Gemma V Stephanie

[GiRTh]

Who's side are you on?

[ScottyT]

Kind of hate Gemma more than Steph so yeah..

Gemma has a good point but she's just a total bellend so.

[Pete.]

100% Team Gemma, Stephanie is a hot mess

[Dominic]

Gemma defo

[Tom4784]

Neither, both messes.

[reece(:]

Gemma was spot on about tragic Steph

[lewis111]

Gemma
Steph is a lying cheating messy **** who can't handle the truth

[Amy Jade]

Both morons tbh

[susie q]

There both as bad as one another, their both talentless attention seeking, pathetic overgrown babies.

[Jordan.]

They were both right about each other :worry:

[LukeB]

Gemma

[zakman440]

Gemma - though I did find it hilarious when they shoved Steph into the large task room :joker:

[Drew.]

Despise Gemma but it was good to see someone finally letting Steph know how much of a fool she is

[odd sock]

I'm with Gemma, Stephanie is a trollop !

[Ross.]

Gemma

[lewis111]

Yea Gemma is a bit dramatic but everything she said was so true and cause Steph couldn't take it she called her a **** ??

[Jason.]

Gemma

[Kazanne]

Don't like either but on Stephanies side,Gemma needs to butt out nosey cow

[mr rochester]

Who appointed the Lumpy Diva as moral arbiter of the house?

[Heaven = Winner]

Gemma's of course! Stephanie is vile.

[armand.kay]

Gemma was in the right but Steph is just so tragic its hilarious.

[EspeonBB]

Gemma told the truth about Steph

[MB.]

Gemma shat on Stephanie's head tbqh

[MrWong]

Gemma was right.

Stephanie then brought up irrelevant **** about reality TV.

The same Stephanie that's now having to resort to reality TV.

[Patricia4]

Gemma

[Greg!]

Gemma 100%
I screamed when Stephanie denied she was kissing Jeremy even though you could hear the slurping noises :laugh2:

[rubymoo]

I'm not on either side, they're both idiots but as Kaz said Gemma needs to butt out, since when did she become the wise old woman of the house, i don't condone cheating, but Stephanie is a grown up and can make her own decisions, and she will be the one who has to face the reality of her decision when she comes out.

[Kazanne]

I'm not on either side, they're both idiots but as Kaz said Gemma needs to butt out, since when did she become the wise old woman of the house, i don't condone cheating, but Stephanie is a grown up and can make her own decisions, and she will be the one who has to face the reality of her decision when she comes out.

My thoughts exactly,affairs of the heart are hurtful enough without busybodies interfering,Steph is the one who will have to face the consequences,gemma needs clean her own doorstep before trying to clean others.:wavey:

[Vicky.]

Cannot stand Gemma, but on her side in this. What a big-headed mess Steph is.

[Stormy]

Gemma has no business standing over Steph and Jeremy's bed lecturing them. That was plain out of order. No one made her Stephanie's guardian.

I can understand everyone agreeing that Steph was in the wrong with Jeremy but she was right to have a go at Gemma. How can anyone say that Gemma was right to stand over their bed and lecture them?

[Cherie]

There both as bad as one another, their both talentless attention seeking, pathetic overgrown babies.

.

[rubymoo]

My thoughts exactly,affairs of the heart are hurtful enough without busybodies interfering,Steph is the one who will have to face the consequences,gemma needs clean her own doorstep before trying to clean others.:wavey:

I think Gemma interferes because she knows they're getting airtime and she wants a piece of it!:wavey:

[Stevep]

None of Gemma's business tbf, it's between Jeremy, Stephanie and her boyfriend.

[MB.]

None of Gemma's business tbf, it's between Jeremy, Stephanie and her boyfriend.

...and the 2 million people watching it on TV every night

[joeysteele]

Hate to say it but being totally fair, Gemma was spot on right as to this one.

[Jordan.]

Gemma was right but it was obvious she couldn't wait to stick her spoon in rather than being genuinely concerned

[Dollface]

I'd literally take a turnips side over Stephanie's, can't stand her

[Stevep]

...and the 2 million people watching it on TV every night

Sadly, many would genuinely like to think so.

[Kazanne]

I think Gemma interferes because she knows they're getting airtime and she wants a piece of it!:wavey:

Yes,she hates missing any action doesn't she ?

[MTVN]

Don't think there's ever been a BB series where I've been so reluctant to back either side

[smudgie]

Both pretty pathetic. Gemma can't help it with that wooden spoon, even if she spoke wise words:laugh:
But makes for a good episode. Not a boring episode so far thIs series.

[Northern Monkey]

I would not pick a side.Can't stand either of them.I'm not sure if there's actually anyone in that house that i do like,Tiffs ok and Maloney i suppose.

[jet]

I'd literally take a turnips side over Stephanie's, can't stand her

:laugh: Yeah, me too!

[Carl Jayson]

Can't stand Stephanie after her slutty ways but really gained a lot of respect for Gemma after tonight! Go the GC!

[jennyjuniper]

Neither, they are both chavs with very few redeeming qualities. Out with both of them.

