UK: Parents In Pyjamas on School Run debated on GMBHD

[arista]

Just Debated on itv's GMBHD.


A Headteacher gave a interview on Radio5
and told these Women to Dress in
Proper Clothes.


Then a lady Journalist/Broadcaster
Kelly Rose Bradford said in the studio
it is wrong.
Although she did do it,
but never got out the Car.

Piers said if men went like that
on a School Run , they would be arrested for being Lewd


Shocking Women

[Ammi]

Just Debated on itv's GMBHD.


A Headteacher gave a interview on Radio5
and told these Women to Dress in
Proper Clothes.


Then a lady Journalist/Broadcaster
Kelly Rose Bradford said in the studio
it is wrong.
Although she did do it,
but never got out the Car.

Piers said if men went like that
on a School Run , they would be arrested for being Lewd


Shocking Women



...that's it though as well, many parents don't get out of the car as so many schools do 'drop offs' with parking etc always being an issue and safety...also many parents have children going to different schools because obviously different ages, so having to do two/three or how ever many school runs in the mornings, plus may have pre-school children and babies as well/making packed lunches etc..which yes, could be done in advance but those children have to be bathed and settles in bed as well and general exhaustion...so something has to give with the getting dressed in the mornings...anyways, I bet you love a lady in her pjs and slippers....

[smudgie]

Lovely example they set for their kids.
The lazy beggars that I have seen on the local news walk to school, fag in their mouth, slippers and dressing gowns on top of their pj's. Female Andy Capp springs to mind:joker:
Think it was all stopped a good while back.

[Marsh.]

It's just laziness.

I remember there was a woman down the road who would stroll to the post office in her pyjamas.

Take pride ffs. :idc:

[Cherie]

Awful practice, It takes minutes to change into day clothes there is no excuse

[arista]

It's just laziness.

I remember there was a woman down the road who would stroll to the post office in her pyjamas.

Take pride ffs. :idc:


Why did You not Tell Her Off
Marsh?

[King Gizzard]

broken britain

[arista]

...that's it though as well, many parents don't get out of the car as so many schools do 'drop offs' with parking etc always being an issue and safety...also many parents have children going to different schools because obviously different ages, so having to do two/three or how ever many school runs in the mornings, plus may have pre-school children and babies as well/making packed lunches etc..which yes, could be done in advance but those children have to be bathed and settles in bed as well and general exhaustion...so something has to give with the getting dressed in the mornings...anyways, I bet you love a lady in her pjs and slippers....

Yes I think they call that
a Milf!


But Ammi
it was just Debated Live on SkyNewsHD
2 women , no less.

[Crimson Dynamo]

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/01/27/13/30A0B9BE00000578-3418979-image-a-38_1453902249909.jpghttp://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/01/26/16/30992D6F00000578-3417588-But_Connie_who_has_a_niece_at_the_school_disagreed _with_the_lett-a-53_1453826080893.jpg


smh chavs

[Crimson Dynamo]

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/01/26/15/3098B00400000578-0-image-a-24_1453822422567.jpg

:clap1:

[arista]

Awful practice, It takes minutes to change into day clothes there is no excuse


Yes these women seem not to care?
Even on LWHD

[arista]

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/01/26/15/3098B00400000578-0-image-a-24_1453822422567.jpg

:clap1:




Thank You LT
that was the letter on GMBHD
at 7:15AM today

[Alf]

I remember when the streets were safe enough for kids to go to School without their parents.

[arista]

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/01/27/13/30A0B9BE00000578-3418979-image-a-38_1453902249909.jpghttp://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/01/26/16/30992D6F00000578-3417588-But_Connie_who_has_a_niece_at_the_school_disagreed _with_the_lett-a-53_1453826080893.jpg


smh chavs


Thats Shocking LT

[arista]

I remember when the streets were safe enough for kids to go to School without their parents.



Yes now its Mum in her PJs and BMW


Sign Of The Times

[Jack_]

Who gives a ****? People should be able to wear whatever they want (or as little as they want...although not in this scenario) wherever they want

Live and let live :rolleyes:

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/01/26/15/3098B00400000578-0-image-a-24_1453822422567.jpg

:clap1:

lmao what snobby nonsense, someone should wipe their arse with this trash and post it through the reception's letterbox

[Crimson Dynamo]

Thank You LT
that was the letter on GMBHD
at 7:15AM today

yes I was watching, Piers is an excellent addition to this programme so I watch it more now.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Thats Shocking LT

shocking women :nono:

[Alf]

Who gives a ****? People should be able to wear whatever they want (or as little as they want...although not in this scenario) wherever they want

Live and let live :rolleyes:



lmao what snobby nonsense, someone should wipe their arse with this trash and post it through the reception's letterbox
Exactly, If a Dad wants to take his kids to School dressed up as Jimmy Saville then who is anyone to protest?

[Marsh.]

Why did You not Tell Her Off
Marsh?

I don't shout at middle aged women in the street. :smug:

[arista]

yes I was watching, Piers is an excellent addition to this programme so I watch it more now.



You Are Most Wise LT.

[arista]

Who gives a ****? People should be able to wear whatever they want (or as little as they want...although not in this scenario) wherever they want

Live and let live :rolleyes:



lmao what snobby nonsense, someone should wipe their arse with this trash and post it through the reception's letterbox


Those Days Are Gone
Jack - rare poster of tibb
Man Up!

[Crimson Dynamo]

I would also round up any mum that drives to school who lives 1 mile and under from the school and fine them £5000

[Jack_]

Exactly, If a Dad wants to take his kids to School dressed up as Jimmy Saville then who is anyone to protest?

That would actually be rather amusing :joker: would definitely have cheered me up if I'd saw that on the miserable way into school

[Cherie]

Who gives a ****? People should be able to wear whatever they want (or as little as they want...although not in this scenario) wherever they want

Live and let live :rolleyes:



lmao what snobby nonsense, someone should wipe their arse with this trash and post it through the reception's letterbox

It has nothing to do with snobbery, its setting an example that you dress appropriately for the occasion.

[Crimson Dynamo]

It has nothing to do with snobbery, its setting an example that you dress appropriately for the occasion.

Indeed, you arrive prepared. Pyjamas are for your bedroom. Get up, wash and put your clothes on you skanky lazy chavs

[Jack_]

It has nothing to do with snobbery, its setting an example that you dress appropriately for the occasion.

It has everything to do with it. For the occasion? What occasion? Driving or walking your children to a street which has a building on it in which they go in to learn? Whoopdee-****ing-doo. They aren't attending the Oscars, this isn't The Ritz, it's a bloody school.

People should be able to wear whatever they want, wherever they want...and it's the place of no one else to tell them otherwise. I would also apply this to school uniforms if it weren't for the prevention of bullying that it provides.

'Setting an example' should be explaining to children the importance of and enjoyment that can be sought from learning and being educated, and encouraging them to get the most out of their experience, not 'you should wear this here', 'you shouldn't wear that there' like these man made ~rules~ about what material things that sit on your body should be at all important and have any impact on your contribution to the world :rolleyes:

[Ammi]

Yes I think they call that
a Milf!


But Ammi
it was just Debated Live on SkyNewsHD
2 women , no less.

..oh, two women no less..:laugh:...

..the school want their children to be there on time in the morning, they want them to have had a nourishing breakfast, ready for their learning, they want them in their full school uniforms and not forgetting anything..lunches/PE kits/homework due etc...they want, they want, they want, they want..well it's good to teach children that in adult life, sometimes/some mornings, some things have to give and people don't always get what they want because it's a struggle to get it all done....I looked at their website this morning, I couldn't find a picture with a child in it, doing lessons/activities/special occasions with parents present/family events etc...nothing but empty classrooms..it doesn't seem to me to be a school about children and families ..if they want the 'right impression' for their school, if that's so important to them...then I think that maybe they should look at stepping up their game first and look at the impression that they're giving out ...

[arista]

Report just on Ch5HD News Live
one lady said she will obey the Letter.

Well Done Madame.

[Crimson Dynamo]

It has everything to do with it. For the occasion? What occasion? Driving or walking your children to a street which has a building on it in which they go in to learn? Whoopdee-****ing-doo. They aren't attending the Oscars, this isn't The Ritz, it's a bloody school.

People should be able to wear whatever they want, wherever they want...and it's the place of no one else to tell them otherwise. I would also apply this to school uniforms if it weren't for the prevention of bullying that it provides.

'Setting an example' should be explaining to children the importance of and enjoyment that can be sought from learning and being educated, and encouraging them to get the most out of their experience, not 'you should wear this here', 'you shouldn't wear that there' like these man made ~rules~ about what material things that sit on your body should be at all important and have any impact on your contribution to the world :rolleyes:


So you would be happy for the teachers to rock up in slippers and pjs?

[Jack_]

So you would be happy for the teachers to rock up in slippers and pjs?

