Paid £4000 for football scores?

[Amy Jade]

Am I reading this right? £4k for a few scores...such an idiot.

[smudgie]

Am I reading this right? £4k for a few scores...such an idiot.

Nope, he was going to buy the score, umbongo and something else..then changed his mind after being whinged at..by the very person that grabbed 5 grand at the first chance she got.
Bloody hypocrite.

[Amy Jade]

Nope, he was going to buy the score, umbongo and something else..then changed his mind after being whinged at..by the very person that grabbed 5 grand at the first chance she got.
Bloody hypocrite.

Glad Chloe talked him out of it :clap1:

[smudgie]

Glad Chloe talked him out of it :clap1:

Aye, so am I, reckon if has cost her the win:cheer2:

More the fact that she has whinged at everyone else who dares to even think of spending any f the cash...then grabs it for herself:nono:
Selfish girl.

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

A mess

[abhorson]

No. After (going home Friday) Myrtle moaned about it, he cancelled it. The Chloe 5k is history!!

Another bad woman player bites the dust. Still, take solace all feminists. We have had Kate Lawler, Nadia Almada?, Rachel Rice, Sophie Reade, Josie Gibson and Helen Wood as winners. Not as bad a ratio as you think!

[jessicadanielle]

No. After (going home Friday) Myrtle moaned about it, he cancelled it. The Chloe 5k is history!!

Another bad woman player bites the dust. Still, take solace all feminists. Wem have had Kate Lawler, Nadia Almada?, Rachel Rice, Sophie Reade, Josie Gibson and Helen Wood as winners. Not as bad a ratio as you think!

The fact that you so irrelevantly mentioned gender is probably why some people think the Chloe hate is fuelled by sexism. Fortunately I don't think it is for most people...

[jennyjuniper]

The fact that you so irrelevantly mentioned gender is probably why some people think the Chloe hate is fuelled by sexism. Fortunately I don't think it is for most people...

No it's not sexist, I dislike Danny Weazel equally as much as I dislike Chloe.

[Josy]

No he never.

[ItWasJustBanter]

Glad Chloe talked him out of it :clap1:

Shouted him out of it more like. She's vile mate.

[Pete.]

The fact that you so irrelevantly mentioned gender is probably why some people think the Chloe hate is fuelled by sexism. Fortunately I don't think it is for most people...
:clap1:

[Pete.]

No. After (going home Friday) Myrtle moaned about it, he cancelled it. The Chloe 5k is history!!

Another bad woman player bites the dust. Still, take solace all feminists. We have had Kate Lawler, Nadia Almada?, Rachel Rice, Sophie Reade, Josie Gibson and Helen Wood as winners. Not as bad a ratio as you think!

Not when Craig, Brian D, Cameron, Anthony, Pete, Brian B, Aaron, Luke, Sam, Jack, Mark, Bez, Alex, Paddy, Julian, Rylan, Jim, Gary, Paul, John and Brian D again provide a ratio of 21:12 - overwhelming male winners

[Amy Jade]

I wouldn't be worried if he had taken £4000 in prize money for himself tbh, that is cold hard cash but for football results :umm2:

[Pete.]

I wouldn't be worried if he had taken £4000 in prize money for himself tbh, that is cold hard cash but for football results :umm2:
I'm surprised BB didn't say no, it is outside world information after all (but then again they don't care anymore)

[Ammi]

I wouldn't be worried if he had taken £4000 in prize money for himself tbh, that is cold hard cash but for football results :umm2:

..yeah, this is it for me as well Amy and why not all of their 'offers' have been the same ...did he get the score btw..?...I would have been evil BB and given him some old/last year's score and said, oh I never said recent ones/ha 2....(sorry for the rush/work..)....

[Amy Jade]

..yeah, this is it for me as well Amy and why not all of their 'offers' have been the same ...did he get the score btw..?...I would have been evil BB and given him some old/last year's score and said, oh I never said recent ones/ha 2....(sorry for the rush/work..)....

No, apparently Chloe talked him out of it. :)

[Ammi]

No, apparently Chloe talked him out of it. :)

...well done Chloe, looking out for that winner and pointing out their selfishness...what a gal, eh Amy..:wink:....I seriously wish her luck with her £5000....(you have a good day..:love:..)...

[bots]

so something that is important to Chloe is justified, while something that is important to Jack is not?

We all have different methods of identifying what is important to us, the success or failure of Jacks football team is very important to him. Double standards :nono:

[Ammi]

so something that is important to Chloe is justified, while something that is important to Jack is not?

We all have different methods of identifying what is important to us, the success or failure of Jacks football team is very important to him. Double standards :nono:

..it really isn't like that though and not double standards at all...yeah, football scores may be important to Jack and I agree, if something is important to a person then it has equal importance to anything else to someone else..but his knowing the football scores was only him knowing them right now as opposed to when he got out so he's not giving anything up whereas Chloe would have been giving the £5000 up completely...he still gets his football scores anyway, doesn't he....

[bots]

..it really isn't like that though and not double standards at all...yeah, football scores may be important to Jack and I agree, if something is important to a person then it has equal importance to anything else to someone else..but his knowing the football scores was only him knowing them right now as opposed to when he got out so he's not giving anything up whereas Chloe would have been giving the £5000 up completely...he still gets his football scores anyway, doesn't he....

you are still devaluing something that is important to jack. It doesnt matter whether something is for instant gratification or not. It is important to jack

Chloe has been an absolute bitch about the money all week, that is why people are shouting hypocrisy. She has continually chastised Jack, while only thinking of herself. Jack is a much kinder person than Chloe will ever be.

[Amy Jade]

Ammi isn't devaluing anything, she makes a valid point. Chloe took a one off offer of 5k, to spend how she likes. Jack wanted to use it to find out scores he could know by friday.

£5000 could pay for so much, I wouldn't blame any of them for taking it

[bots]

Ammi isn't devaluing anything, she makes a valid point. Chloe took a one off offer of 5k, to spend how she likes. Jack wanted to use it to find out scores he could know by friday.

£5000 could pay for so much, I wouldn't blame any of them for taking it

again, you are making value judgements based on its worth to you. You are not jack. What is important to him, should be given equal standing as anything Chloe decides is of value.

[Amy Jade]

again, you are making value judgements based on its worth to you. You are not jack. What is important to him, should be given equal standing as anything Chloe decides is of value.

Ok yeah I feel £4,000 is too much to pay to find out football results. Jack did too. And?

[Mick]

Jack knew he was wasting 4k there was little gain for himself a football result a £1 drink and a "Cheap" Blazer.Chloe took 5k of real money that's the significant difference imo.

Jack acted in the spirit of the game but Chloe was calculating and clinical.

Even if he had not back tracked and cancelled it I still think that the majority of viewers would have found in his favour.

[Vanessa]

No, he didn't. He changed his mind.

[Babayaro.]

I don't think he'd want to know the scores tbh. Plymouth missed out on a play-off spot by 1 point :joker:

[Ashley.]

Chloe is a beaut <3

She's obviously gathered that nobody is listening to her about not taking the money so she thought she'd join in. If Jack, Nick and Joel aren't selfish, then neither is she. :clap2:

[Pete.]

again, you are making value judgements based on its worth to you. You are not jack. What is important to him, should be given equal standing as anything Chloe decides is of value.

You're not Jack either so you don't know where he stands with Chloe

[Pete.]

Have people conveniently forgotten that Chloe asked Jacks dad for the football results for free?

[bots]

You're not Jack either so you don't know where he stands with Chloe

i never said i was

[MrWong]

Not Chloe trying to justify taking 5k by bringing up that Jack nearly spent 4k.

[Cherie]

Have people conveniently forgotten that Chloe asked Jacks dad for the football results for free?

Jack asked her to ask for them, and he didn't know his Dad was going to ring in the show so i don't really get the point of this argument?

[mimosveta]

Another bad woman player bites the dust. Still, take solace all feminists. We have had Kate Lawler, Nadia Almada?, Rachel Rice, Sophie Reade, Josie Gibson and Helen Wood as winners. Not as bad a ratio as you think!

You know, I'd rather have 5 worthy people as finalists than 5 women. But I'm not getting either, so I'm pissed.

Then again, real comfort to feminists is that out of all male housemates, not one was a decent person. Girls at least had Sarah, Jade, Sam and Harry, maybe even Adjoa (she was in for far too short to tell, I didn't enjoy her being christian, but I liked how she creeped everyone out talking about poosey :)

Real solace to feminists is that these girls weren't backstabbing mess, if girls have fixed their attitude towards other women, half a fight is done. Chloe being disloyal is hardly a dent compared what those men in there are like. :shrug:

[erinp5]

No he made the offer to BB but Chloe guilt tripped him and he withdrew it ...Just as well... as she then took 5k .

