Log in

View Full Version : How does it make Chloe a hypocrite?


Withano
08-07-2015, 11:59 PM
I asked on another thread but it'll get lost in the comments and i really want to know the answer because i don't see the similarities that people have drawn.

Chloe got a little mad at people for spending money which was not theirs to spend.. How is it the same as Chloe choosing to not give money which was hers to give.

Its not the same. I would have done the exact same as Chloe, it was my 5k to give or keep and i would have got a bit miffed at others recklessly buying stupid ****, its not their money to spend.. if somebody could explain why her and i are hypocrites, id be grateful! It was her money to give and she chose not to :shrug:

Scream
09-07-2015, 12:04 AM
Well, you said 'I would have got a bit miffed at others recklessly buying stupid **** its not their money to spend'

If that's her logic, when Jack got the football scores he said she could of done the same and she said 'we're not that selfish!!!!'

She's not that selfish to use 4k, but she's selfish enough to take 5k :conf:

Withano
09-07-2015, 12:05 AM
Well, you said 'I would have got a bit miffed at others recklessly buying stupid **** its not their money to spend'

If that's her logic, when Jack got the football scores he said she could of done the same and she said 'we're not that selfish!!!!'

She's not that selfish to use 4k, but she's selfish enough to take 5k :conf:

Its not jacks money to spend, it was chloes money to give. The two examples cant really be compared.

Scream
09-07-2015, 12:08 AM
Its not jacks money to spend, it was chloes money to give. The two examples cant really be compared.

But Chloe said to Jack that it was bad him taking the money from the prize fund because they all thought Danny would win and therefore they were taking the money from Danny. So her taking that 5K took 5K from Danny's prize fund.

Withano
09-07-2015, 12:12 AM
But Chloe said to Jack that it was bad him taking the money from the prize fund because they all thought Danny would win and therefore they were taking the money from Danny. So her taking that 5K took 5K from Danny's prize fund.

She didnt take from the prizefund, she chose not to contribute the 5k that she basically won. i dont see how its hypocritical because its not the same scenario, i can see how it may be considered immoral, not saying shes in the right.. Its just not hypocritical.

jyunga
09-07-2015, 12:19 AM
I don't see how it's hypocritical. If BB offered anyone money for themselves or to put back into the prize fund there is nothing wrong with taking the money. You would be ADDING to the winners fund.

Joel and Jack were TAKING money from the fund, not for themselves but for stupid items they wanted to eat/use in the house. It was a complete waste of money.

Withano
09-07-2015, 12:24 AM
I don't see how it's hypocritical. If BB offered anyone money for themselves or to put back into the prize fund there is nothing wrong with taking the money. You would be ADDING to the winners fund.

Joel and Jack were TAKING money from the fund, not for themselves but for stupid items they wanted to eat/use in the house. It was a complete waste of money.

Yes, this was my point. People are slating her (which i guess i can understand, it wasn't the morally 'nice' thing to do but i do feel like it was mostly built up anger and an excuse to lash out at her finally) but hypocritical was he wrong adjective, surely.

REDCROP
09-07-2015, 12:35 AM
I really dislike her..always have...and here is my attitude towards ' Little Miss Hit and Run' and her 'World Owes Me Something' attitude.....the prize money started off at 150 grand....by the time Chloe and Sam had finally stopped talking during the cash bomb task, despite BB making it clear it would cost them and despite Harry trying yet again to indicate to them, it had plummeted down to less than 50 grand....between them they managed to lose best part of 100 grand....never once have they acknowledged this or apoagised to anyone for this...and now here she is slicing away at it yet again.
And why was she talking during the task ? She was bitching about the boys being faster then her and how she couldn't get her stealers on the cash button in time to save herself from nomination...yet when Nick did the exact same thing the next day she accused him of putting a price on friendship....and do i even need to mention the way she treated Jack for even thinking about doing the same thing.....SHE IS HANDS DOWN THE BIGGEST HYPOCRITE IN THERE....

fitz2k2
09-07-2015, 12:41 AM
she went around the house and told everyone stop talking about the money and yet she takes the money.face it chloe is done friday

marlobrando2
09-07-2015, 12:47 AM
I asked on another thread but it'll get lost in the comments and i really want to know the answer because i don't see the similarities that people have drawn.

Chloe got a little mad at people for spending money which was not theirs to spend.. How is it the same as Chloe choosing to not give money which was hers to give.