Yes. It's an educational establishment, not a fashion parade

[Cherie]

Yes. It's an educational establishment, not a fashion parade

Well I hope you practice what you preach next time have an important interview, let us know how it goes

[arista]

Yes. It's an educational establishment, not a fashion parade


Correct Jack
but it is a School Run
come on.



I worry about you
You need a International Job
Ideal for you to Carry Legal Diamonds
no one would suspect you etc.

[Jack_]

Well I hope you practice what you preach next time have an important interview, let us know how it goes

LOL this is always the go-to response people have when presented with such ~radical~ ideas :rolleyes:

I'm perfectly aware of the way the world works, and that I, and everyone else, have no choice than to trudge along with these ridiculous conventions if we want to get on in life...but that doesn't make them any less stupid than they are, and it doesn't mean they can't be called out for being so stupid.

Should people have to 'dress appropriately' (whatever that even means) for an interview? No, you are applying for a job not a spot on Next Top Model, your qualifications, experience, knowledge and passion should be the only thing that matters, people are perfectly capable of working to their full potential wearing whatever they want, it's just as a society we've established these irrelevant ~rules~ about the way people need to look and act in order to succeed and all of it is bull****, but people continue to lap it up cause it's the only thing they know to be true. Unfortunately, until people step back and realise just how silly it all is, it will continue. So do people have to 'dress appropriately' for an interview? Yes, sadly they do.

[Cherie]

LOL this is always the go-to response people have when presented with such ~radical~ ideas :rolleyes:

I'm perfectly aware of the way the world works, and that I, and everyone else, have no choice than to trudge along with these ridiculous conventions if we want to get on in life...but that doesn't make them any less stupid than they are, and it doesn't mean they can't be called out for being so stupid.

Should people have to 'dress appropriately' (whatever that even means) for an interview? No, you are applying for a job not a spot on Next Top Model, your qualifications, experience, knowledge and passion should be the only thing that matters, people are perfectly capable of working to their full potential wearing whatever they want, it's just as a society we've established these irrelevant ~rules~ about the way people need to look and act in order to succeed and all of it is bull****, but people continue to lap it up cause it's the only thing they know to be true. Unfortunately, until people step back and realise just how silly it all is, it will continue. So do people have to 'dress appropriately' for an interview? Yes, sadly they do.

Sorry to break it to you but conform to the social norms or wallow in your Pjs :hee:

[Jack_]

Sorry to break it to you but conform to the social norms or wallow in your Pjs :hee:

Oh dear, looks like someone didn't read my post or else you'd see I alluded to pretty much that in my second paragraph :hehe:

Don't worry, I expected it to go over your head anyway...

[Cherie]

Oh dear, looks like someone didn't read my post or else you'd see I alluded to pretty much that in my second paragraph :hehe:

Don't worry, I expected it to go over your head anyway...

You are right I didn't read all your post as with you its why use one word when I can use 20, this is where speed reading comes in handy

[Crimson Dynamo]

Oh dear, looks like someone didn't read my post or else you'd see I alluded to pretty much that in my second paragraph :hehe:

Don't worry, I expected it to go over your head anyway...

:nono:

that is rude to a lady Jack, you take that impudence back

[Cherie]

:nono:

that is rude to a lady Jack, you take that impudence back

No worries LT :laugh: he thinks I am an air head, he has a lot to learn

[Jack_]

You are right I didn't read all your post as with you its why use one word when I can use 20, this is where speed reading comes in handy

Because sometimes complex ideas (that aren't even complex in this case, maybe for you though) need explaining properly so that people can try to get their heads around them and work out how to respond sufficiently, that's usually how debates work :think:

For someone who is a prolific 'the forum is being ruined by clocked, teas and gifs' complainer you aren't half seeming a little contradictory when presented with something a bit more substantial :hehe: and despite what I said in my last post, I didn't actually expect you'd give up so easily. When the level of response is of a dismissive 'well you see how that goes for you' nature, you know you've proven the other person wrong and they've been left with nothing else to say

oop did I just clock you? (is that better?)

[GiRTh]

Cant see why the parents dont throw on a tracksuit bottom and tee shirt or something. No one is asking them to be smart just please dont leave the house in bedroom clothing.

[Cherie]

Because sometimes complex ideas (that aren't even complex in this case, maybe for you though) need explaining properly so that people can try to get their heads around them and work out how to respond sufficiently, that's usually how debates work :think:

For someone who is a prolific 'the forum is being ruined by clocked, teas and gifs' complainer you aren't half seeming a little contradictory when presented with something a bit more substantial :hehe: and despite what I said in my last post, I didn't actually expect you'd give up so easily. When the level of response is of a dismissive 'well you see how that goes for you' nature, you know you've proven the other person wrong and they've been left with nothing else to say

oop did I just clock you? (is that better?)


You seem to know a lot about my posting history, can't recall complaining about clocked etc and if I did it's a long time ago, maybe you can find the posts and refresh my memory, btw I didn't give up, I've said what I wanted to say and am not going to get involved in tit for tat with you, so now I'm in "can't be arsed mode" as you are drifting into spoiling for a fight and personal insult mode it's just not worth my time..

[Jack_]

You seem to know a lot about my posting history, can't recall complaining about clocked etc and if I did it's a long time ago, maybe you can find the posts and refresh my memory, btw I didn't give up, I've said what I wanted to say and am not going to get involved in tit for tat with you, so now I'm in "can't be arsed mode" as you are drifting into spoiling for a fight and personal insult mode it's just not worth my time..

You are the one that started the tit for tat when you used a patronising smiley and said 'wallow in your Pjs' and then insulted the way I post :conf:

If you cba to debate properly and sufficiently respond to posts then in future don't bother quoting me, or better still don't involve yourself in the thread? I was open to a civilised discussion but if you're going to give it out then you should expect to take it back

[Cherie]

You are the one that started the tit for tat when you used a patronising smiley and said 'wallow in your Pjs' and then insulted the way I post :conf:

If you cba to debate properly and sufficiently respond to posts then in future don't bother quoting me, or better still don't involve yourself in the thread? I was open to a civilised discussion but if you're going to give it out then you should expect to take it back

Don't involve myself in the thread, don't quote you? :joker:....I can take it back fine except when posters start with the personal insults, then it really isn't worth it :hee:

[Jack_]

Don't involve myself in the thread, don't quote you? :joker:....I can take it back fine except when posters start with the personal insults, then it really isn't worth it :hee:

...yes? If you're going to involve yourself in a debate, question someone's position and then dismiss their response with a patronising throwaway comment (and then go on to insult the way they post) then what's the point in joining in? It's just unnecessary and rude

And believe me I haven't once insulted you in this thread. Again, you started the digs...if you want to turn what should've been a civilised discussion into tit for tat then that's your problem, but expect it back.

[Rob!]

I watched an interview with this woman on This Morning and she said that the main reason she wrote the letter was because of the fact that some parents were coming to things like parents evenings and Christmas shows in their PJs too. That I can understand why she'd have an issue.
But the dropping off and picking up of the kids at school where the parents are literally there for about 5 minutes or less has absolutely nothing to do with her and to say that she wants other parents to set an example to other people's children when it's concerning the wearing of pyjamas is an absolute load of ****. She has no right to tell ANYONE's parents how to dress for that.

[Alf]

Cherie owning Jack in this thread.

[Alf]

I watched an interview with this woman on This Morning and she said that the main reason she wrote the letter was because of the fact that some parents were coming to things like parents evenings and Christmas shows in their PJs too. That I can understand why she'd have an issue.
But the dropping off and picking up of the kids at school where the parents are literally there for about 5 minutes or less has absolutely nothing to do with her and to say that she wants other parents to set an example to other people's children when it's concerning the wearing of pyjamas is an absolute load of ****. She has no right to tell ANYONE's parents how to dress for that.
She has every right to say what she likes.

[arista]

She has every right to say what she likes.


Correct she is the School Head
her letter means so much
to many of us.

[Rob!]

She has every right to say what she likes.

Well that's me told.

[Ammi]

..I guess that (as well as having our own opinions..)..we can only go on our own experiences as well and in this school it could be a 'growing trend', but in ours, it's really just more isolated occasions that some parents sometimes wear pjs for the school drop off but it is only sometimes with those parents and only occasionally, not something that is an every day or regular thing...it's funny though, quite a few years ago we did have a parent who would do it more regularly/a dad...although it was commented on by other parents, it was commented on affectionately and in a jokey way...he was a very popular dad (very good looking..)..very charismatic, very charming etc and there he would be in the playground surrounded by mums all joking with him that he had his pjs on again and fluttering around him..:laugh:...anyways, he had 10 children of all ages and had 3 school runs to do, plus pre school children as well..he also ran his own business, as did his wife/mum as well, she had her own business, both very busy people in every way...when it was his school run day, he (mostly..)...got the children to school on time, in his lovely pjs...when it was mum's day to do the school run..?...the children were often and mostly a little late but she was always fully and smartly dressed for work...there was a lot of criticism (from parents..)...that she could never get the children to school on time and yet those same parents, fluttering around her husband and joking that he was wearing his pjs again....hmmmm, can't win for losing I guess...


...anyways I'm probably biased in this because (again in my experience..)..I'm not a fan of academy schools, which this school is...for me, there just isn't the same ethos and family values/families working together..it's more about the business side...their website really bothers me for them to be a school who are making an issue out of this/focusing on it because all there is on the site are empty rooms...empty classrooms, empty halls, empty libraries...no focus on children and what the school has to offer and all od the happy, smiley faces of children doing activities, some of which parents participate in, as well as showing them in lessons...a website is not just for parent information, it's a 'showcase' of what a school offers for anyone who is new to the area or is looking to transfer their child to another school/for whatever that reason may be...so they're worried about parents wearing pjs as being a 'wrong impression'/bad example or whatever..if I was looking at a school to send my child to, I wouldn't care about parents in pjs but I would worry about the non focus on the children and their families...and it wouldn't be a school I would be interested in...I would want to feel my child is happy in their school environment would be the focal thing...

..the other thing is, the letter in itself...was the first communication with this..?..there are other ways of discussing this, we have a parent forum each term which would be the place to approach this and actually talk about it with the parents/discuss it and what their reasons are if it's felt that it's becoming a growing trend/a 'playground accessory'/type thing...the communication with this seems awful and definitely not what we should be teaching children/communication is everything so I think another thing that the school should be looking at themselves to handling something badly...no 'home/school agreement' that I'm aware covers a code of playground dress for parents, so nothing that can be attempted to enforce...with things like that, then there should be open discussions first, so was there those here..?..


...I just think personally that there are so many concerns in schools atm generally, really serious concerns that children are falling through gaps and those gaps are growing and becoming huge, children and families crying out for help because of behaviour issues, mental health issues, learning difficulties..children that are suicidal...the worry that many children will leave their school life, having virtually no education at all because of the lack of funding and the lack of help available/families being told no, sorry something serious has to happen first and then we'll see ...these are real concerns that will have an effect on a whole life ...so pj parties in the playground in the grand scheme of things and silly letters about that ..well go write letters to social services, to your local MP, to Mr Cameron himself, write them about something that really is a 'growing trend' and a very serious and worrying one indeed...

[Jack_]

Well that's me told.

People have really well thought out, intellectual responses on here it seems :think: and apparently I just got 'owned' off the back of them, I've heard it all now

[Marsh.]

I watched an interview with this woman on This Morning and she said that the main reason she wrote the letter was because of the fact that some parents were coming to things like parents evenings and Christmas shows in their PJs too. That I can understand why she'd have an issue.
But the dropping off and picking up of the kids at school where the parents are literally there for about 5 minutes or less has absolutely nothing to do with her and to say that she wants other parents to set an example to other people's children when it's concerning the wearing of pyjamas is an absolute load of ****. She has no right to tell ANYONE's parents how to dress for that.

I agree with this.

If it's simple dropping kids off and driving away, then as lazy as I think it is, it's their own business.

If they're entering the school itself then the school has a right to kind of enforce a proper dress code if some people insist on venturing into public with their PJs on.

[Cherie]

I agree with this.

If it's simple dropping kids off and driving away, then as lazy as I think it is, it's their own business.

If they're entering the school itself then the school has a right to kind of enforce a proper dress code if some people insist on venturing into public with their PJs on.

During the interview I heard yesterday the Head did refer to parents attending parents evenings and School concerts in their PJs so I imagine this is what prompted the letter, I think its a bit selfish of parents to expect their young kids to be washed, dressed and ready for their school day when they are not even dressed themselves.

[Marsh.]

During the interview I heard yesterday the Head did refer to parents attending parents evenings and School concerts in their PJs so I imagine this is what prompted the letter, I think its a bit selfish of parents to expect their young kids to be washed, dressed and ready for their school day when they are not even dressed themselves.

Exactly. It's not really setting any example.

[arista]

"I'm not a fan of academy schools, which this school is"

Ammi , Nice you are Honest.

Of course this was all started by
Blair under his New Labour

The future is Academy

Feel The Force

[Crimson Dynamo]

Sorry but what exactly is stopping the parents getting dressed, I presume they get dresed when they come back, its sheer slovenly laziness.

