going to cook or make the bread. Lee came in and asked if she wanted a cuppa, she declined and said I'm going to cook in a bit but not for everyone (so not as you suggest, that she only wanted to cook because Jim said he wanted to. At that point Jim hadn't even mentioned cooking)
Munchkins
16-01-2014, 12:01 PM
Did i say that was good entertainment?
So please stop saying what you presume i said and actually say something that i've actually said in future circumstances pls.
Thanks x
Didn't say you did ;) but you support Dappy:hugesmile:
No need to get so pissy about it ty
Jemal
16-01-2014, 12:04 PM
Didn't say you did ;) but you support Dappy:hugesmile:
No need to get so pissy about it ty
All because i support him, doesnt mean i can't admit when hes being cringe or w.e lol.
Yesterday night he was piss drunk and done cringey stuff, i didnt find it entertaining but other people did i can gaurantee.
Munchkins
16-01-2014, 12:06 PM
All because i support him, doesnt mean i can't admit when hes being cringe or w.e lol.
Yesterday night he was piss drunk and done cringey stuff, i didnt find it entertaining but other people did i can gaurantee.
I guess, its just the majority of Dappy fans i have seen all over Facebook & twitter thought it was hilarious, yet were also saying Luisa was acting slutty etc, just hypocritical, they think he can do no wrong :)
Jemal
16-01-2014, 12:08 PM
I guess, its just the majority of Dappy fans i have seen all over Facebook & twitter thought it was hilarious, yet were also saying Luisa was acting slutty etc, just hypocritical, they think he can do no wrong :)
Yea ik, didnt mean to be pissy btw
Kizzy
16-01-2014, 12:09 PM
So she wasn't bitching about them in bed with Jasmine then?
So is she not allowed to pass comment to one person about them shouting insults about her then?
Can I have a copy of the highlights that you watched please? :D
Initially Luisa did say that she wasn't going to cook or make the bread. Lee came in and asked if she wanted a cuppa, she declined and said I'm going to cook in a bit but not for everyone (so not as you suggest, that she only wanted to cook because Jim said he wanted to. At that point Jim hadn't even mentioned cooking)
Or you could give me a copy of the ones you watched
If that's the way you think it happened then fair do's, I can't be bothered to type out the way I saw it happen on the highlights.
Some don't think she was petty, some do.
Seriously though do you think at least this part was in any way petty or childish?
Luisa said she didn't see why she should ****ing cooking for Lionel or Jim or make bread because they would eat some
Niamh.
16-01-2014, 12:13 PM
So is she not allowed to pass comment to one person about them shouting insults about her then?
She can do what she likes.....and clearly she does, but she was as much at fault as them two
So is she not allowed to pass comment to one person about them shouting insults about her then?
She bitched in the bedroom to Jasmine, Lee and Ollie.
That's 3 people.
Kizzy
16-01-2014, 12:23 PM
I don't feel she was as much to blame, she explained the situation that she got the champagne but was asked to get chocolate by lionel... There was no name calling about lionel or offensive remarks made by her.
Ollie said he didn't want to be involved and she said fair enough, lee was just greasing round her so she'd cook and when she refused he flounced off.
Jemal
16-01-2014, 12:34 PM
Like lionel said 'im i your boss??'
I fully expect now that if i or anyone else asked her to jump off a cliff she would most likely do it.
Like lionel said 'im i your boss??'
I fully expect now that if i or anyone else asked her to jump off a cliff she would most likely do it.
Someone should ask her to kindly **** off then, hope she does that :pipe2:
Vanessa
16-01-2014, 12:35 PM
Someone should ask her to kindly **** off then, hope she does that :pipe2:
:joker::joker:
Yes she was quite happy to ignore Lionel at the start when he was telling her to get down and not to climb over, but when he then asked her to get the chocolates she was suddenly forced into obeying him against her will I suppose :pipe2:
Kizzy
16-01-2014, 12:48 PM
Yes she was quite happy to ignore Lionel at the start when he was telling her to get down and not to climb over, but when he then asked her to get the chocolates she was suddenly forced into obeying him against her will I suppose :pipe2:
Not at all, the task was lost due to the make up issue which was entirely her and jasmines fault.