[downthechippie]

..yeah, this is it for me as well Amy and why not all of their 'offers' have been the same ...did he get the score btw..?...I would have been evil BB and given him some old/last year's score and said, oh I never said recent ones/ha 2....(sorry for the rush/work..)....

The way I see it is that BB can take away from the prize fund (because Chloe and Sam were talking when they were told not to), and some housemates were making really stupid purchases (Joel with the £2,500 pizza, Jack speculated about spending £4000 on football results, but decided not to). Spending £100 on a suitcase.

Now these purchases and BB taking away from the prize fund are all REPLACEABLE. The housemates are given opportunities to top up the prize fund to the original £150,000.

BUT. Chloe's £5000 (and anyone else who takes cash to spend OUTSIDE the house) will ALWAYS be taken into account, so the prize fund will only reach £145,000.

So I believe that anything spent in the house can be replaced. Any cash to be collected on the OUTSIDE will not be replaced.

That's what I think happens in these situations.

Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't this stuff happen in previous years, and didn't BB always get the prize fund topped up, even though stupid things were bought in the house?

[jaxie]

Chloe is a beaut <3

She's obviously gathered that nobody is listening to her about not taking the money so she thought she'd join in. If Jack, Nick and Joel aren't selfish, then neither is she. :clap2:

They are selfish by Chloe's own standards. Exactly why she is a hypocrite.

[downthechippie]

Jack knew he was wasting 4k there was little gain for himself a football result a £1 drink and a "Cheap" Blazer.Chloe took 5k of real money that's the significant difference imo.

Jack acted in the spirit of the game but Chloe was calculating and clinical.

Even if he had not back tracked and cancelled it I still think that the majority of viewers would have found in his favour.

That's just it - In the spirit of the game. Stupid purchases such as the £2,500 pizza, Joel. Losing almost ONE HuNDRED GRAND for talking during a task. All of these are IN THE SPIRIT OF THE GAME.

Take £5,000 hard cash to be spent OUTSIDE the house is a completely different thing.

I don't blame Chloe for taking it. I just don't like the little madam because she is a disloyal, cowardly sneak.

[vafunghoul]

Jack is a degenerate gambler. Chloe may just be a degenerate.

[abhorson]

After tonights show goes out. Chloe will be odds on to be evicted. Harry will be safe.

Win, win, either way.

[jaxie]

The way I see it is that BB can take away from the prize fund (because Chloe and Sam were talking when they were told not to), and some housemates were making really stupid purchases (Joel with the £2,500 pizza, Jack speculated about spending £4000 on football results, but decided not to). Spending £100 on a suitcase.

Now these purchases and BB taking away from the prize fund are all REPLACEABLE. The housemates are given opportunities to top up the prize fund to the original £150,000.

BUT. Chloe's £5000 (and anyone else who takes cash to spend OUTSIDE the house) will ALWAYS be taken into account, so the prize fund will only reach £145,000.

So I believe that anything spent in the house can be replaced. Any cash to be collected on the OUTSIDE will not be replaced.

That's what I think happens in these situations.

Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't this stuff happen in previous years, and didn't BB always get the prize fund topped up, even though stupid things were bought in the house?

I would agree with you.

[jaxie]

After tonights show goes out. Chloe will be odds on to be evicted. Harry will be safe.

Win, win, either way.

I think Harry took the cash too so she might be heading for some fallout too. She has also been calling others selfish.

[sampvt]

You all seem to be missing the point, the 2.5k for pizza and even the 4k for footie scores are make believe sums that fluctuate up and down but will always end up at the top figure of 150k. The 5k in little miss skanky gob, stays in her bank to be used for chavvy purposes no doubt, or maybe lent to her family to fund more drug runs, who knows.

One thing is for sure, it aint going anywhere but down her neck or into someone elses pocket so she can play chav. Its gone from the prize fund for ever. Joels 2.5k will be earned back by some inane scheme provided by BB.

[abhorson]

I think Harry took the cash too so she might be heading for some fallout too. She has also been calling others selfish.

Ah. not seen that. After what she said too!! Both devious bastards.

[Ashley.]

Ah. not seen that. After what she said too!! Both devious bastards.

Before you jump to conclusions, Harry didn't take the money, she put it back in the prize fund.

[Pete.]

Jack asked her to ask for them, and he didn't know his Dad was going to ring in the show so i don't really get the point of this argument?
No Chloe asked off her own back