Sam Evans vs Helen Wood?

[Mystic Mock]

Which winner do you prefer?

Poll will be coming up shortly.

And I promise that this will be the last poll like this for the night.

[Brooklyn]

Sam, because he wasn't horrid.

[Xtopher]

Sam cause the same reason ^

[uniquedude]

Helen basically got paid 100k to bully a hosue of people for two months, Sam was better hands down and not as boring as people make out.

[jennyjuniper]

I would have liked to say neither. But if I had to choose, then Sam, because although he was as exciting as watching paint dry, he wasn't vicious like the Wood woman.

[Amy Jade]

Helen because she actually contributed to the show. Sam is the worst BB winner ever

[Denver]

Helen obvs without her BB15 would have been pointless

[little.lilly]

Neither. Helen was a bully and Sam was . . . umm, what was Sam other than boring?

[Northern Monkey]

Sam by a mile.Helen was a bitter old **** with a constant period.

[Liam-]

Queen Helen of course

[Jamesy]

Which is better wine or urine?

Sam obviously, he was boring, but a really nice genuine guy with a good heart and a cute face.

Helen was just a bitter cow that enjoyed bullying and segregating people.

[Nick.]

I genuinely supported Sam in BB14. :blush2:

[Jack_]

One is arguably BBUK's best ever winner, the other is BBUK's worst ever winner. It's quite obvious who is who.

[Firewire]

Helen tbh

[Natalie.]

Definitely Helen

[Niamh.]

Sam because he didn't get a pass to the final on day 1, and he wasn't a big asshole

[Adamw92]

I don't really like her but Helen because she actually contributed to her series and didn't just sit in the background.

[Glenn.]

Helen is a bitch

[Lostie!]

This poll result is actually really disheartening. :shocked:

Sam wasn't exactly a brilliant winner, but he beats an aggressive bully like Helen any day. People can say she "added more" all they want, but what she "added" isn't anything good.

[karezza]

Anyone but Sam.

[LukeB]

This poll result is actually really disheartening. :shocked:

Sam wasn't exactly a brilliant winner, but he beats an aggressive bully like Helen any day. People can say she "added more" all they want, but what she "added" isn't anything good.

:clap1:

[LukeB]

Sam

[Dylan95]

Sam, he was an awful winner but he wasn`t vile like Helen

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

sam as a person obvz but helen as a housemate

[Daniel-X]

Helen was about 1000x better as least she didn't just sit on the fence for her whole time in the house

[Jake.]

Sam as a person, easily

[Rob!]

Neither should have won...both completely the opposite sides of the spectrum...I guess Helen, because at least she was memorable in her series. People literally only know Sam for winning.

[Raph]

Sam definitely, my favorite BBUK winner of all time.

[Niamh.]

Neither should have won...both completely the opposite sides of the spectrum...I guess Helen, because at least she was memorable in her series. People literally only know Sam for winning.

don't forget his ever expanding winkie :fan:

[LukeB]

I have only liked one C5 winner and that was Sam and i votes for him too

[Shaun]

Give me nice winners over pricks any day.

[Rob!]

Sam definitely, my favorite BBUK winner of all time.

Why??

[Niamh.]

Give me nice winners over pricks any day.

:clap1:

[Jake.]

Give me nice winners over pricks any day.

tbh

[MB.]

Both are some of the worst winners we've had and I've made my opinions known on both... but Sam, by miles.

[Shaun]

Like I've said it multiple times and it seems to fall on deaf ears but surely the winner of a series has no bearing over your enjoyment of the series. BB6, BB7, and BB9 are all often referred to as 'great' or 'the best' series but had totally bland and/or terrible winners.

By all means keep the 'entertaining' (look, I'm even willing to compromise with you on what constitutes entertainment, because it sure as hell is not Helen Wood) housemates until the very end - through contrived and fixed 'final pass' twists if you must - but don't take the piss and pretend she is in any way a redeemable or 'deserving' winner. The winner should always, 100% be the best 'person' in the final. Anything else (like how much of the series they dominated) should be an after-thought.

I mean really this is not that far off from saying that Jade Goody should have won CBB5 and Shilpa was terrible.

[Macie Lightfoot]

I mean, almost 20% of the voting public still voted to evict Shipla over Jade so I'm not entirely surprised

[Niamh.]

I mean, almost 20% of the voting public still voted to evict Shipla over Jade so I'm not entirely surprised

I know, it horrifies me when I hear some people actually arguing the case that Shilpa was to blame in that scenario D:

[Liam-]

Jade was terrible that series without a doubt, but Shilpa was hardly a 'good housemate' entertainment wise

[LukeB]

Shilpa was a goddess :nono:

[Shaun]

well I mean you were probably 4 at the time but ok liam sure

[LukeB]

Give me nice winners over pricks any day.

couldn't have said it better myself.

we had like 14 nice winners and there's Helen.

[Liam-]

well I mean you were probably 4 at the time but ok liam sure

Can we not
A. I was 11
B. I've watched the series multiple times since then

[Lostie!]

Like I've said it multiple times and it seems to fall on deaf ears but surely the winner of a series has no bearing over your enjoyment of the series. BB6, BB7, and BB9 are all often referred to as 'great' or 'the best' series but had totally bland and/or terrible winners.

By all means keep the 'entertaining' (look, I'm even willing to compromise with you on what constitutes entertainment, because it sure as hell is not Helen Wood) housemates until the very end - through contrived and fixed 'final pass' twists if you must - but don't take the piss and pretend she is in any way a redeemable or 'deserving' winner. The winner should always, 100% be the best 'person' in the final. Anything else (like how much of the series they dominated) should be an after-thought.

I mean really this is not that far off from saying that Jade Goody should have won CBB5 and Shilpa was terrible.

:clap1::clap1::clap1:

Apart from the Rachel part, she's still my favourite winner. :laugh:

[uniquedude]

This poll result is actually really disheartening. :shocked:

Sam wasn't exactly a brilliant winner, but he beats an aggressive bully like Helen any day. People can say she "added more" all they want, but what she "added" isn't anything good.

It's a sad fact that bullies always win, whether it be 100k or a poll on Tibb :bawling:

[uniquedude]

Like I've said it multiple times and it seems to fall on deaf ears but surely the winner of a series has no bearing over your enjoyment of the series. BB6, BB7, and BB9 are all often referred to as 'great' or 'the best' series but had totally bland and/or terrible winners.

By all means keep the 'entertaining' (look, I'm even willing to compromise with you on what constitutes entertainment, because it sure as hell is not Helen Wood) housemates until the very end - through contrived and fixed 'final pass' twists if you must - but don't take the piss and pretend she is in any way a redeemable or 'deserving' winner. The winner should always, 100% be the best 'person' in the final. Anything else (like how much of the series they dominated) should be an after-thought.

I mean really this is not that far off from saying that Jade Goody should have won CBB5 and Shilpa was terrible.

I actually quite liked all those three winners lol.

[bots]

Like I've said it multiple times and it seems to fall on deaf ears but surely the winner of a series has no bearing over your enjoyment of the series. BB6, BB7, and BB9 are all often referred to as 'great' or 'the best' series but had totally bland and/or terrible winners.

By all means keep the 'entertaining' (look, I'm even willing to compromise with you on what constitutes entertainment, because it sure as hell is not Helen Wood) housemates until the very end - through contrived and fixed 'final pass' twists if you must - but don't take the piss and pretend she is in any way a redeemable or 'deserving' winner. The winner should always, 100% be the best 'person' in the final. Anything else (like how much of the series they dominated) should be an after-thought.

I mean really this is not that far off from saying that Jade Goody should have won CBB5 and Shilpa was terrible.


That really depends on why you are watching BB and what you get out of it. While entertainment may be the primary focus in early weeks, by the time it gets to the last few weeks, people have identified who they want to win, and it becomes a battle between those left. Entertainment doesn't enter into it. Thats why Helen won last year imo, and she as much deserved that win as any other BB winner. Its not like a general election, its forgotten the next day, it has no impact whatsoever on anyone.

[Raph]

Why??

1) I didn't really like most of the winners so competition wasn't exactly massive.
2) He was an all round nice guy who stood up for his friends and didn't bitch
3) His friendship with Callum was awesome to watch (Also his friendship with Gina actually)
4) He was funny, loved his one liners
5) He was Welsh :tongue:

[Amy Jade]

Sam definitely, my favorite BBUK winner of all time.

:umm2:

[Raph]

:umm2:

Noo Amy don't, that emoticon is so rude!! :laugh:

[Amy Jade]

Noo Amy don't, that emoticon is so rude!! :laugh:

I love you really but sorry I honestly don't understand anyone thinking he's the best winner. I respect your opinion but honestly don't understand it

[Raph]

I love you really but sorry I honestly don't understand anyone thinking he's the best winner. I respect your opinion but honestly don't understand it

Yeah I get it, it's mostly because I really haven't liked most the other winners or found them to be irrel like Luke A :p Who's your favorite winner of all time?

[LukeB]

sam is probs my 3rd favourite winner, my number 1 is Sophie(dogface) :D

[Niamh.]

sam is probs my 3rd favourite winner, my number 1 is Sophie(dogface) :D

to me they would be nice but dull winners (which is miles better than bullying nasty winners imo) Brian Dowling for me was the best winner because he was nice but also really entertaining, the perfect HM :love:

[Withano]

Good question, Sam. But mostly by default.