However when she climbed the cage lionel who initally said don't then asked luisa to get the chocolate, making him complicit. He enjoyed it and revelled in the rebellion... nya nya nya nya nya were his exact words.
Fast forward to them arguing he puts 100% blame on her and acts like a total innocent, just like he did in the 18 task! We heard you scream 'suck my dick!' lionel...
Not at all, the task was lost due to the make up issue which was entirely her and jasmines fault.
However when she climbed the cage lionel who initally said don't then asked luisa to get the chocolate, making him complicit. He enjoyed it and revelled in the rebellion... nya nya nya nya nya were his exact words.
Fast forward to them arguing he puts 100% blame on her and acts like a total innocent, just like he did in the 18 task! We heard you scream 'suck my dick!' lionel...
Lionel was complicit in it but Luisa would have gone ahead without his complicity anyway, making his role irrelevant, they weren't punished any more for her stealing the champagne and the chocolates than they would have been had she only got the champagne
GiRTh
16-01-2014, 12:50 PM
All she said to lionel was 'you wanted the effing chocolate'
Then we were shown lionel screeching about her being an evil selfish bitch in the kitchen, and jim and lionel repeating that to anyone who would listen in the garden.If you say Lionel was 'screeching' then how would you describe Luisa's tone of voice? She didnt say it she yelled it a number of times at the top of her voice like a kid who had been caught red handed but was trying to deflect the blame.
I dont deny Luisa is a great reality Tv contestants but she's one hell of a nightmare.
chuff me dizzy
16-01-2014, 12:53 PM
Childish, nasty little cowbag
chuff me dizzy
16-01-2014, 12:55 PM
Not at all, the task was lost due to the make up issue which was entirely her and jasmines fault.
However when she climbed the cage lionel who initally said don't then asked luisa to get the chocolate, making him complicit. He enjoyed it and revelled in the rebellion... nya nya nya nya nya were his exact words.
Fast forward to them arguing he puts 100% blame on her and acts like a total innocent, just like he did in the 18 task! We heard you scream 'suck my dick!' lionel...
Totally agree, he was helping her climb the fence, I was shocked he had the nerve to pull her up about it
MrWong
16-01-2014, 12:58 PM
Or you could give me a copy of the ones you watched
If that's the way you think it happened then fair do's, I can't be bothered to type out the way I saw it happen on the highlights.
Some don't think she was petty, some do.
Seriously though do you think at least this part was in any way petty or childish?
This is the copy I watched http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x19qc23_e13-wednesday-15-jan-first-half_shortfilms?start=10
Petty maybe. I wouldn't cook for people who'd slagged me either if I'm honest.
Sophiee
16-01-2014, 03:42 PM
That is why he suggested that eh cooked for the boys and her the girls. So she didn't have to do everything herself.
and I wonder why he offered to cook for the guys only...
armand.kay
16-01-2014, 03:44 PM
She's being petty but that's something I would do tbh :/
Vanessa
16-01-2014, 03:45 PM
and I wonder why he offered to cook for the guys only...
Because she wasn't going to cook for him and Lionel.
Sophiee
16-01-2014, 03:48 PM
Because she wasn't going to cook for him and Lionel.
or because he's sexist as **** :hugesmile:.
bez87
16-01-2014, 03:48 PM
the problem is we don't get to see all the conversations, from the highlights i found her petty and childish in this situation and to blame lionel was so out of order, why bring him into it, yes he asked for the chocolates that was after lusia decided she would claim over on her own accord, but that was not the disscussion, it was about her and jasmine having make up when they both new they were not allowed it, lionel was ready to take his punishment for the chocolate's i think she was just childish when it came down to it. but jim stirs everything up lol
Vanessa
16-01-2014, 03:52 PM
or because he's sexist as **** :hugesmile:.
I don't think so. He said he was going to cook for everyone, before Louisa had her strop.
Vanessa
16-01-2014, 03:53 PM
the problem is we don't get to see all the conversations, from the highlights i found her petty and childish in this situation and to blame lionel was so out of order, why bring him into it, yes he asked for the chocolates that was after lusia decided she would claim over on her own accord, but that was not the disscussion, it was about her and jasmine having make up when they both new they were not allowed it, lionel was ready to take his punishment for the chocolate's i think she was just childish when it came down to it. but jim stirs everything up lol
She holds grudges.
Kazanne
16-01-2014, 03:54 PM
or because he's sexist as **** :hugesmile:.
No because he knows the girls will side with Luisa ,its not rocket science.
MrWong
16-01-2014, 03:58 PM
I don't think so. He said he was going to cook for everyone, before Louisa had her strop.
That's not what happened.
Sophiee
16-01-2014, 03:59 PM
I don't think so. He said he was going to cook for everyone, before Louisa had her strop.
I didn't hear this :suspect:.
No because he knows the girls will side with Luisa ,its not rocket science.
casey is quite friendly with him and he even got rude towards her. I've never seen him in the kitchen apart from eating, I guarantee he thinks that women should do the cooking because that's their 'job'. there's no denying that he's sexist unless you just don't want to believe it because you dislike luisa.
Vanessa
16-01-2014, 04:00 PM
I didn't hear this :suspect:.
casey is quite friendly with him and he even got rude towards her. I've never seen him in the kitchen apart from eating, I guarantee he thinks that women should do the cooking because that's their 'job'. there's no denying that he's sexist unless you just don't want to believe it because you dislike luisa.
It was on the highlights.
Vanessa
16-01-2014, 04:00 PM
That's not what happened.
Yes, it did. It was on the highlights.
Macie Lightfoot
16-01-2014, 04:01 PM
or because he's sexist as **** :hugesmile:.
THANK YOU. Jim's misogyny is disgusting and it speaks volumes that he turned "I'm not cooking for Jim and Lionel" as "I'm only cooking for the girls"
I wouldn't cook for someone I hate
Vanessa
16-01-2014, 04:04 PM
I wouldn't cook for someone I hate
I would. No worries. I'm not the best cook, but i don't hold grudges at all.
Niamh.
16-01-2014, 04:08 PM
I wouldn't cook for someone I hate
I wouldn't cook for just them but If I was in there and cooking with the food bought by the whole houses budget (limited budget) and I was doing a huge meal with that food I wouldn't say Oh everyone but Jim can have some, it's childish and petty
Jords
16-01-2014, 04:17 PM
Its not her job.
Kazanne
16-01-2014, 04:21 PM
I didn't hear this :suspect:.
casey is quite friendly with him and he even got rude towards her. I've never seen him in the kitchen apart from eating, I guarantee he thinks that women should do the cooking because that's their 'job'. there's no denying that he's sexist unless you just don't want to believe it because you dislike luisa.
Just because you haven't seen him in the kitchen doesn't mean he hasn't ,we only see an hour,plus Maybe because you don't like Jim,you fail to see Luisa's faults.
Cherie
16-01-2014, 05:06 PM
Can I have a copy of the highlights that you watched please? :D
Initially Luisa did say that she wasn't going to cook or make the bread. Lee came in and asked if she wanted a cuppa, she declined and said I'm going to cook in a bit but not for everyone (so not as you suggest, that she only wanted to cook because Jim said he wanted to. At that point Jim hadn't even mentioned cooking)
This happened but also what Josy described was later in the HLs, Luisa went into the bedroom and told Jim she was only using one ring so he could use the other 3 if he wanted to cook.
Cherie
16-01-2014, 05:10 PM
or because he's sexist as **** :hugesmile:.
Do you read any of the Twitter feed? or watch any of the clips? Jim cooks for the group, we know this because Linda bitched that he had cooked too much food..he was also cooking last night after the eviction and Linda was gobbling it up, clip on the YouTube Feed, and as for his suggestion to cook for the boys, he suggested it because Luisa turned down his offer of him cooking for everyone.
Here is an example of what you are missing
11.00pm: Jim has cooked Linda a bite to eat. "Mmm, really tasty" she says. They're getting on *suspiciously* well. #bbuklive
joeysteele
16-01-2014, 05:11 PM
and I wonder why he offered to cook for the guys only...
