Why was Chloe naked under her robe out of interest?

[mazerunner_888]

Was there a reason for it? I mean was she going to take her off before getting to bed and be nude!

[Daniel.]

Because most people can feel secure being naked under a robe without someone exposing them

[Scream]

well she might have had underwear on just not a bra but maybe that's how she goes to bed at home and feels comfortable...she might of been about to go to bed until jeremy started throwing up

[daniel-lewis-1985]

Why not?

I don't wear anything under my dressing gown.

[mazerunner_888]

well she might have had underwear on just not a bra but maybe that's how she goes to bed at home and feels comfortable...she might of been about to go to bed until jeremy started throwing up

Wow so she did not mind being topless in bed with all those people and cameras watching. What if she tossed her covers off in the night she would be topless for everyone to see.

[jackc1806]

Wtf

[Jake.]

I've never worn clothes underneath a dressing gown

[sampvt]

so she could trap Jeremy, that's why she closed the door, maybe.

[Denver]

Why not?

I don't wear anything under my dressing gown.

But your not on national tv while doing it

[Denver]

so she could trap Jeremy, that's why she closed the door, maybe.

There has been talk of a publicity stunt gone wrong

[Marsh.]

Maybe she was washing in the bathroom before bed and Jeremy started throwing up before she could go and change into pyjamas.

There is no suggestion she was going to get them out for the world to see in her bed.

Also, no matter whether she's comfortable showing her body in public or not still does not give Jeremy the right to whip her robe open.

[JoshBB]

Feels like someone is trying to defend jeremy a bit :l

[Liam-]

How dare the woman try to be comfortable under her dressing gown? dozy mare! :fist:

[Gusto Brunt]

Because most people can feel secure being naked under a robe without someone exposing them

I wouldn't and I'm a bloke.

I'd at least be in a rush to put some boxers on, and in a woman's case a bra!

[GiRTh]

Why does it matter?

[Daniel.]

Well I wear my dressing gown with no clothes underneath and I'm a guy.

The comments in this thread about "trapping Jeremy" and "publicity stunt" are shocking

[Jake.]

There has been talk of a publicity stunt gone wrong

There hasn't. Anywhere.

[daniel-lewis-1985]

Well I wear my dressing gown with no clothes underneath and I'm a guy.

The comments in this thread about "trapping Jeremy" and "publicity stunt" are shocking

I know im not even answering to those posting such vile comments.

[Jake.]

I'm not even overreacting, but comments on this forum recently are worrying to say the least.

[Denver]

There hasn't. Anywhere.

On twitter

They share the same agent

[Marsh.]

It's reminding me of the people who tried to blame Hazel for Daley's psychopathic behaviour.

[Marsh.]

On twitter

They share the same agent

Yes because I'm sure Jeremy couldn't wait to come to an agreement to come across as some kind of sex offender on national television.

[Jake.]

It's reminding me of the people who tried to blame Hazel for Daley's psychopathic behaviour.

Except this time there seems to be more of them... some just shouldn't be allowed to have internet access.

[Daniel.]

Such backward thinking shouldn't be allowed, there's opinion and then there's worrying comments.

[Scream]

Wow so she did not mind being topless in bed with all those people and cameras watching. What if she tossed her covers off in the night she would be topless for everyone to see.

well what if she went to bed completely clothed and in the middle of the night started unconsciously taking off all her clothes and jumping out of her bed doing a hand stand and then proceeding to thrust against perez? :shrug:

[Denver]

Anyway we now have Chloe side of the sorry so stop trying to be 'Hero's' and making it a bigger problem then it is

[Jake.]

Anyway we now have Chloe side of the sorry so stop trying to be 'Hero's' and making it a bigger problem then it is

And the very same back to you.

[jennyjuniper]

If I was at home, after a bath I would probably be naked under a robe (although not in winter) But in a house full of virtual strangers I think I would have something on under the robe. After all a robe that isn't buttoned or zipped closed can always fall open of it's own accord.