[LukeB]

to me they would be nice but dull winners (which is miles better than bullying nasty winners imo) Brian Dowling for me was the best winner because he was nice but also really entertaining, the perfect HM :love:

I can see why he is peoples favourite tbh :laugh:
i didn't really rate him on UBB tbh to me he knew he was going to win:laugh:

but I agree, I rather have nice winners tbh no matter if i dislike them or not.

[Denver]

Shilpa was a goddess :nono:

Shilpa won because of sympathy not because she was liked

[ruiphillips]

Sam.

BB14 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

[LukeB]

Shilpa won because of sympathy not because she was liked

she was still a good housemate, I loved her and she was really adorable.I'm glad she beat a Jackson who would have won for being a Jackson.

[Ammi]

..neither really, I don't think that Helen had a good character at all but I didn't find any or much character in Sam so I would say for me that both were not good winners but for totally different reasons...

[Black Dagger]

Sam is the worst thing to happen to the show as a winner. ****ing garbage and had no moments whatsoever. Give me the gob****e any day of the week.

[Daniel.]

I don't like either but Helen was a far better and more deserving winner.

Bitches > Bores

[Kazanne]

I liked them both,but Helen gets it for me as I disliked her when she entered but was championing her to win by the end,she was interesting and did have a vunerable side.I liked Sam aswell but he wasn't as dynamic as Helen.

[YourLAEx]

Helen. She was by far the most interesting houseamate.

Sam should have been a week six boot and I can't help thinking he would have been had he not been deaf.

[reece(:]

Sam is the worst thing to happen to the show as a winner. ****ing garbage and had no moments whatsoever. Give me the gob****e any day of the week.
This

[Macie Lightfoot]

Jade was terrible that series without a doubt, but Shilpa was hardly a 'good housemate' entertainment wise

Shilpa's actually hilarious and an angel and a top tier BBUK winner and human so check your facts.

Also, to answer the question it's a tough one! Sam is the most irrelevant person ever? and wasn't even shown on the show semi-regularly until Week 6, Helen was omnipresent but GOOD LORD how annoying and awful and etc she was. So I'd pick Sam but literally only by default.

[Tom4784]

They were both awful, Sam won only because of the sympathy vote and Helen won because the people who voted were obviously on crack.

[Pete.]

Shilpa won because of sympathy not because she was liked
Of course Shilpa was liked, Shilpa was LOVED. How could someone dislike her?

[Pete.]

They were both awful, Sam won only because of the sympathy vote and Helen won because the people who voted were obviously on crack.
chuffmedizzy shade

[LukeB]

Of course Shilpa was liked, Shilpa was LOVED. How could someone dislike her?

I found it really hard to dislike her tbh, So likeable and adorable

[Denver]

Of course Shilpa was liked, Shilpa was LOVED. How could someone dislike her?

I found Shilpa dull and she brought nothing to the house

[Macie Lightfoot]

Shilpa was a hilariously awkward weirdo, and could be compared to (#racist but not rly) Deana almost?

[andybigbro]

Sam by I long long mile. And I never liked him.

[Tony Montana]

Yikes! This is a tough one

On the one hand, we have one of the Dullest, most boring non entities to have ever graced our screens who contributed zero, only piping up in the last week to confront Dexter. All he did was sleep for 10 weeks and have that short feud with the equally boring Sophie.

on the other hand, we have one of the nastiest, most vindictive and repulsive individuals to have ever stepped foot in the bb house. an absolutely horrible bully with no redeeming qualities who enjoyed bullying and intimidating her fellow hms with a smile on her face and with no regrets for her actions. she ruled both houses she lived in with an iron fist

they're two of the worst winners of all time but sam is the lesser of two evils

[Epic.]

Sam easily, give me a mediocre bore over a monstrous bellend any day

[brat.]

Sam is t'second worst (Luke A) winner of C5, at least Helen had some redeemable qualities even if she was a monster, Sam literally said nothing until the third last week and even then it was only to bitch about sophie under his breath and weirdly flirt with gina

[RileyH]

Helly Woo Woo obvs

[DouglasS]

Helen is the worst winner of the franchise by a mile, and so I prefer Sam.

[Matthew.]

i havent even watched bb14 and i already know the answer is the woo woo

[Tony Montana]

Sam is t'second worst (Luke A) winner of C5, at least Helen had some redeemable qualities even if she was a monster, Sam literally said nothing until the third last week and even then it was only to bitch about sophie under his breath and weirdly flirt with gina

and what are these ''redeemable qualities'' you speak of?

[Jodie.]

and what are these ''redeemable qualities'' you speak of?

She was a scream girl

[Beastie]

Sam is the worst winner ever.