View Full Version : VTE makes more money than VTS
Jemal
09-06-2014, 05:50 PM
Which is why it keeps on being chosen.
As BB isn't as popular anymore their are the majority of people who will bote to evict instead of vote to save purely because they may think that the person is already safe. On the other vote to evict is more precise for viewers.
BB know this, its all about the money.
Not keeping entertaining ones in.
King Gizzard
09-06-2014, 05:54 PM
yup
King Gizzard
09-06-2014, 05:55 PM
and eviction shows are more entertaining and draw in more viewers than if it was just a bore leaving
Marsh.
09-06-2014, 05:55 PM
Of course it is. :confused:
People like to think BB give a damn about who wins the show and they intentionally want to scupper your favourites.
Truth is, as long as they're making a bit of money they couldn't give a damn.
Jemal
09-06-2014, 06:04 PM
Im just saying cause people keep questioning it
Black Dagger
09-06-2014, 06:05 PM
It's not about that, it's the fact they piss about with it and give us vote to evict and don't give a toss if the more dramatic housemates leave in the civil one, but god forbid that happening in the celeb one because they spent £££ on them.
Headie
09-06-2014, 06:08 PM
It's not about that, it's the fact they piss about with it and give us vote to evict and don't give a toss if the more dramatic housemates leave in the civil one, but god forbid that happening in the celeb one because they spent £££ on them.
This.
It's not about that, it's the fact they piss about with it and give us vote to evict and don't give a toss if the more dramatic housemates leave in the civil one, but god forbid that happening in the celeb one because they spent £££ on them.
.
Pete.
09-06-2014, 06:28 PM
wouldn't they use it for CBB in that case as it gets more viewers?
Marsh.
09-06-2014, 06:29 PM
It's not about that, it's the fact they piss about with it and give us vote to evict and don't give a toss if the more dramatic housemates leave in the civil one, but god forbid that happening in the celeb one because they spent £££ on them.
So it's not about the money, it's about them purposely trying to wind the viewers up?
Ok then.
wouldn't they use it for CBB in that case as it gets more viewers?
Yes that's true.
Black Dagger
09-06-2014, 06:57 PM
So it's not about the money, it's about them purposely trying to wind the viewers up?
Ok then.
No, I'm saying that is the reason that most people on here don't like VTE.
Jemal
09-06-2014, 07:05 PM
Lucas i know. But i made this thread so people could know that BB doesn't give a fk about keeping entertaining housemates and they just want money hence VTE
Marsh.
09-06-2014, 07:36 PM
No, I'm saying that is the reason that most people on here don't like VTE.
The thread is about why they make the decision to make it VTE.
People don't like VTE because they believe the producers are winding them up on purpose? Even though they're not, it's about what brings in the most money. :conf:
starry
09-06-2014, 08:04 PM
I thought they made little money out of voting anyway, much fewer voted ever since Nikki was given a second chance to win.
The producers were always negative anyway, even when they switched to vote to save. The cast has to be damn good to survive vote to evict and they just don't provide a good enough cast now. And the interference with someone being up every week and another already in the final makes a joke of it anyway.
Vote to evict probably enables them to decide evictions easier, give someone a bad edit and they are gone. Vote to save allows viewers to keep in their favourites longer. The producers are more interested in their own agenda being successful.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.