Judy James "we could have won this battle?"

[the truth]

the so called shrink on big brother came out with this biased sexist nonsense last night

stating if theyd targeted jim th, we could have won this battle.
in making these aggressive biased sexist comments judy james really did give her game away

shes certainly not an impartial objective analyst on the show.
she is a woman totally biased in favour of the women and sees it as a battle that she and all women must fight to detsroy the male characters. especially those with their own strong opinions.

she pointed out the fact louisa was getting her opinions and approval from linda to name call jim. she didnt say it was morally wrong, but tactically wrong.
she then went on to talk about dappys penis again and again...but didnt mention luisas vagina/

point is though judy james has no impartiality and therefore he so called objective analysis is worthless....

[Jake.]

the so called shrink on big brother came out with this biased sexist nonsense last night

stating if theyd targeted jim th, we could have won this battle.
in making these aggressive biased sexist comments judy james really did give her game away

shes certainly not an impartial objective analyst on the show.
she is a woman totally biased in favour of the women and sees it as a battle that she and all women must fight to detsroy the male characters. especially those with their own strong opinions.

she pointed out the fact louisa was getting her opinions and approval from linda to name call jim. she didnt say it was morally wrong, but tactically wrong.
she then went on to talk about dappys penis again and again...but didnt mention luisas vagina/

point is though judy james has no impartiality and therefore he so called objective analysis is worthless....

The desperation :joker:

[Niamh.]

the so called shrink on big brother came out with this biased sexist nonsense last night

stating if theyd targeted jim th, we could have won this battle.
in making these aggressive biased sexist comments judy james really did give her game away

shes certainly not an impartial objective analyst on the show.
she is a woman totally biased in favour of the women and sees it as a battle that she and all women must fight to detsroy the male characters. especially those with their own strong opinions.

she pointed out the fact louisa was getting her opinions and approval from linda to name call jim. she didnt say it was morally wrong, but tactically wrong.
she then went on to talk about dappys penis again and again...but didnt mention luisas vagina/

point is though judy james has no impartiality and therefore he so called objective analysis is worthless....

Dappys penis has been a pretty focal point of the whole series................luisas vagina hasn't

[Jake.]

Dappys penis has been a pretty vocal point of the whole series................luisas vagina hasn't

Exactly

[Vanessa]

Last night BOTS was mostly pro Jim, even Judi. It was surreal. :huh:

[daniel-lewis-1985]

Ooh another sexism thread, a lot of accusations there. This post comes across a bit like Linda, Bitter.

Plus loving the accusations of "she is a woman totally biased in favour of the women and sees it as a battle that she and all women must fight to detsroy the male characters" is not really fact is it, just an over the top opinion.

Im sure I saw another post where you said it was wrong to make allegations against Jim without proof and there is certainly no proof that "she is a woman totally biased in favour of the women and sees it as a battle that she and all women must fight to detsroy the male characters" so a bit contradictory imo.

Last nights BOTS was pretty much pro Jim I thought, why would Judi even mention Luisas noony, Dappys unusually large appendage has been a big talking point, pardon the pun.

[abhorson]

Just glad Linda said house self harm was a lie.

[abhorson]

Last night BOTS was mostly pro Jim, even Judi. It was surreal. :huh:

:thumbs::thumbs:

[the truth]

yep judy james exposed her bias and misandry......delighted though that most of them have seen the light and backed jim.....its quite incredible that hes overcome a biased show, packed with man haters , false accusers and one or 2 gay panellists who slandered jim badly.....oh not to forget fake healdines form channel 5s newspaper which stated jim had pushed linda to self harming. disgusting lies from a lot of man haters. delighted hes overcome all the male hate and prejudice. fantastic jimbo

[Vanessa]

Just glad Linda said house self harm was a lie.

:thumbs::thumbs:

[the truth]

:thumbs::thumbs:

after the newspaper was circulated to millions and jim was worngly slandered yet again...hes due a major payout and good luck to him :wavey:

[Vanessa]

after the newspaper was circulated to millions and jim was worngly slandered yet again...hes due a major payout and good luck to him :wavey:

I knew Linda was just a liar and a nasty cow. for me she's a bully as well. :mad:

[Beso]

Is it right to assume Louisa's vag is bigger than dappy's penis.

