Neil 'Dr.' Fox latest to be held over 'sexual assaults'

[Shaun]

Radio DJ Neil Fox - known as "Dr Fox" - has been arrested in London by police investigating claims of historical sex offences.

The arrest came after separate allegations were made by two women, the BBC understands.

According to reports, he was arrested in Soho at the studios of Magic FM, where he presents the breakfast show.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-29431833

[arista]

Not him

[Crimson Dynamo]

:whistle:

[arista]

http://www.primeperformersagency.co.uk/uploads/images/speakers/220x220/Neil-Fox.jpg

Hey fella
do not point at me
I did not arrest you

[Crimson Dynamo]

Wait till they find out he isnt even a real doctor...

[arista]

Wait till they find out he isnt even a real doctor...

http://www.ukgameshows.com/atoz/people/f/fox_neil/NeilFox1.jpg

[Jack_]

Oh dear :umm2: my brother in law used to work with him, how weird

[arista]

Oh dear :umm2: my brother in law used to work with him, how weird


He may not know of this
this is years back when he was at the BBC
a place that let many break laws

[Ithinkiloveyoutoo]

for crying out loud. Does anyone not assault?

[Gusto Brunt]

I'm not defending any pervert, BUT I hear one man got 6 months prison sentence suspended for 18 months for patting a woman's botty. :eek:

If I had got charged all the people who had pinched my bum in nightclubs and bars they'd all be doing 60 years collectively. :D

[Marc]

Interesting. I wouldn't be surprised though

[Ithinkiloveyoutoo]

Is this a conspiracy? Is the government plotting to bring down every established public figure with fabricated stories for whatever reason?
















(no)

[Crimson Dynamo]

h8Q8gZK76u4





:umm2:

[arista]

LT he is now with Magic Radio in Sexy Soho

http://wwwcdn.channel5.com/assets/images/000/050/944/full_left_column_Neil_Fox.jpg?1385655060

[Crimson Dynamo]

LT he is now with Magic Radio

Well he will have to conjure something up to avoid a DLT

[arista]

I'm not defending any pervert, BUT I hear one man got 6 months prison sentence suspended for 18 months for patting a woman's botty. :eek:

If I had got charged all the people who had pinched my bum in nightclubs and bars they'd all be doing 60 years collectively. :D



At least its
not a child

[arista]

Well he will have to conjure something up to avoid a DLT


http://thetvroom.com/images/pool-1/104/main-93.jpg

[joeysteele]

He may not know of this
this is years back when he was at the BBC
a place that let many break laws

I think the BBC has a great deal to answer as to these cases actually, you make a strong point in my view.

They have been paying the wages of people from all people having to pay them a licence fee and quite frankly I think the BBC need to be called to account for what has been happening in their studios,suppled dressing rooms and also as to the staff they have been employing.

Really shocking a state funded organisation, funded by compulsory enforcement of a licence fee for just about everyone,has found itself so involved in such cases by the people it 'chose' to employ,often at extremely high fees too.

If you didn't pay the licence fee,then you could have got a criminal record for not doing so,it should be also criminal for the negligence of the BBC as to what has happened often on their premises by those employed by it to entertain its viewers.

[arista]

http://static.entertainmentwise.com/photos/Image/wenn20486981.jpg
Hey fella
put that away
I do not know where
its been



Life In The City

[Gusto Brunt]

At least its
not a child

Not part of the Jimmy Savile investigations.

[arista]

Not part of the Jimmy Savile investigations.



But still while under Poxy BBC

[arista]

http://cdn2-b.examiner.com/sites/default/files/styles/image_content_width/hash/1b/d3/1bd3662387a4e8d3ccfaf2d58ab3fced.jpg?itok=iWNI2FMr


Yes but have a shave

[arista]

http://www.radiocentre.org/files/hm7_4101.crop.jpg


No Fella
you can not Fly out of this one



Its 2 women that claim
you had them while at the Poxy BBC




Sign Of The Times

[user104658]

Read this last night and the first comment on the article was: "I'm a doctor, miss... Honest."

Heh.

[kirklancaster]

I think the BBC has a great deal to answer as to these cases actually, you make a strong point in my view.

They have been paying the wages of people from all people having to pay them a licence fee and quite frankly I think the BBC need to be called to account for what has been happening in their studios,suppled dressing rooms and also as to the staff they have been employing.

Really shocking a state funded organisation, funded by compulsory enforcement of a licence fee for just about everyone,has found itself so involved in such cases by the people it 'chose' to employ,often at extremely high fees too.

If you didn't pay the licence fee,then you could have got a criminal record for not doing so,it should be also criminal for the negligence of the BBC as to what has happened often on their premises by those employed by it to entertain its viewers.

Excellent. :clap1::clap1:

[arista]

SkyNewsHD just confirmed DJ N. Fox
has now been arrested a 3rd time

[arista]

Charged With Nine Sex Offences

http://news.sky.com/story/1450904/dj-neil-fox-charged-with-nine-sex-offences

[Crimson Dynamo]

hopefully he will be struck off

[arista]

hopefully he will be struck off


DJ Fox


Shaun should change his heading now he has been charged

[Crimson Dynamo]

This news has not left me surprised...

[arista]

This news has not left me surprised...


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/10/01/1412155179106_wps_16_DJ_Neil_Fox_Dr_Fox_at_his.jpg

[arista]

http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/50860000/jpg/_50860298_jex_929620_de27-1.jpg
No fella
no escape this time

[arista]

[Dr Fox 'Exploited Fame To Abuse Teenage Fans'
The former Pop Idol judge used his celebrity to "inflict himself upon adolescent girls", his sex assault trial is told.]

The DJ is saying he still not guilty.

["She describes how on one occasion
Mr Fox asked her to help him carry his records
to the underground car park."
Alone and out of sight, Fox allegedly kissed her.
On a second occasion he asked her
to accompany him and then molested her,
the jury heard.]


http://news.sky.com/story/1582411/dr-fox-exploited-fame-to-abuse-teenage-fans

[arista]

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/12/14/15/2F5E1F7A00000578-0-image-m-104_1450107487347.jpg
Dr Fox weeps in the dock as he is found not guilty of sexually and indecently assaulting young fans and colleagues

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3359520/DJ-Dr-Fox-not-guilty-indecent-sexual-assaults-women-girls.html#ixzz3uJYKgXEY


http://news.sky.com/story/1605769/dj-neil-fox-cleared-of-sex-assault-charges

[Northern Monkey]

I hope the women who falsely accused him are now arrested and jailed for trying to ruin a mans life.

[Niamh.]

I hope the women who falsely accused him are now arrested and jailed for trying to ruin a mans life.

You can't do that unless they could actually prove that these women were lying though. Presumably he was found not guilty because there wasn't evidence to back their claims (which I have no doubt is a common occurrence in sexual assault cases) that isn't proof that they made it up, it's just not enough to prove that he did assault them :shrug:

ETA : I'm not saying I believe he did do it, I'm just saying he probably was found not guilty as it was a one word against another type thing

[lostalex]

I hope the women who falsely accused him are now arrested and jailed for trying to ruin a mans life.

why would they be jailed? just because he was found not guilty does NOT mean that he is innocent, it just means that they couldn't PROVE he was guilty.

If they have to prove someone is a rapist, then you should also have to prove that they were lying. how will you prove that they are lying?

how can you prove someone is lying???

it's just as hard to prove that they were lying as it is to prove that they were raped.

this is why so many rapists get away with it, because there is never enough evidence, it's always just he said/she said.

[gamepodfan]

nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

not the pop idol god

[user104658]

why would they be jailed? just because he was found not guilty does NOT mean that he is innocent, it just means that they couldn't PROVE he was guilty.

If they have to prove someone is a rapist, then you should also have to prove that they were lying. how will you prove that they are lying?

how can you prove someone is lying???

it's just as hard to prove that they were lying as it is to prove that they were raped.

this is why so many rapists get away with it, because there is never enough evidence, it's always just he said/she said.

Indeed. You can't charge the woman with anything - or in my opinion, even assume that she IS lying - without proof. You just have to accept that the truth remains unknown.

If, for example, some concrete evidence for example was to come to light then it MIGHT be a different story - say for example, someone was accused of raping someone "last tuesday" but then CCTV footage of them at a hotel in another country every day that week was shown...

