Do you like face to face nominations?

[zakman440]

?

[mrflibble]

No, just gives them an excuse to pick on the housemates they know won't cause much fuss (or are likely to go). Takes away some of the honesty, I think.

[LukeB]

yeah i think its great, would of liked friends and family noms

[Marsh.]

No because they're never done properly anyway.

[Lostie!]

No, there's too much dithering and false "Oh, it's so hard, I'm sorry, this is a crap reason but it's all I can think of", etc. Some people aren't fully honest when it's face-to-face.

[coffee]

They act fake as hell. I hate seeing them fake cry and fake sadness as they mutter the person they ****ing HATES name.

[tanussa]

does anyone know if they are live face to face noms?

[erinp5]

Nope because it turns out to be follow the leader .

[Adamw92]

Sometimes but I hate when they block vote someone thinking it's funny

[joeysteele]

Once or twice in a series but no more for me.

[Bedouin]

Nope.

[dyfed]

I read somewhere the suggestion to let them do the noms in the dairy room,but show it back to all of them later....sounds like a plan to set them off...

[joeysteele]

I read somewhere the suggestion to let them do the noms in the dairy room,but show it back to all of them later....sounds like a plan to set them off...

I like it when they do that.

[reece(:]

They should be used sparingly, not once or twice a series.

[VanessaFeltz.]

No because they can change their minds or they can be scared and target the easy targets. For example mark will kill them if they nominate him

[Achilles]

I prefer private nominations in diary room but remove the "no talking about nominations" rule. Housemates can easily get round it anyway by having chats such as "who do you least get on with" etc and always have done. If remove the no discussing nominations rule, you can have tactical voting and alliances, BUT a housemate will be able to change their mind in privacy of diary room.

[Vanessa]

yes, i do. I love watching them squirm. :laugh:

[Johnnyuk123]

It only works if they nominate in the diary room first so they can't change their minds on live on tv.

[Vanessa]

Someone always tries to cheat. :joker:

[chuff me dizzy]

No ,not at all ,all of them will bottle it, Ash won't get a single vote because people will be scared of a backlash from Helen ,Mark won't be chosen either, its the quite one ,the ones who won't kick off who are in danger, therefore Pv,Christopher,Chris in danger

[bots]

So much depends on the order of the noms if its live. They might react a bit differently if there is cash involved as this is supposed to be money power week. I also think it will be set up to show up the hypocrisy displayed when Marlon hit the button

[Daffodil]

No, just gives them an excuse to pick on the housemates they know won't cause much fuss (or are likely to go). Takes away some of the honesty, I think.

Completely agree with you. It allows the bullies to get to the next stage :(

[Ellen]

Only if they have told BB who they will nominate first and then if they change it at face to face BB can replay their original selection and that will be the one that counts.

[PrincessIona]

Usually I don't like it but this time I don't really mind

[Sophiee]

it might be overdone but yes I always enjoy them.

[Jack_]

Not really because they never have the desired effect and the reasons are always timid and lame

What would be better is if they let them nominate normally and then broadcast them in full on the plasma a day later. That's what they should do more often instead of face to face

[Jay.]

Yeah, I find normal nominations boring.