Its not the same. I would have done the exact same as Chloe, it was my 5k to give or keep and i would have got a bit miffed at others recklessly buying stupid ****, its not their money to spend.. if somebody could explain why her and i are hypocrites, id be grateful! It was her money to give and she chose not to :shrug:

She moaned for Jack and Sam for getting their suitcases for £200 but has the indecency to take 5k for herself.She need to be flogged for that.Get her out.:nono:

ThriceShy
09-07-2015, 12:57 AM
Chloe is going to leave with about 97% of the eviction vote.

jennyjuniper
09-07-2015, 05:07 AM
She didnt take from the prizefund, she chose not to contribute the 5k that she basically won. i dont see how its hypocritical because its not the same scenario, i can see how it may be considered immoral, not saying shes in the right.. Its just not hypocritical.

Yes it is. She complained when the others were depleting the prize fund, but by her accepting the 5000, that too was depleting the prize fund.

Josy
09-07-2015, 05:15 AM
Chloe got more than a little miffed. She's been a horror all week.

ItWasJustBanter
09-07-2015, 05:38 AM
Good riddance to her.

Ammi
09-07-2015, 05:44 AM
I asked on another thread but it'll get lost in the comments and i really want to know the answer because i don't see the similarities that people have drawn.

Chloe got a little mad at people for spending money which was not theirs to spend.. How is it the same as Chloe choosing to not give money which was hers to give.

Its not the same. I would have done the exact same as Chloe, it was my 5k to give or keep and i would have got a bit miffed at others recklessly buying stupid ****, its not their money to spend.. if somebody could explain why her and i are hypocrites, id be grateful! It was her money to give and she chose not to :shrug:

....hmm, I haven't seen it all/I haven't seen her getting £5000..?..anyways though, just going on what you're saying, I do agree with you that 'hypocrite' wouldn't seem accurate as such but I can still understand why that's being called just because she has been so vocal and judgemental of others..for me I guess there's a difference between 'an offer' from the prize fund which is something that is a treat for any of them right now...I don't know, I just personally think that they never seem to really have 'hardships' in terms of treats...they get so much outside contact anyway, the smokers all seem to have cigarettes, you don't really see them struggling with their basic budgets..?..etc, etc....but with Chloe, to be offered or have taken £5000 as something that was not a treat for her short time left in the house but something that she would and could use outside of the house to me seems not the same thing at all...and only one of them can win what is left of the prize fund and BB mess up that prize fund so much anyway so I think a lot of people would just accept the £5000 and say thank you/I've earned that, type thing....

Smash the Clique
09-07-2015, 07:02 AM
Sorry, not up with all the ins and outs of this; if she had said no to the five grand, would it have been added back to the overall prize fund? If it would've been added to the overall prize fund, then she is depleting it for her own benefit, which indeed makes her an utter, utter hypocrite, especially after her lecturing Sam and Jack for spending a measly 200 quid for having the audacity to want their personal belongings back (and this after they had done the bag task for over 11 hours between them, a task she selfishly dropped out of after a few minutes). Can't stand her.

Amy Jade
09-07-2015, 07:11 AM
I don't get it either, I feel it's just people grasping onto anything possible slate her.

She took none of the prize fund. She took money offered to her that would have fallen into the prize fund if she refused...good on her for taking the cash!

Vanessa
09-07-2015, 07:14 AM
She says they can't be selfish. Has a go at anyone who wastes "Danny's money", then takes 5 grand for herself. GET HER OUT! :nono:

Amy Jade
09-07-2015, 07:17 AM
She says they can't be selfish. Has a go at anyone who wastes "Danny's money", then takes 5 grand for herself. GET HER OUT! :nono:

It wasn't part of the prize fund yet and you'd justify it if Cristian took it so :shrug:

Vanessa
09-07-2015, 07:28 AM
It wasn't part of the prize fund yet and you'd justify it if Cristian took it so :shrug:

Cristian is not the one calling people who waste the prize fund money selfish. She gave Joel, Nick and Jack such a hard time about it, then she takes the money herself. Hypocrite. Calls others selfish, but she's no better.

Miss Nicole
09-07-2015, 07:35 AM
I love Chloe, they have all made mistakes at some point and it just makes them human, I actually don't think what she did was wrong though.

Macie Lightfoot
09-07-2015, 07:36 AM
I don't get it either, I feel it's just people grasping onto anything possible slate her.

She took none of the prize fund. She took money offered to her that would have fallen into the prize fund if she refused...good on her for taking the cash!

You know the drill, we have a woman frontrunner so it's time to evict her and see The Look On Her Face :rolleyes:

bots
09-07-2015, 07:37 AM
You know the drill, we have a woman frontrunner so it's time to evict her and see The Look On Her Face :rolleyes:

thats just not true. Anyone that can't see the nasty game that Chloe has been playing this last week has to be wearing rose coloured spectacles

DemolitionRed
09-07-2015, 07:39 AM
Was she the only one who took the 5k?

Papillon
09-07-2015, 07:42 AM
Chloe & Sam combined lost over 70K of the prize money during the Cashbomb Nom Task.

Through out this week HMs were trying to add money to the pot to raise it for the winner, 1,000 here 2,000 there.

Every time someone spent some of the prize money or in her opinion wasn't playing for the team, she went ape chit.

Chloe didn't even encourage or insisted Jack took the phone call from his Father yesterday even though she knew Jack had £0 in his sack. This really was out of order considering Jack didn't even get his letter from home.

Yes technically the 5K that was offered to Chloe wasn't even part of the cash pot (yet) but it could have been.
Chloe have said through out the series she wasn't in BB for the money "just for the experience". Through out this week Chloe's actions has proven otherwise.
IMO Taking the money smacks hypocrisy.

Papillon
09-07-2015, 07:43 AM
Was she the only one who took the 5k?

No, Rylan said Chloe wasn't the only HM who kept the 5K.

downthechippie
09-07-2015, 01:02 PM
Sorry, not up with all the ins and outs of this; if she had said no to the five grand, would it have been added back to the overall prize fund? If it would've been added to the overall prize fund, then she is depleting it for her own benefit, which indeed makes her an utter, utter hypocrite, especially after her lecturing Sam and Jack for spending a measly 200 quid for having the audacity to want their personal belongings back (and this after they had done the bag task for over 11 hours between them, a task she selfishly dropped out of after a few minutes). Can't stand her.

She really is a piece of work isn't she? She scoffs ice cream in front of them in a really smug way.

She stuffs her face with pizza in front of them, sneering at them as she eats.

She tells Jack's dad 'He can't come to the phone', when she KNOWS his sack held zero cash.

She is all pally with Jack when she thinks the public like him, but turns totally against him when she thinks the public don't like him.

She throws a tantrum and cries if anyone dares to nominate her - hence why nobody has dared to nominate her since.

And as for the others spending some of the prize money on stupid things like Joel with the Pizza, as Joel TRIED to point out, BB would give them opportunities to refill the prize money if it was spent on 'silly luxuries'.

But TAKING £5000 cash to be spent OUTSIDE of the house is an entirely different animal. That money will not be topped up.

So we can't compare Joel's £2,500 pizza with Chloe's Cash grab.

Beetlejuice
09-07-2015, 01:06 PM
She didnt take from the prizefund, she chose not to contribute the 5k that she basically won.

Ridiculous. It was obviously going to the prize fund but she took it for herself instead.

Vicky.
09-07-2015, 01:08 PM
Ridiculous. It was obviously going to the prize fund but she took it for herself instead.

Yup. The straws being clutched to justify Chloe being a complete hypocrite...

I don't have a problem with any of them taking anything tbh. Good on Chloe for taking the 5k. However my problem is with her nonestop whingeing about others doing it...having a ****fit for the sake of 100 quid last night FGS..then doing the exact same thing herself.It matters not if its taking away from the prize fund or keeping an offer for yourself and refusing to add to it really, its the same thing and I'm not sure why its being made out to be completely different.

Poor 'Danny' (we all know she does not really mean Danny when she goes off on one ;) )

Beetlejuice
09-07-2015, 01:09 PM
I don't see how it's hypocritical. If BB offered anyone money for themselves or to put back into the prize fund there is nothing wrong with taking the money. You would be ADDING to the winners fund.

The prize fund has already had money taken away. They are all trying to build it back up. Joel did his by accident and Jack withdrew his.

Joel and Jack were TAKING money from the fund, not for themselves

Of course it was for themselves. Regardless of what it was being spent on.

but for stupid items they wanted to eat/use in the house. It was a complete waste of money.

