PDA

View Full Version : Should Kimberly be replaced?


Headie
19-07-2014, 10:57 AM
Now that Kim's gone, I think they should definitely invite back Biannca or Danielle (or Marlon but we don't need another male tbh). I also wouldn't mind it if they replaced her with another new female HM tbh.

They could get away with putting Biannca back in because no one 'evicted' her, they just saved other HMs instead.

Having only 3 girls left is a joke and there's still 7 males left... what an absolute farce.

LukeB
19-07-2014, 10:57 AM
Yes danielle should go back in :p

Jake.
19-07-2014, 10:58 AM
Bringing back Danielle would be fair given how it wasn't a 'proper' eviction

Marc
19-07-2014, 10:59 AM
Money was spent for the eviction. Wasted money if Biannca is put back in as people will have frantically voted to save Pav and Zoe for nothing.

Daffodil
19-07-2014, 11:00 AM
For FAIRNESS' sake, Danielle has got to go back in.

Samm
19-07-2014, 11:00 AM
Yes Danielle plz, or a new HM

They brought Kinga back in with only about 2 weeks left so it's not to late

Yaki da
19-07-2014, 11:03 AM
Why do people want the fraudulent Danielle back in the house?

joeysteele
19-07-2014, 11:06 AM
Normally I would say no and especially to evicted housemates but after last week's farce as to evictions and noms I do think really Danielle should, if anyone ought to, now be returned if she wished to.

This series just gets worse and worse and BB have made it a near laughing stock, how Emma and Rylan on bbbots can defend this nonsense as supposed people who love BB is beyond me.

In my view Danielle was evicted by BB and no one else, it allowed people who had been in the house for less than 5 days to make the decision and for me, it was totally wrong and unacceptable too.
Whether she would want to go in again is now likely doubtful and the way BB are wrecking the noms and eviction process with really stupid ideas, would suggest to me that they would have no intention whatsoever of putting anyone back in anyway.

Thank goodness this series is over halfway through because rivetting watching and anything at all of real entertainment value,it certainly falls miles short of,in my view.
It really needs putting out of its misery.

Headie
19-07-2014, 11:06 AM
Money was spent for the eviction. Wasted money if Biannca is put back in as people will have frantically voted to save Pav and Zoe for nothing.

Bit they can get away with it, as the whole point of vote to save is to save your favourites, not evict someone else. So people who voted Pav/Zoe to get Biannca out aren't technically using the system properly, which is why she'd be allowed to come back if necessary.

Pete.
19-07-2014, 11:07 AM
Bring back Danielle

Gusto Brunt
19-07-2014, 11:07 AM
Put Sasha in! :p

Jay.
19-07-2014, 11:10 AM
With Danielle please :love:

andybigbro
19-07-2014, 12:23 PM
No. There's too many in there.

smudgie
19-07-2014, 12:26 PM
Enough people in there now.
No way should an evicted housemate be put back in.

Livia
19-07-2014, 12:28 PM
She should be replaced by a housemate with equal personality and charisma. Say, a pot plant of some kind.

Amy Jade
19-07-2014, 12:47 PM
Biannca should come back, technically she was not evicted.

Jake.
19-07-2014, 12:48 PM
Biannca should come back, technically she was not evicted.

Pretty sure she was

Northern Monkey
19-07-2014, 12:49 PM
I would like Bianca but for the sake of fairness it should be Danielle.Her eviction should not have taken place with Kim gone.

Cherie
19-07-2014, 12:49 PM
Biannca should come back, technically she was not evicted.

She was voted out by the public where is the technicality SH?

JTM45
19-07-2014, 12:50 PM
It won't happen! No way, no how.:nono:

PrincessIona
19-07-2014, 01:13 PM
No, although I'm very dissapointed Danielle and Bianca left. Bianca shouldn't go back because she was voted out, in a way I'd like Danielle back but I disagree with people being evicted then put back in. I'd be quite happy for her to go back because I quite like her but I'd be fuming if it happened with someone I didn't like so it would be kind of a double standard

BigSister
19-07-2014, 01:16 PM
I think they should replace her as she left and usually I agree with housemates being replaced if they leave of their own choosing. However if they don't I think there should be no eviction this week

Josy
19-07-2014, 01:18 PM
No there's still too much of them in there as it is.

Marc
19-07-2014, 01:40 PM
Bit they can get away with it, as the whole point of vote to save is to save your favourites, not evict someone else. So people who voted Pav/Zoe to get Biannca out aren't technically using the system properly, which is why she'd be allowed to come back if necessary.