I would wager their houses are like tips

[Cherie]

Sorry but what exactly is stopping the parents getting dressed, I presume they get dresed when they come back, its sheer slovenly laziness.

I would wager their houses are like tips

It takes as much time to pull on a pair of jeans and a jumper as it does to pull on a dressing gown unless they sleep it :omgno: get up 10 minutes earlier and have a wash

[kirklancaster]

Sorry but what exactly is stopping the parents getting dressed, I presume they get dresed when they come back, its sheer slovenly laziness.

I would wager their houses are like tips

And though I would "Bet on two raindrops running down a window pane" :fist: - I would not lay your bet because I AGREE WITH YOU.

If they are so 'pressed for time' the answer's simple - do as generations of hard-working parents have done in times which were far more austere and primitive with no modern time-saving appliances - and set the feck-ing alarm clock for 30 minutes earlier.

[Marsh.]

Imagine if they had to be all ready for work as well as taking the kids. :idc:

[Cherie]

And though I would "Bet on two raindrops running down a window pane" :fist: - I would not lay your bet because I AGREE WITH YOU.

If they are so 'pressed for time' the answer's simple - do as generations of hard-working parents have done in times which were far more austere and primitive with no modern time-saving appliances - and set the feck-ing alarm clock for 30 minutes earlier.

That's far too simple, the poor dears are too exhausted to set an alarm :laugh:

[Crimson Dynamo]

Imagine if they had to be all ready for work as well as taking the kids. :idc:

:joker:

[kirklancaster]

It takes as much time to pull on a pair of jeans and a jumper as it does to pull on a dressing gown unless they sleep it :omgno: get up 10 minutes earlier and have a wash

:laugh: W-A-S-H?

Some of these 'parents' reported receiving 'Threatening Letters' to the police because someone had pushed Palmolive Soap wrappers through their letterbox. :hehe:

[RichardG]

There's loads of people round here who walk around in their pj's, I saw someone wearing them in asda the other day. :laugh: I don't understand why they can't just get dressed into day clothes, it takes all of one minute to throw on a t shirt and some pants. :shrug:

[arista]

Sorry but what exactly is stopping the parents getting dressed, I presume they get dresed when they come back, its sheer slovenly laziness.

I would wager their houses are like tips


Yes Shocking LT
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-9s1m0yY1Evg/U2PNyzgXtiI/AAAAAAAAGWs/2iMrmFD-Su0/s1600/My+Messy+Kitchen.jpg

[kirklancaster]

There's loads of people round here who walk around in their pj's, I saw someone wearing them in asda the other day. :laugh: I don't understand why they can't just get dressed into day clothes, it takes all of one minute to throw on a t shirt and some pants. :shrug:

EXACTLY Richard. Exactly.

[Niamh.]

I agree with this.

If it's simple dropping kids off and driving away, then as lazy as I think it is, it's their own business.

If they're entering the school itself then the school has a right to kind of enforce a proper dress code if some people insist on venturing into public with their PJs on.

Yep agree with that too.

[smudgie]

You have to wonder at their personal hygiene as well, sleeping in your pj's then getting up and going to school in them, do people not get showered or even washed before they leave the house.
A couple of toothbrushes would come in handy as well going by the toothless wonder that was interviewed...I thought she must have been the grandmother until she started talking about her little one.
The fact that they turn up at concerts and parents evenings in them is a disgrace.

[Marsh.]

A couple of toothbrushes would come in handy as well going by the toothless wonder that was interviewed...I thought she must have been the grandmother until she started talking about her little one.

:joker::joker::joker:

[Cherie]

You have to wonder at their personal hygiene as well, sleeping in your pj's then getting up and going to school in them, do people not get showered or even washed before they leave the house.
A couple of toothbrushes would come in handy as well going by the toothless wonder that was interviewed...I thought she must have been the grandmother until she started talking about her little one.
The fact that they turn up at concerts and parents evenings in them is a disgrace.

Get a wash and a hairbrush :clap1:

[kirklancaster]

You have to wonder at their personal hygiene as well, sleeping in your pj's then getting up and going to school in them, do people not get showered or even washed before they leave the house.
A couple of toothbrushes would come in handy as well going by the toothless wonder that was interviewed...I thought she must have been the grandmother until she started talking about her little one.
The fact that they turn up at concerts and parents evenings in them is a disgrace.

:laugh2:

[arista]

The Last Item on BBC QT
was this debate.

Making it a Laugh.

And Of Course, the Labour Transport woman
admitted wearing a dressing gown.