[abhorson]

after the newspaper was circulated to millions and jim was worngly slandered yet again...hes due a major payout and good luck to him :wavey:

Agreed, that rag should be accountable for that story.

[daniel-lewis-1985]

I knew Linda was just a liar and a nasty cow. for me she's a bully as well. :mad:

Can I just point out it was Liz who said Linda slashed her wrists not Linda. Linda categorically denied it on Daybreak today.

[Vanessa]

Can I just point out it was Liz who said Linda slashed her wrists not Linda. Linda categorically denied it on Daybreak today.

She still sold her story to the Star. The headline says "Jim made me self harm".

[abhorson]

So Liz is a nasty liar.

[Beso]

Linda was quoted in the daily star as saying she did it under the covers.

[the truth]

liz was as spineless as the rest of them as she let linda indoctrinate her in the evil gang...and I relaly do mena evil. this is no longer agame in a house. this is yet more gross slander which no man or woman should be subjected to. I hope he gets a huge payout

[abhorson]

She still sold her story to the Star. The headline says "Jim made me self harm".

Backtracked due to fostering chances. Too little thought. Anger before thinking.

[Vanessa]

Backtracked due to fostering chances. Too little thought. Anger before thinking.

Too late. :devil:

[the truth]

Backtracked due to fostering chances. Too little thought. Anger before thinking.

anger and some easy money for a pack of slanderous lies

[Beso]

Backtracked due to fostering chances. Too little thought. Anger before thinking.

good shout.

[Vanessa]

liz was as spineless as the rest of them as she let linda indoctrinate her in the evil gang...and I relaly do mena evil. this is no longer agame in a house. this is yet more gross slander which no man or woman should be subjected to. I hope he gets a huge payout

Liz let Linda influence her like the others. But lying about something like this is really low. :nono:

[GiRTh]

TBH Judi makes good point. Jim is a known sexist, he admits it yet the women failed to out him. Ironically their attempt to get him to show this side only made him more popular.

[the truth]

TBH Judi makes good point. Jim is a known sexist, he admits it yet the women failed to out him. Ironically their attempt to get him to show this side only made him more popular.

wrong. hes not a known anything. hes a comedian and he has done nothing sexist at all in the house. as for outside well, hes been slandered against and falsely accused. even after the show and during the slanderous lies continue. no evidence for any of it as its all slanderous lies. judy james shouldnt be saying this, she displays enormous bias and ,ale hate here...shes is yet another biased man hater and a total hypocrite

[GiRTh]

wrong. hes not a known anything. hes a comedian and he has done nothing sexist at all in the house. as for outside well, hes been slandered against and falsely accused. even after the show and during the slanderous lies continue. no evidence for any of it as its all slanderous lies. judy james shouldnt be saying this, she displays enormous bias and ,ale hate here...shes is yet another biased man hater and a total hypocriteI have heard stories about Jim Davidson since the 1980's. There are well documented incidents and if only half of those are true then he's a definite sexist and misogynist. I didnt bring this knowledge into my judgments of him cuz I think he's been a great HM but for you to try and brush his past under the carpet as if it was all lies is laughable. IF you;re trying to make a point about sexism then you've made that point but we all know what kind of person Jim Davidson is and if you dont want to acknowledge that then that is entirely up to you but I'm stating the things I am fairly sure about with Jim Davidson and I know for sure I'm NOT wrong.

[Beastie]

I love Judy James. There was no sexist comments. She's a brilliant psychologist and the best on the show. All hail Dame Judy James :worship:

[the truth]

I have heard stories about Jim Davidson since the 1980's. There are well documented incidents and if only half of those are true then he's definite sexist and misogynist. I didnt bring this knowledge into my judgments of him cuz I think he's been a great HM but for you to try and brush his past under the carpet as if it was all lies is laughable. IF you;re trying to make a point about sexism then you've made that point but we all know what kind of person Jim Davidson is and if you dont want to acknowledge that then that is entirely up to you but I'm stating the things I am fairly sure about with Jim Davidson so I know for sure I'm NOT wrong.

dont pretend you know anything ....whats he been charged with? do you know all the specific detail of the allegation youve made? no of course not

[the truth]

I love Judy James. There was no sexist comments. She's a brilliant psychologist and the best on the show. All hail Dame Judy James :worship:

she has proved herself to be biased and sexist. she is meant to be impartial ....by revealing her enormous bias all her analysis has lost all credibility

[Pincho Paxton]

Linda wasn't well, probably still isn't. To side with someone who is ill is an emotional response, a shared empathy between a group of people. Judi James is supposed to be immune to an empathic response due to her work. She should see right through it. The fact is that she can't analyse herself. The first thing she should improve on is analysing herself.

[Lozzibear]

I think she always talks s*** so just ignore her.

[GiRTh]

dont pretend you know anything ....whats he been charged with? do you know all the specific detail of the allegation youve made? no of course notWhat are you on about? What allegations have I made? If you want a dialogue then please note what I say and make your response relevant.

Let me explain, I have made no allegation but I have heard a hell of a lot of stories and read a hell of a lot of articles in the paper with a very conservative estimate of half of those being true - then I have a great idea of what Jim Davidson is like plus his persona on screen is consistent with what I've read. I met him once in the 1980 and his persona was consistent then too.

There is no need to reply cuz I dont think you really have anything to say. I dont have proof , I dont ne4ed it this is not a court of law but I've heard a hell of a lot of thing s and I've read a hell of a lot of things and what I see on Tv is consistent with that. I dont need any more than that to state my opinion

Do you wish to discuss the other part of my post or are you gonnas skate over that bit?

[Niamh.]

What are you on about? What allegations have I made? If you want a dialogue then please note what I say and make your response relevant.

Let me explain, I have made no allegation but I have heard a hell of a lot of stories and read a hell of a lot of articles in the paper with a very conservative estimate of half of those being true - then I have a great idea of what Jim Davidson is like plus his persona on screen is consistent with what I've read. I met him once in the 1980 and his persona was consistent then too.

There is no need to reply cuz I dont think you really have anything to say. I dont have proof , I dont ne4ed it this is not a court of law but I've heard a hell of a lot of thing s and I've read a hell of a lot of things and what I see on Tv is consistent with that. I dont need any more than that to state my opinion

Do you wish to discuss the other part of my post or are you gonnas skate over that bit?

:worship:

[the truth]

What are you on about? What allegations have I made? If you want a dialogue then please note what I say and make your response relevant.

Let me explain, I have made no allegation but I have heard a hell of a lot of stories and read a hell of a lot of articles in the paper with a very conservative estimate of half of those being true - then I have a great idea of what Jim Davidson is like plus his persona on screen is consistent with what I've read. I met him once in the 1980 and his persona was consistent then too.

There is no need to reply cuz I dont think you really have anything to say. I dont have proof , I dont ne4ed it this is not a court of law but I've heard a hell of a lot of thing s and I've read a hell of a lot of things and what I see on Tv is consistent with that. I dont need any more than that to state my opinion

Do you wish to discuss the other part of my post or are you gonnas skate over that bit?

so youre making endless assumptions and labelling jim depsite knowing nothing of the specifics and depsite the fact no charges were ever made. pretty judgemental that. as for judy james not only is she anti jim , but she is openly biased for the women, the term we could have won the battle is a disgrace for a supposedly professional obective analyst

[GiRTh]

so youre making endless assumptions and labelling jim depsite knowing nothing of the specifics and depsite the fact no charges were ever made. pretty judgemental that. as for judy james not only is she anti jim , but she is openly biased for the women, the term we could have won the battle is a disgrace for a supposedly professional obective analystCan you read or do you deliberately choose not to? Please point out all the allegations I make.

[GiRTh]

OK I'll do it for you, he himself says he's a chauvinist and a sexist.