Irrelevant. And no one is blaming Chloe for taking 5k. What they dislike is her making points such as that being Danny's money and other housemates screwing him over. If she really believes that then she has done the same to the tune for 5 thousands pounds.

jaxie
09-07-2015, 01:11 PM
I really dislike her..always have...and here is my attitude towards ' Little Miss Hit and Run' and her 'World Owes Me Something' attitude.....the prize money started off at 150 grand....by the time Chloe and Sam had finally stopped talking during the cash bomb task, despite BB making it clear it would cost them and despite Harry trying yet again to indicate to them, it had plummeted down to less than 50 grand....between them they managed to lose best part of 100 grand....never once have they acknowledged this or apoagised to anyone for this...and now here she is slicing away at it yet again.
And why was she talking during the task ? She was bitching about the boys being faster then her and how she couldn't get her stealers on the cash button in time to save herself from nomination...yet when Nick did the exact same thing the next day she accused him of putting a price on friendship....and do i even need to mention the way she treated Jack for even thinking about doing the same thing.....SHE IS HANDS DOWN THE BIGGEST HYPOCRITE IN THERE....

:clap1:

jaxie
09-07-2015, 01:13 PM
Its not jacks money to spend, it was chloes money to give. The two examples cant really be compared.

It wasn't Chloe's money at all, it was the prize. As Chloe said it's selfish to take money from the prize fund.

Niamh.
09-07-2015, 01:15 PM
agree ^ It wasn't her money, it was a test like everything else, it's money that was only given to her because of the add to/subtract from cashbombs involving the Prizefund

jaxie
09-07-2015, 01:17 PM
Sorry, not up with all the ins and outs of this; if she had said no to the five grand, would it have been added back to the overall prize fund? If it would've been added to the overall prize fund, then she is depleting it for her own benefit, which indeed makes her an utter, utter hypocrite, especially after her lecturing Sam and Jack for spending a measly 200 quid for having the audacity to want their personal belongings back (and this after they had done the bag task for over 11 hours between them, a task she selfishly dropped out of after a few minutes). Can't stand her.

The choice was keep it yourself or put it back in the prtize fund.

Niamh.
09-07-2015, 01:19 PM
The choice was keep it yourself or put it back in the prtize fund.

Yep just like Joel used £2.5k for a pizza, Chloe used £5k to keep for herself, same difference, both was money that would otherwise have been given to the winner :shrug:

jaxie
09-07-2015, 01:22 PM
It wasn't part of the prize fund yet and you'd justify it if Cristian took it so :shrug:

The question was: take the money yourself OR PUT IT BACK IN THE PRIZE FUND. It was some of the hundred k she lost the in the first place for jabbering on in the task after being told they must not talk.

jaxie
09-07-2015, 01:24 PM
Was she the only one who took the 5k?

I think Harry may have as well. I started another thread about it.

jaxie
09-07-2015, 01:29 PM
You know the drill, we have a woman frontrunner so it's time to evict her and see The Look On Her Face :rolleyes:

I'm a woman, I think she's a selfish hypocrite and want her to go Friday, what's your point?

It's far more sexist to claim someone will be evicted because they are a woman than to judge people on their actions regardless of gender, race or colour.

RichardG
09-07-2015, 01:39 PM
The £5000 was originally part of the total prize for the winner of £150,000 but was removed at the beginning of the twist as punishment for people talking. She had the opportunity to add it back to the fund, or take it for herself. It would only really be "her money to give" if the housemates had successfully raised the prize back up to the original £150,000, and the £5000 was an additional extra that could raise the fund to higher than this. I totally don't blame her, most people - including me - would've done the same, but t definitely does make her look a bit silly after the fuss she's made all week about any money being taken away from what the winner deserves.

Cherie
09-07-2015, 01:46 PM
She moaned for Jack and Sam for getting their suitcases for £200 but has the indecency to take 5k for herself.She need to be flogged for that.Get her out.:nono:

Yes good point she bleated on and on about Danny and Cristian outside trying their best and that Jack and Sam were selfish for spending 100.00 on getting their suitcases, Sam had already added 10k to the fund so, so yes she is a hypocrite.