But not very often that you get things like that happening. The vast majority of rape accusations go without anyone ever being charged. Plenty of those will have been guilty men walking free. Like Neem, I'm not saying that this is what has happened in this case, just that it's simply untrue to say that it doesn't happen and like I said above - you just have to accept that the women MIGHT be lying, but still MIGHT NOT, and so definitely should not be punished for coming forward.

[arista]

You can't do that unless they could actually prove that these women were lying though. Presumably he was found not guilty because there wasn't evidence to back their claims (which I have no doubt is a common occurrence in sexual assault cases) that isn't proof that they made it up, it's just not enough to prove that he did assault them :shrug:

ETA : I'm not saying I believe he did do it, I'm just saying he probably was found not guilty as it was a one word against another type thing


Yes Complex


He was Crying outside the court
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/12/14/15/2F5E230600000578-0-image-a-105_1450107810287.jpg

[arista]

http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/50860000/jpg/_50860298_jex_929620_de27-1.jpg
No fella
no escape this time



OK Fella
you are now free from this
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/12/14/16/article-3359520-2F5EA3F900000578-737_964x523.jpg

[bots]

Indeed. You can't charge the woman with anything - or in my opinion, even assume that she IS lying - without proof. You just have to accept that the truth remains unknown.

If, for example, some concrete evidence for example was to come to light then it MIGHT be a different story - say for example, someone was accused of raping someone "last tuesday" but then CCTV footage of them at a hotel in another country every day that week was shown...

But not very often that you get things like that happening. The vast majority of rape accusations go without anyone ever being charged. Plenty of those will have been guilty men walking free. Like Neem, I'm not saying that this is what has happened in this case, just that it's simply untrue to say that it doesn't happen and like I said above - you just have to accept that the women MIGHT be lying, but still MIGHT NOT, and so definitely should not be punished for coming forward.

It would certainly be an interesting system if either the accused or accuser went to jail :laugh:

The woman would need to have been held in contempt of court if her testimony was deemed to be full of falsehood. Clearly that was not the case here.

I do like the system where there are 3 possible outcomes; Innocent, Guilty and not proven, but unfortunately not proven has now been associated with got off with it, so from a who sues who perspective, the clear either or choice is the only system that currently works.

[empire]

Remember what paul gambaccini said about the flypaper trap, him and jim davidson both said in there books, and it exposed what the police and the media where doing, because they are all sitting in the same room, everyone of those guys have been hounded, persecuted, and called everything, and I mean everything, the police have wasted public money, for a PR machine, their seems to be a culture of compensation, these days, because people will do anything for money, and even go this low for it, these guys have now had their lives ruined, and put through hell, because the police put up a website that says, have you been tapped on the bottom, or hugged by a celebrity, years ago, then we will believe you, and we will take him to court, the british public have this sick perversion in them to hear what the media tells them, I believe dj fox is a victim of the flypaper trap, these drumhead trials must stop, calum best was nearly thrown into the flytrap by a money grabber, who wanted more than just a few notes spread on the bed, I believe the future for celebs, is that their agents and PR teams will tell them not to hug or kiss, their fans, or put their arms around them for a photo, because it will lead to a false accusation, being made, and their is the price of a loony world we live in today,

[lostalex]

It would certainly be an interesting system if either the accused or accuser went to jail :laugh:

The woman would need to have been held in contempt of court if her testimony was deemed to be full of falsehood. Clearly that was not the case here.

I do like the system where there are 3 possible outcomes; Innocent, Guilty and not proven, but unfortunately not proven has now been associated with got off with it, so from a who sues who perspective, the clear either or choice is the only system that currently works.


but even if that was the case, ACTUALLY raping someone is still a million times worse than lying about someone raping you.

I don't like how some people seem to be implying that being accused of rape is just as bad as actually BEING raped. because it;s not. it's not even in the same universe.

[Niamh.]

but even if that was the case, ACTUALLY raping someone is still a million times worse than lying about someone raping you.



I don't like how some people seem to be implying that being accused of rape is just as bad as actually BEING raped. because it;s not. it's not even in the same universe.