[AnnieK]

A lot of what people know about Jim have come from Jim - to ignore the fact that he himself calls himself a chauvinist is a little blinkered.

[the truth]

A lot of what people know about Jim have come from Jim - to ignore the fact that he himself calls himself a chauvinist is a little blinkered.

its self deprecating humour....dont you get that?

[Apple202]

so what did she do that was actually sexist other than support a woman over a man

[Apple202]

which fyi isn't sexist

[daniel-lewis-1985]

Can you read or do you deliberately choose not to? Please point out all the allegations I make.

Honestly don't waste your time all you will get is bombarded with question after question even when I and others can probably see you have given brilliant and in depth responses.

This isn't a court for god sakes so don't let someone feel like you're in the box standing trial lol.

[anne666]

The Daily Star is almost automatically dismissed as tripe on here and on a regular basis. Yet because this now involves Linda Nolan, to some , it's her fault! Get real please.
As far as the so called expert is concerned, the OP's outrageous, "Out to destroy the male character", is a totally false statement.

[Northern Monkey]

I thought everybody knew that Judi James talks bollocks most of the time?Who even listens to her?lol

[Pincho Paxton]

I thought everybody knew that Judi James talks bollocks most of the time?Who even listens to her?lol

Until this series she was good... what happened? :conf:

[daniel-lewis-1985]

Until this series she was good... what happened? :conf:

She was allways good, she changed last summer when she entered the BB task for the play/pause task with Rylan and I noticed the next day she was on she had turned into someone totally different.

She went from judging a housemates behaviour to sometimes making catty comments and her ego definitely got bigger.

Sad really seeing as shes been a part of the show for about 12 years I think.

[anne666]

Until this series she was good... what happened? :conf:

Doesn't that depend on, if one is or is not a fan of whoever she views in a negative light? :conf:

[Pincho Paxton]

Doesn't that depend on if one is or is not a fan of whoever she views, in a negative light? :conf:

No, I base it on her noticing things that I didn't notice in past years.

[Lex]

I thought everybody knew that Judi James talks bollocks most of the time?Who even listens to her?lol


This! :thumbs:...besides, some people seem to think that she is some sort of psycho analyst or something...when really she is merely a so called 'body-language expert' and in fact has no scientifically recognised qualifications at all!
In other words...she is about as qualified to read peoples real nature and intentions as the 'Gypsy Rosalee's' that are parked in every other shop front on Blackpool Promenade!...And yes , she did sound as though she was being sexist last night...[and probably was!]...but worse than that is the fact that she sits up confidently and speaks in a manner that exudes superiority and sophistication ...but yet continuously spouts rubbish, and peddling her transparently biased views of the house mates...aided by Emma Willis whom she obviously has some kind of Svengali hold over, which makes her fawn over her like a modern day prophet! [wonder if she's Emma's mother?]

In short, as Eyeballpaul says...Judi James is no more than a wannabe-shrink that spouts copious amounts of Shyte ! ....just ignore her...she's... :sleep:

[Arrow]

Can you read or do you deliberately choose not to? Please point out all the allegations I make.

Do you read your own posts you made the allegations that its a fact he is sexist chauvinist

[Northern Monkey]

This! :thumbs:...besides, some people seem to think that she is some sort of psycho analyst or something...when really she is merely a so called 'body-language expert' and in fact has no scientifically recognised qualifications at all!
In other words...she is about as qualified to read peoples real nature and intentions as the 'Gypsy Rosalee's' that are parked in every other shop front on Blackpool Promenade!...And yes , she did sound as though she was being sexist last night...[and probably was!]...but worse than that is the fact that she sits up confidently and speaks in a manner that exudes superiority and sophistication ...but yet continuously spouts rubbish, and peddling her transparently biased views of the house mates...aided by Emma Willis whom she obviously has some kind of Svengali hold over, which makes her fawn over her like a modern day prophet! [wonder if she's Emma's mother?]

