Primark Security Officer grabs baby from Lady Aggresive Baby Breast Feeding

[arista]

http://media.skynews.com/media/images/generated/2015/7/14/406023/default/v1/metro-p1-july-15-1-720x960.jpg



She should have put a a cover over it
every other Lady does that.

[Vicky.]

My god I would have decked him tbh. What sort of a dickhead snatches a baby off its mother. Absolute disgrace.

[arista]

My god I would have decked him tbh. What sort of a dickhead snatches a baby off its mother. Absolute disgrace.


with Your Tit Hanging out?

[Vicky.]

with Your Tit Hanging out?

Yes.

[Pete.]

Ouch?

[Pete.]

with Your Tit Hanging out?
Serving Harry?

[arista]

Yes.


You are a Rebel at times
Vicky

[MB.]

with Your Tit Hanging out?

Well that's usually how breast-feeding works, yes

[Benjamin]

That baby is ****ing ugly

[arista]

Well that's usually how breast-feeding works, yes


No most women have scarf
or something over it

[arista]

That baby is ****ing ugly


No Ben its only just born
it wants its milk

[Pete.]

Why was she breastfeeding behind a mannequin? Shouldn't she go to a quiet area of a cafe or something

[Benjamin]

No Ben its only just born
it wants its milk

I get it wants milk but it is still ugly as hell

[Benjamin]

Why was she breastfeeding behind a mannequin? Shouldn't she go to a quiet area of a cafe or something

Or a changing room

[MB.]

No most women have scarf
or something over it

But they still have to have it out in order to breast feed. :suspect:

[arista]

Why was she breastfeeding behind a mannequin? Shouldn't she go to a quiet area of a cafe or something


Because she is a Tit Activist

[Ammi]

..I saw this story yesterday, she says in the vid that she was covered up with a blanket when she was breast-feeding and was quite modest and discreet/there was nothing to be seen...I know in an ideal word, she probably wouldn't have fed her baby in a shop but there isn't always facilities close by either and she also had a two year old in a buggy/with a crying hungry baby and was caught in a queue at the time so just found somewhere that she felt was discreet...but ughhhh, breasts, eh...should never be shown in public with babies at the end of them, am I right honey..without the baby, of course they're fine...anyway, I wonder what he would have thought if someone had just grabbed his child from his wife...

[reece(:]

The Primark security are annoying af and needlessly aggressive.

[arista]

Security Officer has his version
Ammi

That matters as well

[Ammi]

Security Officer has his version
Ammi

That matters as well

...but it isn't necessarily the factual story though, Arista ..to say that she should have had a scarf and that would be ok/modest etc, when she in fact says that she did have a blanket...

[Pete.]

I think CCTV receipts are necessary

[Samuel.]

I don't think it matters either way, taking the baby from her was a very poor choice, even if she was doing wrong

[Ammi]

I don't think it matters either way, taking the baby from her was a very poor choice, even if she was doing wrong

...absolutely...it's not always an ideal situation in terms of breastfeeding that a 'right place' can be nearby when needed so then it all gets clouded with that and wheter to bear a breast or not bear a breast when he had no right in any circumstances of breastfeeding to lay his hands on her child, let alone to snatch the baby away...she had no idea really that he was who he was portraying to be and he could have been anyone, how scary that must have been ...

[Toy Soldier]

Security guard would be getting kicked down the "up" escalator, tbqfh.

[arista]

I don't think it matters either way, taking the baby from her was a very poor choice, even if she was doing wrong


But Shoppers do Not want to see a Tit

[Marsh.]

But Shoppers do Not want to see a Tit

So taking the baby off the tit to expose it to the shoppers wasn't a very good choice of action was it? :hehe:

[smudgie]

Time people realised breasts were made for feeding babies.
Tits on the otherhand take a baby out of its mothers arms.

[Toy Soldier]

But Shoppers do Not want to see a Tit

Primark would be well advised to fire him, then.

[Toy Soldier]

Time people realised breasts were made for feeding babies.
Tits on the otherhand take a baby out of its mothers arms.

Aw damnit, beaten to the guard = tit punchline. Should read all the way to the end before I reply :joker:

[MB.]

I walked past here today and saw no tits. Thought you'd like an update.

[arista]

So taking the baby off the tit to expose it to the shoppers wasn't a very good choice of action was it? :hehe:


That Security
Officer was strong handed.
But he was protecting Children
and other shoppers
who do not want a Baby Sucking a Tit
distraction.

[Marsh.]

That Security
Officer was strong handed.
But he was protecting Children
and other shoppers
who do not want a Baby Sucking a Tit
distraction.

If grown adults find a breastfeeding mother a "distraction" then they need help.

[arista]

If grown adults find a breastfeeding mother a "distraction" then they need help.


Many will not have kids yet.


New National Numbers today
say most Women not having
kids until after 30 years of age

[Marsh.]

So? :laugh: Whether they have kids or not it's hardly porn is it? :joker:

[arista]

So? :laugh: Whether they have kids or not it's hardly porn is it? :joker:


But it can Shock Some

[smudgie]

Aw damnit, beaten to the guard = tit punchline. Should read all the way to the end before I reply :joker:

:laugh: Makes a change TS..you are normally on Better form.

[Toy Soldier]

That Security
Officer was strong handed.
But he was protecting Children
and other shoppers
who do not want a Baby Sucking a Tit
distraction.
Children don't need "protected" from seeing mothers feeding their infants, arista. In fact, maybe if they saw more of it, less youngsters would grow up believing that stuffing a plastic bottle full of lukewarm, processed cows milk in babies' gobs is "normal".

#breastfeeding mafia

[JoshBB]

But Shoppers do Not want to see a Tit

Then they should not look at her boobs. Why has breastfeeding become sexualised?

[Saph]

with Your Tit Hanging out?

ha titty out

[Saph]

tbf though it makes me uncomfortable seeing people breast feed openly in public.. its okay with a cover over it but having the boob just hanging out looks so chavvy

[Toy Soldier]

tbf though it makes me uncomfortable seeing people breast feed openly in public.. its okay with a cover over it but having the boob just hanging out looks so chavvy

Don't be daft, chavs don't breastfeed.

[lostalex]

why do people act like they have to breast feed at that exact moment? Is a baby going to starve if it has to wait 20 minutes?

I personally don't have any problem with the nudity aspect of breast feeding, i think people should be allowed to be nude in public. I have a problem with the expelling bodily fluids part of breast feeding. I don't think anyone should have fluids coming out of their body in public, be it milk, blood, spit, piss, semen, vomit or any other bodily fluid you can think of.

It's gross and inappropriate because it's unhygienic, not because i can see your breasts.

[Amy Jade]

What is Primark? is it like wetherspoons?

[MTVN]

This woman has now been charged with intent to pervert the course of justice: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3177155/Mother-claimed-assaulted-security-staff-breastfeeding-Primark-charged-perverting-course-justice.html

[T*]

The Primark security are annoying af and needlessly aggressive.

their most expensive clothing is like 50p why are they so bothered with security :umm2:

[Livia]

I find this story a little hard to believe. Well, the side we've heard anyway.

edit: Just seen MTVN's post. Doesn't surprise me...

[Marsh.]

its okay with a cover over it but having the boob just hanging out looks so chavvy

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/07/16/article-2174220-14149D81000005DC-832_634x431.jpg

[kirklancaster]

So taking the baby off the tit to expose it to the shoppers wasn't a very good choice of action was it? :hehe:

:laugh: And so very true.

[the truth]

he only took the baby a few yards...this woman is an attention seeking twat...go breastfeed in public...respect the public....what next men being allowed to wank themselves sill in public? pathetic attention seekers

[Marsh.]

he only took the baby a few yards...this woman is an attention seeking twat...go breastfeed in public...respect the public....what next men being allowed to wank themselves sill in public? pathetic attention seekers

Yes because feeding a baby is oh so similar to wanking. :umm2:

What planet are you on?