[unoino]

A few on here have made the point that would she have over reacted the same way if it was Callum in the loo and not the ugly American...she knows she went ott...get her out too

[AnnieK]

FFs.....no one knows how she would have reacted if it had been Callum....because it wasn't. :facepalm:

[Kazanne]

If I was at home, after a bath I would probably be naked under a robe (although not in winter) But in a house full of virtual strangers I think I would have something on under the robe. After all a robe that isn't buttoned or zipped closed can always fall open of it's own accord.

:clap1::clap1:

[AnnieK]

And in answer to OP she probably thought no one in the house would try to open her robe.

Had it fallen open of its own accord that's different to it being opened by someone else who she hadn't invited.

[Jake.]

FFs.....no one knows how she would have reacted if it had been Callum....because it wasn't. :facepalm:

I've given up already Annie, leave them to it.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Whilst I am not excusing loose cannon Jeremy I would imagine the dressing gown and a little boob showing was just part of her general look at my boobs folks strategy

Lets not kid on here she wants people to like her based on her body - look at me, desire me yada yada

[Crimson Dynamo]

and a dressing gown goes on over your pjs. Its not to cover your naked body

:umm2:

[JoshBB]

and a dressing gown goes on over your pjs. Its not to cover your naked body

:umm2:

She wasn't expecting anyone to pull it off though, why should she?

[coffee]

I have never once in my entire life worn ANY clothes under a robe... Wtf!
The robe is for covering up your naked body before putting clothes on!
After a shower, quick dry, I put my robe on.
Keep it on for hours before I even get dressed. I do my hair and makeup first so my clothes don't get dirty.
Get a grip, people.

[Marsh.]

Whilst I am not excusing loose cannon Jeremy I would imagine the dressing gown and a little boob showing was just part of her general look at my boobs folks strategy

Lets not kid on here she wants people to like her based on her body - look at me, desire me yada yada

Yet she had the gown fully covering her body, no boob showing. :conf:

[Shaun]

anyone would think it was her body and her choice

what a crazy world

[Niamh.]

Yes because I'm sure Jeremy couldn't wait to come to an agreement to come across as some kind of sex offender on national television.

:laugh:

but yeah ontopic, wtf? it doesn't matter what she was or wasn't wearing under the dressing gown, she was wearing a dressing gown which covered her all the way to her ankles :shrug:

[Niamh.]

anyone would think it was her body and her choice

what a crazy world

No Shaun people wearing dressing gowns are fair game I'm afraid

[Marsh.]

A few on here have made the point that would she have over reacted the same way if it was Callum in the loo and not the ugly American...she knows she went ott...get her out too

I've only seen you make this invalid "point".

[Shaun]

just a minor point but how on earth is Jeremy ugly? The beard's a bit wild but he's in great shape and pretty handsome.

[Marsh.]

just a minor point but how on earth is Jeremy ugly? The beard's a bit wild but he's in great shape and pretty handsome.

I would tbh.

[AnnieK]

just a minor point but how on earth is Jeremy ugly? The beard's a bit wild but he's in great shape and pretty handsome.

I was just going to say this....he is not ugly in the slightest. :shrug:

[Macie Lightfoot]

Because we're all naked under the clothes we wear.

[Niamh.]

just a minor point but how on earth is Jeremy ugly? The beard's a bit wild but he's in great shape and pretty handsome.

He' s better looking than Callum imo ^

[Niamh.]

Because we're all naked under the clothes we wear.

lol yes that's what I was trying to say in my earlier post but you did it better :laugh:

[Kizzy]

Because we're all naked under the clothes we wear.

#mindblown

[rionablue]

Was there a reason for it? I mean was she going to take her off before getting to bed and be nude!

I saw the robe it was fully belted and down to her ankles. All the housemates wear robes at some stage, some with pyjames on some without. Chloe was entitled to wear it FFS she hardly expected a man who was puking his guts out in a toilet while she was asking him was he alright to make a grab for her robe was she!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!

[mazerunner_888]

I saw the robe it was fully belted and down to her ankles. All the housemates wear robes at some stage, some with pyjames on some without. Chloe was entitled to wear it FFS she hardly expected a man who was puking his guts out in a toilet while she was asking him was he alright to make a grab for her robe was she!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!