It's wasted money and it wouldn't be fair for those who voted.

M X
19-07-2014, 01:42 PM
Yes, bring back Danielle.

LukeB
19-07-2014, 01:43 PM
bring back danielle! as it bring less complaints in

Marsh.
19-07-2014, 01:45 PM
They probably won't bother because they still needed to get rid of a few in time for the finale, now the numbers are down somewhat reasonably.

I wouldn't mind if Danielle went back in because it wasn't a public vote eviction but then again now she's been out it's never the same when you put them back in so I'd rather they didn't.

They shouldn't put a brand new housemate in, it's far too late.

susie q
19-07-2014, 01:47 PM
The original series always replaced housemates who left for reasons other than being evicted. I think the currant series should do the same. I wouldnt mind Danielle going back in because I quite liked her, and felt that she was unfairly evicted particularly as it looked as if Kimberley would have gone anyway. Wouldnt want Bianca back in, because she was basically evicted by us, also I thought she was a vile person(Yes I do realise that Im probably the only one on this forum who thinks this) who would almost have certainly carried on with the same behaviour that she indulged in over the last 4 days, plus finding someone else to bitch about with Helen.
I wouldnt mind if a new housemate was brought in, I think it should be a female to balance things up a bit.

minny03
19-07-2014, 01:47 PM
Yes, of course. Once again the female housemates are dropping like flies. Three girls gone in one night. So frustrating.

CaudleHalbard
19-07-2014, 01:51 PM
Lol @ assumptions that Danielle would want to go back in - with her cover blown and totally discredited.

Ashleigh wouldn't even want to speak to her!

Marsh.
19-07-2014, 01:52 PM
The original series always replaced housemates who left for reasons other than being evicted. I think the currant series should do the same. I wouldnt mind Danielle going back in because I quite liked her, and felt that she was unfairly evicted particularly as it looked as if Kimberley would have gone anyway. Wouldnt want Bianca back in, because she was basically evicted by us, also I thought she was a vile person(Yes I do realise that Im probably the only one on this forum who thinks this) who would almost have certainly carried on with the same behaviour that she indulged in over the last 4 days, plus finding someone else to bitch about with Helen.
I wouldnt mind if a new housemate was brought in, I think it should be a female to balance things up a bit.

But we have two newbies who arrived on Monday so I think they more than compensate for being down 1 extra housemate.

Samm
19-07-2014, 01:54 PM
No there's still too much of them in there as it is.

No there isn't they didn't plan Kimberly to leave so they would of expected more, it's not to late either KInga was officially a housemates in BB6 a week away from the final

Headie
19-07-2014, 01:54 PM
She was voted out by the public where is the technicality SH?

It's wasted money and it wouldn't be fair for those who voted.

She received the least votes to keep her in, so less money was spent on her.

No one voted to evict her, they voted to save someone else. So if people paid money to save Pav & Zoe, good on them because Pav & Zoe are still there, but if Biannca was to go back in, Pav & Zoe would still be there and the money would not have been wasted.

The whole point of Vote to Save isn't to get somebody out, it's to keep someone in. People should've thought about that when they were voting for Zoe/Pav.

Me. I Am Salman
19-07-2014, 01:55 PM
newbie pls

Vicky.
19-07-2014, 01:57 PM
I disagree with putting people back in really, BUT Danielle was evicted unfairly really, and without a public vote too so I wouldn't be completely opposed to her going back in

A newbie at this stage is silly really but we do need some more girls in there now

Marsh.
19-07-2014, 01:57 PM
She received the least votes to keep her in, so less money was spent on her.

No one voted to evict her, they voted to save someone else. So if people paid money to save Pav & Zoe, good on them because Pav & Zoe are still there, but if Biannca was to go back in, Pav & Zoe would still be there and the money would not have been wasted.

The whole point of Vote to Save isn't to get somebody out, it's to keep someone in. People should've thought about that when they were voting for Zoe/Pav.

It still renders the public vote pointless if all of them stay?

That's fairly obvious.

Saying "We're going to be evicting one of the newbies so you better vote to save your favourite" then changing to "All 3 are staying in anyway so your votes are meaningless" is not going to happen.

aimat2
19-07-2014, 02:00 PM
come on BB get Jenny in for Helen

daniel-lewis-1985
19-07-2014, 02:00 PM
Why do people want Danielle back she admitted she was putting on an act although she only really admitted it slightly it was written all over her face that she had been caught out.

She has nothing more to bring to the show unless she goes back in as the girl she really is, the glamour model who earns money on webcam.

