Log in

View Full Version : Why is sharing a shower different to sharing a bath...


Vicky.
19-06-2014, 10:31 PM
They all seem to share baths. And there isn't a problem :umm2:

Also gotta LOL at Helen going on about the girl code :hehe:

Amy Jade
19-06-2014, 10:36 PM
I asked his too, I saw Matthew who has a long time girlfriend in the bath with Pauline and Danielle. Why did Helen and Toya not errupt over that?

Marsh.
19-06-2014, 10:37 PM
Exactly.

I said if there was no glass around the shower, nobody would care. When the shower was an open area like in BB6, everyone just stood in it with their swimming stuff on.

:shrug: Just an excuse to bitch about Kim who they'd already changed their mind about.

Josy
19-06-2014, 10:38 PM
There isn't a difference, the over reaction was awful :laugh:

Kim never done a thing wrong IMO and that shower is designed for more than 1 at a time it's absolutely massive.

Braden
19-06-2014, 10:39 PM
The most annoying thing about the situation is that Kimberly asked if it was ok if she could go in, and he blatantly said yes...but obviously Kimberly is the one in the wrong,

InOne
19-06-2014, 10:41 PM
Because Kim is a sizzling hot American Goddess that they're all insanely jealous of.


If Danielle, Jale or Mutha P got in there I bet there would be no showergate

Mick McMick
20-06-2014, 09:17 AM
Also gotta LOL at Helen going on about the girl code :hehe:

I assume Coleen Rooney is not deserving of having the "girl code" upheld? :shrug:

Niamh.
20-06-2014, 09:25 AM
Because Kim is a sizzling hot American Goddess that they're all insanely jealous of.


If Danielle, Jale or Mutha P got in there I bet there would be no showergate

That is actually true, if she wasn't good looking no one would see a problem, it's ridiculous

Crimson Dynamo
20-06-2014, 09:27 AM
thing is Matthew was already in the shower with Winston but was side on so was invisible

Jack_
20-06-2014, 09:28 AM
It isn't, the whole thing was pretty stupid and is based around the assumption that it's impossible for an attractive woman to have an innocent, meaningless shower with a man

I'm glad it caused ructions though, it's given Kimberly something to do at last...not sure why people would want that to stop

Daffodil
20-06-2014, 09:29 AM
and another thing ... NO-ONE has made a fuss about Steven lying in bed with Pauline!!!! :yuk: :facepalm:

Jamesy
20-06-2014, 09:30 AM
It's just Helen after her precious screentime. Bless.

Robodog
20-06-2014, 09:49 AM
They all seem to share baths. And there isn't a problem :umm2:

Also gotta LOL at Helen going on about the girl code :hehe:

VERY good point indeed.

I wish Kim had said that to Helen last night.

Shared baths are a BB staple, every year!

But as we know, it's all about Helen and co's jealousy. After all, Helen's 'girl code' didn't stop her calling Jale a 'non woman' and 'slug'.

Gusto Brunt
20-06-2014, 09:57 AM
There isn't a difference, the over reaction was awful :laugh:

Kim never done a thing wrong IMO and that shower is designed for more than 1 at a time it's absolutely massive.


I don't like Kim but as you say the over-reaction was absurd.

Niamh.
20-06-2014, 10:00 AM
and another thing ... NO-ONE has made a fuss about Steven lying in bed with Pauline!!!! :yuk: :facepalm:

People are just blocking that out from their minds, it's easier that way :hehe:

rubymoo
20-06-2014, 10:37 AM
:cloud:It annoys me!!! They aren't mad at Winston, their problem isn't with Winston, it's the beautiful Kimberley they have a problem with, double standards.

lily.
20-06-2014, 10:43 AM
thing is Matthew was already in the shower with Winston but was side on so was invisible

haha.. he's like the gable end of a pound note.

Vicky.
20-06-2014, 11:13 AM
People are just blocking that out from their minds, it's easier that way :hehe:

Unfortunately I can't block out the 'grinding' episode where the guys had to flirt :yuk:

Niamh.
20-06-2014, 11:14 AM
Unfortunately I can't block out the 'grinding' episode where the guys had to flirt :yuk:

Ew I'd forgotten about that, cheers :fist: