PDA

View Full Version : The worst history of female evictees surely


rionablue
18-07-2014, 09:12 PM
After seven weeks we have only seen two males evicted and that includes the newbies and one of them was only evicted as all males were up. Surely this is the worst history of female evictees ever in such a short space. its absolutely ridiculous that now only three original girls remain and one of them is safe plus one new housemate. And all the knobhead fellas like Steven and Ash and to an extent Christopher are heading for the final. PLEASE PLEASE STOP this trend

lovebigbrotheruk
18-07-2014, 09:33 PM
The sexism though.

Jarvio
18-07-2014, 09:41 PM
Matthew was only evicted because of the all-males twist. Marlon's eviction wasn't even a public vote.

So basically, no man has 'truly' been evicted this series.

Speedster
18-07-2014, 09:48 PM
After seven weeks we have only seen two males evicted and that includes the newbies and one of them was only evicted as all males were up. Surely this is the worst history of female evictees ever in such a short space. its absolutely ridiculous that now only three original girls remain and one of them is safe plus one new housemate. And all the knobhead fellas like Steven and Ash and to an extent Christopher are heading for the final. PLEASE PLEASE STOP this trend

It's always been like this-most of the women are voted out before guys get evicted. I think women vote more than men and they like men, obviously, also, they like making up reasons why this male idiot or that male idiot is actually just "quiet" not "boring" or "confident" not "arrogant" "lively" not "an attention *****" "passionate/telling it like it is" not "aggressive" etc.

Judging by posts on here, and other BB related sites, the crowd reaction to women and the fact that the women are voted out so fast-one after another, I think women don't seem to have worked out double standards are meant to work in their favour and not against them; who got slaughtered over the close friendship between Tamara and winston? who became the favourite to win the show when Tamara got booted out?. There were cries of "girl code" when Kimberly was in the shower with winston, people were angry at Danielle in bed with winston but seemed fine with winston being in bed with danielle.

Speedster
18-07-2014, 09:49 PM
Matthew was only evicted because of the all-males twist. Marlon's eviction wasn't even a public vote.

So basically, no man has 'truly' been evicted this series.



This.

reece(:
18-07-2014, 09:50 PM
Matthew was only evicted because of the all-males twist. Marlon's eviction wasn't even a public vote.

So basically, no man has 'truly' been evicted this series.
This, very sad feat since all of the females bar Tamara have delivered.

Amy Jade
18-07-2014, 09:51 PM
All female series due

iRyan
18-07-2014, 09:52 PM
It's a travesty

reece(:
18-07-2014, 09:53 PM
All female series due
make it happen c5 :clap1:

Vicky.
19-07-2014, 12:18 AM
I think with VTS this year we would have an entirely different story and we would have a female filled house now. The problem has been (IMO) that the guys are all kinda easy going and the women have been REALLY strong characters (bar tamera who was just there). In vote to evict, especially with a load up, the strongest character leaves usually.

Marsh.
19-07-2014, 12:19 AM
Biannca leaving in a vote to save suggests it wouldn't have been much different.

Maybe the smaller pool of potential voters has changed most of the results which would've been different a few years back? :shrug:

Samm
19-07-2014, 12:20 AM
They should of done VTS, would of saved a lot of females

Marsh.
19-07-2014, 12:21 AM
Sexism? :joker:

There must be an equal number of evictees male/female and final lineups must be equal in genders regardless of personalities otherwise it's sexism?

As laughable as the cries about racism.

Joelle.
19-07-2014, 12:24 AM
I think with VTS this year we would have an entirely different story and we would have a female filled house now. The problem has been (IMO) that the guys are all kinda easy going and the women have been REALLY strong characters (bar tamera who was just there). In vote to evict, especially with a load up, the strongest character leaves usually.

Yeah I agree with this.

Hira's eviction is probably the best example of this tbh. If it had been VTE Lisa would have probably gone. VTS generally gets rid of the bores and irrelevents - i.e. the men this series.

Vicky.
19-07-2014, 12:32 AM
Biannca leaving in a vote to save suggests it wouldn't have been much different.

Maybe the smaller pool of potential voters has changed most of the results which would've been different a few years back? :shrug:

Not really..it was pretty much a given that Zoe was staying, so the remaining vote was between pav and biannca (I imagine it was quite close too) so it was essentially vote to evict...dislike Bianca vote pav and vice versa

In a vote with 4/5+ up, the characters will generally stay with VTS. In VTE, the characters will go, even if they are popular. Check out BB11s quad for proof of that :umm2:

Heaven = Winner
19-07-2014, 12:56 AM
So true. Only female that deserved to be evicted at the time they got evicted imo was Tamara. :/

Videostar
19-07-2014, 12:57 AM
After seven weeks we have only seen two males evicted and that includes the newbies and one of them was only evicted as all males were up. Surely this is the worst history of female evictees ever in such a short space. its absolutely ridiculous that now only three original girls remain and one of them is safe plus one new housemate. And all the knobhead fellas like Steven and Ash and to an extent Christopher are heading for the final. PLEASE PLEASE STOP this trend

So what are you saying? that the females that have gone have been voted out due to sexism? and that we should have some kind of all male shortlist eviction to redress the balance? (we've already had that and that was disgusting and wrong)

If so you are mental.....who ever goes is down to being voted out (other than tonight) fairly.

Scream
19-07-2014, 01:00 AM
Biannca leaving in a vote to save suggests it wouldn't have been much different.

Maybe the smaller pool of potential voters has changed most of the results which would've been different a few years back? :shrug:

I do think Biannca shouldn't be used as proof that VTS doesn't save the strong characters because even though she was the strongest up she was SO offensive. There are still a lot of older viewers who would have been blown away by what she was doing tonight & some younger ones for that matter. :joker: There wasn't a lot likeable about her unless you wanted her to stay for her entertainment value but a lot of people wouldn't see past that because of how poorly she acted

Marsh.
19-07-2014, 01:02 AM
There's not much likeable about 90% of the cast so that goes for the other evictees too.

Bluerang1
19-07-2014, 01:08 AM
Not really..it was pretty much a given that Zoe was staying, so the remaining vote was between pav and biannca (I imagine it was quite close too) so it was essentially vote to evict...dislike Bianca vote pav and vice versa

In a vote with 4/5+ up, the characters will generally stay with VTS. In VTE, the characters will go, even if they are popular. Check out BB11s quad for proof of that :umm2:


:clap1:

Brother Leon
19-07-2014, 01:10 AM
Even with that pathetic girl power week too :laugh:

Videostar
19-07-2014, 01:17 AM
Anyway, tonights public vote was a no brainer and Danielle left because of only two peoples opinions (one of them female) so this thread has no relevance.

CaudleHalbard
19-07-2014, 01:19 AM
VTS kicked out Biannca! ;)

Marsh.
19-07-2014, 01:32 AM
Not really..it was pretty much a given that Zoe was staying, so the remaining vote was between pav and biannca (I imagine it was quite close too) so it was essentially vote to evict...dislike Bianca vote pav and vice versa

In a vote with 4/5+ up, the characters will generally stay with VTS. In VTE, the characters will go, even if they are popular. Check out BB11s quad for proof of that :umm2:

So basically all the moaning people do about VTE and VTS means nothing because they're both the same and you need half the house up on VTS to make any difference. :joker:

Videostar
19-07-2014, 01:32 AM
VTS kicked out Biannca! ;)

Proving once and for all that VTS is the best voting system of all. :D

Vicky.
19-07-2014, 01:33 AM
So basically all the moaning people do about VTE and VTS means nothing because they're both the same and you need half the house up on VTS to make any difference. :joker:

Pretty much yeah. In 2/3 ways it makes not much difference at all

This year though, half the house has been up each time, so it would have changed the results quite a bit

delta
19-07-2014, 09:34 AM
Just said this in another thread, the male numbers are top heavy and even when the ratio of 2:1 in favour of the women with the new housemates that has already been evened out.


I think it's a double whammy, woman generally don't like or get on with women, they are wired that way for some reason and so they will vote for each other in the house and rub each other up the wrong way and catty argue.

The viewing public see this and of course at least 50% of the voters are women so it stands to reason on statistics that there is more chance of the women being voted out first. Not too sure what the answer is, but it still doesn't stop a woman winning.

rionablue
19-07-2014, 09:40 AM
So what are you saying? that the females that have gone have been voted out due to sexism? and that we should have some kind of all male shortlist eviction to redress the balance? (we've already had that and that was disgusting and wrong)

If so you are mental.....who ever goes is down to being voted out (other than tonight) fairly.

I am perfectly sane thank you and a lot of people are agreeing with my post. I don't know why the women have been voted out but its a pattern that is happening nearly every year. Disgusting and arrogant men like Ash and Steven are still in there. I never mentioned the word sexism

rionablue
19-07-2014, 09:42 AM
Anyway, tonights public vote was a no brainer and Danielle left because of only two peoples opinions (one of them female) so this thread has no relevance.

Well go away and comment on ANOTHER THREAD then videostar. I only comment on threads that I feel strongly about. I am perfectly entitled to start a thread about ANYTHING I WANT

joeysteele
19-07-2014, 10:36 AM
Matthew was only evicted because of the all-males twist. Marlon's eviction wasn't even a public vote.

So basically, no man has 'truly' been evicted this series.

Really good points. So it could have been likely even worse for the female housemates.

mrflibble
19-07-2014, 10:46 AM
Problem is they cast guys who are either inoffensive or just kind of chilled/funny and they choose girls who are just going to be argumentative or get drunk and act like idiots. If they chose women with a head on their shoulders, this probably wouldn't have been a problem. Ashleigh is the only one in this series that fits that description.

Yaki da
19-07-2014, 10:49 AM
The problem was the theme... Powerful, strong or hardfaced women are always going to be voted off. You have to be an inoffensive, boring, vacuous airhead to do well on BB if you're a girl today

mrflibble
19-07-2014, 10:49 AM
The only strong female in there is Ashleigh and she's doing fine? All the boring, vacuous airheads have gone.

MTVN
19-07-2014, 10:50 AM
And the females only have themselves to blame

Marc
19-07-2014, 10:50 AM
To be honest if Ash was up he'd likely go. If Steven was up he'd go.

Unfortunately the large group in the house have the numbers

Marc
19-07-2014, 10:53 AM
Plus looking at the nominations the girls are nominating each other, so it doesn't help their cause.

Although Danielle didn't nominate any girls in there hmm

Samm
19-07-2014, 10:54 AM
yep now it is with only 3 females left, if one goes next week then I'm done

Beastie
19-07-2014, 11:57 AM
Jesus do we only have 3 girls left now?

Why has Kim left? I am guessing she could have become pregnant!!! No joke.

Is Steven going to walk? (I doubt it)

Daffodil
19-07-2014, 11:58 AM
Hopefully they are making arrangements for the re-installing of DANIELLE as we speak!

:banana:

Creggle
19-07-2014, 11:59 AM
They're all fit too.

/happydance

CaudleHalbard
19-07-2014, 12:02 PM
They're all fit too.

/happydance
Quality is always better than quantity! ;)

Anyway, isn't it sexist to be counting in terms of gender? :p

Pete.
19-07-2014, 12:04 PM
Ashleigh and Zoe >

Creggle
19-07-2014, 12:06 PM
Quality is always better than quantity! ;)

Anyway, isn't it sexist to be counting in terms of gender? :p

Helen's body when they were playing strip poker, want more! :evilgrin:

MeMyselfAndI
19-07-2014, 12:09 PM
this always happen in BBUK, it's a regular occurrence :laugh:

Speedster
19-07-2014, 12:20 PM
Quality is always better than quantity! ;)

Anyway, isn't it sexist to be counting in terms of gender? :p


It's also a bit sexist to lose women one after another until you get the inevitable all-male-final and a male winner. This pretty much happens every single year and very few people bat an eyelid.

On the other hand, remember the panic on here that set in when all the men were up for eviction a few weeks ago?.

Kai Anders
19-07-2014, 12:25 PM
I reckon a lot of it is to do with the audience.. which a majority are females.. they're far more likely to vote a male contestant whose 'hunky' or whatever, than a women who seems slightly more egotistical or larger than life.. likewise, I know no men who'd vote.. whether to evict or save.. it seems a little unfair but who knows.. Zoe seems to be playing it well with the public!

daniel-lewis-1985
19-07-2014, 02:22 PM
Helen's body when they were playing strip poker, want more! :evilgrin:

OMG how fit is she I never realised before.

She does have a banging body.

I wish Bianca had stayed, if she could influence Helen and make her misbehave then shes gotta be a strong character lol what other girl is able to do that to Helen?

Will.
19-07-2014, 02:35 PM
they seriously need to chuck a girl back in, they should get Danielle or do a twist were the public gets to vote one of the previous evicted females back in. Wow 3 girls and we still have 4 weeks left. BB 14 had 3 girls left in the final week before the last eviction.

CaudleHalbard
19-07-2014, 02:38 PM
It's also a bit sexist to lose women one after another


You have to blame the voting demographic on that, methinks!

Vicky.
19-07-2014, 02:42 PM
You have to blame the voting demographic on that, methinks!

I'd say blame the weak male cast choices. I mean, I like most of them but compared to the women this year the blokes have been really quiet.

I said in another thread if we had had the same choices for eviction, and it had been vote to save, I really think we would have a female heavy house at this stage.