In short, as Eyeballpaul says...Judi James is no more than a wannabe-shrink that spouts copious amounts of Shyte ! ....just ignore her...she's... :sleep:

Yes,This is what i thought too,Well said :blush:

[Gusto Brunt]

Anyone know how old Judy James is?

She looks about 75.

[Patricia4]

She talks like 75.

[smeagol]

she is awful. i dont know what qualifications she has and i dont really care cause she is proof they mean nothing as she doesn't know whats she talking about most of the time

ive seen her on the walking dead

[Gusto Brunt]

She talks like 75.

But she dresses like a 30 year old. :eek:

[Pincho Paxton]

I like intelligent women so I'm a bit into her in a way.

[anne666]

Anyone know how old Judy James is?

She looks about 75.

OMG! Please at least be real and ageism isn't appropriate either.

[anne666]

This! :thumbs:...besides, some people seem to think that she is some sort of psycho analyst or something...when really she is merely a so called 'body-language expert' and in fact has no scientifically recognised qualifications at all!
In other words...she is about as qualified to read peoples real nature and intentions as the 'Gypsy Rosalee's' that are parked in every other shop front on Blackpool Promenade!...And yes , she did sound as though she was being sexist last night...[and probably was!]...but worse than that is the fact that she sits up confidently and speaks in a manner that exudes superiority and sophistication ...but yet continuously spouts rubbish, and peddling her transparently biased views of the house mates...aided by Emma Willis whom she obviously has some kind of Svengali hold over, which makes her fawn over her like a modern day prophet! [wonder if she's Emma's mother?]

In short, as Eyeballpaul says...Judi James is no more than a wannabe-shrink that spouts copious amounts of Shyte ! ....just ignore her...she's... :sleep:

I am no fan but is that not a touch OTT? What exactly are her qualifications as you seem to know all about her?

[Gusto Brunt]

OMG! Please at least be real and ageism isn't appropriate either.

It's not ageist to say how old someone looks. It's only ageist if you base an opinion on them because of their age.

[HD]

She looks like a foot and she needs to **** off home.

http://img.thesun.co.uk/aidemitlum/archive/00001/F_200701January05tvCB_1396a.jpg

[Pincho Paxton]

... a foot?

[HD]

... a foot?

http://www.zfootdoc.com/_derived/warts.htm_txt_Anna_Wart.gif

one of them

[Pincho Paxton]

I don't know what that is... I'll ask Jade Goody!

[anne666]

It's not ageist to say how old someone looks. It's only ageist if you base an opinion on them because of their age.

What did you meany by saying she looked 75? Was that NOT an opinion on her looks?

[HD]

I don't know what that is... I'll ask Jade Goody!

:laugh3:

[Gusto Brunt]

What did you meany by saying she looked 75? Was that NOT an opinion on her looks?


It was an opinion on how old she looks but not an opinion of her as a person and what she is capable of, or her status, etc, because that would be ageist.

[the truth]

she went into a lengthy diatribe last week about the fact jim touched his ball sack when talking to other men...supposedly this is some neanderthal caveman symbol by jim the sexist? she honestly believes this ? a mans ball bag is the most sensitive painful uncomfortable poorly designed part of the human anatomy. women really need to understand just the slightest gust of wind sets the a;larm balls ringing. every man who ever lived is constantly redadjusting his ball sack, not because hes a sex addict or sending subliminal messages to other males? but because they fear crushing the hairy bean bag

[Pincho Paxton]

she went into a lengthy diatribe last week about the fact jim touched his ball sack when talking to other men...supposedly this is some neanderthal caveman symbol by jim the sexist? she honestly believes this ? a mans ball bag is the most sensitive painful uncomfortable poorly designed part of the human anatomy. women really need to understand just the slightest gust of wind sets the a;larm balls ringing. every man who ever lived is constantly redadjusting his ball sack, not because hes a sex addict or sending subliminal messages to other males? but because they fear crushing the hairy bean bag

I don't kneed mine like a ball of dough!

[anne666]

It was an opinion on how old she looks but not an opinion of her as a person and what she is capable of, or her status, etc, because that would be ageist.

