Log in

View Full Version : Perez Hilton His Warning


Josy
29-01-2015, 09:24 PM
Was that warning deserved?

Opinions...

Cal.
29-01-2015, 09:24 PM
Yes, he was getting in her personal space.

Marsh.
29-01-2015, 09:25 PM
Yes, I suppose touching another person that way deserved some kind of warning.

The whole "offensive to the public" was a bit OTT though.

Jake.
29-01-2015, 09:25 PM
Na, found it to be OTT

Pincho Paxton
29-01-2015, 09:26 PM
Well I did say that it probably breaks the rules.

bots
29-01-2015, 09:27 PM
i would say it was much more of a rule break than the Jeremy incident, and he got thrown out

Vanessa
29-01-2015, 09:27 PM
No, because she has invaded his personal space many times , but never complained about it. And they were both smiling and enjoying themselves.

Lostie!
29-01-2015, 09:27 PM
I'd say so, it was an invasion of personal space. But "offensive to the public" was definitely over-the-top.

However, the warnings should be consistent. I think Katie H deserves a reprimand for her repeated comments where she negatively generalises Americans, too (which are likely to be offensive to some members of the public). I'm sure someone would be warned had they said the same sort of things but about those of a different skin colour, so I'm not sure why remarks that can be seen as xenophobic are tolerated. :shrug:

Drew.
29-01-2015, 09:28 PM
Thought they were both having a bit of fun really, a rare sight.

Jack The Cat
29-01-2015, 09:29 PM
No, these warnings are stupid, BB should reserve them for more important things.

Samm
29-01-2015, 09:31 PM
Yes, if it was Ken the reaction on here would be much worse and Ken probably would of got a formal warning or have gotten kicked out

Stevep
29-01-2015, 09:33 PM
No, it was all done in good humour. I'm pretty sure Hopkins took it this way to, hence the hysterical laughter.

JoshBB
29-01-2015, 09:33 PM
I need to catch up and see this. Whose personal space did he get in?

One thing I will say though is Perez should not be thrown out because clearly it is not the same as if Jeremy/Ken did it because he isn't straight and has no interest in sexually harassing them

Kazanne
29-01-2015, 09:33 PM
Yes simply because Katie had said NO twice.

Jack The Cat
29-01-2015, 09:35 PM
No, it was all done in good humour. I'm pretty sure Hopkins took it this way to, hence the hysterical laughter.

Right, its all about the context.

Moosething
29-01-2015, 09:38 PM
She was giggling & loving it

T*
29-01-2015, 09:41 PM
yes

Miranda123
29-01-2015, 09:41 PM
Was that warning deserved?

Opinions...

well I thought they should have said something but when they asked KH in the Dr if she felt intimidated or wanted to tell them something, she laughed it off and said he is a little child and I can deal with that

I guess they had to cover themselves, as they have probably had complaints from people outside

Miranda123
29-01-2015, 09:42 PM
I need to catch up and see this. Whose personal space did he get in?

One thing I will say though is Perez should not be thrown out because clearly it is not the same as if Jeremy/Ken did it because he isn't straight and has no interest in sexually harassing them

so cause he's gay he can do what he wants in people personal space, if they are a woman??

thats crazy talk

erinp5
29-01-2015, 09:44 PM
Daily Star front page Police called over Katie H attack
https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/560920146185707520/photo/1

Stevep
29-01-2015, 09:45 PM
Daily Star front page Police called over Katie H attack
https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/560920146185707520/photo/1

lol, that is so pathetic if it's regarding the lick, kiss or whatever it was.

Firewire
29-01-2015, 09:46 PM
I need to catch up and see this. Whose personal space did he get in?

