View Full Version : Crisps or Chocolate?
Jamie89
04-02-2016, 06:05 PM
Chocolate for me. Unless it's Doritos v Snickers, then it would be crisps. But just generally speaking...
Denver
04-02-2016, 06:06 PM
Chocolate but Crisps fill you up more
Jamie89
04-02-2016, 06:07 PM
Chocolate but Crisps fill you up more
Unless you have a king size :think:
Denver
04-02-2016, 06:08 PM
Unless you have a king size :think:
Im not fat :fist:
andybigbro
04-02-2016, 06:09 PM
Crisps :love:
Niamh.
04-02-2016, 06:19 PM
Crisps by miles
Shaun
04-02-2016, 06:19 PM
I'd rather have rice cakes or nuts than crisps, but there's no substitute for chocolate...
LukeB
04-02-2016, 06:20 PM
Chocolate
Crisps are nasty
Dominic
04-02-2016, 06:21 PM
Chips ofc
Jason.
04-02-2016, 06:47 PM
Chocolate.
I find crisps are just empty calories. It's like a pack of Walkers has like 135 calories and there's only about 4 crisps inside and a few crumbs at the end. I need to eat a few packets in order to feel satisfied with crisps, whereas chocolate has more substance to it and a chunk of chocolate is much more satisfying and filling. Tastes better too.
Jordan.
04-02-2016, 07:50 PM
Crisps by miles
.
Chocolate is overrated trash!
zakman440
04-02-2016, 07:51 PM
Chocolate (more specifically Lindor balls) >
Crisps I like puffy ones, like spicy bikers and Tommy toms x
Calderyon
04-02-2016, 08:32 PM
Both really.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.