View Full Version : Should Steph have been given a formal warning?
zakman440
18-01-2016, 08:12 PM
Instead of the reminder of the rules that she was given instead?
joeysteele
18-01-2016, 08:59 PM
Yes but she did threaten violence against another housemate so really she should be out for me.
LukeB
18-01-2016, 09:00 PM
Yes, Megan and Tiffany also got warning so it's only fair.
Denver
18-01-2016, 09:00 PM
Then Gemma should of got one for going through Tiffany's belongings
Daniel-X
18-01-2016, 09:02 PM
Then Gemma should of got one for going through Tiffany's belongings
No because it's completely different subject we're talking about lmao
Denver
18-01-2016, 09:04 PM
No because it's completely different subject we're talking about lmao
Well its against BB rules to touch others belongings so warning should be given pout fairly
Patricia4
18-01-2016, 09:07 PM
YES
BigBrotherfan4ever
18-01-2016, 09:46 PM
Yes she should have got a warning
Niamh.
19-01-2016, 09:26 AM
No because she was venting in the Diary Room, if she'd said it to Gemma or even to other people in the house then yes...............and I really dislike Stephanie
Jamesy
19-01-2016, 09:29 AM
No. It's laughable really she was told off for saying something while angry, venting to herself (pretty much). Most people say silly things when angry. Let's not forget ghetto **** in a hurry...
chuff me dizzy
19-01-2016, 10:11 AM
No,as she said it in the diary room
Crimson Dynamo
19-01-2016, 10:18 AM
No
Leave the poor wee girl alone
:fist:
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.