One thing I will say though is Perez should not be thrown out because clearly it is not the same as if Jeremy/Ken did it because he isn't straight and has no interest in sexually harassing them

How can you say he shouldn't be thrown out when you haven't seen it yet?

ebandit
29-01-2015, 09:46 PM
.........i don't care................i don't care.........stomping my foot like

tiny tears pez

Mark L

Pincho Paxton
29-01-2015, 09:47 PM
Call the police!!!

rionablue
29-01-2015, 09:48 PM
Yes!!!

Jules2
29-01-2015, 09:53 PM
Of course he deserved it, about time tbh. Police called......mmmmmm and still he gets away with murder.....

Ninastar
29-01-2015, 09:54 PM
Absolutely. Can you imagine if she had done that to him? He's be straight in the diary room, crying, claiming abuse, trying his hardest to get her kicked out.

smudgie
29-01-2015, 09:54 PM
If Katie H complained then perhaps fair enough. She did appear to be having fun with him.:shrug:
Nadia aske Perez to get Katie H off her on the bed..now we know it was all a bit of fun, but just where do they draw the line.
I only hope it is not down to these ridiculous headlines in the gutter press.

Jules2
29-01-2015, 09:54 PM
lol, that is so pathetic if it's regarding the lick, kiss or whatever it was.

He did a bit more but it wasnt shown, the powers that be were afraid of public opinion and complaints.

SaveUs
29-01-2015, 09:59 PM
Yep, he doesn't seem to value personal space any more now than he did when he released indecent images of other celebrities to bump his 'career'. He just has no consideration for other people

wendywillow
29-01-2015, 10:06 PM
wait....he got a warning over that silly little like of the neck when they were joking around? the first time the two of them are kind of having fun and perez got a warning for it?

Marsh.
29-01-2015, 10:07 PM
Yes, if it was Ken the reaction on here would be much worse and Ken probably would of got a formal warning or have gotten kicked out

Step aside Mystic Meg (p)Sychic Sam is in town.

Jake.
29-01-2015, 10:08 PM
Daily Star front page Police called over Katie H attack
https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/560920146185707520/photo/1

I'm glad that Nadia was quick to react

Marsh.
29-01-2015, 10:09 PM
Sex attack. :joker:

The housemates could play tag and they'd write a story about a tag team orgy.

Kazanne
29-01-2015, 10:11 PM
Daily Star front page Police called over Katie H attack
https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/560920146185707520/photo/1

Good God Nadia that's going too far:hehe:

Denver
29-01-2015, 10:12 PM
Yes he deserved a warning as not only is it touching somebody when they asked him not to its also a risk of spreading germs/infections to other housemates

jaxie
29-01-2015, 10:13 PM
It was Ott but the funny thing was I don't think he even realised it was a proper warning.

Denver
29-01-2015, 10:13 PM
Does Nadia have the local Inspeactors number on speed dial :hehe:

joeysteele
29-01-2015, 10:42 PM
This is the issue as I see it, there was nothing malicious about it but it was uninvited.

However the space that was in fact actually originally being invaded was his, by Katie Hopkins pushing her face closer and closer to his.

So if he warranted a warning then so did she,since she didn't get one then he shouldn't have either,in my view.

In addition now,I have to be fair here and so I reallycommend her for saying when asked,'had anything crossed a line as to the actions that night between her and Perez'.
She with no hesitation said no, so then,where was the problem and from her own mouth came the facts that there was nothing that needed to be addressed at all, never mind have any warnings issued as to.

Jack The Cat
29-01-2015, 11:03 PM
It was Ott but the funny thing was I don't think he even realised it was a proper warning.

Well like his last "Warning" BB never said the words "You are issued with a warning". Unlike both Ken and Alex, so was it a warning?

T*
29-01-2015, 11:09 PM
Absolutely. Can you imagine if she had done that to him? He's be straight in the diary room, crying, claiming abuse, trying his hardest to get her kicked out.

ikr, hes absolutely vile

T*
29-01-2015, 11:10 PM
He needs to be thrown out

Lstan
29-01-2015, 11:12 PM
Na, found it to be OTT

I got the feeling they did it because the public complained because when they asked katie h if she was ok about that she said she wasnt bothered

T*
29-01-2015, 11:15 PM
I need to catch up and see this. Whose personal space did he get in?