Cherie
09-07-2015, 01:47 PM
The £5000 was originally part of the total prize for the winner of £150,000 but was removed at the beginning of the twist as punishment for people talking. She had the opportunity to add it back to the fund, or take it for herself. It would only really be "her money to give" if the housemates had successfully raised the prize back up to the original £150,000, and the £5000 was an additional extra that could raise the fund to higher than this. I totally don't blame her, most people - including me - would've done the same, but t definitely does make her look a bit silly after the fuss she's made all week about any money being taken away from what the winner deserves.

:clap1: as long as she doesn't mind looking a bit two faced about it all its fine she can have the money

Niamh.
09-07-2015, 01:54 PM
Yes good point she bleated on and on about Danny and Cristian outside trying their best and that Jack and Sam were selfish for spending 100.00 on getting their suitcases, Sam had already added 10k to the fund so, so yes she is a hypocrite.

Sam who'd just spent 6 and a half hours doing the task with Danny and Cristian while Chloe didn't spend 6 minutes doing it

Vicky.
09-07-2015, 01:56 PM
Sam who'd just spent 6 and a half hours doing the task with Danny and Cristian while Chloe didn't spend 6 minutes doing it

Tbf to Chloe she did attempt to say it was only Jack she was pissed off at.

You know, Jack who she allowed to spend 4 hours or so standing, encouraged to miss a call from his father..etc...while knowing he was adding nothing...

Pink Pegasus
09-07-2015, 01:58 PM
I think it just depends on the way you view it.

The people who were offered money I don't see it as being really their money.

They are being offered money for a chance to give them the option of rebuilding the prize fund for the eventual winner.

It's not like the prize fund is still intact and this is just an extra 5000 they are offering to certain people with the option to keep it or add to prize fund.

No matter what way it was worded by BB, Chloe was given the option to basically return 5000 to the prize fund that she contributed (amongst others) to dropping in the first place or else to pocket it for herself and she chose to pocket it.

This does lessen the overall prize fund so in a slightly more indirect way perhaps than Jack/Joel, is still 'taking away' from a figure that could very easily have been higher for the winner if she just said a simple no.
I know it's not 'taking away' from the current prize fund figure on the plasma screen but imo the money on offer to each of them is just part of the original prizefund anyways that they are meant to be trying to rebuild. I don't see it as just some extra treat or prize that is being offered, it's part of the money that they helped to lose and supposedly want to regain again for the sake of the winner.

She goes on and on about how everybody should want the winner to have as big a prize fund as is possible but doesn't apply that reasoning to her own actions. That is why she is a hypocrite.

Niamh.
09-07-2015, 01:58 PM
Tbf to Chloe she did attempt to say it was only Jack she was pissed off at.

You know, Jack who she allowed to spend 4 hours or so standing, encouraged to miss a call from his father..etc...while knowing he was adding nothing...

She's really gunning for her BFF this week

Niamh.
09-07-2015, 02:00 PM
I think it just depends on the way you view it.

The people who were offered money I don't see it as being really their money.

They are being offered money for a chance to give them the option of rebuilding the prize fund for the eventual winner.

It's not like the prize fund is still intact and this is just an extra 5000 they are offering to certain people with the option to keep it or add to prize fund.

No matter what way it was worded by BB, Chloe was given the option to basically return 5000 to the prize fund that she contributed (amongst others) to dropping in the first place or else to pocket it for herself and she chose to pocket it.

This does lessen the overall prize fund so in a slightly more indirect way perhaps than Jack/Joel, is still 'taking away' from a figure that could very easily have been higher for the winner if she just said a simple no.
I know it's not 'taking away' from the current prize fund figure on the plasma screen but imo the money on offer to each of them is just part of the original prizefund anyways that they are meant to be trying to rebuild. I don't see it as just some extra treat or prize that is being offered, it's part of the money that they helped to lose and supposedly want to regain again for the sake of the winner.

She goes on and on about how everybody should want the winner to have as big a prize fund as is possible but doesn't apply that reasoning to her own actions. That is why she is a hypocrite.

Wonderfully put as usual :love:

abhorson
09-07-2015, 02:10 PM
As others have said. Joel, Jack, and Nick never actually took any cash home. They were doing it for the game. And all knew that the cash would go back up. They all did it for a reason. Chloe took cold hard cash.

Chloe after four days of slating others, took cash home. If any one fails to see the hypocrisy, then well...

