What was the point in putting six people up then?

[Ashley.]

Daniel still went, who was going to be up for eviction had Channel 5 done it correctly. Hopefully this teaches them that messing with the rules of nominations hardly ever affects the outcome (e.g. trying to save Jim & Liz by putting up Sam, trying to save Leslie & Frenchy with that awful 'everyone goes up' twist, trying to save Marc by putting up Jack etc etc)

[Jake.]

Just them trying to save the 'bigger' characters, the probably assumed Chris would go

[chuff me dizzy]

Crazy ,take it back to one on one

[Jamie89]

Well when they did it they didn't know that daniel would get the least votes. And had they kept just the 3 up, daniel may have received a lot of votes to save in order to get rid of one of the other two, which is much less likely to happen with more hm's being up. I actually agree that they should do it like they used to, with the two or more with the most votes being up, but this eviction result won't change anything. They got what they were aiming for.

[Pete.]

So Channel 5 gets more money

[Smithy]

they make more money duh

[Cherie]

So Channel 5 gets more money

they make more money duh

6 phone lines ringing instead of 3, it's a money spinner, who do people think pays the fees for these celebs

[andybigbro]

Daniel isn't a big character so it's not like they were trying to save him

[Rob!]

Am I the only one who doesn't have any issue with so many people being up? Especially with a a vote to save? Yeah they get more money but I think it's more exciting when more of them are up :shrug:

[Ashley.]

Am I the only one who doesn't have any issue with so many people being up? Especially with a a vote to save? Yeah they get more money but I think it's more exciting when more of them are up :shrug:

It just makes it so boring. It makes nominations so pointless and predictable. The same people will be up again next time.