PDA

View Full Version : Which group should be facing the eviction?


Firewire
27-05-2015, 10:26 PM
Which group would you rather face the eviction?

Personally I'm happy the new group is up because I like more of the original group and wouldn't want to lose four of them.

LukeB
27-05-2015, 10:27 PM
All housemates should be up :worry:

Amy Jade
27-05-2015, 10:27 PM
The nominated ones for sure, what's the actual point in nominations if they're ignored?

Babayaro.
27-05-2015, 10:38 PM
Original group, it's only fair

Northern Monkey
27-05-2015, 10:39 PM
The nominated ones for sure, what's the actual point in nominations if they're ignored?
Exactly this.

Shaun
27-05-2015, 10:39 PM
In the interests of fairness, obviously the original lineup, but the selfish in me wants this group up.

Adamw92
27-05-2015, 10:39 PM
All should be up but if I had to choose then the original group seeing as they were nominated for it.

Drew.
27-05-2015, 10:40 PM
Of course the original, but given the situation which we're now in then it's a relief it's not the originals.

reece(:
27-05-2015, 10:48 PM
The whole house.

rusticgal
27-05-2015, 10:53 PM
In the interests of fairness, obviously the original lineup, but the selfish in me wants this group up.


It does make a mockery of nominations....but it's same old...the ones that get talked about the most always end up being nominated. Too many Danny's and Chloe's just playing it quiet and nice just to not get nominated... The twins are boring too... It's completely against the rules of the BB format..but who cares..get the deadwood out.

the_answers
27-05-2015, 10:55 PM
The nominated ones for sure, what's the actual point in nominations if they're ignored?
House has got stale at the moment.
So those HMs willing to stick their necks out are often the ones nommed !

HM's always vote for others they see as a threat to them.
Fans sometimes complain it's the interesting ones who go first.

Like them or not Danny, Twins, Chloe (and maybe Kieran) have avoided being nommed by doing very little.

Should that really be rewarded ?

I think it's a really FAIR twist.

Daniel-X
27-05-2015, 10:56 PM
Of course the original, but given the situation which we're now in then it's a relief it's not the originals.

Yeah I pretty much agree with this.

Benjamin
27-05-2015, 10:57 PM
House has got stale at the moment.
So those HMs willing to stick their necks out are often the ones nommed !

HM's always vote for others they see as a threat to them.
Fans sometimes complain it's the interesting ones who go first.

Like them or not Danny, Twins, Chloe (and maybe Kieran) have avoided being nommed by doing very little.

Should that really be rewarded ?

I think it's a really FAIR twist.

Yeah but it still defeats the whole point of nominations lol and just makes it redundant. May as well scrap noms each week and let the producers decide who is up... Oh wait that happens already.

Xtopher
28-05-2015, 12:21 AM
Current. If they got rid of the 4 originals, the house will be a very boring place.

the_answers
28-05-2015, 01:45 AM
Yeah but it still defeats the whole point of nominations lol and just makes it redundant.
But actually, it hasn't at all.

Based on votes cast, we have the ones who are up.

Remember...
Had Aaron or Joel not voted for Nick, Nick would be up.
Had Chloe or Harriet not voted for Cristian, Christian would be up too.

Now maybe you don't like the twist.
But all the votes counted for sure !

crazycolaist
28-05-2015, 02:03 AM
The nominated ones for sure, what's the actual point in nominations if they're ignored?


To F with the housemates heads & BB loves to stir shiz. I dont understand the problem with this twist. Maybe it was a bit of an emergency push for ratings but heh im glad this twist is happening

BigBrotherfan4ever
28-05-2015, 07:14 AM
The original group

Pete.
28-05-2015, 07:17 AM
Most of the original group shouldn't have been nominated anyways

Gusto Brunt
28-05-2015, 07:46 AM
Current. :D