FacelessME
09-07-2015, 02:44 PM
Given the chance, I and anyone else would had taken the money. She's a hypocrite for getting mad at Jack about how selfish he was for depleting the prize fund and now she basically did the same thing. Chloe fans probably won't see the hypocrisy.

abhorson
09-07-2015, 02:52 PM
Given the chance, I and anyone else would had taken the money. She's a hypocrite for getting mad at Jack about how selfish he was for depleting the prize fund and now she basically did the same thing. Chloe fans probably won't see the hypocrisy.

They all do! Most have admitted it, and only a few funny types won't.

Lostie!
09-07-2015, 02:55 PM
I don't get it either, I feel it's just people grasping onto anything possible slate her.

She took none of the prize fund. She took money offered to her that would have fallen into the prize fund if she refused...good on her for taking the cash!

That's actually not a world away from taking from the prize fund. The money being offered comprises of the money deducted from the prize fund in the first place. Anyone who chooses to take the money for themselves rather than putting it back into the prize fund ("back into" being the important part) is essentially taking from the prize fund IMO.

Of course, I don't have an issue with her choice, I'd have done the same. But then, I wouldn't have spent the past week being all high-and-mighty about it either.

Withano
09-07-2015, 02:57 PM
Given the chance, I and anyone else would had taken the money. She's a hypocrite for getting mad at Jack about how selfish he was for depleting the prize fund and now she basically did the same thing. Chloe fans probably won't see the hypocrisy.

Im not a chloe fan, shes my least favourite excluding danny and cristian,

i like to ask questions when im unsure on the answer.. I guess the best answer on here, for me was; its hypocritical for her to get mad at others.. and i understand that now.. i still dont think its hypocritical for her to take the money though, it really was hers to give, choosing not to is irrelevant.

Macie Lightfoot
09-07-2015, 06:58 PM
I'm a woman, I think she's a selfish hypocrite and want her to go Friday, what's your point?

It's far more sexist to claim someone will be evicted because they are a woman than to judge people on their actions regardless of gender, race or colour.

The only point I made was that the public is always far more critical of women than men, and the public always waits for an opportunity to take down a female front runner. Corin, Alex, Deana, Gina, Ashleigh, and now Chloe. This is nothing new.

Pete.
09-07-2015, 07:05 PM
The only point I made was that the public is always far more critical of women than men, and the public always waits for an opportunity to take down a female front runner. Corin, Alex, Deana, Gina, Ashleigh, and now Chloe. This is nothing new.
Omg preach

fitz2k2
09-07-2015, 07:10 PM
hypocrite-a person who claims or pretends to have certain beliefs about what is right but who behaves in a way that disagrees with those beliefs

Ashley.
09-07-2015, 07:27 PM
hypocrite-a person who claims or pretends to have certain beliefs about what is right but who behaves in a way that disagrees with those beliefs

Belief - Did not like people taking money from the prize fund
Action - Took £5k that was offered to her by Big Brother and was not from the prize fund

Vicky.
09-07-2015, 07:29 PM
Belief - Did not like people taking money from the prize fund
Action - Took £5k that was offered to her by Big Brother and was not from the prize fund

This excuse is really weak :laugh:

Its exactly the same thing..the money she took was going to be part of the prize fund, but she took it :shrug:

abhorson
09-07-2015, 07:32 PM
The only point I made was that the public is always far more critical of women than men, and the public always waits for an opportunity to take down a female front runner. Corin, Alex, Deana, Gina, Ashleigh, and now Chloe. This is nothing new.

Again. It is a big majority of women that vote. Are you saying that your fellow women are wrong?

camertone
09-07-2015, 07:35 PM
Chloe & Sam combined lost over 70K of the prize money during the Cashbomb Nom Task.

Through out this week HMs were trying to add money to the pot to raise it for the winner, 1,000 here 2,000 there.

Every time someone spent some of the prize money or in her opinion wasn't playing for the team, she went ape chit.

Chloe didn't even encourage or insisted Jack took the phone call from his Father yesterday even though she knew Jack had £0 in his sack. This really was out of order considering Jack didn't even get his letter from home.

Yes technically the 5K that was offered to Chloe wasn't even part of the cash pot (yet) but it could have been.
Chloe have said through out the series she wasn't in BB for the money "just for the experience". Through out this week Chloe's actions has proven otherwise.
IMO Taking the money smacks hypocrisy.

yep, this is how. :)

M X
09-07-2015, 07:38 PM
You are reaching for the stars here. It was a very hypocritical move of her.