Yes I get that point and I fully agree. She can wear what she wants and should not have to fear anyone pulling open her robe...

but...

She is in a house with cameras in every room, watching every move, you have some quite lively characters in there also. So it would be so easy to see how a play fight, someone messing around or simply getting into bed it would be soooo easy for her to flash her ample breasts by accident. To me I don't get why she would knowing all this be naked under her robe!

[Marsh.]

Yes I get that point and I fully agree. She can wear what she wants and should not have to fear anyone pulling open her robe...

but...

She is in a house with cameras in every room, watching every move, you have some quite lively characters in there also. So it would be so easy to see how a play fight, someone messing around or simply getting into bed it would be soooo easy for her to flash her ample breasts by accident. To me I don't get why she would knowing all this be naked under her robe!

Did she get involved in a play fight with this robe on or had she just been washing/showering before bed and heard Jeremy vomit before going to get ready?

Of course not. She must have been mastering the art of seduction.

THE POINT is that the robe wasn't opened by accident, it was purposely pulled open by Jeremy. What may or may not have happened by accident is completely besides the point.

[mazerunner_888]

What may or may not have happened by accident is completely besides the point.


I agree but to me I still do find it strange to be naked under a robe held together with just a belt on national TV but yes that's up to her of course.

[Marsh.]

I agree but to me I still do find it strange to be naked under a robe held together with just a belt on national TV but yes that's up to her of course.

She'd just come out of the bathroom, maybe after showering? Maybe she was on her way to get dressed into PJs or something? :shrug:

[mazerunner_888]

She'd just come out of the bathroom, maybe after showering? Maybe she was on her way to get dressed into PJs or something? :shrug:

We can surmise about maybes all we want but the fact is she was going around the house helping drunken Americans in a bath robe naked underneath. Now of course she can do that if she likes but that does not seem to me like she was in any rush to get some underwear on which is also fine and her purgative but i find it strange behavior on national TV.

[MB.]

in a bath robe naked

That doesn't even make sense.

[jaxie]

so she could trap Jeremy, that's why she closed the door, maybe.

I think that is a really low thing to say. You should be ashamed of yourself for that.

[mazerunner_888]

That doesn't even make sense.

underneath bath robe I mean

[MB.]

underneath bath robe I mean

We're all naked under our clothes, love.

[coffee]

We're all naked under our clothes, love.

and a robe is clothes so... she was wearing clothes!

[Pincho Paxton]

I wouldn't pay to go to a strip joint where everyone is wearing dressing gowns!

£15 entrance fee
Girls naked under dressing gowns extravaganza!
Join us tonight!
Drink till you puke!
They may help you by passing you a loo roll fun!!!

[Marsh.]

We can surmise about maybes all we want

That's EXACTLY what you're doing.

[Niamh.]

I wouldn't pay to go to a strip joint where everyone is wearing dressing gowns!

£15 entrance fee
Girls naked under dressing gowns extravaganza!
Join us tonight!
Drink till you puke!
They may help you by passing you a loo roll fun!!!

:laugh2:

[Anaesthesia]

Not going to say what I think was right or wrong. Just saying that a model in a robe, leaning over you, robe slightly gaping, you're a bit drunk. Would you, conceivably, try to flick that robe open without any other motivation apart from being a bit drunk?

I bet a few would.

[chuff me dizzy]

We can surmise about maybes all we want but the fact is she was going around the house helping drunken Americans in a bath robe naked underneath. Now of course she can do that if she likes but that does not seem to me like she was in any rush to get some underwear on which is also fine and her purgative but i find it strange behavior on national TV.

:clap1:

[Macie Lightfoot]

Not going to say what I think was right or wrong. Just saying that a model in a robe, leaning over you, robe slightly gaping, you're a bit drunk. Would you, conceivably, try to flick that robe open without any other motivation apart from being a bit drunk?

I bet a few would.

That doesn't make it any more right or acceptable

[GiRTh]

Not going to say what I think was right or wrong. Just saying that a model in a robe, leaning over you, robe slightly gaping, you're a bit drunk. Would you, conceivably, try to flick that robe open without any other motivation apart from being a bit drunk?

I bet a few would.:facepalm: Looks like I'm not much of an opportunist cuz I can definitely say I wouldn't be putting my hands on anyone unless I was sure they wanted me to.

[Liam-]

Not going to say what I think was right or wrong. Just saying that a model in a robe, leaning over you, robe slightly gaping, you're a bit drunk. Would you, conceivably, try to flick that robe open without any other motivation apart from being a bit drunk?

I bet a few would.

Only the ones with terrible judgement/low morality

[Kazanne]

Not going to say what I think was right or wrong. Just saying that a model in a robe, leaning over you, robe slightly gaping, you're a bit drunk. Would you, conceivably, try to flick that robe open without any other motivation apart from being a bit drunk?

I bet a few would.

:joker::joker: Not this angelic bunch Anaesthesia,just like they don't post half naked pics of women and salivate over the female form,:joker::joker: Of couse they would :wavey:

[Anaesthesia]

We're talking drunkenness here, and no, I'm not trying to justify anything, just saying, in a drunken state, not rational thinking state, can you honestly say you or anyone you know, wouldn't find it funny?

[Daniel.]

:joker::joker: Not this angelic bunch Anaesthesia,just like they don't post half naked pics of women and salivate over the female form,:joker::joker: Of couse they would :wavey:

It's completely different, those pictures are there to admire, exposing someone isn't to be done without permission

[Marsh.]

Not going to say what I think was right or wrong. Just saying that a model in a robe, leaning over you, robe slightly gaping, you're a bit drunk. Would you, conceivably, try to flick that robe open without any other motivation apart from being a bit drunk?

I bet a few would.

Leaning over him? Was she?

[Anaesthesia]

:joker::joker: Not this angelic bunch Anaesthesia,just like they don't post half naked pics of women and salivate over the female form,:joker::joker: Of couse they would :wavey:

:love:

[Marsh.]

:joker::joker: Not this angelic bunch Anaesthesia,just like they don't post half naked pics of women and salivate over the female form,:joker::joker: Of couse they would :wavey:

It's a bit different tbh. Like when Chloe mentioned her page 3 modelling.

Those images are her choice to put in the public arena. Nothing to do with someone helping themselves to opening your clothes.

[chuff me dizzy]

Leaning over him? Was she?

Yes ,she was

[Daniel.]

Yes ,she was

It still makes absoloutley no difference

[Kazanne]

It's a bit different tbh. Like when Chloe mentioned her page 3 modelling.

Those images are her choice to put in the public arena. Nothing to do with someone helping themselves to opening your clothes.

Don't spoil it Marsh:joker::joker::joker:

[Marsh.]

Yes ,she was

There was no camera in the toilet hun.

The small bit we did see through the door she was sat down and not leaning anywhere near him.

http://i.imgur.com/H9p2ywC.png

[Liam-]

Morsh scalping with imagery :flutter:

[bots]

We can surmise about maybes all we want but the fact is she was going around the house helping drunken Americans in a bath robe naked underneath. Now of course she can do that if she likes but that does not seem to me like she was in any rush to get some underwear on which is also fine and her purgative but i find it strange behavior on national TV.

But equally there are not many tv programs that are 24/7 in a house where she could easily have been preparing for a shower/bed. Lets not forget that the puking was an unexpected event at a snapshot in time. Its not like Chloe thought ... Jeremy is in the loo puking, I will just get naked under my bathrobe and give him an opportunity to see my bits :joker:

[Marsh.]

Don't spoil it Marsh:joker::joker::joker:

:fist:

[chuff me dizzy]

There was no camera in the toilet hun.

The small bit we did see through the door she was sat down and not leaning anywhere near him.

http://i.imgur.com/H9p2ywC.png

On your tv ,but as we've proved ,it not working as good as it should be

[Liam-]

lmfao and then we know that Marsh wins the argument <3

[kirklancaster]

QUOTE=Kazanne;7474950]:joker::joker: Not this angelic bunch Anaesthesia,just like they don't post half naked pics of women and salivate over the female form,:joker::joker: Of couse they would :wavey:[/QUOTE]

Kazanne!!!!:laugh2:

[Marsh.]