One thing I will say though is Perez should not be thrown out because clearly it is not the same as if Jeremy/Ken did it because he isn't straight and has no interest in sexually harassing them

So if I went over to a woman and grabbed their breast in a malicious way, they shouldn't be offended because i'm gay? :rolleyes: Incredibly stupid thing to say.

Rob!
29-01-2015, 11:49 PM
It was a stupid warning. BB asked Katie yesterday whether she felt it was over the line and she said no, despite the fact that she's shrewd enough to know what would happen if she'd have said yes.

Northern Monkey
30-01-2015, 12:02 AM
She said 'no' and he still did it.When a woman says 'no' it means NO.

darkestcornwall
30-01-2015, 12:40 AM
:nono:Thou shall not exchange bodily fluids without permission............:nono:

arista
30-01-2015, 12:49 AM
http://media.skynews.com/media/images/generated/2015/1/29/366953/default/v2/star-1-720x960.jpg

What utter made up rubbish

Who called the Police a old granny?

arista
30-01-2015, 12:59 AM
He needs to be thrown out


For What


Being his self?

Withano
30-01-2015, 01:10 AM
I need to catch up and see this. Whose personal space did he get in?

One thing I will say though is Perez should not be thrown out because clearly it is not the same as if Jeremy/Ken did it because he isn't straight and has no interest in sexually harassing them

Oh yeah, Perez is gay so he might as well of stuck a finger or two right up in there

Lstan
30-01-2015, 01:40 AM
http://media.skynews.com/media/images/generated/2015/1/29/366953/default/v2/star-1-720x960.jpg

What utter made up rubbish

Who called the Police a old granny?

ironic they are reporting this when katie h slagged of this very paper....

Lstan
30-01-2015, 01:41 AM
Sex attack. :joker:

The housemates could play tag and they'd write a story about a tag team orgy.

:omg:

that was one mental image I DIDNT need thanks :joker:

ozzyshaggah
30-01-2015, 03:27 AM
no
it was contrived bull**** to appease the morons that whinge about the show for the weirdest reasons
small minded wowsers should get a life

The term wowser - surely one of the most impressive and expressive of Australian coinages - is used to express healthy contempt for those who attempt to force their own morality on everyone

Pink Pegasus
30-01-2015, 03:33 AM
She kept repeatedly sticking her face right up to him, he responded by sticking out his tongue/licking motion. When she said don't lick me, he told her that if she kept getting that close to him he would and made a joke that he would eat her up, she then continued to still go right into his face so he continued with the licking motion. It then seemed to descend into a game of sorts,her repeatedly trying to go back into his face again and again, and everytime she leaned into his face, he leaned forward right back at her saying give me a hug/kiss, and then like a game of chase happened. They even ended with him saying, ok no physical contact just say cheers and Katie tipped wine glasses with him. When BB asked her if she felt a line had been crossed she said no everything was "absolutely fine" that she felt Perez was like a child.

If someone kept almost touching noses with me whilst they gave out to me, and refused to get out of my face I might first walk away. If they continued to keep talking and insisting on getting right into my face where they are millimetres from touching, my natural reaction would be to just push them away from me with my two hands (not a huge push just to move them). I would leave it at that and hoped they stopped, but no doubt you would probably get thrown out for "assault" if you did that in the big brother house, so if you can't physically push someone away out of your face maybe that's why he started by staying in the one spot and just sticking his tongue out in a licking way, to keep her away from his face. Getting in someone's face like that could easily result in aggression but I felt his attempt to turn it into a game and the resulting chase thing seemed to break a bit of tension between them I thought.

I don't know why the police were called?:conf:

kirklancaster
30-01-2015, 04:05 AM
Anyone attempting to, or wanting to lick Katie Hopkin's face ought to have the men in white coats called for and an appointment at Specsavers made.

Uggh. I would rather eat a bowl of dead skin flakes from a leper and drink a glass of White Dee Kelly's armpit sweat than have my poor innocent tongue touch that ugly bitch.

She's got a face like Maggie Thatcher's and Max Bygrave's bastard offspring. :yuk::yuk:

kirklancaster
30-01-2015, 04:10 AM
She kept repeatedly sticking her face right up to him, he responded by sticking out his tongue/licking motion. When she said don't lick me, he told her that if she kept getting that close to him he would and made a joke that he would eat her up, she then continued to still go right into his face so he continued with the licking motion. It then seemed to descend into a game of sorts,her repeatedly trying to go back into his face again and again, and everytime she leaned into his face, he leaned forward right back at her saying give me a hug/kiss, and then like a game of chase happened. They even ended with him saying, ok no physical contact just say cheers and Katie tipped wine glasses with him. When BB asked her if she felt a line had been crossed she said no everything was "absolutely fine" that she felt Perez was like a child.

If someone kept almost touching noses with me whilst they gave out to me, and refused to get out of my face I might first walk away. If they continued to keep talking and insisting on getting right into my face where they are millimetres from touching, my natural reaction would be to just push them away from me with my two hands (not a huge push just to move them). I would leave it at that and hoped they stopped, but no doubt you would probably get thrown out for "assault" if you did that in the big brother house, so if you can't physically push someone away out of your face maybe that's why he started by staying in the one spot and just sticking his tongue out in a licking way, to keep her away from his face. Getting in someone's face like that could easily result in aggression but I felt his attempt to turn it into a game and the resulting chase thing seemed to break a bit of tension between them I thought.

I don't know why the police were called?:conf:

Because Hopkin's was guilty of possessing 'an ugly face in a built up area' - contrary to Paragraph 64 of Section 32 of the Offences Against Scaring Discerning Adults Act 1927. :hehe:

Caballo
30-01-2015, 05:55 AM
The 'victim' was offered the opportunity to complain and flatly refused it. On that basis NO warning required. In reality they were covering their asses for all the people in soceity hwo think it's their job to be offended on behalf of others.

Mick
30-01-2015, 06:48 AM
No, it was all done in good humour. I'm pretty sure Hopkins took it this way to, hence the hysterical laughter.

Yes it was and fair dues to her because she took it as such and when asked by BB said so.If the situation had been reversed I suspect that Perez would have been asking for his Lawyer.

What I found interesting was Perez not being willing to accept the reprimand which BB still decided to issue. Goose and Gander some Honking.!

Patricia4
30-01-2015, 06:54 AM
Yes

Niamh.
30-01-2015, 09:12 AM
He shouldn't have licked her face that's for sure but she shouldn't have gotten in his face like that either, they both should have been spoken to about respecting eachothers boundaries and personal space I think. I mean how close was her face to his for him to be able to lick her?

Beso
30-01-2015, 09:14 AM
way out of line giving him a warning, she was the one coming up into his grill, he licked her so she would move away..and **** me if you cant chase someone around the big brother house as you both giggle then what the hell can you do...where is Hopkins warning for her American comment cause that offended the **** out of me....A VIEWER!

chuff me dizzy
30-01-2015, 09:32 AM
Of course it was deserved ,if when BB asked her KH had said she was offended by it((As Pervez would have if boot was on the other foot) He would have been removed

Niamh.
30-01-2015, 09:40 AM
Of course it was deserved ,if when BB asked her KH had said she was offended by it((As Pervez would have if boot was on the other foot) He would have been removed

He shouldn't have done it, I won't disagree with that but do you not think she was also wrong in invading his personal space like that? She was milimetres away from his face?

chuff me dizzy
30-01-2015, 09:45 AM
He shouldn't have done it, I won't disagree with that but do you not think she was also wrong in invading his personal space like that? She was milimetres away from his face?

So that warrants licking her face ? No Niahm it doesn't, if he had done that to me I would have killed him,filthy gett

bots
30-01-2015, 09:46 AM
it was a schoolyard stand off to me, but these things always have limits, and perez went way over the limit

Niamh.
30-01-2015, 09:48 AM
So that warrants licking her face ? No Niahm it doesn't, if he had done that to me I would have killed him,filthy gett

No, it doesn't of course but what would you have done if someone you didn't like got in your face like that repeatedly after you'd told them to get out of your face? Also, can i add if you had "killed him" don't you think that would have been too extreme a reaction just like his towards her? :laugh:

chuff me dizzy
30-01-2015, 09:49 AM
No, it doesn't of course but what would you have done if someone you didn't like got in your face like that repeatedly after you'd told them to get out of your face? Also, can i add if you had "killed him" don't you think that would have been to extremem a reaction just like his towards her? :laugh:

Repeatedly ?

Ellen
30-01-2015, 09:49 AM
I agree that if it had been the other way around Perez would have crying like a baby to BB BUT i think it was them both been silly. There are some things i believe Perez should have been warned about but not this. I think the reason BB spoke to him was because of KH saying no and potential backlash.
KH said there was no problem, it should have been left at that.

Niamh.
30-01-2015, 09:51 AM
Repeatedly ?

Yes, she did it quite a few times, he told her to get away a couple of times before he licked her and she continued to do it after he licked her as well

chuff me dizzy
30-01-2015, 09:53 AM
Yes, she did it quite a few times, he told her to get away a couple of times before he licked her and she continued to do it after he licked her as well

Not on my tv

Tip
30-01-2015, 09:53 AM
I didn't see it - did he actually lick her face?

Brave man - but yeah, probably not a good idea on BB.

Probably taught her to keep a nose length away from his face in future though.

Denver
30-01-2015, 09:55 AM
Dont forget he also grabbed her when she tried to get away

Beso
30-01-2015, 10:09 AM
Not on my tv

you'd be to busy reporting it to the police.

Smithy
30-01-2015, 10:12 AM
Of course it was justified, if some skank licked me i'd punch them one :umm2:

People saying she was in his personal space, anytime he went towards her to kiss her or lick her she backed away, he lunged at her and licked her

Niamh.
30-01-2015, 10:13 AM
Not on my tv

You're still avoiding my question Chuff, you just said you'd have "killed him" if he licked your face but what if he stuck his face right in yours whilst goading you? would that have been ok?

aj2463
30-01-2015, 11:20 AM
Katie was in his face.. The warning was pathetic.. BB just trying to please the delusional half of the public

sampvt
30-01-2015, 11:24 AM
They had to warn him after the Jeremy affair just to level the playing field.

Pincho Paxton
30-01-2015, 11:35 AM
Well she did repeatedly get close to his face. Anyway the warning was not a severe warning, it was just like... stop being naughty.

joeysteele
30-01-2015, 12:24 PM
No, it doesn't of course but what would you have done if someone you didn't like got in your face like that repeatedly after you'd told them to get out of your face? Also, can i add if you had "killed him" don't you think that would have been too extreme a reaction just like his towards her? :laugh:

It doesn't happen to me thankfully but if anyone had come as near as she did to my face and was spouting off at me, sorry but to protect my space,I would have moved them to the side, not licked their face.

I see her as equally to blame for the incident but since she never complained, I don't see the issue really and although I don't like her, that is to her full credit that she said no lines had been crossed.

As for any Police involvement, that is plain ridiculous in my opinion, the Police have plenty to do dealing with real aggressive crime.

I mean Perez was doing a crazy 'dance' on a bbbots exclusive last night,where he jumped on Kavana and others with no one complaining.
It really is pathetic some of the things housemates, all of them, not just Perez, in all CBB/BB series, get pulled up on now.

-Sue-
30-01-2015, 12:28 PM
I have a question has Katie H ever had a warning about breaking the BB bunny? (in previous series of BB, BB will warn HMs not to break BB property) or threatening Perez's water? or threatening to bang things over his head? etc????

Katie IMO seems to have gotten away with so much that I would consider awful inappropriate behaviour but can't remember seeing her ever getting told off

PS Can BB also tell her off for sucking all the 'fun' out of the house.. thank you :D

poppsywoppsy
30-01-2015, 12:32 PM
I read that it was worse than him licking her face, he made a couple of remarks about her and his d*** and another one in the same lines.

However, we didn't hear it and they didn't refer to it in the warning.

If Katie had complained, we might have more info but it is CBB covering Perez's back again as usual.

joeysteele
30-01-2015, 12:35 PM
I have a question has Katie H ever had a warning about breaking the BB bunny? (in previous series of BB, BB will warn HMs not to break BB property) or threatening Perez's water? or threatening to bang things over his head? etc????

Katie IMO seems to have gotten away with so much that I would consider awful inappropriate behaviour but can't remember seeing her ever getting told off

PS Can BB also tell her off for sucking all the 'fun' out of the house.. thank you :D

No she hasn't that we have been told or seen Sue, however it seems that it is okay for her to threaten and even do those things.

Not however in my view it isn't, so I rightfully condemn her for those things and she should have had in my book,at the very least 2 'guidance chats' as to rules and behaviour if not actual warnings.

Vanessa
30-01-2015, 12:36 PM
Women i there get away with anything, while the men are warned for everything. :crazy:

LukeB
30-01-2015, 12:39 PM
Yes.. He got into her personal space without her permission. It was disgusting least KH didn't complain about it. If any man did that without permission they would have got a slap :joker:

poppsywoppsy
30-01-2015, 12:39 PM
No she hasn't that we have been told or seen Sue, however it seems that it is okay for her to threaten and even do those things.

Not however in my view it isn't, so I rightfully condemn her for those things and she should have had in my book,at the very least 2 'guidance chats' as to rules and behaviour if not actual warnings.

As Perez didn't get a warning for humping the window or the very many times he called others filthy names, what you want Katie warned for is very mild compared to his.

joeysteele
30-01-2015, 12:41 PM
As Perez didn't get a warning for humping the window or the very many times he called others filthy names, what you want Katie warned for is very mild compared to his.

I beg your pardon, breaking something that isn't hers, threatening to put something into someones drink that shouldn't be.

I would expect to get punished if I threatened to or did anything like that and I would deserve to be too.

Denver
30-01-2015, 12:46 PM
I beg your pardon, breaking something that isn't hers, threatening to put something into someones drink that shouldn't be.

I would expect to get punished if I threatened to or did anything like that and I would deserve to be too.

The bunny wasnt Perez's

she never threatened to posion him what so ever

poppsywoppsy
30-01-2015, 12:48 PM
I beg your pardon, breaking something that isn't hers, threatening to put something into someones drink that shouldn't be.

I would expect to get punished if I threatened to or did anything like that and I would deserve to be too.

It was banter, not serious for a moment, goodness, they won't be able to speak soon when people miss the irony and the point.

-Sue-
30-01-2015, 01:02 PM
No she hasn't that we have been told or seen Sue, however it seems that it is okay for her to threaten and even do those things.

Not however in my view it isn't, so I rightfully condemn her for those things and she should have had in my book,at the very least 2 'guidance chats' as to rules and behaviour if not actual warnings.

Thank you or that :D :flowers:
I was shocked Perez got a warning for that but ok a minor slap on the wrist for having fun but it annoys me because we have seen KH harrass and get in Perez's personal space and him say 'no' to things when she is confronting him but yet nothing gets done... I think back to Jade Goody and how she got slaughtered by the GBP for various reasons but yet the same chants of aggression 'go home''get out' so many hate speeches ...nothing is done..even a simple slap on wrist for KH threats etc but no nothing makes me sad :(

-Sue-
30-01-2015, 01:04 PM
As Perez didn't get a warning for humping the window or the very many times he called others filthy names, what you want Katie warned for is very mild compared to his.

