Nominations to be scrapped for future series?

[elliebrew]

Housemate nominations need to be scrapped.

Hand the entire vote over the public and leave it as a vote to save.

Nominations only allows the 'nice boring people' to remain safe for weeks on end.

The deadwood would be gone within a few weeks. The housemate wouldn't know who is popular or unpopular within the house and the dynamics of the house wouldn't be put in jeopardy.

When the eviction is announced don't call the names of the housemates out and allow them to hear the crowd reaction.

This often changes the way a housemate acts

[Black Dagger]

Yeah with the way nominations have been in recent years they may as well not bother. I have championed an all house up weekly vote to save for a bit. But then realise ghastly people would forever stay.

[Jack_]

Normal noms are largely boring and obviously don't happen much anymore so this would be fine by me. It's one of two options:

- A rolling vote to save across the series that doesn't restart (I think this would generate a lot of revenue), you could also have a leaderboard that's shown to the viewers but not to the housemates each week so as to increase competition between fans.

- Implement the US format, either with or without a few tweaks to give the public some influence

[Marsh.]

The show needs to be scrapped. I never thought it could sink lower than last year but the producers have managed it.

[Lostie!]

Officially scrapping nominations would be the final push that makes me quit BBUK for good. Nominations have always been one of my favourite aspects of the show and the lack of proper nominations we get now is frustrating enough.

[elliebrew]

Officially scrapping nominations would be the final push that makes me quit BBUK for good. Nominations have always been one of my favourite aspects of the show and the lack of proper nominations we get now is frustrating enough.

Lost you're holding onto the past. You cannot keep something for nostalgia sake if it isn't working anymore.

The viewers have changed. The housemates have certainly changed.

Nominations ensure that the big characters in the house are often on the chopping block

[elliebrew]

The show needs to be scrapped. I never thought it could sink lower than last year but the producers have managed it.

And then what? What a stupid thing to say. You love a show yet you want to see it axed.

If it was axed you'd be calling for it to come back.

Or you could try and find a solution to help nurture it back to health

[Oliver_W]

I thought "reverse noms" might be interesting, where the whole house is always up for the public vote, and then the HMs decide which of the two with the most should leave on Friday.

[Marsh.]

Lost you're holding onto the past. You cannot keep something for nostalgia sake if it isn't working anymore.

Nominations do work.

Nothing suggests they don't work when the producers have refused to even let the regular format play out for about 3 years.

[Liam-]

Scrapping the nomination process is a ghastly prospect.

[elliebrew]

Scrapping the nomination process is a ghastly prospect.

Absolutely disagree

Tell me what they offer the house? really?

[Ashley.]

Nominations or nothing, that's what I say. :laugh:

[Jack_]

I thought "reverse noms" might be interesting, where the whole house is always up for the public vote, and then the HMs decide which of the two with the most should leave on Friday.

Now that I'm up for as well, so long as it's a vote to save and they vote amongst the two with the fewest votes.

In fact, that'd be pretty hilarious because most of the time they'd have to evict someone they all love and get on with cause they're nice :joker: and we get rid of dullards in the process <333

[Ashley.]

Absolutely disagree

Tell me what they offer the house? really?

What do you mean?

They are the focal point of the show and have been for 15 years. :joker: They offer reassurance that I'm actually watching Big Brother.

[Lostie!]

Lost you're holding onto the past. You cannot keep something for nostalgia sake if it isn't working anymore.

The viewers have changed. The housemates have certainly changed.

Nominations ensure that the big characters in the house are often on the chopping block

Expecting the show to retain one of it's fundamental aspects is "holding on to the past"? I'm (attempting to at least) holding on to whatever might remain of Big Brother, and that's not much anymore.

And if I am holding on to the past, it's because BB of the past was immeasurably better IMO.

As I said, the nominations interference nowadays is bad enough. Scrapping the nominations format completely would absolutely be the final nail in this show's coffin for me.

I thought "reverse noms" might be interesting, where the whole house is always up for the public vote, and then the HMs decide which of the two with the most should leave on Friday.

BBAU did that for the first half of one of it's series, but I can't say it's something I'd love personally.

[elliebrew]

Expecting the show to retain one of it's fundamental aspects is "holding on to the past"? I'm (attempting to at least) holding on to whatever might remain of Big Brother, and that's not much anymore.

And if I am holding on to the past, it's because BB of the past was immeasurably better IMO.

Why must BB be a set format in your brain.

Why aren't you open to the possibility of it adapting and changing to suit its current audience.

Simply forcing the same tired format on a new audience only serves to beat it into the ground further.

[Liam-]

Absolutely disagree

Tell me what they offer the house? really?

Well it offers the people in there the chance to get rid of the people they don't want to live with anymore for a start and for me personally, as long as there are nominations, the show is still Big Brother, take them away and then we've lost one of the fundamental parts of the show, granted right now the nomination process isn't at it's best, but it's better than not having them at all and just letting the public vote on who they like the best out of everyone each and very week.