[the truth]

Yes because feeding a baby is oh so similar to wanking. :umm2:

What planet are you on?

oh here comes the false outrage from mr false..

im from planet reality not planet loony liberal left like you mr insincere

re wanking or breast feeding
a natural exercise that involves releasing fluid from the body....

[Marsh.]

oh here comes the false outrage from mr false..

im from planet reality not planet loony liberal left like you mr insincere

re wanking or breast feeding
a natural exercise that involves releasing fluid from the body....

:joker::joker::joker:

Snot coming out of my nose is fluid released from my body. Crying releases fluid from my body.

Would you compare those two acts to a sex act? :joker:

[the truth]

:joker::joker::joker:

Snot coming out of my nose is fluid released from my body. Crying releases fluid from my body.

Would you compare those two acts to a sex act? :joker:

it depends if you've got a flump up your jacksey

[Marsh.]

it depends if you've got a flump up your jacksey

Did the breastfeeding mother have a flump up hers? :hee:

[the truth]

Did the breastfeeding mother have a flump up hers? :hee:

she was gobbling it

[Marsh.]

Two posts it took to expose your baseless logic for the cretinous crap it is. :hee:

[the truth]

Two posts it took to expose your baseless logic for the cretinous crap it is. :hee:

nope people shouldn't be allowed to expose themselves, time for you to put it away marsh:hehe:

[Marsh.]

I see. When in doubt, ignore the contents of the post. :thumbs:

[Mystic Mock]

This is why Mothers should use Bottled Milk, pervy security men at Primark take your child away so they can catch a look at your breast.

[Jack_]

nope people shouldn't be allowed to expose themselves, time for you to put it away marsh:hehe:

Feeding a child via physiological means is not gratuitous, crass nudity and is thus not the same as 'exposing yourself'. It's time to put your hate of women aside for one second and look at this from a rational standpoint.

Let's be real, if a man were biologically capable of feeding via their nipple and did so in public you would be lambasting anyone that criticised them. And rightly so.

[Jack_]

On a totally separate note and topic however, people should be allowed to expose themselves whenever and wherever they want, so long as it's not directly at someone when unwanted, nor in obvious exceptions such as at a school

[Mystic Mock]

Is it just me who falls in the middle of both sides of this argument?

Yes I'm sitting on the Rachel Ricd on this one.

[Mystic Mock]

Is it just me who falls in the middle of both sides of this argument?

Yes I'm sitting on the Rachel Rice on this one.

[Tom4784]

It's best to ignore Truth, he's just a troll.

[Mystic Mock]

It's best to ignore Truth, he's just a troll.

I laugh him off most of the time, that's what I recommend to other people.

I don't like ignoring other members though as even if I disagree with them completely, they're apart of what makes this Forum great and makes it a fun experience for me.

But yes on the topic at hand, the security guard should be sacked for taking the child off her.

However I don't get why the Mother couldn't wait until she got home to breastfeed the little bugger? It feels like attention seeking to me.

But I also don't get why it bugs people so much and “distracts” them seeing a natural process happen? You don't have to look.

[Marsh.]

It's best to ignore Truth, he's just a troll.

So ban it!!!!! :laugh:

[Marsh.]

On a totally separate note and topic however, people should be allowed to expose themselves whenever and wherever they want

:umm2:

[Jack_]

:umm2:

It's true, if people wish to walk down the street naked I see no reason why they shouldn't be allowed to. Each to their own and all that.

Our bodies are natural and clothes are a man made concept and product, there's no inherent reason why we should ~have~ to wear clothes.

Again, barring the obvious exceptions and instances of which would be classed as sexual assault or harassment before someone points the inevitable out, I don't think expressing your natural self freely is at all wrong, nor should it be something illegal.

