This Black Woman’s BOLD Statement Will Enrage Ferguson Protesters (USA)

[Crimson Dynamo]

h_BduTSiaUI


The backlash against the backlash continues...

[Crimson Dynamo]

Interesting comment from liveleak:

She missed the main point though: He was not shot because he committed robbery but because he had directly threatened the life of the cop through assault to such a degree self-defense was necessary.

His actions are the result of his ignorant attitude and aggression which are encouraged in these black "communities", so he surely would have benefited of having a mother with a moral compass like this woman.

However, stating that he was shot because he stole the cigars is playing directly in the hands of the protesters since they would easily refute such a statement. What the protesters tactically ignore is that Mike Brown was shot because he charged a cop, after he attacked and wounded him, and tried to grab his gun.

Read more at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ea7_1418269907#h78gjMpZQBCJ247e.99

[Udanax]

lol

[Ninastar]

think i have a new wife

[Liam-]

I love her :lovedup:

[Udanax]

I love her :lovedup:

why...?

[Ninastar]

i love her 5 seconds of nothing but her glare at the beginning

[Ithinkiloveyoutoo]

"Mike brown robbed" Ok but it was proved Darren Wilson didn't know about it and it's debatable as there's video of him paying.
"Why run when they tell you to stop" because Eric Garner.

Go away love.

[Ithinkiloveyoutoo]

"What the protesters tactically ignore is that Mike Brown was shot because he charged a cop, after he attacked and wounded him, and tried to grab his gun." those little ingrown marks that were pictured don't really prove the "hulk hogan" "demon" charged at him.

[arista]

h_BduTSiaUI


The backlash against the backlash continues...



Yes Lady Very Spunky

[Ithinkiloveyoutoo]

Yes Lady Very Spunky

Shut up Arista.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Yes Lady Very Spunky

telling it like it is to those who dont want to hear the truth

:dance:

[GiRTh]

She makes one good point and thats also supposition in that Mike Brown started the cycle that led to his death but that still doesnt explain why he was shot 12 times and the inconsistencies in the police stories. All that crap about it 'doesnt matter if its itty biddy scratches'. I'm afraid it does when the officer is saying he feared for his life.

[Ithinkiloveyoutoo]

telling it like it is to those who dont want to hear the truth

:dance:



Done:spin:

EDIT: oops, it's just leathertrumpet.

[M X]

GloZell gets political

[kirklancaster]

She makes one good point and thats also supposition in that Mike Brown started the cycle that led to his death but that still doesnt explain why he was shot 12 times and the inconsistencies in the police stories. All that crap about it 'doesnt matter if its itty biddy scratches'. I'm afraid it does when the officer is saying he feared for his life.

I don't know why you're even bothering to argue - The cop is a liar. Mike Brown was executed in cold blood, and all the 'damage limitation' B.S. propaganda manifested by the police authorities 'after the fact' isn't going to change the truth of that.

Wilson has got clean away with murder aided and abetted by the Police Authorities. Simple as.

[arista]

Shut up Arista.


No I will Not


I will Slapp your ass

[lostalex]

She makes a good point....

and think about it this way...

if the cop was black and mike brown was white, and a white kid acted that way, and a black cop acted that way, would we be talking about it right now>?

I really wonder.

[kirklancaster]

She makes a good point....

and think about it this way...

if the cop was black and mike brown was white, and a white kid acted that way, and a black cop acted that way, would we be talking about it right now>?

I really wonder.

You can bet your life I would be. Who watches the Watchers? Who polices the Police?

[lostalex]

You can bet your life I would be. Who watches the Watchers? Who polices the Police?

we do. (do, do do-do-do, this is how we do, this is how we do) :banana:

[waterhog]

very strong - just coming up for air.

[Ithinkiloveyoutoo]

She makes a good point....

and think about it this way...

if the cop was black and mike brown was white, and a white kid acted that way, and a black cop acted that way, would we be talking about it right now>?

I really wonder.

The black cop would have been in jail long ago. Therefore there would be no need for protest as justice would have been done.

I meeeean I think a black cop got 225 years for something about a dog. Can't remember the story.