The two aren't comparable but one thing they do have in common is they can both ruin a persons life

[Crimson Dynamo]

well done Foxy

[Johnnyuk123]

Foxy now for Strictly Come Dancing. Obviously the foxtrot.

[the truth]

he doesn't look well....lets hope he sues these lying scumbags for a fortune

[empire]

From what I heard in the news, there where alot of female obsessed fans who where a bit nutty, they camped outside the studio, even followed him home, and yes stalked him, it raises questions about why this was brought to court, some of them seem madly in love with him, but he rejected them, I think some of them need professional help,

[Johnnyuk123]

From what I heard in the news, there where alot of female obsessed fans who where a bit nutty, they camped outside the studio, even followed him home, and yes stalked him, it raises questions about why this was brought to court, some of them seem madly in love with him, but he rejected them, I think some of them need professional help,

And the men who stalked him too.

[the truth]

From what I heard in the news, there where alot of female obsessed fans who where a bit nutty, they camped outside the studio, even followed him home, and yes stalked him, it raises questions about why this was brought to court, some of them seem madly in love with him, but he rejected them, I think some of them need professional help,

trouble is that wastes even more millions of tax payers money

Heres a snippet from the long suffering innocent jim Davidson, falsely accused by a pack of gold digging liars who got off unnamed unashamed and unimprisoned...jim lost 100s of thousands of pounds, 2 years of his career, reputation in tatters life destroyed


"It was once that in merry old England you got a fair trial. Not any more. In their rush to increase the conviction rate, the government of the day, with David (himself the subject of sex scandal) Blunkett as the Justice Minister, decided to breach Article 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998, by taking away the presumption of innocence. This was achieved in subtle fashion by taking away the warning to Juries, "about the dangers of convicting a person on the unsupported say so of of a claimant." Thus, any person making a gold-digging [false] claim of abuse, will be believed, because the trial judge has not told them differently. After that little ruse and other amendments in the Sexual Offences Act 2003, the conviction rate soared - filling our prisons with many innocent men in the process. Did you say "prats?", If you did, we tend to agree. So come on all you claimants, why not accuse a politician of giving you one up the rear? Give them a taste of their own medicine. There is no need for proof and it won't matter if when they inspect your anal passage that they find no evidence of trauma - believe us, that will be put down to some incredible healing power. Bull****! But that is what is happening out there today. It's true."



When it come to historical allegations, there is almost no chance of mounting a defence. Any witnesses to provide an alibi will long since have forgotten about dates and times. Your own diaries will have been thrown away and other information such as telephone bills, etc, will be long gone.

[lostalex]

From what I heard in the news, there where alot of female obsessed fans who where a bit nutty, they camped outside the studio, even followed him home, and yes stalked him, it raises questions about why this was brought to court, some of them seem madly in love with him, but he rejected them, I think some of them need professional help,

are you saying that if a girl loves a boy she can't be raped by the boy she loved? do you know that the vast majority of rapes happen from a man that a girl trusts?

mot rapes hoopoe between a woman and a man that she trusts. most rapes happen from a husband raping his wife or a boyfriend raping his girlfriend.

people still have this silly idea that rapes happen in dark parking lots, or back alleys, but it's not true. a woman is most likely to be raped in her own bed by someone she trusts.

so what if they were stupid and naive, do stupid and naive people deserve to be raped?

this man is a celebrity, and many women felt like they could trust him, or like they knew him, the way we all feel like we know celebrities.

[empire]

even jimmy tarbuck, got the trick treatment, a woman said that he and his road managers, sexually assaulted her in his dressing room on top of the pops, in london, in 1963, but most people will know, that TOTP, started in 1964, and the studio was in the city of manchester, for three years, and tarbuck never appeared on the show, this was backed up by records and people who worked on the show, this person got the city, year, studio address, wrong, and the police failed to catch on, for nearly 12 months, jim davidson like tarbuck, and others, got police raids at 5am in the morning, with 14 officers and yes, the media standing near their homes, then the mock trial begains, with computers, and other things taken away, in plastic boxes, the police say that they can't crack down on crime, but they seem to have the manpower to do a PR maneuver to do this for along time.