View Full Version : BB's biased pro-Helen editing of the trial
jegmeister
11-08-2014, 08:37 PM
No mention of the long list of HMs that Christopher read out who Helen had argued with.
No mention of Helen contradicting Stephen's assertion that Helen never says anything behind anyone's backs.
Very selective and biased editing there.
ruiphillips
11-08-2014, 08:38 PM
who cares, Queen Ashleigh 4 the win
Lstan
11-08-2014, 08:40 PM
No mention of the long list of HMs that Christopher read out who Helen had argued with.
No mention of Helen contradicting Stephen's assertion that Helen never says anything behind anyone's backs.
Very selective and biased editing there.
...but ashleigh won anyway right?
rusticgal
11-08-2014, 08:47 PM
It's propaganda...she will never win
jegmeister
11-08-2014, 08:48 PM
...but ashleigh won anyway right?
she did but you wouldn't have thought so from the editing. Those 2 points were the most crucial in undermining Helen's case so why leave them out?
jessicadanielle
11-08-2014, 08:52 PM
Even with pro-Helen editing she came across pretty awfully.
Her remark when creating their speech about Ashleigh, "she only makes friends with people who are uglier and not as cool as her" (or something like that, apologies if inaccurate) oozed envy, bitterness, and was really really pathetic. How can she be so outraged at people calling them cool kids, when she's judging Ashleigh based on the appearance of herself and her friends. That's exactly what the self-proclaimed cool kids at school would say.
Achilles
11-08-2014, 09:10 PM
It was very pro-Helen and Anti-Ashleigh. Why was no mention made of Helen's warnings and bullying behaviour? Why didn't they talk about Jale being called a slug? Why didn't we hear anything about how Helen and her nasty gang bullied Christopher calling him boring? Helen and her nasty gang are vile and yet BB constantly try and make them out to be nice people. It's disgusting. BB love nasty people like Helen and Conor
BigBrotherfan4ever
11-08-2014, 09:20 PM
No mention of the long list of HMs that Christopher read out who Helen had argued with.
No mention of Helen contradicting Stephen's assertion that Helen never says anything behind anyone's backs.
Very selective and biased editing there.
I just said that in another thread, I thought the edit was very pro Helen tonight, more so than usual.
SocietyIsRuined
11-08-2014, 09:36 PM
Everything this week has been pro-Helen. They want her and Ash for the Daily Star and the trash mags. That's why the show has been crap, they don't care about the show. Only about the papers.
Macie Lightfoot
11-08-2014, 09:38 PM
Who cares? All this does is rehash things we already know because Channel 5 loves to run the same storylines to the ground. We learned nothing new about Ashleigh and nothing new about Helen.
joeysteele
11-08-2014, 09:40 PM
This was another total farce of a task and when I saw waste of space Judy James as the judge it was even moreso farcical.
Let's hope Judy James never takes up law,far too prejudiced.
susie q
11-08-2014, 09:54 PM
Unfortunately I missed most of tonights episode, and am having internet connection problems, can anyone download some videos particularly of Christopher in action
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.