On your tv ,but as we've proved ,it not working as good as it should be

Oh right, so Chloe was sat down as seen in that image (you did look at it didn't you my love?) on my TV but leaning over him on yours? Ok hun. :joker:

Maybe a change in your prescription is required. :thumbs:

[chuff me dizzy]

lmfao and then we know that Marsh wins the argument <3

He wishes :joker::joker::joker:

[Marsh.]

He wishes :joker::joker::joker:

When it comes to "proved" I am the only one to have provided actual evidence to my points.

Come and join the adults and be rational for once.

[Liam-]

He wishes :joker::joker::joker:

You had to resort to questioning the working state of his tv as an apparently 'rational' argument.. it's fair to say, in a debate where proof is needed, you lost :hehe:

[daniel-lewis-1985]

We can surmise about maybes all we want but the fact is she was going around the house helping drunken Americans in a bath robe naked underneath. Now of course she can do that if she likes but that does not seem to me like she was in any rush to get some underwear on which is also fine and her purgative but i find it strange behavior on national TV.

She was helping drunken Americans? Lets not exaggerate it was 1 and yes she was HELPING HIM.

Lets just say it how it is.

The people who are saying she should have been wearing something under the robe are saying that its her own fault and she deserves anything she gets for teasing a man with her sexy dressing gown.

Am I wrong?

[Marsh.]

She was helping drunken Americans? Lets not exaggerate it was 1 abd yes she was HELPING HIM.

Lets just say it how it is.

The people who are saying she should have been wearing something under the robe are saying in the nicest way possible that its her own fault and she deserves anything she gets for teasing a man with her sexy dressing gown.

Am I wrong?

D: That old woman I saw on the ward in hospital had nothing on under the hospital gown.

The little tease. :creep:

[Liam-]

She was helping drunken Americans? Lets not exaggerate it was 1 abd yes she was HELPING HIM.

Lets just say it how it is.

The people who are saying she should have been wearing something under the robe are saying in the nicest way possible that its her own fault and she deserves anything she gets for teasing a man with her sexy dressing gown.

Am I wrong?

No you are not wrong, you are very much correct unfortunately

[daniel-lewis-1985]

D: That old woman I saw on the ward in hospital had nothing on under the hospital gown.

The little tease. :creep:

Not even those sexy little paper knickers? :o

The filthy mare!

[Pincho Paxton]

They should put Frank Bruno in with his sexy boxer dressing gown he's the complete package!!!

[Marsh.]

Not even those sexy little paper knickers? :o

The filthy mare!

She'd pissed herself so had to take it off.

But we know that was all part of her plan.

[chuff me dizzy]

When it comes to "proved" I am the only one to have provided actual evidence to my points.

Come and join the adults and be rational for once.

Adults ? I look in the lounge love, I think your highly mistaken

[daniel-lewis-1985]

She'd pissed herself so had to take it off.

But we know that was all part of her plan.

Pfft how transparent.

[Marsh.]

Adults ? I look in the lounge love, I think your highly mistaken

You're looking in the lounge? Try the kitchen maybe you left your marbles there? :)

[chuff me dizzy]

You're looking in the lounge? Try the kitchen maybe you left your marbles there? :)

Is this is personal attack by any chance ?

[Niamh.]

Yes alright you two, lets not start insulting eachother

[Marsh.]

Is this is personal attack by any chance ?

Only as personal as the ones sent my way. :)

[Marsh.]

Yes alright you two, lets not start insulting eachother

It's fine. The discussion on topic has ended now anyway with the photographic evidence.

I'm done. :laugh:

[Jake.]

the clocking


http://i.imgur.com/f8QAXsp.gif

[chuff me dizzy]

Yes alright you two, lets not start insulting eachother

No personal attacks from me

[MB.]

No personal attacks from me

:laugh:

You said that the people in the Lounge were immature just a couple of minutes ago. This whole thread is comical.

[Niamh.]

Closed, I think this thread has run it's course