Would you think less of Sarah if she had sex in the house?

[Richkingretro]

I would not but I think many others would judge her if she did. If she does I hope its with one of the less obvious guys such as Nick Jack or Kieran

[Marsh.]

Yes. I judge anyone for having sex on television.

[Gusto Brunt]

She wouldn't do it.

I don't think.

But having sex on TV. You're no better than a prostitute or some cheap porn star 'actress'.

That's why Steven and his 'wife' Kim are hated.

[Richkingretro]

Yes. I judge anyone for having sex on television.

Don't you think that's a bit unfair? I mean she is in the house for quite some time and it's natural in close proximity with males for her to want to engage in coitus.

[Liam-]

No, i loved Kim even after she let that ogre into her, i don't think it's a negative thing, it's just looked down on for some reason.

[Richkingretro]

If there was more free love in the house the housemates would be happier the viewers more entertained and better ratings for the show.

[Raph]

No but if they talked about it for ages after then that would irritate me, but I'd be annoyed at both genders, not just one.

[Calderyon]

We had a housemate who won even when she had sex. But to be fair, she thought smart.

She did it abroad (on BB Norway, which was in Sweden), when she was on a housemate swap. And they did it like rabbits, at least 6-10 times in a period of 7 days. Behind the covers, but with lots of noise.

All others on our BB, who have done it inside our BB house, have never won the show, one came second though (he was a male though). And usually the female partner of the duo gets evicted way before finale. Usually in their first eviction vote. But their male partners have not usually done so good either.

[Calderyon]

But no, i would not think less of her. She is already near the bottom of my list.

[y.winter]

It's just cheap. Imagine a family member of yours doing it on tv, doesn't feel right...

[mrmattybeck1]

Sarah comes across as quite classy to me

[Maria26]

Cheap? prostitute? Please....

How many people over the years have had sex in the house? Hating on them for that simple reason just makes you a fool and a disgusting prick....you don't hate people for having sex, especially has you don't see anything graphic.

[fitz2k2]

lol

[Legend killer]

It's hard to resist the Legacy so no not really

[Ramsay]

I wouldn't really give two ****s. let her do what she wants. Sex is just sex.

[Jason.]

It's hard to resist the Legacy so no not really

:joker:

[Kazanne]

I would not but I think many others would judge her if she did. If she does I hope its with one of the less obvious guys such as Nick Jack or Kieran

Why is her having sex even talked about?I would hope she wouldn't and don't think she will,hopefully she has far more about her than that,:shrug:

[Mystic Mock]

Well I would think less of Danny too as it's just such a classless act on TV.

[Richkingretro]

I wouldn't really give two ****s. let her do what she wants. Sex is just sex.

You say it would not change your view of her but if she was having sex with Jack and Joel at the same time would you be so blasé on the matter I wonder?

I think most people would not be saying oh it's just sex let her do what she likes. They would be reaching for the evict button with the all the vigour of the Spanish inquisition.

[Dollface]

Why is this thread only aimed at Sarah? There are like 13 other housemates in there that are capable of having sex.

[jennyjuniper]

I wouldn't like it. Not just because it's Sarah, but anyone who has sex on tv is a bit slimy.

[Ramsay]

You say it would not change your view of her but if she was having sex with Jack and Joel at the same time would you be so blasé on the matter I wonder?

I think most people would not be saying oh it's just sex let her do what she likes. They would be reaching for the evict button with the all the vigour of the Spanish inquisition.

Yeah that's most people, not me. obviously it would do her no favors in the eyes of the public but me personally? i don't really care. people in general put sex on this massive pedestal as if it matters sooo much and can define a person. it doesn't..at all... and i say this as someone who doesn't even really like Sarah that much tbh.

[Richkingretro]

Why is this thread only aimed at Sarah? There are like 13 other housemates in there that are capable of having sex.

It's just a hypothetical and the reason for Sarah is because as a attractive female she is the most likely to be judged on her actions in regards to this.

[Richkingretro]

Yeah that's most people, not me. obviously it would do her no favors in the eyes of the public but me personally? i don't really care. people in general put sex on this massive pedestal as if it matters sooo much and can define a person. it doesn't..at all... and i say this as someone who doesn't even really like Sarah that much tbh.

You have a good attitude on this matter and I agree with you.

[Northern Monkey]

Depends how much tit or ass we got to see.If she does'nt show us any then yes,I would think less of her.

[Richkingretro]

Depends how much tit or ass we got to see.If she does'nt show us any then yes,I would think less of her.

