Log in

View Full Version : Katie Hopkins Is it just me who thinks that she's a hypocrite on this?


Mystic Mock
09-01-2015, 04:32 AM
I know that the production probably want me to feel this way but here it goes.

Katie goes on about Cami and Chloe being only put in there for two assets which are on display (which is very true on why BB did put them on the show) but how come she doesn't comment on Calum, Jeremy, and Kavana being put in there for those reasons too? Not one of them?

She's been a funny contestant so far (if not a little contrived in places) but it really pisses me off when people go on about their gender being put in for their looks, but never about the opposite gender that they themselves fancy, Katie really showed herself up to me there.

Shaun
09-01-2015, 05:23 AM
well for starters Kavana is definitely not there for those reasons in my eyes

Raph
09-01-2015, 06:47 AM
Really sound post, Mock. Unfortunately it's just another case of institutional sexism. As woman as a whole are viewed more objectively in society, Katie feels as though its acceptable to say that. I also think it's rooted in her having quite traditional conservative views but you're absolutely right Mock, it's totally contrived to accuse one sex of something you wouldn't accuse the other of.

Mystic Mock
09-01-2015, 06:47 AM
well for starters Kavana is definitely not there for those reasons in my eyes

Wasn't he from a boyband though.

Raph
09-01-2015, 07:20 AM
Wasn't he from a boyband though.

Well said Mock. I suppose he also rooted to his fame largely to his looks, he's an alright looking chap

Northern Monkey
09-01-2015, 07:29 AM
Because she's a woman and she can be as sexist as she likes towards other women.I agree though.It's not right really.

Beso
09-01-2015, 07:46 AM
she needs to remember she's only in it for having one asset.

pity it's for being a **** and not her ****.

Niamh.
09-01-2015, 09:37 AM
I agree with you about Calum but tbf Kavanagh first of all isn't remotely attractive so it's definitely not eye candy reasons plus at one time he was pretty famous as was Jeremy

rusticgal
09-01-2015, 09:42 AM
She does seem to target females... I haven't seen her ever discredit a male or verbally attack one.

chuff me dizzy
09-01-2015, 09:44 AM
She does seem to target females... I haven't seen her ever discredit a male or verbally attack one.

Give her time ,its early days yet

Beso
09-01-2015, 09:45 AM
She does seem to target females... I haven't seen her ever discredit a male or verbally attack one.

she's a bully, only picking on the lesser celeb or the quieter ones.

Lostie!
09-01-2015, 12:06 PM
The way she mocked others for being a low calibre of celebrity / not doing much for their "fame" made me roll my eyes. It's like she has no self awareness whatsoever.

Niamh.
09-01-2015, 12:08 PM
The way she mocked others for being a low calibre of celebrity / not doing much for their "fame" made me roll my eyes. It's like she has no self awareness whatsoever.

She probably thinks she's a serious journalist :hehe:

Lostie!
09-01-2015, 12:10 PM
She probably thinks she's a serious journalist :hehe:

Aw, that's cute. Bless her. :hehe:

kefln
09-01-2015, 12:20 PM
Katie goes on about Cami and Chloe being only put in there for two assets which are on display (which is very true on why BB did put them on the show) but how come she doesn't comment on Calum, Jeremy, and Kavana being put in there for those reasons too? Not one of them?

Katie is a hypocrite to her core.

She had this whole thing about how she judges people based on the names that they give their kids - hence the Tyler thing. She publicly stated that she looked down on people that give babies place names like Brooklyn or silly celeb names like Apple. But her own kids are named Poppy and India. Which are lovely names, but not according to her own "standards".

She'll say whatever gets her the highest chance to be booked onto debate shows for the rest of 2015. It won't matter if its hypocritical or not.

kefln
09-01-2015, 12:21 PM
She probably thinks she's a serious journalist :hehe:
:laugh:

GiRTh
09-01-2015, 01:11 PM
Katie made those comments because she targets women not men. I bet she hardly has a bad word about any of the men in there but rips into the other women.

I hope Nadia sees this as an opportunity to take Katie down a peg or two. There has already been tension between lets hope it stays like that.

sampvt
09-01-2015, 01:19 PM
Katies comments on all things feisty are designed to create a reaction so she wins hands down on that one. Anyone that can make the dole offices seem less attractive and make people think twice about bragging about deliberately ripping off the system is good in my book.