Maybe you simply need to be more aware of the age range of FM's. It was hardly a compliment, a negative remark and rather hurtful to myself as a 60 plus woman. We all age.:hugesmile:

[anne666]

she went into a lengthy diatribe last week about the fact jim touched his ball sack when talking to other men...supposedly this is some neanderthal caveman symbol by jim the sexist? she honestly believes this ? a mans ball bag is the most sensitive painful uncomfortable poorly designed part of the human anatomy. women really need to understand just the slightest gust of wind sets the a;larm balls ringing. every man who ever lived is constantly redadjusting his ball sack, not because hes a sex addict or sending subliminal messages to other males? but because they fear crushing the hairy bean bag

Oh dear, let's all go into denial of basic body language then.:dance:

[abhorson]

I like intelligent women so I'm a bit into her in a way.

Kinky.

[abhorson]

Gosh, can they not see it. It is all entertainment. I laugh so much.

[Northern Monkey]

she went into a lengthy diatribe last week about the fact jim touched his ball sack when talking to other men...supposedly this is some neanderthal caveman symbol by jim the sexist? she honestly believes this ? a mans ball bag is the most sensitive painful uncomfortable poorly designed part of the human anatomy. women really need to understand just the slightest gust of wind sets the a;larm balls ringing. every man who ever lived is constantly redadjusting his ball sack, not because hes a sex addict or sending subliminal messages to other males? but because they fear crushing the hairy bean bag

See,She talks bollocks :joker:I honestly would'nt take anything she says as gospel.I don't think many people take her opinions that seriously.

[abhorson]

And too the PC bandwagon, as Jim says FU.

[Lex]

ive seen her on the walking dead

:joker: You are...awful! :laugh3:


I am no fan but is that not a touch OTT? What exactly are her qualifications as you seem to know all about her?

Well...none actually she is a bit of a 'jack-of-all-trades' ...she started off as a model and claims to have trained Naomi Campbell ...she's written six steamy novels and researched body language in books and on-line , then declaring herself to be an expert on social behaviour, relationships, body language, workplace culture, stress and time management. She also writes regular columns for You and Q magazines and is Real magazine's ‘relationship doctor'.
Impressive enough in a sort of "ambitious-go-for-it sort of way"...but no real qualifications i'm afraid! :nono:

[anne666]

:joker: You are...awful! :laugh3:




Well...none actually she is a bit of a 'jack-of-all-trades' ...she started off as a model and claims to have trained Naomi Campbell ...she's written six steamy novels and researched body language in books and on-line , then declaring herself to be an expert on social behaviour, relationships, body language, workplace culture, stress and time management. She also writes regular columns for You and Q magazines and is Real magazine's ‘relationship doctor'.
Impressive enough in a sort of "ambitious-go-for-it sort of way"...but no real qualifications i'm afraid! :nono:

Thanks. Have any of them got any real qualifications?

[MarcusMel]

the so called shrink on big brother came out with this biased sexist nonsense last night

Biased I agree with, but you would have to explain how it is sexest.


stating if theyd targeted jim th, we could have won this battle.
in making these aggressive biased sexist comments judy james really did give her game away

This is massive misinterpretation. Judy clearly means 'we' as in females and not some conspracy plot to out Jim Davidson.


shes certainly not an impartial objective analyst on the show.
she is a woman totally biased in favour of the women and sees it as a battle that she and all women must fight to detsroy the male characters. especially those with their own strong opinions.
If this was a battle between men and women then why the interpretation that Luisa was acting in the house?



she pointed out the fact louisa was getting her opinions and approval from linda to name call jim. she didnt say it was morally wrong, but tactically wrong.
she then went on to talk about dappys penis again and again...but didnt mention luisas vagina/


Judy James is not really qualified to comment on this aspect as she is a body language expert. She is parroting what other people are saying on this aspect.


point is though judy james has no impartiality and therefore he so called objective analysis is worthless....

On this, I agree with you.

[the truth]

glad we agree her views are now worthless

[Northern Monkey]

Hahaha!F U Judy James!