An honest man is always in trouble :joker:

[Kazanne]

An honest man is always in trouble :joker:

I think your watching the wrong show tbh,theres plenty of that all over the net if that's what floats your boat.cringe

[Richkingretro]

I think your watching the wrong show tbh,theres plenty of that all over the net if that's what floats your boat.cringe

You can cringe but I never said i want to see it I simply posed a hypothetical question. My aim was to challenge peoples prejudices about an attractive female having sex in the house.

An honest man in trouble comment was referring to previous poster and I think his views are fine as well. Don't forget without your parents having sex you would not be here and sex is the primary biological goal of our species.

[Daniel-X]

Yes. I would pretty much judge anyone and take a bit of a dislike to them for having sex on TV. Michelle Bass who I loved even went down a bit after having sex. I just think it's the not done thing when family and the whole nation are watching... :umm2:

'open it' has to be one of the most disturbing things ever though :omgno:

[Vanessa]

It's hard to resist the Legacy so no not really

:laugh2: i'd say it's impossible!

[Richkingretro]

'open it' has to be one of the most disturbing things ever though :omgno:


That's showbiz!! :joker:

[Northern Monkey]

:laugh:

[AnnieK]

Depends how much tit or ass we got to see.If she does'nt show us any then yes,I would think less of her.

Thar made me chuckle more than it should. ...:laugh:

[Kazanne]

You can cringe but I never said i want to see it I simply posed a hypothetical question. My aim was to challenge peoples prejudices about an attractive female having sex in the house.

An honest man in trouble comment was referring to previous poster and I think his views are fine as well. Don't forget without your parents having sex you would not be here and sex is the primary biological goal of our species.

:joker: Thanks for the biology lesson,but my cringe comment was not aimed at people having sex,:joker: I guess it got lost somewhere,nevermind.

[Marsh.]

Don't you think that's a bit unfair? I mean she is in the house for quite some time and it's natural in close proximity with males for her to want to engage in coitus.

It's natural for anyone to get such desires and urges.

However it's also within our means to practice self control. We can choose when and where to have sex. I could get horny as sh*t watching some woman on the TV whilst watching it with family, does that make it at all appropriate for me to whip my cock out and masturbate in front of them? No. :hee:

[armand.kay]

She can do what she likes with he puss not my business

[Kazanne]

It's natural for anyone to get such desires and urges.

However it's also within our means to practice self control. We can choose when and where to have sex. I could get horny as sh*t watching some woman on the TV whilst watching it with family, does that make it at all appropriate for me to whip my cock out and masturbate in front of them? No. :hee:

:joker::joker::joker:

[Richkingretro]

It's natural for anyone to get such desires and urges.

However it's also within our means to practice self control. We can choose when and where to have sex. I could get horny as sh*t watching some woman on the TV whilst watching it with family, does that make it at all appropriate for me to whip my cock out and masturbate in front of them? No. :hee:

There is a difference between what's going on in your head and having Sarah in your bed. These people are on this show because they want to be seen, want to be vivid. What can be more vivid than sex with the world watching and "you're" watching as your voyeuristically enjoying the show. So if it's Jack in torment over the food or Sarah being bonked under the bed covers it's all the same thing. It's only your judgment that says oh that's a step too far. If it was me I would like to see cameras everywhere without censorship. My point is people judging Sarah if she had sex on the show is to me hypocritical because your simply just sanctifying your voyeurism.

[Marsh.]

There is a difference between what's going on in your head and having Sarah in your bed. These people are on this show because they want to be seen, want to be vivid. What can be more vivid than sex with the world watching and "you're" watching as your voyeuristically enjoying the show. So if it's Jack in torment over the food or Sarah being bonked under the bed covers it's all the same thing. It's only your judgment that says oh that's a step too far. If it was me I would like to see cameras everywhere without censorship. My point is people judging Sarah if she had sex on the show is just to me hypocritical because your simply just sanctifying your voyeurism.

Masturbation is a sexual act, not one in my mind honey.

As I said, there is a level of self control involved in not performing sexual acts in public.

So if they have sex on TV it's not "because of their natural urges", it's because they have chosen to. Which I will then lower my opinion of them for because I find it classless and tasteless.

[Northern Monkey]

It's natural for anyone to get such desires and urges.

However it's also within our means to practice self control. We can choose when and where to have sex. I could get horny as sh*t watching some woman on the TV whilst watching it with family, does that make it at all appropriate for me to whip my cock out and masturbate in front of them? No. :hee:

Haha.:laugh:

[Marsh.]

My point is people judging Sarah if she had sex on the show is just to me hypocritical because your simply just sanctifying your voyeurism.