There is nothing wrong in using the system to help if help is needed the right way, but everything is wrong if its being abused to feed habits and promote a lifestyle designed to rip us all off.

Not all dole seekers are skanks but there are loads that are and her comments are aimed at them in the main, even though she fails to put it across the right way.

Withano
09-01-2015, 01:24 PM
They're famous for singing/acting/being an itboy. Cami and Chloe are literally famous for their tits. I don't think its quite the same.

The boys are famous and good looking but those girls are famous because they're good looking.

Niamh.
09-01-2015, 01:27 PM
They're famous for singing/acting/being an itboy. Cami and Chloe are literally famous for their tits. I don't think its quite the same.

The boys are famous and good looking but those girls are famous because they're good looking.

I disagree with you about Callum, I would put him in the same category as Chloe, he had a famous dad, she had a famous boyfriend, he's been in reality TV shows and so has she. They're both in the limelight because of their looks

Mystic Mock
10-01-2015, 01:27 AM
I disagree with you about Callum, I would put him in the same category as Chloe, he had a famous dad, she had a famous boyfriend, he's been in reality TV shows and so has she. They're both in the limelight because of their looks

Exactly, well put Niamh.

LukeB
10-01-2015, 01:29 AM
I see where you're coming from mock!

Mystic Mock
10-01-2015, 01:32 AM
Didn't she also go for Patsy tonight instead of any of the guys? Interesting targets Katie Hopkins.

Shaun
10-01-2015, 01:35 AM
No, Katie nominated Perez :p

Mystic Mock
10-01-2015, 01:40 AM
No, Katie nominated Perez :p

I'm sorry I should've been more clearer, I'm on about on the highlight show I'm sure she had a dig at Patsy whilst being nice about all the “macho” men, especially the “hunks” never get a bad word said about them.

Jose Mourinho
10-01-2015, 01:41 AM
I know that the production probably want me to feel this way but here it goes.

Katie goes on about Cami and Chloe being only put in there for two assets which are on display (which is very true on why BB did put them on the show) but how come she doesn't comment on Calum, Jeremy, and Kavana being put in there for those reasons too? Not one of them?

She's been a funny contestant so far (if not a little contrived in places) but it really pisses me off when people go on about their gender being put in for their looks, but never about the opposite gender that they themselves fancy, Katie really showed herself up to me there.Katie is the queen of contradicting herself.. I find her entertaining there is no doubt, but a lot of it is for this fact that she contradicts herself so much in what she says and does... Comedy gold.

Udanax
10-01-2015, 01:44 AM
deleted

Mystic Mock
10-01-2015, 01:44 AM
I suppose you're right Jose, I bet you have to put up with this type of behaviour all the time at Chelsea huh?

Jose Mourinho
10-01-2015, 02:00 AM
I suppose you're right Jose, I bet you have to put up with this type of behaviour all the time at Chelsea huh?Haha we win the premier league the players may say as they wish! Possibly also win Champions league.

Mystic Mock
10-01-2015, 02:04 AM
Too true Jose, too true.

Jose Mourinho
10-01-2015, 05:04 AM
Katies comments on all things feisty are designed to create a reaction so she wins hands down on that one. Anyone that can make the dole offices seem less attractive and make people think twice about bragging about deliberately ripping off the system is good in my book.

There is nothing wrong in using the system to help if help is needed the right way, but everything is wrong if its being abused to feed habits and promote a lifestyle designed to rip us all off.

Not all dole seekers are skanks but there are loads that are and her comments are aimed at them in the main, even though she fails to put it across the right way. Is it also "good" when she needlessly insults a big hearted, selfless, courageous nurse returning from Africa with life threatening Ebola?

aj2463
10-01-2015, 10:27 AM
I know that the production probably want me to feel this way but here it goes.

Katie goes on about Cami and Chloe being only put in there for two assets which are on display (which is very true on why BB did put them on the show) but how come she doesn't comment on Calum, Jeremy, and Kavana being put in there for those reasons too? Not one of them?

She's been a funny contestant so far (if not a little contrived in places) but it really pisses me off when people go on about their gender being put in for their looks, but never about the opposite gender that they themselves fancy, Katie really showed herself up to me there.

Calum, Jeremy and Kavana have had some sort of careers, these girls are in there to look good. Apparently

Razor
10-01-2015, 01:31 PM
I didn't even know who Katie was before she appeared in BB.