[Ithinkiloveyoutoo]

Samuel Barlow was moments away from being shot by specially-trained firearms officers as he roamed around Shetland Mainland, brandishing his rifle in front of frightened residents. Armed police almost opened fire at the 16-year-old as he repeatedly pointed his rifle at officers during the stand-off in September. But a court heard how it was only the professionalism and courage of officers which prevented the stand-off ending in Barlow's death.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2870530/Terrifying-moment-teenage-gunman-takes-aim-police-officers-firearms-incident-Scottish-island.html



Thank **** it wasn't a toy gun, a pack of cigs and/or actual real threat of death from the attacker because he might've been shot dead. Phew. England, US same. Even that crazy cinema shooter reserved some human rights after clearly being the murderer. Phew http://i.imgur.com/z1lBrDh.gif

[Ninastar]

She makes a good point....

and think about it this way...

if the cop was black and mike brown was white, and a white kid acted that way, and a black cop acted that way, would we be talking about it right now>?

I really wonder.

no we wouldnt

because no one would care

its sad really

[Brother Leon]

Ithinkiloveyoutoo killed off all her points and this thread in general tbh.



Anyway, Every black person in Ferguson/New York/Florida etc has a right to protest how disposable a black person's life is in comparison to any other.

[Ithinkiloveyoutoo]

Ithinkiloveyoutoo killed off all her points and this thread in general tbh.



Anyway, Every black person in Ferguson/New York/Florida etc has a right to protest how disposable a black person's life is in comparison to any other.

By killed off what do you mean?

The comment up there was sarcasm.

[Brother Leon]

no we wouldnt

because no one would care

its sad really

We wouldn't because his life would never have been in danger in such a situation anyway. Murderers and Serial killers have 12 hour standoffs with Police to ensure there are no deaths. Black dude from the hood doesn't get that privilege though.

By killed off what do you mean?

The comment up there was sarcasm.
As in you rendered her points pointless.

[Ithinkiloveyoutoo]

We wouldn't because his life would never have been in danger in such a situation anyway. Murderers and Serial killers have 12 hour standoffs with Police to ensure there are no deaths. Black dude from the hood doesn't get that privilege though.


As in you rendered her points pointless.

Oh ok. Thanks boo. :D

[lostalex]

We wouldn't because his life would never have been in danger in such a situation anyway. Murderers and Serial killers have 12 hour standoffs with Police to ensure there are no deaths. Black dude from the hood doesn't get that privilege though.


As in you rendered her points pointless.


You aren't making any sense.

Please tell me the name of the white serial killer that tried to grab a police officers gun and ended up in a 12 hour stand off???

or are you just making it up?

[GiRTh]

^^Cliven Bundy is a man who admitted that he did not recognize or respect the police authorities when they tried to stop his cattle grazing on government property last year. The cattle had been grazing for over twenty years and Bundy had not paid his taxes. He and his like minded friends were involved in a ARMED protest against the police that ended peacefully. HE became the darling of the right wing media till they realized was crazy. As if threatening to arm and protect himself against the police wasnt enough of a hint.

Mike Brown, Tamir Rice and who ever else you want to mention were not armed and they were not allowed to surrender.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundy_standoff

[Creggle]

Thank **** it wasn't a toy gun, a pack of cigs and/or actual real threat of death from the attacker because he might've been shot dead. Phew. England, US same. Even that crazy cinema shooter reserved some human rights after clearly being the murderer. Phew http://i.imgur.com/z1lBrDh.gif

See, doing something like that should of gotten him killed, what were those cops smoking



Mike Brown, Tamir Rice and who ever else you want to mention were not armed and they were not allowed to surrender.

Dude............................... What is a police officer supposed to do when somebody who WILL beat the **** out of him keeps going for his gun and attacking him, even after being shot once... I honestly think people would of preferred it if Mike Brown had taken the officer's gun and killed him with it

[GiRTh]

He kept going for the gun even after being shot did he? Was he a super hero?

[Creggle]

He kept going for the gun even after being shot did he? Was he a super hero?

Yes he did, he attacked the officer, tried to get his gun so the officer shot him, and then afterwards he went for him again and was put down.

Open and shut case. People need to stop being racist and assuming every black criminal the police apprehend/put down was done that way because of the color of their skin, they are doing their jobs, the entire 'OMG IT WAS CUZ HE WAS BLACK' is just as racist as somebody actually targeting people for their skin color, stop objectifying people based on their race.

[GiRTh]

Yes he did, he attacked the officer, tried to get his gun so the officer shot him, and then afterwards he went for him again and was put down.

Open and shut case. People need to stop being racist and assuming every black criminal the police apprehend/put down was done that way because of the color of their skin, they are doing their jobs, the entire 'OMG IT WAS CUZ HE WAS BLACK' is just as racist as somebody actually targeting people for their skin color, stop objectifying people based on their race.:facepalm:

The evidence doesn't back your apparent certainties and I've just given you an instance where police allowed an ARMED man and and his ARMED friends to peacefully surrender.

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

:umm2:

[Creggle]

:facepalm:

The evidence doesn't back your apparent certainties and I've just given you an instance where police allowed an ARMED man and and his ARMED friends to peacefully surrender.

There is the same amount of evidence backing what I said as there is the crap the race card babies are spewing. I'll believe the word of a police officer, thank you. Title alone gives him more credit than anyone else involved in this joke.

So, the armed protest... They were attacking a putting officers lives in danger were they? Thought not.

[GiRTh]

There is the same amount of evidence backing what I said as there is the crap the race card babies are spewing. I'll believe the word of a police officer, thank you. Title alone gives him more credit than anyone else involved in this joke.

So, the armed protest... They were attacking a putting officers lives in danger were they? Thought not.
Its a joke is it? That an unarmed person was gunned down in the street? Now I see where you're coming from. :thumbs:

As for the armed protest? Please explain how an unarmed man is more of a threat than an armed gang?

[Creggle]

Its a joke is it? That an unarmed person was gunned down in the street? Now I see where you're coming from. :thumbs:

As for the armed protest? Please explain how an unarmed man is more of a threat than an armed gang?

Well now you've stooped to twisting words I can see where you've been coming from. What is a joke, is the uproar over it. I'm sorry but if an 'unarmed' man assaults a police officer and attempts to take his weapon from him, the officer is free to do whatever he wants, the perp loses his right to live.

LMAO okay, let me stand next to you with a gun, and then let my unarmed 6'7 friend attack you repeatedly, it's nice to see you'd see me as the threat in that situation. :thumbs:

Both situations are uncomparable. Holding a weapon doesn't make you a threat, attacking somebody does.

[Niamh.]

Holding a weapon makes you a threat, of course it does

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

the officer is free to do whatever he wants, the perp loses his right to live

jesus

[GiRTh]

Well now you've stooped to twisting words I can see where you've been coming from. What is a joke, is the uproar over it. I'm sorry but if an 'unarmed' man assaults a police officer and attempts to take his weapon from him, the officer is free to do whatever he wants, the perp loses his right to live.

LMAO okay, let me stand next to you with a gun, and then let my unarmed 6'7 friend attack you repeatedly, it's nice to see you'd see me as the threat in that situation. :thumbs:

Both situations are uncomparable. Holding a weapon doesn't make you a threat, attacking somebody does.He loses his right to live cuz he's a big guy but a gang, with guns, who have threatened to resist the cops are less of a threat? WTF I dont get this logic.

[Creggle]

Holding a weapon makes you a threat, of course it does

Not if you're doing so to prove a point and make it painfully obvious that's all it is for, please don't give these criminal sympathizers a shred of righteousness to cling onto, it does nobody any good.

He loses his right to live cuz he's a big guy but a gang with guns who have threatened to resist the cops are not? WTF I dont get this logic.

The flawed logic is your comparison, you're comparing a dude who is actively assaulting and endangering another human being to an overzealous protest rally by a bunch of loons. Did the protesters fire a shot, did they point their guns at the police? I know you're quite desperate to keep the comparison holding some form of substance towards your agenda here but it's ridiculous.

[Niamh.]

Not if you're doing so to prove a point and make it painfully obvious that's all it is for, please don't give these criminal sympathizers a shred of righteousness to cling onto, it does nobody any good.



The flawed logic is your comparison, you're comparing a dude who is actively assaulting and endangering another human being to an overzealous protest rally by a bunch of loons. Did the protesters fire a shot, did they point their guns at the police? I know you're quite desperate to keep the comparison holding some form of substance towards your agenda here but it's ridiculous.