Withano
09-07-2015, 07:44 PM
This excuse is really weak :laugh:

Its exactly the same thing..the money she took was going to be part of the prize fund, but she took it :shrug:

Disagree atm, I'll wait for the highlights to make my mind completely but by the sound of it one is basically stealing from the winner, the other is choosing not to give to the winner.

I agree it may be considered hypocritical of her to be mad at others and expect people to not be mad at her.. but the two scenarios are not the same at all to me.

Smash the Clique
09-07-2015, 07:47 PM
Again. It is a big majority of women that vote. Are you saying that your fellow women are wrong?

Spot on, most bb voters are women yet when they turn on one of the sisterhood it's somehow "the menz" fault!

Macie Lightfoot
09-07-2015, 08:05 PM
Again. It is a big majority of women that vote. Are you saying that your fellow women are wrong?

I'm saying that the public always looks for an opportunity to turn on a woman with a chance to win.

RodHull
09-07-2015, 11:14 PM
Belief - Did not like people taking money from the prize fund
Action - Took £5k that was offered to her by Big Brother and was not from the prize fund

Thats basically semantics...

Its all part of the prize fund, as Jack pointed out in a moment of clarity the producers can do what they like with the fund and will ultimately make sure the amount they want as a prize will be left at the end in some form.

Nobody had any issue with her taking the money as indeed nobody care Sam took it. And it was clear cristian would have he looked gutted when he guessed wrong.

The issue which chloe herself still didnt grasp was she spent all week banging on about how she wanted everyone to play together to put money in the pot for the winner, literally making Jack and Joels like miserable with her constant moaning and going on about how shes not in it for the money and money changes people, but when it came to the crunch she grabbed the 5k with the thoughtful words of 'oh **** it' and smirked like a naughty kid when it was revealed before she turned on the water works when danny lost his temper (again)

As Danny himself said (and I hate the guy) its fine you took the money but everything you said all week now is useless.

Iceman
09-07-2015, 11:22 PM
I'm saying that the public always looks for an opportunity to turn on a woman with a chance to win.

That's such a cop out to be fair. Chloe has been a moaning bitch all week. Nothing to do with her being a woman just to do with her being a pain in the ass.

sosadbbend
10-07-2015, 08:27 AM
I asked on another thread but it'll get lost in the comments and i really want to know the answer because i don't see the similarities that people have drawn.

Chloe got a little mad at people for spending money which was not theirs to spend.. How is it the same as Chloe choosing to not give money which was hers to give.

Its not the same. I would have done the exact same as Chloe, it was my 5k to give or keep and i would have got a bit miffed at others recklessly buying stupid ****, its not their money to spend.. if somebody could explain why her and i are hypocrites, id be grateful! It was her money to give and she chose not to :shrug:
It absolutely makes her a hypocrite after telling everyone to make sure they add to the pot for the winner and not take anything out...then BB said' take £5,000 or add it to the pot'. She took it when she could have added to the pot that is why she is a hypocrite. I personally don't blame her but she has been so sanctimonious about the money in the last few days.

kandykakes123
12-07-2015, 02:35 AM
Chloe is definitely a hypocrite the same way Harry would have been a hypocrite if she had taken the money for herself. Then she cries when you point out something that she does wrong instead of owning up to it and apologising. I loved her as well. But that hypocritical cry baby quality of her is not on

Withano
12-07-2015, 08:41 PM
Oh hai

Beetlejuice
12-07-2015, 09:01 PM
The fact some morons on a survey don't understand what the word hypocrite means doesn't contribute anything to this debate, which is already over. The girl is a hypocrite.

There are, however, worse things in the world to be.

TheMachine
12-07-2015, 09:04 PM
clearly understanding logic and what hypocrite means to the OP and some people who voted on that poll is too hard.

Withano
12-07-2015, 09:15 PM
The fact some morons on a survey don't understand what the word hypocrite means doesn't contribute anything to this debate, which is already over. The girl is a hypocrite.

There are, however, worse things in the world to be.

clearly understanding logic and what hypocrite means to the OP and some people who voted on that poll is too hard.

I think most people know what hypocritical means... I think most people saw the two scenarios as different though

If chloe complained about Joel spending 2.5k on a pizza right before she spent 2k on a kebab, that would be hypocritical. Choosing not to contribute money isn't the same as spending it though, hence it isn't hypocritical to the majority of the viewers and I.