How is it hypocritical? :umm2:

It's not just Sarah, I'd judge anyone who does it and have judged anyone who has done it in the past.

Watching housemates talking to each other on TV is no different to watching people in my daily life conversing, going about normal lives.

Having sex is not the same thing.

You're sanctifying your perversion and desire to see Sarah ride a cock. :hee:

[Kazanne]

How is it hypocritical? :umm2:

It's not just Sarah, I'd judge anyone who does it and have judged anyone who has done it in the past.

Watching housemates talking to each other on TV is no different to watching people in my daily life conversing, going about normal lives.

Having sex is not the same thing.

You're sanctifying your perversion. :hee:

:clap1:Exactly this,he wants to have a peek:joker::joker:

[Richkingretro]

Masturbation is a sexual act, not one in my mind honey.

As I said, there is a level of self control involved in not performing sexual acts in public.

So if they have sex on TV it's not "because of their natural urges", it's because they have chosen to. Which I will then lower my opinion of them for because I find it classless and tasteless.

I think your missing the point they are not in public they are in a house and if Sarah is in bed with Danny then it's just that. It's real not something going on in their head like your example of seeing a hot women on tv. Yes of course they know it's being recorded and yes they should have self control but to me that's doing it under the covers not like in the dairy room or something.

If you choose to judge someone based on a natural act then maybe you should examine why you find that wrong but voyeuristically watching people being emotionally manipulated to tears or anger is fine.

[Marsh.]

It's real not something going on in their head like your example of seeing a hot women on tv.

My example was masturbating in front of my family.

That's about as real as anything. :umm2:

[Marsh.]

I think your missing the point they are not in public they are in a house and if Sarah is in bed with Danny then it's just that. It's real not something going on in their head like your example of seeing a hot women on tv. Yes of course they know it's being recorded and yes they should have self control but to me that's doing it under the covers not like in the dairy room or something.

If you choose to judge someone based on a natural act then maybe you should examine why you find that wrong but voyeuristically watching people being emotionally manipulated to tears or anger is fine.

I don't judge anyone for engaging in a natural act, I'm judging them for doing it in public.

"It's just Sarah and Danny in bed..." on television. They have gone into a house to put themselves on television so are responsible for how they conduct themselves on this public platform.

We get it, you want to see Sarah climaxing on live feed. Good for you. :hee:

I also never said anyone being "manipulated" towards an emotion is fine. Don't put words (or a cock) into my mouth. Thanks. :hee:

[Richkingretro]

:clap1:Exactly this,he wants to have a peek:joker::joker:

If they do than cool if they don't then cool but I won't make a sexist judgement on Sarah for doing so either way.

[Marsh.]

If they do than cool if they don't then cool but I won't make a sexist judgement on Sarah for doing so either way.

Stop right there.

Who's made a "sexist judgement"?

[Richkingretro]

My example was masturbating in front of my family.

That's about as real as anything. :umm2:

Yeah like you would do that!

Well assume not :hehe:

[Beetlejuice]

I already think less of her for actually cuddling up to Danny.

[Marsh.]

Yeah like you would do that!

Well assume not :hehe:

Your assumption is correct because I find I'd find it inappropriate, embarrassing and crass.... just like having sex on national television.

Sex and masturbation is natural. Sex and masturbation in public is crass.

[Richkingretro]

Stop right there.

Who's made a "sexist judgement"?

You said you would judge Sarah on such a action if you see your earlier post.

[Marsh.]

You said you would judge Sarah on such a action if you see your earlier post.

I also said I'd judge ANY housemate for having sex and have judged housemates in the past for doing so.

I'll ask again, how is this sexist?

[joeysteele]

I don't really think much of her already anyway so that would be just about the limit for me as to her.

[Richkingretro]

I also said I'd judge ANY housemate for having sex and have judged housemates in the past for doing so.

I'll ask again, how is this sexist?

Well the context of the thread is people making sexist judgements on attractive females i.e Sarah if they have sex in the house. If your saying you would judge both male and female having sex equally then of course the charge of sexism does not apply to you if your being honest. However I still feel it's a prudish judgment but I respect you might have different boundaries to me.

[Marsh.]

Well the context of the thread is people making sexist judgements on attractive females i.e Sarah if they have sex in the house. If your saying you would judge both male and female having sex equally then of course the charge of sexism does not apply to you if your being honest. However I still feel it's a prudish judgment but I respect you might have different boundaries to me.

I don't think it's prudish at all. And I doubt anyone who's spoken to me on this forum would think of me of all people as a prude. :joker:

Sex on TV makes them classless. It's not something that makes me break out in hives, throw holy water on the TV and cry myself to sleep. Just something I find cheap, crass and a low thing to do.