"loons" with guns isn't a dangerous combination then? :think:

[GiRTh]

overzealous protest rally by a bunch of loons. Did the protesters fire a shot, did they point their guns at the police? But peaceful protests in Ferguson were forcefully broken up by police with military grade weaponry. The inconsistency is the real crime IMO.

[Creggle]

"loons" with guns isn't a dangerous combination then? :think:

Depends on your definition of a loon, I think crazy people who shout at oranges, I guess others could perceive it as psychopaths :shrug:

[Niamh.]

Depends on your definition of a loon, I think crazy people who shout at oranges, I guess others could perceive it as psychopaths :shrug:

either way someone who's "unbalanced" in charge of a gun is pretty dangerous imo

[Creggle]

But peaceful protests in Ferguson were forcefully broken up by police with military grade weaponry. The inconsistency is the real crime IMO.

Yeah they should of been allowed to protest but I suppose when you have an army of sensationalists running around drumming up fuss over nothing, it could put the lives of other officers at risk from revenge attacks. It's not hard to see why the police sweep this under the rug, they know that if Mike Brown was white there wouldn't of been a single article on it bar an obituary.

either way someone who's "unbalanced" in charge of a gun is pretty dangerous imo

Indeed but opening fire on a group of apparently harmless nutjobs isn't the same as defending your own life against a viscous thug.

[GiRTh]

Yeah they should of been allowed to protest but I suppose when you have an army of sensationalists running around drumming up fuss over nothing, it could put the lives of other officers at risk from revenge attacks. It's not hard to see why the police sweep this under the rug, they know that if Mike Brown was white there wouldn't of been a single article on it bar an obituary.



Indeed but opening fire on a group of apparently harmless nutjobs isn't the same as defending your own life against a viscous thug.An Army of sensationalists? Bundy was interviewed by the right wing press and none other than Sean Hannity himself told him on air that he'd like to join him. A supposedly fair and balance news anchor was publicly supporting an armed stand off against the police. Talk about fuss over nothing.

[Creggle]

An Army of sensationalists? Bundy was interviewed by the right wing press and none other than Sean Hannity himself told him on air that he'd like to join him. A supposedly fair and balance news anchor was publicly supporting an armed stand off against the police. Talk about fuss over nothing.

Lmao yes that whole armed protest was infuriatingly stupid I'll agree but I'm still not sure why they deserved to be fired upon if Mike Brown did. Not saying you're saying they should of been shot etc btw but the police finding a peaceful resolution to that, when they're in numbers and both sides don't exactly want death or injury is not the same as a single officer failing to find a peaceful resolution to somebody twice his size assaulting him. Mike would of probably killed the officer had he gotten the upper hand, the only person who could say otherwise would be Mike himself, but Darren didn't fancy taking that gamble.

[Daniel.]

The racism though

[Ninastar]

The racism though

who is being racist here? please explain

[GiRTh]

Lmao yes that whole armed protest was infuriatingly stupid I'll agree but I'm still not sure why they deserved to be fired upon if Mike Brown did. Not saying you're saying they should of been shot etc btw but the police finding a peaceful resolution to that, when they're in numbers and both sides don't exactly want death or injury is not the same as a single officer failing to find a peaceful resolution to somebody twice his size assaulting him. Mike would of probably killed the officer had he gotten the upper hand, the only person who could say otherwise would be Mike himself, but Darren didn't fancy taking that gamble.They deserved to be fired upon cuz they publicly threatened to resist the officers and said on TV that they didnt respect their authority. IF ever there was a chance to show who was in charge that was it, but instead they somehow found a peaceful resolution but the Ferguson protestors are introduced to the departments new military grade weaponry.. The inconsistency, again, is the real crime IMO

[Creggle]

They deserved to be fired upon cuz they publicly threatened to resist the officers and said on TV that they didnt respect their authority. IF ever there was a chance to show who was in charge that was it, but instead they somehow found a peaceful resolution but the Ferguson protestors are introduced to the departments new military grade weaponry.. The inconsistency, again, is the real crime IMO

Actions speak louder than words though and in the end they did not attack or act in an aggressive manner towards the police. A little bit much saying they deserved to be fired upon though, especially as that would of basically created a warzone and who knows how it would of panned out. The way the Ferguson protests were handled was wrong though I will admit that, but the fact that homes and businesses were raided and destroyed in 'honor' of Mr. Brown doesn't make me believe the peaceful part. I'd imagine that is what caused the reaction they got, along with the protest potentially causing more sinister issues like I stated before.

