New : Harry Hill's Stars In Their Eyes 7PM ITV1HD Saturdays

[cheeky_monkey]

Stars In Their Eyes starts today at 7pm on ITV :cheer2:

[Smithy]

Saw a clip on this morning yesterday, looks like Harry hill has utterly ruined the show with his ****ty sketches

[arista]

For any that are watching BBC1
its on again tomorrow at 12:30PM

[Liam-]

I love Stars in their eyes, but I can't stand Harry Hill so I'm torn on this one.

[andybigbro]

I never knew this was coming back :laugh:

[cheeky_monkey]

Stars In Their Eyes just started :cheer2:

[arista]

Yes this bits like his old show

[arista]

For a dog groomer
she looks great in those clothes

[Jøsh]

i hope my old primary school teacher goes on dis she would be mega rofls

[Kazanne]

These two are quite good.

[arista]

this is great
and Harry is like he is back at TV burp
at times

[Kazanne]

have enjoyed this so far

[Shaun]

jesus christ i turned off the voice for this

absolute abomination

[Smithy]

Saw a clip on this morning yesterday, looks like Harry hill has utterly ruined the show with his ****ty sketches

Looks like I was right

[arista]

have enjoyed this so far



Yes its a Fun Show
Written by Harry Hill

[Jamesy]

I didn't like it tbh. Watched 15 minutes of it and switched off.

Maybe if I was 15 I would find Harry's humour funny and love it. Although on the whole they've ruined a good original show.

[BigSister]

I think if you just concentrate on the star performances its not `that` bad. Ok the sketches are a bit stupid but I like the introducing bits. And the star guests aren't bad as well.

[Jack.]

Why didn't they get Matthew Kelly back? I think I would of said yes to a return.

[andybigbro]

It was terrible.

[joeysteele]

Watched it today,however it is a pale imitation of what it was.

I wasn't impressed.

[Jack.]

I'll be watching next week but only because there is a girl on who lives in the same town as me :D!!

[GoldHeart]

:rant: i hate it !!!!! harry hill has completely wrecked what use to be a entertaining unique talented show!! it use to have a sensible mature format
and why have Mathew Kelly just for that dumb cameo?? :conf:
he should of come back to present the show dont tell me he'd refuse
Mathew Kelly made stars in their eyes!! its his show!!
cat deeley was ok but for me Mathew Kelly was the man for the job!
and even Davina Mccoll was better than moron Harry Hill because they all stayed true to the show!



now its just a horrible joke its nothing like the original format it might aswell be called THE HARRY HILL SHOW!!! the man is a ******!
he behaves like a toolbag with a egg shaped head and a stupid goofy grin on his face

they still have 5 guests perform but i dont know how they have enough time when Harry Hill wastes soo much times with his pathetic childish antics!! the entire show only has like 10 mins worth of stars in their eyes performances

even the contestants VT'S are ridiculous its a rip off family fortunes
everyone thinks their a comedian none of it is funny :bored:

so why bring back a fun show like stars in their eyes if your just going to destroy it !!! and everything it use to be they've shattered the show to pieces and i hope the next generation dont get fooled into thinking this is how the show is suppose to be because the original was nothing like this

It should get axed or harry hill should get fired but that wont happen!! because that thick tart seems to be everywhere . part of me enjoys to see who the contestants impersonate and i enjoy guessing but i cant sit through Harry Hill and his crap :notimpressed:

[Lee.]

This is the worst thing on telly since that celebrity diving programme!

[InOne]

One of the worst things I've ever watched. I knew as soon as his name was attached to it it would be abysmal

[arista]

On Now

[Jack.]

Only watching it tonight to see my local girl Emma Jones :love:

[arista]

Only watching it tonight to see my local girl Emma Jones :love:


OK

I hope she is good

[Jack.]

OK

I hope she is good

So do I. I've never heard her sing :laugh:

[Suze]

They were all quite good :) But I was blown away by how good the bloke who was Frankie Valli was :shocked: A very worthy winner imo. I should think he will get quite a bit of work out of appearring on SITEs.

[kirklancaster]

Saw a clip on this morning yesterday, looks like Harry hill has utterly ruined the show with his ****ty sketches

:clap1::clap1::clap1:

Absolutely my thoughts too Smithy. Its now more about him than the contestants, and they look so naff too in those stupid, pointless unfunny sketches.

He could fit in another 3 contestants if they cut out the crap. I am very disappointed.

[Jack.]

They were all quite good :) But I was blown away by how good the bloke who was Frankie Valli was :shocked: A very worthy winner imo. I should think he will get quite a bit of work out of appearring on SITEs.

He was amazing.

[Jack.]

:clap1::clap1::clap1:

Absolutely my thoughts too Smithy. Its now more about him than the contestants, and they look so naff too in those stupid, pointless unfunny sketches.

He could fit in another 3 contestants if they cut out the crap. I am very disappointed.

Bring back Matthew Kelly I say.

[Kazanne]

They were all quite good :) But I was blown away by how good the bloke who was Frankie Valli was :shocked: A very worthy winner imo. I should think he will get quite a bit of work out of appearring on SITEs.

Yes Suze,he was excellent,I like the show but HH has kinda spoilt the format.

[Suze]

Yes Suze,he was excellent,I like the show but HH has kinda spoilt the format.

I agree with you he has spoilt it Kazanne, Harry Hill is making it all about him rather than the contestants. SITEs was always meant to be one of those serious talent shows with a touch of lightheartedness added imo, meant to showcase the contestants talents. It can be lighthearted in places without having to verge on the ridiculous with Harry at the helm. I like watching the singers though, so will persevere, even if I have to record it then fast forward Harry.

[Kazanne]

I agree with you he has spoilt it Kazanne, Harry Hill is making it all about him rather than the contestants. SITEs was always meant to be one of those serious talent shows with a touch of lightheartedness added imo, meant to showcase the contestants talents. It can be lighthearted in places without having to verge on the ridiculous with Harry at the helm. I like watching the singers though, so will persevere, even if I have to record it then fast forward Harry.

Was much better before Suze,so much time is wated on HH daftness,no need for his sketches really.

[BigSister]

I agree the right winner won last nights show but I also agree over HH that's why I just try and block him out and just watch the performances and the Vts. Some good singers but overshadowed by the silly off screen bits

[GoldHeart]

i stopped watching after the first episode !!!
its not stars in their eyes its Harry Hill tv burp
with a imitation of lookalikes and soundalikes performances
Harry Hill has thrown the show down the toilet and i hope it gets axed
its a tedious cringe fest :bored::notimpressed: