South Korea to launch 5G service download an entire film in just one second

[arista]

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/01/25/article-2545831-0EF7D65600000578-508_634x507.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/01/25/article-0-19323E2400000578-727_634x413.jpg
Speedy: South Korea are investing £900million into 5G wireless internet services capable of downloading an entire film in a single second

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2545831/South-Korea-launch-5G-service-fast-users-download-entire-film-just-ONE-SECOND.html#ixzz2rVC5unsX



What a Nice Speed,



Life In The Fast Lane

[T*]

Coming to the uk in 3015.

[lostalex]

yes please. more, more MORE!!!!

[Ramsay]

the amount of porn i could download. jesus

[thesheriff443]

the amount of porn i could download. jesus

the problem is you will cum at the same speed:joker:

[lostalex]

the problem is you will cum at the same speed:joker:

by speed do you mean the amount of time it takes him to reach orgasm? or the velocity of his jizz shooting out?

[Livia]

South Korea are technologically parsecs ahead of the West. We're schmoozing bloody China while we should be building closer relations with South Korea if you ask me.

[T*]

by speed do you mean the amount of time it takes him to reach orgasm? or the velocity of his jizz shooting out?

OMFG STOP D:

[Marc]

I want this

[lostalex]

South Korea are technologically parsecs ahead of the West. We're schmoozing bloody China while we should be building closer relations with South Korea if you ask me.

How much closer could we be with them? They are already basically the 56th state (after Canada, Uk, Australia, NZ, and Israel)

[Z]

The difference between North and South Korea is honestly depressing to look at. Look at how much the South has achieved in the last 50 or so years, the mind boggles that the North is trapped in this insular dictatorship

[RichardG]

South Korea :worship:

This would be amazing, it's crazy to think that that's possible to do.

[In the Drunk Tank]

I do not care for this

[Smithy]

-moves to South Korea-

[Z]

I do not care for this

Matthew still has dial up :pipe2: harking back to the good ol' days of 1999

[arista]

I do not care for this


You would if you could
you would love this speed.

[arista]

the problem is you will cum at the same speed:joker:


No this is Faster




Feel The Force

[Livia]

How much closer could we be with them? They are already basically the 56th state (after Canada, Uk, Australia, NZ, and Israel)

When I said "we", I was referring to the UK. Our politicians - from Cameron down to constituency MPs - have spent a lot of time in China this year. I think some of that time would have been better spent fostering relations with South Korea.

[King Gizzard]

there's a sort of buzz of having to wait 5-10-20 minutes for something to download for me, maybe I'm just weird

[Z]

there's a sort of buzz of having to wait 5-10-20 minutes for something to download for me, maybe I'm just weird

The thrill of wondering if the download will pause

[lostalex]

When I said "we", I was referring to the UK. Our politicians - from Cameron down to constituency MPs - have spent a lot of time in China this year. I think some of that time would have been better spent fostering relations with South Korea.


I think the UK has a default close relationship with SK based on the UK's relationship with the US. I don't think UK politicians feel they need to work on that relationship because it's granted by your relationship with the US. Obviously they are gonna spend more time on relationships that they are on shaky ground with, the countries that are outside of the US sphere. I think the UK and South Korea are already on very good terms, and I don't think either side is in doubt about that. both are under the heavy umbrella of the US.

because the UK does so much business with the US, and South Korea does so much business with the US, both economies are on the same page, and the same multinational companies that do business in the US and South Korea also do business with the UK, it's all free flowing, and free.

I think UK politicians are wise to spend their time on China and other countries which are more questionable. It would be silly to waste time woo'ing countries that don't need to be woo'ed.

[Z]

There are benefits of forging relations with your default allies though. Combined, the UK and South Korea could force some counter leverage on the US in the event of any kind of conflict of interests, e.g. when the UK voted against going into Syria and relations became frosty between the US and UK. If the UK had better relations with some of the US's other allies, they could only potentially benefit, there would be no drawbacks and the US wouldn't be able to do anything about it. It's a bit like how Russia has control over all of the Central Asian -stan countries and some Eastern European countries yet none of them have real relations with each other; it's all down to Russia.

[lostalex]

There are benefits of forging relations with your default allies though. Combined, the UK and South Korea could force some counter leverage on the US in the event of any kind of conflict of interests, e.g. when the UK voted against going into Syria and relations became frosty between the US and UK. If the UK had better relations with some of the US's other allies, they could only potentially benefit, there would be no drawbacks and the US wouldn't be able to do anything about it. It's a bit like how Russia has control over all of the Central Asian -stan countries and some Eastern European countries yet none of them have real relations with each other; it's all down to Russia.

umm....what? relations didn't get frosty between the UK and US over Syria at all. The US was elated that the UK vetoed the Syria thing. Do you really think that Obama wanted to go into Syria? The UK provided the perfect out for him. There was no frosting of relations at all.

Obama has made it clear that he doesn't want to enter any military conflicts, and he's been scaling back American military involvement all over the world the entire time he's been in office, which is really pissing off saudi Arabia and Israel.

The UK parliamentary vote against military action in Syria was a godsend to Obama. He was pleased as punch. It was the French who were trying to ramp up support for a Syria military action, and the Israeli's and Saudi's, but the UK parliament vote gave Obama the perfect excuse to get out of it.

[Z]

umm....what? relations didn't get frosty between the UK and US over Syria at all. The US was elated that the UK vetoed the Syria thing. Do you really think that Obama wanted to go into Syria? The UK provided the perfect out for him. There was no frosting of relations at all.

Obama has made it clear that he doesn't want to enter any military conflicts, and he's been scaling back American military involvement all over the world the entire time he's been in office, which is really pissing off the Saudi's and the Israeli's.

The UK parliamentary vote against military action in Syria was a godsend to Obama. He was pleased as punch.

If you say so... :laugh:

[lostalex]

If you say so... :laugh:

You see it differently? You think Obama really wanted to attack Syria? please explain why you disagree.