Hi Sophiee :xyxwave:.
Because Luisa had said that she was not going to cook for Jim and also for Lionel so that only left 3 more boys,hence Jim saying he would cook for them.
She created something really nasty from what was a pointless thing to refuse to do in the first place.
She isn't at home, she is in the BB house and wthether they like housemates or not, I don't think I have ever come across any housemate cooking that excluded anyone before, no matter the arguments and bad feeling between them.
She was in my view absolutely pathetic.
In fact,had I been a housemate, I would have said to her, clear off, someone else or/and I will do the cooking if you are going to be that childish and stupid.
Cherie
16-01-2014, 05:18 PM
It was on the highlights.
Yes Vanessa it was on the highlights. You are not going mad.
Patricia4
16-01-2014, 05:21 PM
She is nasty she is one that love's to fall out all the time and she thinks she is big and powerful but she will land on her arse soon.
He must have done a lot of cooking at the start because Lionel moaned Jim's in the kitchen all the time.
optimisticcynic
16-01-2014, 06:08 PM
THANK YOU. Jim's misogyny is disgusting and it speaks volumes that he turned "I'm not cooking for Jim and Lionel" as "I'm only cooking for the girls"
Jim feels closer to the boys because they don't sit around constantly bickering about and judging him, and are not under orders from chief justice linda! Linda was sat on her bed telling all the girls not to dislike Jim just because she hates him for being a chauvinistic pig, which was ridiculous as she was in actual fact implanting that seed herself and she blimming knew it.
Jim probably assumes, from what is constantly said to him that his only chance of solidarity now lies with the boys of the house, and he is more likely to achieve a peacemaking split with him cooking for the boys and Luisa cooking for her coven. He did nothing wrong in this instance and people seeking to blame him for Luisa's tantrum, having disadvantaged the whole house by breaking rules with the champagne and make-up, lack objectivity in this instance. Refusing to help bake bread, having been the cause of worse than basic rations for the week shows how self-centred she is. "Poor me, I've unrepentently shafted you all for a week, and for some reason you're upset with me...." Bellend!
Macie Lightfoot
16-01-2014, 06:29 PM
Jim feels closer to the boys because they don't sit around constantly bickering about and judging him, and are not under orders from chief justice linda! Linda was sat on her bed telling all the girls not to dislike Jim just because she hates him for being a chauvinistic pig, which was ridiculous as she was in actual fact implanting that seed herself and she blimming knew it.
Jim probably assumes, from what is constantly said to him that his only chance of solidarity now lies with the boys of the house, and he is more likely to achieve a peacemaking split with him cooking for the boys and Luisa cooking for her coven. He did nothing wrong in this instance and people seeking to blame him for Luisa's tantrum, having disadvantaged the whole house by breaking rules with the champagne and make-up, lack objectivity in this instance. Refusing to help bake bread, having been the cause of worse than basic rations for the week shows how self-centred she is. "Poor me, I've unrepentently shafted you all for a week, and for some reason you're upset with me...." Bellend!
He IS a chauvinistic pig though. You can't say he didn't do anything wrong when he groups all the girls together (per usual) when not all of them dislike him. He's the biggest self-victimizer in the house and if you don't see that you're blind and/or extremely biased.
optimisticcynic
16-01-2014, 06:37 PM
He IS a chauvinistic pig though. You can't say he didn't do anything wrong when he groups all the girls together (per usual) when not all of them dislike him. He's the biggest self-victimizer in the house and if you don't see that you're blind and/or extremely biased.
Only two people that stuck up for him and lionel - dappy and lee! Both male-ish!! There is already a gender divide in that house and it's not always a negative thing. Jim has acknowledged the divide whether conscously or unconsciously, and is being hit with the "he who smelt it dealt it" riposte.
Cherie
16-01-2014, 06:48 PM
He IS a chauvinistic pig though. You can't say he didn't do anything wrong when he groups all the girls together (per usual) when not all of them dislike him. He's the biggest self-victimizer in the house and if you don't see that you're blind and/or extremely biased.
When did he group all the girls together?
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.