I did not realise Chloe was a nude model. Does that change your view of her?

[mazerunner_888]

Having seen a number of nude photoshoots I must say I was a bit shocked. However I think good on her if she has confidence to show off her body.

Does this change your view of her now?

[Razor]

No

[MrWong]

No.

Why would it?

[armand.kay]

No

[sassysocks]

Having seen a number of nude photoshoots I must say I was a bit shocked. However I think good on her if she has confidence to show off her body.

Does this change your view of her now?

Oh come on - it was always obvious she had no shame.

It isn't about how good her body is, it should be at her age. It is about her laziness and lack of ability and desire to do something worthwhile with her life and just take the easy way to a fast buck.

You see, the next easy route will be a wealthy older husband.

She is predictable, lazy and low achieving - and just perpetuates past low expectations and standards for women - to sell sex.

[Withano]

No.

Why would it?

I was gonna post these exact 4 words lols

[bots]

Yes, i'm shocked and stunned, I thought she was a virgin princess :shocked:

[mazerunner_888]

Yes, i'm shocked and stunned, I thought she was a virgin princess :shocked:

I never thought this as she seemed quite worldly but was socked to see her posing nude but she is an attractive girl.

[sassysocks]

I never thought this as she seemed quite worldly but was socked to see her posing nude but she is an attractive girl.

Worldly is a polite way of putting it - wouldn't been around the block be more appropriate!

Assuming you have an attractive wife, girlfriend or sister, would you be happy for them to pose nude. Wouldn't you hope they had more self-respect than that?

Chloe is not only a sad and needy girl but she is a total hypocrite.

All that crap she spouted when she over-reacted about the incident with Jeremy proudly harping on about CHOICE when she reminded us that she took her clothes off for a living but this did not give men rights to touch.

No it doesn't, and Jeremy did not touch, but doesn't she understand that girls that do what she does give out the wrong impression to men. They make men think women are there for their gratification, and if they don't want to pay for it, some will take.

Girls like her are part of the problem.

[Firewire]

No, it shouldn't change your perspective on anyone.

[mazerunner_888]

Worldly is a polite way of putting it - wouldn't been around the block be more appropriate!

Assuming you have an attractive wife, girlfriend or sister, would you be happy for them to pose nude. Wouldn't you hope they had more self-respect than that?

Chloe is not only a sad and needy girl but she is a total hypocrite.

All that crap she spouted when she over-reacted about the incident with Jeremy proudly harping on about CHOICE when she reminded us that she took her clothes off for a living but this did not give men rights to touch.

No it doesn't, and Jeremy did not touch, but doesn't she understand that girls that do what she does give out the wrong impression to men. They make men think women are there for their gratification, and if they don't want to pay for it, some will take.

Girls like her are part of the problem.

I am truly shocked by your view here. A woman has the right to artistic expression without that meaning any male meth addict then has the right to sexually abuse her. This is 2015 I think we should not go back to 1970s views of women.

[Liam-]

Didn't you make a thread eerily similar to this a couple of days ago? :suspect:

[Jack The Cat]

No, it's her choice and nothing wrong with it anyway.

[mazerunner_888]

Didn't you make a thread eerily similar to this a couple of days ago? :suspect:

No that was when I saw a page3 type photo not nude.

[Pincho Paxton]

When her boob was flashed all she talked about was choosing when to show her body. So it was pretty obvious that she was a nude model.

[mazerunner_888]

When her boob was flashed all she talked about was choosing when to show her body. So it was pretty obvious that she was a nude model.

I don't see that as being obvious she could of been talking about boyfriend

[Josy]

No :shrug:

[Pincho Paxton]

I don't see that as being obvious she could of been talking about boyfriend

The way it was worded was not for a boyfriend.

[Ant.]

Worldly is a polite way of putting it - wouldn't been around the block be more appropriate!

Assuming you have an attractive wife, girlfriend or sister, would you be happy for them to pose nude. Wouldn't you hope they had more self-respect than that?

Chloe is not only a sad and needy girl but she is a total hypocrite.

All that crap she spouted when she over-reacted about the incident with Jeremy proudly harping on about CHOICE when she reminded us that she took her clothes off for a living but this did not give men rights to touch.

No it doesn't, and Jeremy did not touch, but doesn't she understand that girls that do what she does give out the wrong impression to men. They make men think women are there for their gratification, and if they don't want to pay for it, some will take.

Girls like her are part of the problem.

Voluntarily posing naked =/= Involuntarily being groped by a stranger

[sassysocks]

I am truly shocked by your view here. A woman has the right to artistic expression without that meaning any male meth addict then has the right to sexually abuse her. This is 2015 I think we should not go back to 1970s views of women.

No we should not and that is what I am saying. Girls like Chloe perpetuate the views of those times, causing men to see women as sex objects there to be touched. Unfortunately women like Chloe talk the talk, but don't walk the walk.

Hark at your use of the word artiistic - nothing Chloe does is artistic - just cheap and tawdry.

She made a humungus fuss about Jeremy touching/moving part of her dressing-gown when she was in a very safe enviroment. It a deliberate act for air time.