CaudleHalbard
19-07-2014, 02:01 PM
I don't mind someone completely new going in - even another guy. I'm not sexist! ;)

Ramsay
19-07-2014, 02:03 PM
Danielle's already been out for a day and she's already told everyone her gameplan so that's kind of ****ed but if they were to put someone back in it should be her. poor girl, complete and uttterly robbed.

Jake.
19-07-2014, 02:05 PM
Lol @ assumptions that Danielle would want to go back in - with her cover blown and totally discredited.

Ashleigh wouldn't even want to speak to her!

Pretty sure she would given how she was still speaking to her after Biannca 'spilled', and she said that she missed her after

CaudleHalbard
19-07-2014, 02:07 PM
Pav and Zoe have probably spilled a good deal more since Danielle's departure! ;)

Marsh.
19-07-2014, 02:08 PM
Oh I don't know, Ashleigh came around after Danielle convinced her it wasn't what she thought. Which, to be fair, it wasn't. It seems her webcam persona is the same as her BB persona.

So when Ashleigh sees both are complete fakes then she might be taken aback.

But tbh, I can't see any friendships/relationships holding outside of this series. They're all bell ends.

CaudleHalbard
19-07-2014, 02:11 PM
But tbh, I can't see any friendships/relationships holding outside of this series. They're all bell ends.

:D

Strictly Jake
19-07-2014, 02:13 PM
Only just came on this! Shocked Kim is out for good! But quite pleased! I want Danielle back on but it's not gonna happen

fitz2k2
19-07-2014, 02:15 PM
Didn't realize there only 3 girls left. Damn (Gordon ramsey voice)

AarynGriesfan
19-07-2014, 03:42 PM
Kimberly screwed Danielle over the most so I think she should be put back in.

Johnnyuk123
19-07-2014, 03:59 PM
Just give Steveo the psycho a blow up doll with kimbots face on it, he won't notice the difference.

Marc
19-07-2014, 04:08 PM
It'll be full of hot air as well :hehe:

LukeB
19-07-2014, 04:10 PM
Look at Marlon with 0

Brother Leon
19-07-2014, 04:11 PM
Danielle or Marlon should be put back in as it wasn't a public vote.


Bianca didn't get enough votes to stay. Tough **** for her.

Bluerang1
19-07-2014, 04:13 PM
Danielle since she got screwed over and money wasn't spent to Evict her

Achilles
19-07-2014, 04:14 PM
The only way she should be replaced is if there was a public vote for either Marlon or Danielle to be given a second chance in the house. Both were unfairly evicted. That would make it fair for both as the public have had their say. Don't want to see any new housemate, had enough of them. No evicted housemates should go back because that's always bollocks. Public evict you out, you should stay out.

I actually think they should do it because it would be a way for BB to redeem themselves for the complete failure that was Armageddon. Kimberly walking gives them the excuse to do it as well.

mooo
19-07-2014, 04:17 PM
Theres a petition to get danielle back on the show

Achilles
19-07-2014, 04:18 PM
Theres a petition to get danielle back on the show

There shouldn't be a petition for one and not the other, because that means they are only pissed at the person who went and not the principle of it.

Marlon vs Danielle public vote is fair to BOTH.

Brooklyn
19-07-2014, 04:18 PM
I'd like a new housemate more than anything else, but what is done is done. I'm okay with no replacement for Kim.

Razor
19-07-2014, 06:26 PM
I don't want to see any of them back.

Kim was boring
Danielle was annoying and fake

Adamw92
19-07-2014, 06:28 PM
I don't particularly want her replaced but I think if they do, it should be with Danielle.

ruiphillips
19-07-2014, 06:33 PM
Queen Bianca should make her iconic entrance

clao
19-07-2014, 06:33 PM
i could imagine the look on some of the people's faces in the the house if danielle just strolled back in :bigsmile:

Northern Monkey
19-07-2014, 06:38 PM
Toya should come back,Proper Armagedon!

Jamesy
19-07-2014, 06:38 PM
Either Biannca or no one tbh.

No point in putting anyone back in anyway. The house is overcrowded so this has just made it easier to get rid of a load of people in one go.

armand.kay
19-07-2014, 06:45 PM
#JusticForDanni #BringHaBack #KimIsABitch

Jordan.
19-07-2014, 07:04 PM
Yeah with someone new

Lex
19-07-2014, 07:05 PM
For FAIRNESS' sake, Danielle has got to go back in.


And have the power to evict just like Pav and Zoe had! :cheer2:

wormsinfested
19-07-2014, 07:10 PM
New housemate, **** Danielle!!