Nominations (spoilers)

[LukeB]

do you think it was fair for marlon to nominate Christopher because of what he said to helen? when it has nothing to do with him?

[Kazanne]

do you think it was fair for marlon to nominate Christopher because of what he said to helen? when it has nothing to do with him?

Lots of things are nothing to do with them but they all nominate over stuff like that,so yes it's fair.

[LukeB]

Lots of things are nothing to do with them but they all nominate over stuff like that,so yes it's fair.

but its a stupid reason, big brother are going easy on them. it's annoying

[Josy]

Lots have given stupid reasons since the beginning, Danielle's for example.

What isn't fair is questioning Marlon's and his only.

[MrWong]

Helen's mouthpiece needs to go.

[LukeB]

Lots have given stupid reasons since the beginning, Danielle's for example.

What isn't fair is questioning Marlon's and his only.

it is fair because marlon should not be nomination someone when its not their arguement, the fool always gets involved

[Josy]

it is fair because marlon should not be nomination someone when its not their arguement, the fool always gets involved

No it isn't fair if you want to bring up stupid reasons for nominating then there is worse than Marlon's.

[reece(:]

Marlon is irrelevant so he shouldn't be allowed to nominate in the first place.

[LukeB]

No it isn't fair if you want to bring up stupid reasons for nominating then there is worse than Marlon's.

it is because i find marlon annoying when gets involved with things that got nothing to do with with

[LukeB]

Marlon is irrelevant so he shouldn't be allowed to nominate in the first place.

:joker:

[Adamw92]

it is fair because marlon should not be nomination someone when its not their arguement, the fool always gets involved

Why shouldn't he? If he is friends with Helen, (they are friends, aren't they? I', genuinely confused as to that :laugh:) then I don't see why he can't nominate someone who upset his friend.

[LukeB]

Why shouldn't he? If he is friends with Helen, (they are friends, aren't they? I', genuinely confused as to that :laugh:) then I don't see why he can't nominate someone who upset his friend.

because it has nothing to with him, christopher didn't go for marlon did he ? its looking like marlon is up helen's arse as well because ash is there.

[Brother Leon]

Of course it's fair. It's like saying Ashleigh and Danielle couldn't non Ash or Marlon for how they spoke to Toya as it had nothing to do with them. Besides Christopher has nominated Marlon before for things he has said that have nothing to do with him...

[Marsh.]

It's not about the argument being nothing to do with them. If they have an opinion on it or that housemates actions affect their opinion/relationship with them then I don't see the problem.

[Gerbil901]

If anything Marlon got nominated because of a "Nut Cracker" comment by Danielle when it had nothing to do with her. I guess that was unfair too.