View Full Version : Robots are our future
arista
02-10-2014, 09:12 AM
EU wants to give Robots
Legal Status.
Yes that the Story.
But for me
robots in military are our future
as they can go front line and Kill everyone
in front of them.
Thats a Great Future
arista
02-10-2014, 09:14 AM
[Robots could be granted legal “personhood”, under recommendations made
to the European parliament on how intelligent robotic systems should be governed in the future.]
In todays Times
Calderyon
02-10-2014, 10:20 AM
They are.
kirklancaster
02-10-2014, 10:21 AM
[Robots could be granted legal “personhood”, under recommendations made
to the European parliament on how intelligent robotic systems should be governed in the future.]
In todays Times
And if the EU Parliament is involved, then we can look forward to Robot owners being able to claim Job Seekers, Housing Benefits and Council Tax rebates on their behalf, and being granted the power to vote on their behalf in General Elections.
Additional spin-off benefits will surely be that a documentary will be made highlighting the lives of unemploted robots which will in turn lead to appearances in other reality TV shows, then to certain robots standing for election as MP's..... Oh, sorry, I'm getting carried away, that could never happen. :hehe:
Crimson Dynamo
02-10-2014, 10:25 AM
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b52_1411601207
Arista speaks the truth
watch above and see the future
kirklancaster
02-10-2014, 10:28 AM
EU wants to give Robots
Legal Status.
But for me
robots in military are our future
as they can go front line and Kill everyone
in front of them.
Thats a Great Future
And a very short one for all mankind and the planet Earth.
Livia
02-10-2014, 10:59 AM
Oh No... does no one remember Cyberdyne Systems and Skynet? We're all doomed...
arista
02-10-2014, 11:46 AM
Oh No... does no one remember Cyberdyne Systems and Skynet? We're all doomed...
No not at all
The US Army are testing Robots
and making sure a sniper can not stop them
so once a sniper fires a bullet ,
The Armed Robot tracks
it then moves fast to kill him
It means no good humans will die.
Feel The Force
arista
02-10-2014, 11:50 AM
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b52_1411601207
Arista speaks the truth
watch above and see the future
Yes at 26MPH
the Armed Robot
will kill the sniper before he can move
Utter Bliss
Livia
02-10-2014, 11:50 AM
No not at all
The US Army are testing Robots
and making sure a sniper can not stop them
so once a sniper fires a bullet ,
The Armed Robot tracks
it then moves fast to kill him
It means no good humans will die.
Feel The Force
I'd be fine with that if I could be guaranteed that there will never be any kind of technical breakdown or mishap. The trouble with technology is that it's designed, built and programmed by humans.
arista
02-10-2014, 12:04 PM
I'd be fine with that if I could be guaranteed that there will never be any kind of technical breakdown or mishap. The trouble with technology is that it's designed, built and programmed by humans.
Yes but the Army
instruct it to Kill
Isis.
If a group manged to catch one
after 10 seconds it Auto Blows up
and kills all around it.
arista
02-10-2014, 12:16 PM
Skynet
No its the USA Army
testing other Robots
Crimson Dynamo
02-10-2014, 12:38 PM
I'd be fine with that if I could be guaranteed that there will never be any kind of technical breakdown or mishap. The trouble with technology is that it's designed, built and programmed by humans.
Yes I would not trust my DVD player to make toast never mind go on a state sponsored killing spree
My Note 3 however......:evilgrin:
kirklancaster
02-10-2014, 12:45 PM
No not at all
The US Army are testing Robots
and making sure a sniper can not stop them
so once a sniper fires a bullet ,
The Armed Robot tracks
it then moves fast to kill him
It means no good humans will die.
Feel The Force
Nothing utilising new technology is now produced without - what the manufacturers would have us believe - are adequate safety measures; from the most rigorous safety systems of Nuclear power plants, to the simple wire guards of electric fires. Yet, Chernobyl happened, and every week electric fires are to blame for all too often, tragic house blazes.
No technology is so proficient, that man can rely on it absolutely, and with the proposal that these robots will replace man in warfare, there is another real danger; 'detachment'.
Credit accounts with Internet Bookies, Credit Cards, and the Nick Leeson/Barings Bank shocker, are perhaps the best analogies I can use to illustrate what I mean by 'detachment'. All involve(d) money transactions without the physical handling of actual tangible money, and thus, the person placing internet bets or buying goods on a credit card is psychologically 'detached' from the actual reality of such transactions, and is therefore far less likely to realise or be concerned that his bet is too large or that he cannot really afford to make that purchase. It's harder to place a £300 bet on a horse if that is in real money which you have to take out from your £400 wage packet, and it's impossible to buy that new £400 coat when you only have £200 left 'in the world'. Similarly, Nick Lesson acted as he did because it "wasn't real money".
'Detachment' blinds us to actuality and consequence, so we become, not only, 'not responsible' for our actions, but we cease to care.
War has always been illogical and senseless, but if it is to be fought out by robots v humans in some Terminator style future, then it will truly become a 'game' to the side controlling the robots. A game played by megalomaniac military Top Brass in a comfy control centre far remote from the bloodshed and crushed bodies which litter the battleground. Such a game will be played with total 'detachment' and no sense of the real inhuman carnage which their master strategies are creating.
Robert Oppenheimer quoting from The Bhagavad-Gita said:
"I am become death, the destroyer of worlds."
But he also said:
"The atomic bomb made the prospect of future war unendurable. It has led us up those last few steps to the mountain pass; and beyond there is a different country."
War waged by robots reinstates Oppenheimer first quote, and makes a lie of his other.
kirklancaster
02-10-2014, 12:47 PM
I'd be fine with that if I could be guaranteed that there will never be any kind of technical breakdown or mishap. The trouble with technology is that it's designed, built and programmed by humans.
I agree.
arista
02-10-2014, 12:50 PM
[Robert Oppenheimer quoting from The Bhagavad-Gita said:
"I am become death, the destroyer of worlds."
But he also said:
"The atomic bomb made the prospect of future war unendurable. It has led us up those last few steps to the mountain pass; and beyond there is a different country."
War waged by robots reinstates Oppenheimer first quote, and makes a lie of his other. ]
Sure the Clever Americans
taking all the Hitler atomic design scientists
to help them stop Japan.
It all moved fast
thanks to Hitlers team
No not at all
The US Army are testing Robots
and making sure a sniper can not stop them
so once a sniper fires a bullet ,
The Armed Robot tracks
it then moves fast to kill him
It means no good humans will die.
Feel The Force
Then, as it approaches the target, it is infected with a virus, turns and attacks those who built it .... things are advancing, but we are not there yet
Livia
02-10-2014, 02:08 PM
We have learned nothing from Robocop.
We have learned nothing from Robocop.
:laugh:
kirklancaster
02-10-2014, 02:28 PM
Then, as it approaches the target, it is infected with a virus, turns and attacks those who built it .... things are advancing, but we are not there yet
Yes-- The 'Frankenstein Complex'; Man creates monster, monster turns on man'.
arista
02-10-2014, 03:11 PM
2Ysb-Oko3Bg
Also Robot Gear helping
Marsh.
02-10-2014, 03:13 PM
iRobot. :worry:
Livia
02-10-2014, 03:17 PM
I want my jet pack before we start developing robots. I was promised a jet pack and I want it.
kirklancaster
02-10-2014, 03:58 PM
iRobot. :worry:
Yes!!! Even the author of 'I Robot' Issac Asimov's, Three Laws of Robotics:
"A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law."
were ineffective in stopping Robots turning on man.:eek:
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.