Speedster
19-07-2014, 04:01 PM
You have to blame the voting demographic on that, methinks!

:) yeah, I was-that was the point I was trying to make; women -keep- being voted out, like I said in another thread, I think women run this show as far as voting is concerned...


The whole thing seems perverse-women voting out/hating/wanting to kill other women then going all gaga over some bloke no matter who/what he is. Evey....single.....year....since....the...show.... starrrrrted...:sleep:

Yaki da
19-07-2014, 04:04 PM
It's a shame that the producers never ever seem to give the girls a good edit. It's perfectly clear Ashleigh and Chris have gotten on well for weeks, yet we've never really seen her with him.

Maybe if they did show them being a bit more charming, they wouldn't be down to 3 left.

Speedster
19-07-2014, 04:06 PM
I'd say blame the weak male cast choices. I mean, I like most of them but compared to the women this year the blokes have been really quiet.

I said in another thread if we had had the same choices for eviction, and it had been vote to save, I really think we would have a female heavy house at this stage.

If they're so weak why aren't they gone? because no-one -wants- them gone, everyone just wants the women out. The men are being saved no matter what they're like.

Double standards thanks to who does most voting...

Not trying to be offensive but come on, what -does- a bloke have to do to get shown the door?:shrug::conf:

Vicky.
19-07-2014, 09:46 PM
It's also a bit sexist to lose women one after another until you get the inevitable all-male-final and a male winner. This pretty much happens every single year and very few people bat an eyelid.

On the other hand, remember the panic on here that set in when all the men were up for eviction a few weeks ago?.We have NEVER had an all male final?

If they're so weak why aren't they gone? because no-one -wants- them gone, everyone just wants the women out. The men are being saved no matter what they're like.

Double standards thanks to who does most voting...

Not trying to be offensive but come on, what -does- a bloke have to do to get shown the door?:shrug::conf:

Because its vote to evict...the men aren't being 'saved' as such at all. Just they have done nothing to be evicted for, as they have done next to nothing period, where the women have largely carried the series..

Macie Lightfoot
19-07-2014, 10:08 PM
still waiting for our first F/F final two tbh

reece(:
20-07-2014, 01:03 AM
still waiting for our first F/F final two tbh
.

Vicky.
20-07-2014, 01:09 AM
still waiting for our first F/F final two tbh

Seems awful to say it, but we would definitely have had this in BB9 if Mikey wasnt blind :/

Achilles
20-07-2014, 01:13 AM
I think they could introduce a new rule that would stop the trend of women going early and keep the male and female balance throughout the series
16 housemates next season
Week 1 = male vs female
Week 2 = male vs male or female vs female
Always a 1v1 each week. With a 1v1 there is no difference between VTS/VTE so the argument over which is better becomes redundant.
Every eviction would be completely fair as well.
Then for the final 5/6 it is a straight up VTW.
This new rule would address the gender balance complaints and keep "entertaining" housemates in IF the "like" > "dislike"

Vicky.
20-07-2014, 01:17 AM
I honestly don't see the need for balancing out genders. I think its a sexist idea in itself to be quite honest..I do not particularly care what a housemate has between their legs..I just want the interesting ones to stay. If that leaves us with a house full of males or a house full of females then so be it.

Unfortunately this year the voting has been ridiculous as nearly every strong character has left so far. But I stand by the main reason for it being vote to evict mixed with so many housemates up each week.

Achilles
20-07-2014, 01:40 AM
I honestly don't see the need for balancing out genders. I think its a sexist idea in itself to be quite honest..I do not particularly care what a housemate has between their legs..I just want the interesting ones to stay. If that leaves us with a house full of males or a house full of females then so be it.

Unfortunately this year the voting has been ridiculous as nearly every strong character has left so far. But I stand by the main reason for it being vote to evict mixed with so many housemates up each week.

It wouldn't be sexist, it would be just using the same principle as choosing 8 men and 8 women to start the show.
If they made it so every week it was a 1v1 eviction then the strong character would always stay, whether they are strong for the "right" or "wrong" reasons.
1v1 evictions are more exciting too, because it is classic battle of "good vs evil", fans of one, haters of the other vs fans of one, haters of the other.

Big Brother 1
1st eviction was Caroline vs Sada Sada 55%
2nd eviction was Andrew vs Caroline Andrew 68%
3rd eviction was Caroline vs Tom Caroline 62%
4th eviction was Craig vs Nichola Nichola 72%

This year we could have had Steven vs another male in week 2 and got rid of Steven before the Kimberly showmance even got off the ground :banana: