So, the first eviction is anyone with 2 noms is up

[Beetlejuice]

Will it stay that way? (They often change it during a series if someone they like might be in danger)

And am I the only one who just doesn't like that rule. I know it saves the more entertaining figures, but something about it just feels wrong to me.

[Niamh.]

I like that rule and especially in a VTS too, I wish they'd use it for normal BB tbh

[Beetlejuice]

I like that rule and especially in a VTS too, I wish they'd use it for normal BB tbh

I can see the argument for it. And it makes no sense to me why a Celeb series is VTS whilst a normal series is VTE. But that's the bizarre world of Channel 5's Big Brother I guess.

[Vanessa]

I think vote to save is better. Keeps the biggest characters and gets rid of the dullards.

[Niamh.]

I can see the argument for it. And it makes no sense to me why a Celeb series is VTS whilst a normal series is VTE. But that's the bizarre world of Channel 5's Big Brother I guess.

Because they probably paid more for the loud annoying ones so they want their monies worth :laugh:

[Oaker]

Honestly they need to just stick with this now, they keep alternating between 3+ and 2 or more noms and since C5 love big evictions this works better for them.

[Niamh.]

Honestly they need to just stick with this now, they keep alternating between 3+ and 2 or more noms and since C5 love big evictions this works better for them.

Yeah, they're not very transparent with the rules like they used to be, obviously I know why but it just makes me feel dirty and manipulated :'(

[Firewire]

It's fine as long as they stick with it for the rest of the series.

[Macie Lightfoot]

I think it's dumb because if the bar is set so low what's the point of the nomination procedure in the first place?

[keith133]

I think it's dumb because if the bar is set so low what's the point of the nomination procedure in the first place?

i guess just to see what they think of each other and people would complain if there were no nominations

[Niamh.]

Also because it causes tension and paranoia within the group, to me that's more of the point then who goes up and I prefer it this way because you don't get the popular gangs targeting people as easily

[Pete.]

Hate these mega evictions that occur every week. Literally everyone was up the same week in CBB14 and it made people switch off as evictions just weren't interesting enough.

An eviction between Daniel, Farrah and Janice would have been more exciting than this one where Chris seems a cert to go :/

[Vanessa]

Hate these mega evictions that occur every week. Literally everyone was up the same week in CBB14 and it made people switch off as evictions just weren't interesting enough.

An eviction between Daniel, Farrah and Janice would have been more exciting than this one where Chris seems a cert to go :/

Janice is going nowhere, even if she's up every week. She has a massive fanbase and is very entertaining.

[Babayaro.]

Yeah i'm with you on this one. It just doesn't seem fair that Chris is facing eviction with only 2 nominations whilst Farrah recieved 8

[Vanessa]

Yeah i'm with you on this one. It just doesn't seem fair that Chris is facing eviction with only 2 nominations whilst Farrah recieved 8

Maybe not, but i'm fine with it because he's so boring. :hehe:

[bots]

they will just make sure there are at least a minimum number of housemates up to ensure the cash from voting. There will probably be loads up each eviction

[Slevin]

idc. im glad they did it. i was worried those bored were gonna not be up. thank the gods and Chris or the couple need to go. i may not like Farrah or Janice but they need to stay above those 3 sad sacks.

[waterhog]

idc. im glad they did it. i was worried those bored were gonna not be up. thank the gods and Chris or the couple need to go. i may not like Farrah or Janice but they need to stay above those 3 sad sacks.

I got your way of thinking - its about the show and what we want to watch. I agree with you slevin.