Just as I've found a multitude of other things housemates do reduces my opinion of them. Just as in real life. If my friend went upstairs for a shag in the bedroom, fair enough. If he insisted on shagging in the middle of the room during a party I'd think less of them.

[Richkingretro]

I don't think it's prudish at all. And I doubt anyone who's spoken to me on this forum would think of me of all people as a prude. :joker:

Sex on TV makes them classless. It's not something that makes me break out in hives, throw holy water on the TV and cry myself to sleep. Just something I find cheap, crass and a low thing to do.

Ok then we will just have to disagree on this matter as I think someone expressing themselves physically with another human being natural and normal. Yes it's on TV but they agreed to expose themselves as people on a TV show and you signed up to voyeuristically watch them do so. If your red line is sex then fine but I don't find that any less classless than for example the twins getting drunk or any of the other emotional outbursts from the housemates. It's just people being people to me.

[Marsh.]

1) Two human beings getting intimate is normal. I never said any different.

2) I didn't sign up for anything.

3) This thread is so pretentious I'm now done.

[Beetlejuice]

Ok then we will just have to disagree on this matter as I think someone expressing themselves physically with another human being natural and normal. Yes it's on TV but they agreed to expose themselves as people on a TV show and you signed up to voyeuristically watch them do so. If your red line is sex then fine but I don't find that any less classless than for example the twins getting drunk or any of the other emotional outbursts from the housemates. It's just people being people to me.

It's shameless people being shameless people.

[Richkingretro]

1) Two human beings getting intimate is normal. I never said any different.

2) I didn't sign up for anything.

3) This thread is so pretentious I'm now done.

1) You said if two people in the house had sex you would make a judgement on them as being 'classless'. Debasing people based on the most natural of acts is not exactly accepting that as normal.

2) Signing up is just an expression of commitment. You watch the show and post long replies on a forum about the show. To me that's pretty committed by most standards.

3) If anything it is yourself who has made an over the top defence of your view that a natural act taking place would be 'classless' which to me is pretentious. My whole point is someone should not be vilified because of this especially a female.

[Marsh.]

1) You said if two people in the house had sex you would make a judgement on them as being 'classless'. Debasing people based on the most natural of acts is not exactly accepting that as normal.

2) Signing up is just an expression of commitment. You watch the show and post long replies on a forum about the show. To me that's pretty committed by most standards.

3) If anything it is yourself who has made an over the top defence of your view that a natural act taking place would be 'classless' which to me is pretentious. My whole point is someone should not be vilified because of this especially a female.

Why, "especially a female", how sexist of you.

Also, for the 10000th time, I am not judging them for having sex and committing a natural act. I would be judging them for DOING IT ON TELEVISION.

I haven't made "long replies" in regards to the events for this show for a couple of years. :hee:

[YourLAEx]

I bet all the men have had a wank. It's natural. If Sarah wants to let a penis in her pussycat then let her.

[Richkingretro]

I bet all the men have had a wank. It's natural. If Sarah wants to let a penis in her pussycat then let her.

Well said, there should be equal rights for women with out fear of discrimination or judgement.

[Marsh.]

There hasn't been any discrimination. Sarah hasn't even had sex in the house.

What a pointless and stupid thread. :crazy:

[Richkingretro]

There hasn't been any discrimination. Sarah hasn't even had sex in the house.

What a pointless and stupid thread. :crazy:

It's obviously hypothetical but it's been interesting to read people's view points. You seem to have made enough comments in it for some who thinks the thread is stupid and pretentious but then again the apple rarely falls far from the tree.

[Johnnyuk123]

No... Sarah having sex in the house would not change my opinion of her being a pointless housemate.

[Vicky.]

Yes. I judge anyone for having sex on television.

^

Nothing more vile than 'open it II' :yuk:

[Nancy.]

I never thought much of her to begin with so I doubt being bonked by someone in the house will change that.

[Marsh.]

It's obviously hypothetical but it's been interesting to read people's view points. You seem to have made enough comments in it for some who thinks the thread is stupid and pretentious but then again the apple rarely falls far from the tree.

Would you like to repeat that in english? :blush:

[billy123]

Cheap? prostitute? Please....

How many people over the years have had sex in the house? Hating on them for that simple reason just makes you a fool and a disgusting prick....you don't hate people for having sex, especially has you don't see anything graphic.https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/598931291665526784/hwhHhaq6.png

They are in the house to be judged by the public and they will be judged by the things they say and do. Shagging in the house is a desperate move you can see why it wouldnt reflect well with the public.