What about the poor victims who have actually been sexually abused by men who have been looking at tasteless pictures of girls like Chloe and got so worked up they went out and took what they wanted from someone who was not in a save enivonment and did not put themselves on display. Girls like Chloe are partly to blame for that.

[mazerunner_888]

Voluntarily posing naked =/= Involuntarily being groped by a stranger

Exactly I can't believe people still hold out dated views of woman's rights

[rionablue]

Having seen a number of nude photoshoots I must say I was a bit shocked. However I think good on her if she has confidence to show off her body.

Does this change your view of her now?

I quite liked Chloe. I thought she was feisty and at least she was one of the housemates who BROUGHT SOMETHING to the house even if she was bitchy from time to time I reckon she was honest. I knew she had done nude modelling and she never said she didn't. I think she has a gorgeous body and I say live and let live so no that wouldn't change my opinion on her.

[Miranda123]

Having seen a number of nude photoshoots I must say I was a bit shocked. However I think good on her if she has confidence to show off her body.

Does this change your view of her now?

no of course not, why would it


Boticelli would be spinning in his grave at your question lol

[mazerunner_888]

No we should not and that is what I am saying. Girls like Chloe perpetuate the views of those times, causing men to see women as sex objects there to be touched. Unfortunately women like Chloe talk the talk, but don't walk the walk.

Hark at your use of the word artiistic - nothing Chloe does is artistic - just cheap and tawdry.

She made a humungus fuss about Jeremy touching/moving part of her dressing-gown when she was in a very safe enviroment. It a deliberate act for air time.

What about the poor victims who have actually been sexually abused by men who have been looking at tasteless pictures of girls like Chloe and got so worked up they went out and took what they wanted from someone who was not in a save enivonment and did not put themselves on display. Girls like Chloe are partly to blame for that.


Please these views are both offensive and outrageous to suggest that if a women poses nude she is encouraging men to commit acts of sexual violation towards women. Women can do what they like and that does NOT mean they are then responsible for crimes committed by men.

Please re-examine the views you hold or your setting back women's rights 50 years.

[rionablue]

Oh come on - it was always obvious she had no shame.

It isn't about how good her body is, it should be at her age. It is about her laziness and lack of ability and desire to do something worthwhile with her life and just take the easy way to a fast buck.

You see, the next easy route will be a wealthy older husband.

She is predictable, lazy and low achieving - and just perpetuates past low expectations and standards for women - to sell sex.

With the way you have been posting about her and Cami and calling them awful names I am not surprised sassy I was expecting that response :hehe:

[Miranda123]

With the way you have been posting about her and Cami and calling them awful names I am not surprised sassy I was expecting that response :hehe:

I wouldnt bother responding to that kind of blind stupid rhetoric if I were you rionablue

move on to a sensible thread

[rionablue]

Worldly is a polite way of putting it - wouldn't been around the block be more appropriate!

Assuming you have an attractive wife, girlfriend or sister, would you be happy for them to pose nude. Wouldn't you hope they had more self-respect than that?

Chloe is not only a sad and needy girl but she is a total hypocrite.

All that crap she spouted when she over-reacted about the incident with Jeremy proudly harping on about CHOICE when she reminded us that she took her clothes off for a living but this did not give men rights to touch.

No it doesn't, and Jeremy did not touch, but doesn't she understand that girls that do what she does give out the wrong impression to men. They make men think women are there for their gratification, and if they don't want to pay for it, some will take.

Girls like her are part of the problem.

Thank GOD there are many people in here who don't agree with your vicious vicious words about the younger girls but you are entitled to your opinion so carry on

[arista]

Having seen a number of nude photoshoots I must say I was a bit shocked. However I think good on her if she has confidence to show off her body.

Does this change your view of her now?

No


In there she could have been fun
but she blew it
The public hated her


Will she go on Loose WomenHD Live?

[Miranda123]

Thank GOD there are many people in here who don't agree with your vicious vicious words about the younger girls but you are entitled to your opinion so carry on

entitled to his/her opinion of course but this is the type of ignorance that should only ever be ignored

Im off to find some sensible debate

[rionablue]

I wouldnt bother responding to that kind of blind stupid rhetoric if I were you rionablue

move on to a sensible thread

Good idea Miranda. She or He is venting awful outdated hurtful stuff on their posts. I wont rise to them again. NO POINT. Thanks babe PEACE

[sassysocks]

Exactly I can't believe people still hold out dated views of woman's rights

Excuse me I am a hugh supporter of womens's rights, as should be obvious from many of my posts, and I also believe in taking responsibility for your actions.

Chloe's profession gives out negative connations of women and gives certain men the wrong idea. She helps perpetuate those dated, sexist views by what she does. It is not artistic, it is titilation pure and simple.

Then she makes a hugh fuss about a minor incident from an intoxicated and sick man when she knew she was perfectly safe. It was clearly not done through fear but for attention and airtime.

I find your comments hypocritical when judging by your avatar you appear to support Ken who coinicentally was thrown out for sexist and racist comments. Sounds like double standards to me and I cannot take such clear and obvious double standards seriously.