He humped a window all it effected was the poor camera men who were up close n personal ;)

As Katie would say 'chose to be offended' that will always be the 1 clip I could never play normal TV / PC volume :joker: The neighbours would be like 'oh my goodness we need better soundproofing' :D

-Sue-
30-01-2015, 01:05 PM
I beg your pardon, breaking something that isn't hers, threatening to put something into someones drink that shouldn't be.

I would expect to get punished if I threatened to or did anything like that and I would deserve to be too.

:clap1: I agree with that...I'm shocked days later naff all was done :(

Niamh.
30-01-2015, 01:21 PM
Yes.. He got into her personal space without her permission. It was disgusting least KH didn't complain about it. If any man did that without permission they would have got a slap :joker:

tbf she started that first, obviously I'm not saying therefore it was ok for him to lick her because it wasn't but what he did was a reaction to her invading his personal space

ebandit
30-01-2015, 01:28 PM
I mean Perez was doing a crazy 'dance' on a bbbots exclusive last night,where he jumped on Kavana and others with no one complaining.
It really is pathetic some of the things housemates, all of them, not just Perez, in all CBB/BB series, get pulled up on now.

ha ha! he did not dare jump on calum..............he approached and thought

.........

100% pez should have been warned..........imagine? that being excused

in any workplace..............

Mark L

joeysteele
30-01-2015, 02:08 PM
The bunny wasnt Perez's

she never threatened to posion him what so ever


I think with respect yopu are being selective.

I never said the bunny was Perez's, it is/was BB property actually but one thing it wasn't was hers and certainly not hers to break or damage in anyway either.


You nor I have any idea what she was going to do to his drink and never did she say she was only joking either.

However her words, ''I would be careful with that drinks beaker if I get my hands on it'', doesn't sound like planning to do anything 'nice' with it.
That was out of order.

If that is his drinks carrier than she has no right whatsover to even threaten to do anything with it without his permission.

Unlike you possibly, I would be saying that too had he said anything like that as to her property or had he broken the Bunny himself too.

Housemates have been warned in the past just for peeling a bit of backing off the chairs never mind actually breaking something.

-Sue-
30-01-2015, 02:09 PM
I think with respect yopu are being selective.

I never said the bunny was Perez's, it is/was BB property actually but one thing it wasn't was hers and certainly not hers to break or damage in anyway either.


You nor I have any idea what she was going to do to his drink and never did she say she was only joking either.

However her words, ''I would be careful with that drinks beaker if I get my hands on it'', doesn't sound like planning to do anything 'nice' with it.
That was out of order.

If that is his drinks carrier than she has no right whatsover to even threaten to do anything with it without his permission.

Unlike you possibly, I would be saying that too had he said anything like that as to her property or had he broken the Bunny himself too.

Housemates have been warned in the past just for peeling a bit of backing off the chairs never mind actually breaking something.

:clap1: exactly - well said :D

ebandit
30-01-2015, 03:49 PM
so the only defence is blaming someone else for a different issue

..........desperate times require...............

Mark L

Cherie
30-01-2015, 03:55 PM
For What


Being his self?

:laugh:

Pincho Paxton
30-01-2015, 03:59 PM
He humped a window all it effected was the poor camera men who were up close n personal ;)

As Katie would say 'chose to be offended' that will always be the 1 clip I could never play normal TV / PC volume :joker: The neighbours would be like 'oh my goodness we need better soundproofing' :D

I would love to see that camera angle!!! :joker:

-Sue-
30-01-2015, 04:01 PM
I would love to see that camera angle!!! :joker:

LOL :joker: