Is it fair that BB chose James and Audley and gave them immunity?

[zakman440]

Inspired by bbspy.

506179186772676608

[ThriceShy]

BB is dead. Nobody has any input apart from the producers.

Who remembers the good old days when BB would give them a laminate with task instructions and the housemates democratically chose who would be involved in tasks.

How long do they think they can get away with this before even the braindead viewers catch on.

I think this is the last series I will watch.

[jessicadanielle]

It's not fair at all but I put "Don't care" cause I find it hard to care in Celeb when they're not competing for any personal benefit. I'd be pissed if it was civilian though, not fair to give someone a better shot at the 100k without reason

[Xtopher]

It's pretty much a setup so James doesn't go up this week.

[JoshBB]

I am annoyed. Immunity shouldn't be awarded in a task where not everyone can compete for it.

[Flamingjoe]

It's bull****. The producers literally just chose to give them immunity. I'm sick of the Channel 5 producers just picking people to do stuff like this.

[Sophiee]

definitely not, they should have all been eligible to compete to win a task.

[Brother Leon]

In fairness I don't see any of the others having stayed there the full time. They picked who would be best for the task and they both proved BB right in their performance.

[Calderyon]

It should have been that the winning team would get immunity and if there was a tie, no would have been immune.

[Angelika]

BB takes all the fun away from the viewers these days.

I would agree to Gary getting immunity till the end of the show to prevent the others voting him out. It would teach hem all a valuable lesson. Most of the HM's have been ageist, and intolerant of his hearing disability.

[Margarine.]

Not at all.

[bots]

I am annoyed. Immunity shouldn't be awarded in a task where not everyone can compete for it.

This. Its completely unfair. They should have come up with a task that any hm was capable of taking part in to win the immunity.

[reece(:]

Another of many unfair twists from C5.

[the truth]

its a disgrace. its also bordering on illegal with the amount of betting on big brother

[ozzyshaggah]

i can understand pitting these to together
but giving them immunity is wrong

smacks of B U L L S H I T to me

[Rob!]

I couldn't care less to be honest. I don't like either of them and in the same vein neither of them deserve to go this week either.

[ThriceShy]

I couldn't care less to be honest. I don't like either of them and in the same vein neither of them deserve to go this week either.

But it isn't about deserving to go. The whole point and premise of this show was that the housemates nominate each other and we vote them out.

You should care that it is the producers who are deciding who is up for eviction.

[jaxie]

No because James need to go and be sectioned.

[Patricia4]

jaxie he does :joker:

NO

[waterhog]

the rules of the game are in BB hand - we all have to accept that. the fact we had 2 people that would not back down to give them both a reward seems fare to me.

[Robodog]

Normally no - it's not fair.

But if it gets Ricci out this week - it will be worth it.

[ebandit]

poor task..............poor result..............you decide

Mark L

[Pincho Paxton]

Now we don't get to hear the crowd boo James. I think Emma should just call all of their names out for a laugh! At the end she can say "James, Audley.... you are safe."