Also, Darren did not respond to a robbery call, he did not know what Mike was doing yet Mike somehow ended up assaulting him? I think it just goes to show what kind of violent person Mike was, unless people are trying to claim that Darren randomly decided to shoot some dude on the street for absolutely no reason?

[GiRTh]

Actions speak louder than words though and in the end they did not attack or act in an aggressive manner towards the police. A little bit much saying they deserved to be fired upon though, especially as that would of basically created a warzone and who knows how it would of panned out. The way the Ferguson protests were handled was wrong though I will admit that, but the fact that homes and businesses were raided and destroyed in 'honor' of Mr. Brown doesn't make me believe the peaceful part. I'd imagine that is what caused the reaction they got, along with the protest potentially causing more sinister issues like I stated before.

Also, Darren did not respond to a robbery call, he did not know what Mike was doing yet Mike somehow ended up assaulting him? I think it just goes to show what kind of violent person Mike was, unless people are trying to claim that Darren randomly decided to shoot some dude on the street for absolutely no reason?They pointed their weapons at the officers and at one time a protest sniper said he could easily take out four of the officers. The officers also decided not to use their riot gear as that was considered too provocative and might inspire an attack ,. Why are inner cities not policed like that? Why are unarmed people considered more of a threat than a sniper who is in the process of pointing his rifle at the officers? Why is riot gear used on unarmed protestors but armed protesters it is considered provocation? Why is there not the same amount of consideration given to insighting protestors in inner city area? The double standard is the problem. IMO

[Mystic Mock]

"Mike brown robbed" Ok but it was proved Darren Wilson didn't know about it and it's debatable as there's video of him paying.
"Why run when they tell you to stop" because Eric Garner.

Go away love.

From the reports that I've read say that Mike Brown was shot in the back 3 times (indicating that he was running away) and that Darren Wilson and The Police tried to make out that Mike Brown charged at Darren Wilson and that's why Darren Wilson shot Mike Brown, the evidence showed though that Mike Brown had been shot from long range.

This whole case sounds strange to me, I don't agree with what The Looters did, but the original message from the pieceful protesters is spot on imo.

And one good thing that does come out of the looting is that no future dodgy cases like this will be getting a slap on the wrist for awhile.

[lostalex]

From the reports that I've read say that Mike Brown was shot in the back 3 times (indicating that he was running away) and that Darren Wilson and The Police tried to make out that Mike Brown charged at Darren Wilson and that's why Darren Wilson shot Mike Brown, the evidence showed though that Mike Brown had been shot from long range.

This whole case sounds strange to me, I don't agree with what The Looters did, but the original message from the pieceful protesters is spot on imo.

And one good thing that does come out of the looting is that no future dodgy cases like this will be getting a slap on the wrist for awhile.

The autopsy proved that he was not shot in the back. and it also proved that he tried to grab the officers gun.

[Mystic Mock]

The autopsy proved that he was not shot in the back. and it also proved that he tried to grab the officers gun.

It had been proven that he was shot from long range though.

And even if Mike Brown was going for Darren Wilson, why did he have to shoot him 12 times? A lot of robbers try to physically attack The Police and they don't get shot that many times.

[lostalex]

It had been proven that he was shot from long range though.

And even if Mike Brown was going for Darren Wilson, why did he have to shoot him 12 times? A lot of robbers try to physically attack The Police and they don't get shot that many times.

why does it matter how many times the cop shot him? he's dead, why does it matter if he was shot once to kill him or 12 times to kill him?

I don't understand how the number of shots that killed him matters at all.

[Mystic Mock]

It means that there was intent.

If his already dead why would you shoot him that many times.

[lostalex]

It means that there was intent.

If his already dead why would you shoot him that many times.

of course there was intent. a large thug attacked him and he was trying to kill the person who was a danger to society before he hurt anyone else. no one has disputed that.