PDA

View Full Version : Nine-year-old Girl Fatally Shoots Instructor with Uzi


Crimson Dynamo
27-08-2014, 09:15 AM
Nine-year-old Girl Fatally Shoots Instructor with Uzi


Read more at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=376_1409096283#P4pz08dfVrbDmD9H.99


Words fail me

MB.
27-08-2014, 09:47 AM
Because taking a nine year old to a place called 'Bullets and Burgers' seems the rational thing to do

Kizzy
27-08-2014, 11:36 AM
Poor girl how is she ever going to live with this? :(

Jordan.
27-08-2014, 11:40 AM
why does the video cut off http://i.imgur.com/8KAD4SF.gif

Saph
27-08-2014, 11:43 AM
why does the video cut off http://i.imgur.com/8KAD4SF.gif

mte

Northern Monkey
27-08-2014, 10:18 PM
What kind of f'kin idiot puts an Uzi in the hands of a 9 year old?Oh dear,Some people can never be cured of stupidity.

michael21
28-08-2014, 08:57 AM
mad bloody mad

user104658
28-08-2014, 02:53 PM
Anyone who has fired a gun SURELY knows that a 9 year old girl isn't going to be able to handle the recoil?? I was in the atc (airforce cadets) for 4 years and there was a height / size restriction on who could use the firing range because smaller kids can't handle the recoil. And this is 12+ year old with .22 rifles braced against the shoulder, lying prone. So yeah... Why not hand a ****ing UZI to a little girl! Weeeeee!

The positive spin on this story is that she shot the idiot who handed the thing to her when she could have QUITE EASILY have accidentally shot herself. Tragic as it is that someone has died, and that she will have that image in her head forever, it would have been so much worse if she (or another by standing child? I'd bet there were some) had been hit.

GiRTh
28-08-2014, 02:56 PM
Unbelievable. You can see the moment where she loses control of the gun. How the ****** do they expect a nine year old to be able to control such a thing?

Crimson Dynamo
28-08-2014, 03:00 PM
I saw a vid last week where i guy is at a range and he turns and points the gun at the instructor who is seated 10 feet away and pretend to shoot him only he did shoot him in the head, dead.

More toddlers killed americans with guns in 2013 than were killed at Sandyhook!

Benjamin
28-08-2014, 03:03 PM
I saw a vid last week where i guy is at a range and he turns and points the gun at the instructor who is seated 10 feet away and pretend to shoot him only he did shoot him in the head, dead.

More toddlers killed americans with guns in 2013 than were killed at Sandyhook!

I saw that one too. Glad there is another Liveleak nut on here, I felt like the only one. :laugh:

Xtopher
28-08-2014, 03:05 PM
I was actually at that shooting range just a couple months ago when I was on a road trip to Vegas. This is crazy.

Livia
28-08-2014, 03:08 PM
Kids of nine shouldn't be firing air rifles, let alone automatic weapons. This is just ****ing madness, plain and simple.

arista
28-08-2014, 04:03 PM
Kids of nine shouldn't be firing air rifles, let alone automatic weapons. This is just ****ing madness, plain and simple.



Yes But in America
its the Land of Guns
plain and simple


And parents pay for the kids fun day out

user104658
28-08-2014, 05:09 PM
Yes But in America
its the Land of Guns
plain and simple


And parents pay for the kids fun day out

And in the land of the free, nothing quite screams "fun" like involuntary manslaughter.

arista
28-08-2014, 05:16 PM
And in the land of the free, nothing quite screams "fun" like involuntary manslaughter.


Sure
this case is very rare , though

Livia
28-08-2014, 06:49 PM
Yes But in America
its the Land of Guns
plain and simple


And parents pay for the kids fun day out

I understand that. Sadly they cling on to their right to bear arms with both hands, claiming it as their absolute right. At the time the Second Amendment came into being it was still acceptable to keep slaves... which goes some way to explaining how out of touch and out of date this right is. Keeping hand guns and shotguns is one thing... keeping automatic and semi-automatic weapons and allowing children to use them takes it to another level. And in a country where you can't legally drink alcohol till you're 21.

Marc
28-08-2014, 07:01 PM
I wanna see it all pls

Tom4784
28-08-2014, 07:01 PM
Few adults could handle the recoil of an automatic weapon the first time they fired it never mind a 9 year old girl. It's just a moronic waste of life that's going to haunt this poor girl for the rest of her's.

I do not understand why an instructor and the girl's parents would be stupid enough to let her use an Uzi, Hell, why is she playing with guns in the first place? It's just completely negligent and endangering behaviour by the parents.

Kizzy
28-08-2014, 07:02 PM
At the time there were no automatic weapons either so i'm guessing it was nigh on impossible to accidentally shoot someone?

Tom4784
28-08-2014, 07:18 PM
I understand that. Sadly they cling on to their right to bear arms with both hands, claiming it as their absolute right. At the time the Second Amendment came into being it was still acceptable to keep slaves... which goes some way to explaining how out of touch and out of date this right is. Keeping hand guns and shotguns is one thing... keeping automatic and semi-automatic weapons and allowing children to use them takes it to another level. And in a country where you can't legally drink alcohol till you're 21.

The second Ammendment is just painfully outdated, one of the main reasons for it's existence is so that Americans can defend themselves against an oppressive government but in this day and age what good would a gun do against a Drone Strike?

user104658
29-08-2014, 07:09 PM
The second Ammendment is just painfully outdated, one of the main reasons for it's existence is so that Americans can defend themselves against an oppressive government but in this day and age what good would a gun do against a Drone Strike?

Exactly, it's completely pointless. Even taking tech like that out of the equation, a town full of armed civilians wouldn't stand a chance against a relatively small unit of soldiers with trained marksmen, explosives, etc.

At the very least, there should be a strict age limit on who can handle firearms, and obtaining a license should involve formal training and a test, as with driving. It's not the RIGHT to own a gun that I take issue with... I'm generally against prohibition... It's the ease with which they're obtained. We have the right to own guns (except handguns, since the aftermath of Dunblane) in the UK too but far fewer people do own one, because obtaining a license is a lengthier process and of course there just isn't the same "gun culture".