[Ammi]

I think Gemma interferes because she knows they're getting airtime and she wants a piece of it!:wavey:

..I'm not sure it's that Ruby, Gemma has been trying to push a romance in the house from almost the first night...and if she had succeeded then she would know, that would take up air-time...I do believe her when she says that she loves romance/is a romantic...it's interesting how David was the one to talk to Steph and Jeremy first a few days or so ago and I thought that he did it in a great way, by just offering his advice and saying things like...'if you want a hug, come hug me instead..because that would be ok but this is hurting people..'..just all a very positive/calm way and a way that Steph didn't feel so judged and attacked... I'm not keen on Steph at all and I can't imagine what it must be like to be a partner of someone who goes into BB and then they develop a relationship with another housemate and have to watch that...being cheated on is bad enough/that worthless feeling, being a private thing but having that as well..?...I think though that them all judging her and confronting her in the way they did was all kinds of wrong...(and like, they're all so incredibly perfect themselves anyway..)...it's definitely a 'pack mentality' house, all stirring each other up (well many of them..)...and then one 'accusing' because they know that they're going to be 'backed up' ....I did feel a little sorry for Steph I have to say, she and Daniella have known each other outside the house and Steph would feel a bond there and then be shocked and sad that Daniella had made such a personal and actually really comment....that was so, so shabby of Daniella...and then I think that she only joined in to deflect from her own guilt because she knew she had been in the wrong and behaved so badly...

[Ammi]

..also what Steph had to face there was so much judgement by many of them while Jeremy got none, in fact much of their judgement was in 'concern for Jeremy the victim'...she may be the one who had a boyfriend but he's been well aware of that from the beginning, has said he didn't want anything romantic etc etc and then he allowed the kissing to happen because poor defenceless Jeremy, what's a guy to do...pfffttt...he may not have a partner himself but is equally contributing to the hurt of Sam...

[Ammi]

..if it had been the other way round and he had been the one with the partner..?...it would still maybe have been Steph's fault because 'home-wrecker'/guy stealer/evil woman etc..../always the female, when two people are at fault...

[Ammi]

..:fist:...

[rubymoo]

..if it had been the other way round and he had been the one with the partner..?...it would still maybe have been Steph's fault because 'home-wrecker'/guy stealer/evil woman etc..../always the female, when two people are at fault...

There's always been double standards where male/female relationships have been involved, and for some reason the woman always comes off the slut and the man a hero, but i do think in this case if big brother is to be viewed as a social experiment (insert laughter here!) then Steph should be allowed to play out her role as cheater and deal with the consequences when she leaves, after all isn't what she doing classed as normal behaviour in an intense situation (thousands upon thousands of people cheat everyday on their loved ones), it doesn't make it right, maybe the conflict she has shown is genuine, some people do say they love 2 people at once, but Gemma does my head in constantly meddling, even trying to orchestrate love still lets her have a part in that relationship, she should sort herself out and stop trying to have a part in everyone elses storyline, but then if she didn't have a part in everyone elses storyline what would her story line be???? :wavey:

[Ammi]

There's always been double standards where male/female relationships have been involved, and for some reason the woman always comes off the slut and the man a hero, but i do think in this case if big brother is to be viewed as a social experiment (insert laughter here!) then Steph should be allowed to play out her role as cheater and deal with the consequences when she leaves, after all isn't what she doing classed as normal behaviour in an intense situation (thousands upon thousands of people cheat everyday on their loved ones), it doesn't make it right, maybe the conflict she has shown is genuine, some people do say they love 2 people at once, but Gemma does my head in constantly meddling, even trying to orchestrate love still lets her have a part in that relationship, she should sort herself out and stop trying to have a part in everyone elses storyline, but then if she didn't have a part in everyone elses storyline what would her story line be???? :wavey:



..yeah, she is a bit of a meddler Ruby and annoys me as well and she doesn't handle situations well, even if she does judge, it's how she does it in such 'escalating' ways which have caused so much negativity in the house...(also ever so slightly ironic and hypocritical..)..because the hostilities with John../weren't they caused because she felt that John was casting judgement on Darren and 'what was bad for him'..so is this not quite similar in her judgement of Steph...?...don't judge what's best for Darren please, he can smoke if he wants to, it's not for you to say...don't judge Steph please, she can mess up her relationship if she wants to, it's not for you to say...

[Ammi]

..hey Ruby, btw..:love:..

[billy123]

Both plebs.

[rubymoo]

..yeah, she is a bit of a meddler Ruby and annoys me as well and she doesn't handle situations well, even if she does judge, it's how she does it in such 'escalating' ways which have caused so much negativity in the house...(also ever so slightly ironic and hypocritical..)..because the hostilities with John../weren't they caused because she felt that John was casting judgement on Darren and 'what was bad for him'..so is this not quite similar in her judgement of Steph...?...don't judge what's best for Darren please, he can smoke if he wants to, it's not for you to say...don't judge Steph please, she can mess up her relationship if she wants to, it's not for you to say...

Absolutely! They're all adults non of them need a nanny, let the mess play out for what it is :laugh:

..hey Ruby, btw..:love:..

:hug:

[waterhog]

both not worthy but as gemma has built herself up so much - she needs knocking down.