Think about it, you let the public have a continuous vote for who their favourite is and you can guarantee that because of the general demographic of BB viewers/voters, all the boring but good looking men would sail through on the thirsty vote, that doesn't benefit the show whatsoever.

[Marsh.]

Why must BB be a set format in your brain.

Why aren't you open to the possibility of it adapting and changing to suit its current audience.

Simply forcing the same tired format on a new audience only serves to beat it into the ground further.

It's already changed in almost every aspect. :conf:

The format has evolved over the time but changing absolutely everything about it makes it not BB anymore.

That's fairly obvious to anyone with common sense.

[zakman440]

No, they need to go back to a consistent nominations format.

[Lostie!]

Why must BB be a set format in your brain.

Why aren't you open to the possibility of it adapting and changing to suit its current audience.

Simply forcing the same tired format on a new audience only serves to beat it into the ground further.

You're asking me why I'm not open to it adapting in a way that I wouldn't personally find enjoyable? I think your answer is right there.

It sounds like yourself and this "new audience" don't want Big Brother at all, you want a whole other show merely using it's name.

[Marsh.]

You're asking me why I'm not open to it adapting in a way that I wouldn't personally find enjoyable? I think your answer is right there.

It sounds like yourself and this "new audience" don't want Big Brother at all, you want a whole other show merely using it's name.

Yeah, and the "new audience" it's currently adapting to obviously don't want it either as the viewing figures disappear down the drain.

[Liam-]

You're asking me why I'm not open to it adapting in a way that I wouldn't personally find enjoyable? I think your answer is right there.

It sounds like yourself and this "new audience" don't want Big Brother at all, you want a whole other show merely using it's name.

Darn you for having a differing opinion, how stupid can you get mun :fist: :fist: :fist:

[elliebrew]

You're asking me why I'm not open to it adapting in a way that I wouldn't personally find enjoyable? I think your answer is right there.

It sounds like yourself and this "new audience" don't want Big Brother at all, you want a whole other show merely using it's name.

I want a format that allows storylines to play out naturally. Relationships to form naturally

Scrapping the threat of being nominated by having the entire house up liberates the housemates and allows stories to progress without Gameplay.

SURELY its the very basis of the BB experience and something you should be championing

[LukeB]

- Implement the US format, either with or without a few tweaks to give the public some influence

I would not mind this tbh

[elliebrew]

Darn you for having a differing opinion, how stupid can you get mun :fist: :fist: :fist:

Every single time i post you always try and be facetious about me disliking other peoples opinions.

I get it

you can stop trying to be funny now

[Liam-]

Not every single time, that would be tiring :idc:

[Withano]

They were basically scrapped this series, and the public hated it.. So yeah they probably will, you're right.

[Jason.]

The show needs to be scrapped. I never thought it could sink lower than last year but the producers have managed it.

:clap1:

[LukeB]

The show needs to be scrapped. I never thought it could sink lower than last year but the producers have managed it.

I agree with this kind of, C5 has killed BB pretty much, I'm bored of moaning about what they do because they don't care about the fans so I know they wont listen to what people want.

[Lostie!]

I want a format that allows storylines to play out naturally. Relationships to form naturally

Scrapping the threat of being nominated by having the entire house up liberates the housemates and allows stories to progress without Gameplay.

SURELY its the very basis of the BB experience and something you should be championing

Nominations doesn't hinder the natural progression of storylines, constant interference does. I want the show to go back to having a regular, consistent nomination format without the producers trying to out-twist themselves week after week.

If certain housemates decide to use their nominations on a strategic level, so be it. I don't see how that would be hindering story progression, a housemate playing a strategic game is a storyline itself.

The fundamental aspect of Big Brother is the social experiment, putting together different people and seeing what happens. Nominations (where we truly get to see how people are reacting to one another) is a big part of this. Stripping that aspect wouldn't be amplifying the core aspect of the BB experience, it would be draining from it.

I just want the series to play out naturally. Housemates nominate, public evict, and repeat. And if they feel the need to add a twist one week (because a completely twist-free BB is definitely too much to ask for now), so be it.

I understand what you're saying and why you feel that way, but it's not something I'd like. Although, your suggestion may actually be preferable to the current state of nominations.

[Josy]

Hopefully not, one of the most important parts of the show for me since day one

[Jason.]

you always try and be facetious

Carole BB8 is that you?

[abhorson]

Why must BB be a set format in your brain.

Why aren't you open to the possibility of it adapting and changing to suit its current audience.

Simply forcing the same tired format on a new audience only serves to beat it into the ground further.

It has changed and look at the ****e it has become recently.

Viewing figures tell a tale.

[JTM45]

While we're at it why don't they bring Top of The Pops back, but without the music!
The music part was so outdated and unnecessary.:shrug:

[Jamesy]

Do nominations really exist now? I mean noms have moved so far away from the original concept we hardly have proper nominations these days.

[abhorson]

Please go back to the proper noms when if just two that had the most noms, they were up or if the second amount had three or four each, they were up too. Solves all the BB manipulation BS, apart from the edit. Live feed would help with that.

[Beetlejuice]

Housemate nominations need to be scrapped.

Hand the entire vote over the public and leave it as a vote to save.

Nominations only allows the 'nice boring people' to remain safe for weeks on end.

The deadwood would be gone within a few weeks. The housemate wouldn't know who is popular or unpopular within the house and the dynamics of the house wouldn't be put in jeopardy.

When the eviction is announced don't call the names of the housemates out and allow them to hear the crowd reaction.

This often changes the way a housemate acts

The reason this show is in the dire state it is, is because they have ripped up the format and pissed all over it. Bring back normal noms, with the 24/7 live coverage. And find at least 12 good housemates so it won't matter if a big character goes.

[elliebrew]

The reason this show is in the dire state it is, is because they have ripped up the format and pissed all over it. Bring back normal noms, with the 24/7 live coverage. And find at least 12 good housemates so it won't matter if a big character goes.

Live feed will NEVER come back

It's been half a decade

I think people should be over it now

[Beetlejuice]

Live feed will NEVER come back

Came back for 2 hours for BB14. It was the highest rated series ever. According to Oathy numerous people involved in the show want it back.

It's been half a decade

I think people should be over it now

It is not a question of getting over it. It is simply the fact that the show doesn't work without it and cannot work without it.

[karezza]

Regular nominations is the best thing about BB.

[fitz2k2]

what happen to vote to save?

[zakman440]

The reason this show is in the dire state it is, is because they have ripped up the format and pissed all over it. Bring back normal noms, with the 24/7 live coverage. And find at least 12 good housemates so it won't matter if a big character goes.

:clap1:

[REDCROP]

Officially scrapping nominations would be the final push that makes me quit BBUK for good. Nominations have always been one of my favourite aspects of the show and the lack of proper nominations we get now is frustrating enough.

I Agree....its not nominations that are the problem, its the recruitment process before the show begins.....can they not find people with a brain..or a sense of humour who want to go in there ?

How did some of this years lot convince BB that they were interesting in their interviews.....i thought BB employed trained psychologists to do the job...A blind man on a galloping horse could see that these people are just not interesting.

If you were given a new job that payed 150 grand and you arrived for work and just did nothing how long would you last ? They are just lazy and should be embarrassed when they come out

[T*]

i'm doing a bb project rn where the public just vote for their favourite every week and the person with the lowest amount goes

[vafunghoul]

Housemate nominations need to be scrapped.

Hand the entire vote over the public and leave it as a vote to save.

Nominations only allows the 'nice boring people' to remain safe for weeks on end.

The deadwood would be gone within a few weeks. The housemate wouldn't know who is popular or unpopular within the house and the dynamics of the house wouldn't be put in jeopardy.

When the eviction is announced don't call the names of the housemates out and allow them to hear the crowd reaction.

This often changes the way a housemate acts

I like this idea but then it would create more people PLAYING to the camera's. I'd rather something be done to force the to settle in and be more like themselves than worry so much about how they're perceived if that makes sense.

[Daniel-X]

I think this wouldn't be a bad idea at all they'd probably make more money from doing this to be honest and it would mean all the deadwood would be go nearly on and not as many people would be trying to play the game as they don't have to be scared about being out up for eviction

[Ashley.]

If we have a ten-week series, at least seven of these weeks should be twistless nominations. I like a twist, but not when they dominate the game. The vote to save format should be implemented again to get rid of the bores, but the show need to work on looking for interesting and unique housemates rather than the token selection. Also, don't employ bullies and people who are just going to be mean the entire way through. We need housemates with layers. Get people with different beliefs and ways-of-living and you're sorted, no need for twists, they'll cause their own drama.

[Chilltown]

If anything they should just adopt the US format, one competition winner decides the 2 nominees.

[Rorkimaru]

No way give the public full control. Let them compete for immunity in various tasks and then have the public decide between the 2+ that lose.

[minny03]

Sigh... I agree with you OP, but some people here are so afraid of change and do not understand that the show does need a complete revamp to survive in today's television landscape.

[minny03]

Why must BB be a set format in your brain.

Why aren't you open to the possibility of it adapting and changing to suit its current audience.

Simply forcing the same tired format on a new audience only serves to beat it into the ground further.

Exactly. And consider the fact that if you look at some of the most long-running, successful reality shows on television, most of them have changed in some type of way because the producers on other shows have realized the importance of keeping a show fresh, new, and exciting for the viewers. It is extremely boring to just keep everything the same.

It blows my mind that most people still want head to head evictions, with only two people up and a VTE. Yes, that format may have somewhat worked years ago, but it does not work well in this current landscape. Many big characters go up for eviction way too early and then get evicted just because they have personality or are opinionated. That really needs to stop happening. VTS with the whole house up will ensure big characters will survive and there would be less producer manipulation.

[RodHull]

Nominations do work.

Nothing suggests they don't work when the producers have refused to even let the regular format play out for about 3 years.

TBF whenever they rarely do a normal week the easy obvious targets always go and the bores and ass lickers stay in. HMs nowadays are to savvy to the process for it to work anymore.

Its been in steady decline as a concept since around BB6 when ever week the best HMs would be slowly removed leaving all the crap who dont do anything left at the end.

All HMs all up every week with vote to save would work so much better and do tasks maybe to win immunity.

In that system you wouldnt get power blocks forming, controversial but good HMs who the others hate wouldnt be up against nobodies in VTE every week ensuring they go... it wont happen though

[Beetlejuice]

Sigh... I agree with you OP, but some people here are so afraid of change and do not understand that the show does need a complete revamp to survive in today's television landscape.

The show has had a complete revamp and that is why it is in the toilet it now is. The biggest change made to it was the lack of live coverage. The second change is the constant interference. The third change was the astonishingly bad process of casting.

You change it any further, rather than go back to a tried and tested format, and it is Big Brother in all but name. To those who have stuck with it, they will just get fed up. To those who are new to it, they'll just think "Well this is naff".

There are three things the show needs, and it was always this way...

1. A good, varied selection of housemates so that there's no such thing as a "Big character" who the show revolves around (BB3, BB5, BB6 and BB9 are good examples of this).

2. 24/7 live coverage that brings to the show a sense of urgency, allows people to talk about it throughout the day, and actually get to know the housemates properly. Just consider this a moment... You used to get 24/7 coverage for 72 days or more. Now you get about 72 45 minute HL shows and that's about it. If you don't know the HMs, you don't care. And they've made it impossible to get to know them.

3. Stay the **** out of the nomination process and stop relying on pointless twists and desperate stunts. From the house next door to bringing Nikki back, then Jade in CBB to the all girl start of BB8 and the ridiculousness of the half way house. The producers overegged the pudding and did enormous damage to the show. It never recovered of Channel 4.

[Jack_]

The House Next Door Part 1 is the best twist of all time, and Part 2 really wasn't that bad either

[RodHull]

3. Stay the **** out of the nomination process and stop relying on pointless twists and desperate stunts. From the house next door to bringing Nikki back, then Jade in CBB to the all girl start of BB8 and the ridiculousness of the half way house. The producers overegged the pudding and did enormous damage to the show. It never recovered of Channel 4.

I agree with your first 2 points but this I dont.

The producers didnt just think 'hey for s**ts and giggles lets ruin our successful show' it was dieing on its arse after BB4 and was in slow but steady decline from then on. They started ******ing with the format cause of a number of reasons, one of the main ones was the public constantly sabotaged their own viewing experience leaving the final weeks as the most boring thing on tv. Its viewing figures always started high then nosedived as the series went on and the big characters went.

TBF the producers made a hash of rectifying this and just messed it up further but they had to try something as it was not working. And largely still doesnt.

[Beetlejuice]

The House Next Door Part 1 is the best twist of all time, and Part 2 really wasn't that bad either

It was a totally unneccessary twist that brought in 4 housemates nobody cared about. I liked Aisleyne, but I'd rather she had stayed in over Suzie and that was that. In that time they lost Lea and then Nikki, lost half a million viewers as they saw off Jayne, Spiral and Michael and then in an effort to get viewers back up, they got Nikki back in.

It was little more than the latest attempt to recreate the bedsit. They did the same the year before with Orlaith, Eugene and Kinga, and that didn't really work. By the time they did in in BB7 it was just stupid. And by BB8, with the half way house, it was so absurd it was insulting.

[NotARylanFan]

Removing Nominations would have a massive backlash imo.

It would be viewed by the general public as a cash grabbing scheme - instead of voting between three people (or not at all if your favourite wasn't up) it becomes to you must vote every single week to save them.

[EspeonBB]

Lol they might as well. It's not as if the housemates have much influence over who's nominated anyway :joker:

[Beetlejuice]

I agree with your first 2 points but this I dont.

The producers didnt just think 'hey for s**ts and giggles lets ruin our successful show' it was dieing on its arse after BB4 and was in slow but steady decline from then on.

BB5, BB6 and BB7 all got high viewing figures. Higher, or the same as (BB6) than BB4 (Which actually got decent viewing figures for Channel 4)


They started ******ing with the format cause of a number of reasons, one of the main ones was the public constantly sabotaged their own viewing experience leaving the final weeks as the most boring thing on tv.

This is nonsense. The reason the final 2 weeks are invariably boring is because the housemates see the end in sight. As for big characters getting evicted... Fine, it makes the eviction nights much more interesting.


Its viewing figures always started high then nosedived as the series went on and the big characters went.

No, it did not. In BB3 the viewing figures went up in the last 3 weeks. In BB5 it was the same story. BB6 was mostly consistent. BB7 suffered as a result of Nikki getting evicted. But the only reason she was evicted was because of interference with the nominations. They punished Jayne by putting everyone up but her. So the producers interference was to blame. It's not that they sabotage their own show, it's that they are idiots.

TBF the producers made a hash of rectifying this and just messed it up further but they had to try something as it was not working. And largely still doesnt.

Every time the producers have got involved they have made the show worse off. Nikki would never have gone when she did but for the producers making the decision they did. They would never have got themselves in trouble had they not put Jade and her family in and let the treatment of Shilpa get out of control. BB8 would never have been such a flop had they started with a proper cast and not been so heavy handed with Emily.

Almost every bit of interference in this show has damaged it.

[Macie Lightfoot]

Lol they might as well. It's not as if the housemates have much influence over who's nominated anyway :joker:

For real though. Nominations used to be my favorite time of the week because they were usually nailbiters and revealed a lot about house politics. Now I couldn't give any less of a **** because we're spending half an episode either in the DR or face to face when A) depending on who the producers want to save and how vulnerable they are, anyone who gets just two nominations will be facing eviction, and B) about half of the nominees will end up being safe as result of some convoluted twist. Like, it's at the point where you're more likely to be evicted by random chance than anything you've actually done, and isn't the whole point of nominations being able to hold others accountable for their actions? There's literally no point anymore.

[Jack_]

It was a totally unneccessary twist that brought in 4 housemates nobody cared about. I liked Aisleyne, but I'd rather she had stayed in over Suzie and that was that. In that time they lost Lea and then Nikki, lost half a million viewers as they saw off Jayne, Spiral and Michael and then in an effort to get viewers back up, they got Nikki back in.

It was little more than the latest attempt to recreate the bedsit. They did the same the year before with Orlaith, Eugene and Kinga, and that didn't really work. By the time they did in in BB7 it was just stupid. And by BB8, with the half way house, it was so absurd it was insulting.

No it wasn't, it was a well thought out and clever twist that had been planned months in advance of the series even starting, which is something we never ever get on C5 anymore. Granted the new housemates weren't all that great, but that wasn't really the best part or the point of the twist. It was the falsehood of having Aisleyne 'evict' four of them, only to then lead up to the live Tuesday episode where she had to evict either Jonathan or Spiral live to both houses and the viewers, and produced one of the best twist reactions ever in the process.

The whole thing was slick, exciting and tense and was executed to absolute perfection and is the kind of thing that's missing from Big Brother today. I agree that there are too many twists these days, but when they are done sporadically and right as in the C4 days, they can be amazing. As the House Next Door was.

I wouldn't really call it a Bedsit remake either as the point wasn't to watch the housemates in the main house which is all secret rooms consist of these days. And The Secret Garden was totally different as well, another well thought out twist that revolved around them having to sneak around the main house, which was both hilarious and exciting.

And the ex-housemates returning HND may have caused controversy but who cares, the series needed a bit of life injecting into it and it worked. It was great to see them four again (even if they weren't my ideal choices), and Nikki deserved her place in the final week.

[RodHull]

BB5, BB6 and BB7 all got high viewing figures. Higher, or the same as (BB6) than BB4 (Which actually got decent viewing figures for Channel 4)

Producers said themselves they totally misjudged BB4 and the show was in jeopardy from then on. BB5 6 and 7 got on average slightly around same viewers as BB4 but with arguable superior casts so it was clear the show was in decline from then on out, from BB8 onwards it nosedived badly.


This is nonsense. The reason the final 2 weeks are invariably boring is because the housemates see the end in sight. As for big characters getting evicted... Fine, it makes the eviction nights much more interesting..

No it isnt, its cause the ones who make the show watchable and interesting are all gone, no better example exists than BB1 itself, which made headlines with Nick Bateman, then he went and the last weeks were like watching paint dry.

In almost every series (last year was a notable exception) the biggest characters are all gone 3 or 4 weeks before the end and it just grinds to a halt.

And the eviction night is just 1 show why sacrifice the best characters to watch just for 1 night and leave yourself with boring ****s to watch

[Beetlejuice]

No it wasn't, it was a well thought out and clever twist

How was it clever? It was a combination of the fake eviction/bedsit (bb5) and people living next door (BB6). It ruined the flow of the series and brought in total non-entities who they spent the next 2 weeks evicting and viewing figures dropped.


that had been planned months in advance of the series even starting, which is something we never ever get on C5 anymore. Granted the new housemates weren't all that great, but that wasn't really the best part or the point of the twist. It was the falsehood of having Aisleyne 'evict' four of them, only to then lead up to the live Tuesday episode where she had to evict either Jonathan or Spiral live to both houses and the viewers, and produced one of the best twist reactions ever in the process.

All twists produce funny reactions when they are revealed. Bringing in the "Legends" did.


The whole thing was slick, exciting and tense and was executed to absolute perfection and is the kind of thing that's missing from Big Brother today.

It was a tired attempt to recreate what had happened before, and they've never stopped trying to recreate such moments ever since.

I wouldn't really call it a Bedsit remake either as the point wasn't to watch the housemates in the main house which is all secret rooms consist of these days. And The Secret Garden was totally different as well, another well thought out twist that revolved around them having to sneak around the main house, which was both hilarious and exciting.

It was a combination of both. A fake eviction and people living next door.

And the ex-housemates returning HND may have caused controversy but who cares, the series needed a bit of life injecting into it and it worked. It was great to see them four again (even if they weren't my ideal choices), and Nikki deserved her place in the final week.

Nikki being allowed to win caused an enormous fuss and got them in a lot of trouble. Nikki being evicted caused the viewing figures to drop. They buggered the show up by putting everyone but Jayne up, and then they did even more damage to the show by bringing her back.

[Marsh.]

It was a totally unneccessary twist that brought in 4 housemates nobody cared about. I liked Aisleyne, but I'd rather she had stayed in over Suzie and that was that. In that time they lost Lea and then Nikki, lost half a million viewers as they saw off Jayne, Spiral and Michael and then in an effort to get viewers back up, they got Nikki back in.

It was little more than the latest attempt to recreate the bedsit. They did the same the year before with Orlaith, Eugene and Kinga, and that didn't really work. By the time they did in in BB7 it was just stupid. And by BB8, with the half way house, it was so absurd it was insulting.

I thought the Secret Garden worked really well. Makes being let in on the secret was the cherry on top entertainment wise.

And we wouldn't have lost Susie over Aisleyne. Aisleyne would have no doubt been evicted that week, she was hated at that point in the series hence her confusion from all the booing to her being in a secret house.

[Jack_]

How was it clever? It was a combination of the fake eviction/bedsit (bb5) and people living next door (BB6). It ruined the flow of the series and brought in total non-entities who they spent the next 2 weeks evicting and viewing figures dropped.

Creating an entire separate house within the main structure that was a secret, the twist of 'you have to evict four' but she wasn't really and then the surprise of her having to genuinely evict one of the remaining two for real on the special live show. The whole thing was planned to perfection and wasn't some tacky, embarrassing nonsense like we get from the production team these days.

From the way Big Brother spoke to her, from the fact Davina spoke to the house, to her re-entrance, the list goes on.

All twists produce funny reactions when they are revealed. Bringing in the "Legends" did.

There's a clear difference between the tacky montage they produced for the legends entrance (and most secret room re-entrances these days) that actually spoil the surprise before they even enter, and the surprise and tension as Aisleyne realised she'd have to evict one of Spiral or Jonathan with everybody watching, and then her tears that lasted the rest of the evening. Enthralling television. I don't remember anything like that in any other twist reaction.

It was a tired attempt to recreate what had happened before, and they've never stopped trying to recreate such moments ever since.

Not true, it was a genuinely new twist idea (I know you'll say it wasn't but it was) that these days they seem to have run out of, and yes, you're right, they do keep trying to recreate them. Although I wish they would do a secret room with new housemates where there isn't a live feed a la the HND/Secret Garden/Halfway House.

It was a combination of both. A fake eviction and people living next door.

Not really true either. Yes it was a fake eviction, but there were no headphones for spying like the Bedsit had. It was a secret house in which Aisleyne had to 'evict' four of the newbies only to lead up to the amazing night in which she had to evict one of them for real. A totally different twist to the Bedsit and the Secret Garden, and miles apart from the recycled Bedsits we get these days.

Nikki being allowed to win caused an enormous fuss and got them in a lot of trouble. Nikki being evicted caused the viewing figures to drop. They buggered the show up by putting everyone but Jayne up, and then they did even more damage to the show by bringing her back.

I know it did, but they still made the right decision. The public know (and knew) nothing, bringing her back was a good idea.

I'm not denying they made other mistakes punishment wise throughout the series like that, but twist wise BB7 is about as near perfection BBUK has ever got.

[Beetlejuice]

Producers said themselves they totally misjudged BB4 and the show was in jeopardy from then on.

Yes, we all know BB4 was a flop but only after the extraordinary success of BB3. Channel 4 would have been happy with the ratings had it not been for BB3.


BB5 6 and 7 got on average slightly around same viewers as BB4 but with arguable superior casts so it was clear the show was in decline from then on out

No, it was not. Big Brother 5 got the second best viewing figures it had ever got. BB6 got 4.6 million viewers, which is what every other BB got on average (except BB3 and BB5), and BB7 ended up with a 4.8 million viewing average. The show rated consistently well for 3 years after BB4.


from BB8 onwards it nosedived badly.

Yes, because of the ridiculous choices the producers made with the show.



No it isnt, its cause the ones who make the show watchable and interesting are all gone, no better example exists than BB1 itself, which made headlines with Nick Bateman, then he went and the last weeks were like watching paint dry.

And the solution to that problem is to fill the house with characters that make the show watchable. The figures went up in the final weeks of BB3. They went up in the final weeks of BB5 as well.

In almost every series (last year was a notable exception) the biggest characters are all gone 3 or 4 weeks before the end and it just grinds to a halt.


Again, nonsense. The last 3 weeks of BB5 had Nadia, Dan, Jason, Victor (evicted in the 8th week) and Michelle (evicted in the penultimate week). The last 3 weeks of BB6 had Makosi, Derek, Craig and Anthony. The last week of BB9 had... Mikey, Rex, Darnell, Katreya. The biggest characters of BB14 were Dexter and Gina. Both were there until the end.

And the eviction night is just 1 show why sacrifice the best characters to watch just for 1 night and leave yourself with boring ****s to watch

An eviction is a week's process. The whole week is more exciting if big characters are up. The most exciting eviction ever was probably Spencer vs. Alex, or when Adele and Jade were up. If it's minor characters, nobody cares. The solution is to find at least 10 strong characters. Not to constantly interfere with the show when you're only making it worse.

[Marsh.]

This is nonsense. The reason the final 2 weeks are invariably boring is because the housemates see the end in sight. As for big characters getting evicted... Fine, it makes the eviction nights much more interesting.

Now, I agree with this. The final week or so will always be quieter and in series which are heavy in drama that is a welcome relief and calm down before the final.

Especially if the housemates in that final week have been there from the start for a full 2-3 months then they calm down as the end is in sight and they are exhausted no doubt.

[Beetlejuice]

I thought the Secret Garden worked really well. Makes being let in on the secret was the cherry on top entertainment wise.

And we wouldn't have lost Susie over Aisleyne. Aisleyne would have no doubt been evicted that week, she was hated at that point in the series hence her confusion from all the booing to her being in a secret house.

Then so be it. I always thought Aisleyne was overrated anyway.

[Jason.]

No it wasn't, it was a well thought out and clever twist that had been planned months in advance of the series even starting, which is something we never ever get on C5 anymore. Granted the new housemates weren't all that great, but that wasn't really the best part or the point of the twist. It was the falsehood of having Aisleyne 'evict' four of them, only to then lead up to the live Tuesday episode where she had to evict either Jonathan or Spiral live to both houses and the viewers, and produced one of the best twist reactions ever in the process.

The whole thing was slick, exciting and tense and was executed to absolute perfection and is the kind of thing that's missing from Big Brother today. I agree that there are too many twists these days, but when they are done sporadically and right as in the C4 days, they can be amazing. As the House Next Door was.

I wouldn't really call it a Bedsit remake either as the point wasn't to watch the housemates in the main house which is all secret rooms consist of these days. And The Secret Garden was totally different as well, another well thought out twist that revolved around them having to sneak around the main house, which was both hilarious and exciting.

And the ex-housemates returning HND may have caused controversy but who cares, the series needed a bit of life injecting into it and it worked. It was great to see them four again (even if they weren't my ideal choices), and Nikki deserved her place in the final week.

I think you are overestimating how good the HND was. I like the twist, don't get me wrong. But it really wasn't as well-executed as you make out when the secret house wasn't even soundproof, and Aisleyne pretty much knew she was sending people to the main house, which defeated the whole purpose and just made it predictable and less of a surprise to Aisleyne and the remaining HND housemates

The HND used to be my favourite secret room. But, after recently re-watching BB5, I think the Bedsit is far superior - that was riveting viewing, and that's from re-watching it after more than a decade later.

[Beetlejuice]

Creating an entire separate house within the main structure that was a secret, the twist of 'you have to evict four' but she wasn't really and then the surprise of her having to genuinely evict one of the remaining two for real on the special live show. The whole thing was planned to perfection and wasn't some tacky, embarrassing nonsense like we get from the production team these days.

But it was all pointless. And it ruined the flow of that series.

From the way Big Brother spoke to her, from the fact Davina spoke to the house, to her re-entrance, the list goes on.

It doesn't go on.


There's a clear difference between the tacky montage they produced for the legends entrance (and most secret room re-entrances these days) that actually spoil the surprise before they even enter, and the surprise and tension as Aisleyne realised she'd have to evict one of Spiral or Jonathan with everybody watching, and then her tears that lasted the rest of the evening. Enthralling television. I don't remember anything like that in any other twist reaction.

Makosi had to evict Kinga.



Not true, it was a genuinely new twist idea (I know you'll say it wasn't but it was)

It wasn't. As I said it was a fake eviction (Bedsit BB5) combined with a housemate living with new housemates next door and having to evict one (Makosi BB6/Secret garden)



Not really true either. Yes it was a fake eviction, but there were no headphones for spying like the Bedsit had. It was a secret house in which Aisleyne had to 'evict' four of the newbies only to lead up to the amazing night in which she had to evict one of them for real. A totally different twist to the Bedsit and the Secret Garden, and miles apart from the recycled Bedsits we get these days.

How can you say it's totally different?



I know it did, but they still made the right decision. The public know (and knew) nothing, bringing her back was a good idea.

I'm not denying they made other mistakes punishment wise throughout the series like that, but twist wise BB7 is about as near perfection BBUK has ever got.

No, it isn't. The only twist that ever worked was the bedsit twist and they have been trying to recreate it in some other form ever since and failing ever more so with each try. The only reason Dexter/Gina worked was because they hadn't tried it for a few years.

[Marsh.]

TBF whenever they rarely do a normal week the easy obvious targets always go and the bores and ass lickers stay in. HMs nowadays are to savvy to the process for it to work anymore.

Its been in steady decline as a concept since around BB6 when ever week the best HMs would be slowly removed leaving all the crap who dont do anything left at the end.

All HMs all up every week with vote to save would work so much better and do tasks maybe to win immunity.

In that system you wouldnt get power blocks forming, controversial but good HMs who the others hate wouldnt be up against nobodies in VTE every week ensuring they go... it wont happen though

I couldn't disagree more.

[minny03]

The show has had a complete revamp and that is why it is in the toilet it now is. The biggest change made to it was the lack of live coverage. The second change is the constant interference. The third change was the astonishingly bad process of casting.

The show needs a better revamp. Get rid of VTE, have the housemates take part in mentally stimulating or physically demanding tasks, (rather for them to sit in that house week after week doing nothing but menial or pointless tasks), and the evictions need to take place inside of a studio, which would make the housemates less likely to know who is popular since they won't be hearing cheers and "Get _____ out!" every week. Like the OP or someone else mentioned, the behavior of certain housemates change once they hear people booing or whatnot, so that has to stop too.

[minny03]

TBF whenever they rarely do a normal week the easy obvious targets always go and the bores and ass lickers stay in. HMs nowadays are to savvy to the process for it to work anymore.

Its been in steady decline as a concept since around BB6 when ever week the best HMs would be slowly removed leaving all the crap who dont do anything left at the end.

All HMs all up every week with vote to save would work so much better and do tasks maybe to win immunity.

In that system you wouldnt get power blocks forming, controversial but good HMs who the others hate wouldnt be up against nobodies in VTE every week ensuring they go... it wont happen though

I agree with this that everyone needs to be up for eviction and then have them do tasks so a few could win immunity. I really wish the producers would just change it once and for all and have the whole house up with a VTS. I find the regular nomination process so predictable and makes the show less exciting. It becomes obvious who is going to be nominated (the loud, argumentative, or annoying ones are always nominated before everyone else) and these big characters go home quite instantly. It is so damn safe and predictable.

And 9 times out of 10, the boring ones who sit in the background always escape from being nominated and even if they are up for eviction, they end up staying because people don't want to spend their money to get rid of a drab person. That is why the boring people stay there until the end. Come to think of it, its actually a smart strategy. If you want to win Big Brother, barely speak up, stand in the background, and watch everyone else argue.

This is why people like Rachel Rice from BB9 can outlast everyone. Why do people want that to continue to happen? I get that someone like her had fans, but what kind of show would it be if the house was filled with personalities like hers? It would be so uninteresting to watch.

[sungrass]

brilliant idea - because it would so be like a new yet the same show, which is what we need as so far C5 have turned it into a circus - It would just be great to see something different it really would.


The other thing is - there is an audience out there that want to watch a show like this, sorry to say - but me mum!! she would watch it if I could persuade her it wasnt all young chavvy people. Because the show panders to the uneducated, lets say (I know I will get slaughtered for that) it loosers viewers - the autopsy stuff etc CSI etc - all have this connecting dots pattern - the show needs to be classed up. Thats why CBB is so much more popular, the glamour, respectable people... BB is seen by nearly everyone over 50 - which is a good 80% of the UK as a programe for thick people. Its not - they need to address this - stop pandering to kids, who have no money to spend in casinos anyway (their main advertising revenue) and start making this a show for adults with a brain. We are not as thick as you think!


its 03.34 in the AM UK. Im exhausted. Im not sure if that made any sense at all...!

[Marsh.]

Thats why CBB is so much more popular, the glamour, respectable people...

Glamour? Respectable people?
Have you actually watched CBB? Charlotte Crosby pissing the bed, Lauren Harries being... well... Lauren Harries. Perez Hilton versus Katie Hopkins, Denise Welch being a drunken mess, everything about Frenchy, Pete Burns treatment of everyone... I could go on and on and on about how CBB can have housemates even more outrageous than the civilian show nowadays.

BB is seen by nearly everyone over 50 - which is a good 80% of the UK

I'm going to assume I'm misreading this but it sounds like you're saying 80% of the UK is over the age of 50? :conf:

stop pandering to kids, who have no money to spend in casinos anyway (their main advertising revenue)

:joker: :joker: :joker:

[Beetlejuice]

The show needs a better revamp.

What it needs is a return to what it used to be. It succeeds or fails ultimately on having housemates that capture the imagination. But we need to be able to get to know them first.

[Beetlejuice]

brilliant idea - because it would so be like a new yet the same show, which is what we need as so far C5 have turned it into a circus - It would just be great to see something different it really would.

You've been getting something different every year. What the show needs is a structure and given that they are trying to win viewers back, it makes no sense to completely change the show from what it once was. People coming back will want to settle back into what is familiar. All you do by radically changing the show is alienate what viewers you have left, and make returning viewers just give up on it once and for all.