But then, I am a #liberal (loonyleftravingmonster etc etc repeat ad nauseum)

[the truth]

On a totally separate note and topic however, people should be allowed to expose themselves whenever and wherever they want, so long as it's not directly at someone when unwanted, nor in obvious exceptions such as at a school

this is where the loony left leads leads us , no rules no standards just depravity attention seeking provocation.....theres zillions of places where a woman can breasts feed in public just like you pee and wank in private...put your man hate aside and understand firstly just as many women don't like these public acts of attention seeking , understand exposing yourself in public is not acceptable and put it away

[the truth]

It's best to ignore Truth, he's just a troll.

youre the troll...im the truth!!!:cheer2:

[the truth]

I laugh him off most of the time, that's what I recommend to other people.

I don't like ignoring other members though as even if I disagree with them completely, they're apart of what makes this Forum great and makes it a fun experience for me.

But yes on the topic at hand, the security guard should be sacked for taking the child off her.

However I don't get why the Mother couldn't wait until she got home to breastfeed the little bugger? It feels like attention seeking to me.

But I also don't get why it bugs people so much and “distracts” them seeing a natural process happen? You don't have to look.

why should people have to avert their eyes and feel awkward in public places, then these attention seeking twats even have the nerve to complain they don't like people looking /perving at them.....don't you dare look at my penis screamed the streaker ......loony lefties , thank goodness theyre out of power forever

[Marsh.]

It's true, if people wish to walk down the street naked I see no reason why they shouldn't be allowed to. Each to their own and all that.

Our bodies are natural and clothes are a man made concept and product, there's no inherent reason why we should ~have~ to wear clothes.

Again, barring the obvious exceptions and instances of which would be classed as sexual assault or harassment before someone points the inevitable out, I don't think expressing your natural self freely is at all wrong, nor should it be something illegal.

But then, I am a #liberal (loonyleftravingmonster etc etc repeat ad nauseum)

I'd like to enjoy my meal in a public restaurant without being subjected to all and sundry's wobbly bits. :shocked:

[Marsh.]

this is where the loony left leads leads us , no rules no standards just depravity attention seeking provocation.....theres zillions of places where a woman can breasts feed in public just like you pee and wank in private...put your man hate aside and understand firstly just as many women don't like these public acts of attention seeking , understand exposing yourself in public is not acceptable and put it away

Breast feeding isn't about feeding a baby it's about attention seeking?

:pat:

[Jack_]

this is where the loony left leads leads us , no rules no standards just depravity attention seeking provocation.....theres zillions of places where a woman can breasts feed in public just like you pee and wank in private...put your man hate aside and understand firstly just as many women don't like these public acts of attention seeking , understand exposing yourself in public is not acceptable and put it away

This is where the raving reactionary rude right lead us, no freedom, no tolerance just screaming, wailing oppressive conceptual baseless nonsense double standards. I can play that game too, pretty fun, huh?

I notice you ignored my first post that quoted you. Funny that. For a start I don't hate men and I have pointed this out to you before and have given you evidence, please don't ignore me it's rude.

Again, feeding a child is not sexualised gratuitous nudity, it is a physiological natural phenomenon and anyone that looks down on it has issues.

[Mystic Mock]

It's true, if people wish to walk down the street naked I see no reason why they shouldn't be allowed to. Each to their own and all that.

Our bodies are natural and clothes are a man made concept and product, there's no inherent reason why we should ~have~ to wear clothes.

Again, barring the obvious exceptions and instances of which would be classed as sexual assault or harassment before someone points the inevitable out, I don't think expressing your natural self freely is at all wrong, nor should it be something illegal.

But then, I am a #liberal (loonyleftravingmonster etc etc repeat ad nauseum)

What if it was Susan Boyle or Wayne Rooney walking down the street naked?:shocked:

[kirklancaster]

This woman has now been charged with intent to pervert the course of justice: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3177155/Mother-claimed-assaulted-security-staff-breastfeeding-Primark-charged-perverting-course-justice.html

:shrug: What an absolutely idiotic waste of public money.

[Toy Soldier]

The Truth, you appear to be under the confused, mistaken impression that breasts are genitals.

They are not.

But this does explain quite a lot about your general mindset.