View Full Version : The PM's mother moaning about Local Council Cuts
arista
09-02-2016, 06:20 AM
http://media.skynews.com/media/images/generated/2016/2/8/445946/default/v1/mirror-new-1-992x558.jpg
Perfect for the Daily Mirror
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/feb/08/david-camerons-mother-signs-petition-against-cuts-to-childrens-services
Aged 81 his Mother
has gone against her son
I am sure the PM would know of this
of this attack.
[Mary Cameron, who is 81 and served for years as a magistrate,
confirmed to the Daily Mirror that she had signed
a petition battling to save children’s centres designated
for closure by the Conservative-run Oxfordshire county council.
The petition, signed by about 10,000 people,
says: “Our children’s centres are a lifeline to new parents who
rely on locally accessible advice and support at a time when
it is most needed.]
kirklancaster
09-02-2016, 06:44 AM
:laugh: Bless her.
Freedom of speech, isn't it wonderful
waterhog
09-02-2016, 08:34 AM
not when its your mother
Kizzy
09-02-2016, 09:00 AM
Mary for PM!
Northern Monkey
09-02-2016, 09:06 AM
Mary for PM!
Don't see why not.Corbyn's not far off her age and he likes to think he's a contender:laugh:
joeysteele
09-02-2016, 09:26 AM
If fit age should never be a barrier to Trying to be PM,Winston Churchill was elected PM in 1951 at around 76 years old.
Good on the PM's Mother for signing this knowing the embarrassment it could cause him.
kirklancaster
09-02-2016, 09:50 AM
If fit age should never be a barrier to Trying to be PM,Winston Churchill was elected PM in 1951 at around 76 years old.
Good on the PM's Mother for signing this knowing the embarrassment it could cause him.
:dog::dog: Joey running frantically to buy Mary a Valentine's card and massive bouquet. :laugh:
Kizzy
09-02-2016, 10:11 AM
Don't see why not.Corbyn's not far off her age and he likes to think he's a contender:laugh:
6 posts and Corbyns name mentioned, your certificate will be ready for collection shortly.
Livia
09-02-2016, 12:58 PM
"Cameron's Mum Fights Tory Cuts"
Just one small letter out.
#inbeforetoysoldier
joeysteele
09-02-2016, 02:12 PM
:dog::dog: Joey running frantically to buy Mary a Valentine's card and massive bouquet. :laugh:
:joker:No Kirk, one swallow doesn't make a summer, she would need to criticise a great deal more of his policies yet. :joker:
DemolitionRed
09-02-2016, 02:36 PM
Can you imagine the conversations she's now having with her son.
Cameron: Mummy you are so naughty. DO YOU REALISE WHAT YOU'VE DONE?
Mary: I'm sorry Doodle, but mummy hasn't forgiven you since that pig incident. You were a very naughty boy who brought untold shame on our families good name.
Cameron: Sob...sob What do I have to do to make you proud of ME mummy?.
Mary: ...click
smudgie
09-02-2016, 04:07 PM
Good for her,she agrees with her son.
Vicky.
09-02-2016, 04:10 PM
Oddly enough Cameron is also against the childrens centres closing and such. Even though he has caused this to happen. The mind boggles, truly :laugh:
Livia
09-02-2016, 04:14 PM
It's the Council who've cut the children's centres, not the government.
Northern Monkey
09-02-2016, 04:14 PM
Lets hope she does'nt have to pay tax on an extra bedroom.She'll ground him
Vicky.
09-02-2016, 04:15 PM
It's the Council who've cut the children's centres, not the government.
The government have cut councils funding....obviously said councils have to adjust their services as such
Apparently its a small cut that should be easy to get over.... But its something like 33%, or 72m
Livia
09-02-2016, 04:18 PM
The government have cut councils funding....obviously said councils have to adjust their services as such
Apparently its a small cut that should be easy to get over.... But its something like 33%, or 72m
Yes I understand that. But Councils make the decision about where to make cuts and they can raise council tax if they need to. Children, the sick and the elderly should be ring-fenced in my opinion. And when you look at the amount of money councils waste on crap it's easy to see where the money goes.
Vicky.
09-02-2016, 04:28 PM
Yes I understand that. But Councils make the decision about where to make cuts and they can raise council tax if they need to. Children, the sick and the elderly should be ring-fenced in my opinion. And when you look at the amount of money councils waste on crap it's easy to see where the money goes.
I agree. I also think the sick and disabled should be immune from cuts but unfortunately it doesn't work this way.
He has no right to be moaning on about cuts in his constituency when he has effectively, made the cuts. Removing 72 million from a councils budget is ridiculous.
Livia
09-02-2016, 04:30 PM
I agree. I also think the sick and disabled should be immune from cuts but unfortunately it doesn't work this way.
He has no right to be moaning on about cuts in his constituency when he has effectively, made the cuts. Removing 72 million from a councils budget is ridiculous.
We agree, Vicky.
arista
09-02-2016, 04:31 PM
We agree, Vicky.
A Rare Moment
Vicky.
09-02-2016, 04:32 PM
Cameron complains that he is “disappointed” by the council’s proposals “to make significant cuts to frontline services – from elderly day centres, to libraries, to museums. This is in addition to the unwelcome and counter-productive proposals to close children’s centres across the county.” Why, he asks, has Oxfordshire not focused instead on “making back-office savings”? Why hasn’t it sold off its surplus property? After all, there has been only “a slight fall in government grants in cash terms”. Couldn’t the county “generate savings in a more creative manner”?
Explaining the issue gently, as if to a slow learner, the council leader, Ian Hudspeth, points out that the council has already culled its back-office functions, slashing 40% of its most senior staff and 2,800 jobs in total, with the result that it now spends less on these roles than most other counties. He explains that he has already flogged all the property he can lay hands on, but would like to remind the prime minister that using the income from these sales to pay for the council’s running costs “is neither legal, nor sustainable in the long-term since they are one-off receipts”.
As for Cameron’s claim about government grants, Hudspeth comments: “I cannot accept your description of a drop in funding of £72m or 37% as a ‘slight fall’.”
http://voxpoliticalonline.com/2015/11/11/clueless-cameron-has-never-considered-the-true-impact-of-his-cuts-until-now/
Source may be rubbished due to (unneeeded) slant of Cameron as an utter imbecile. But still has the main points in :p
its the council that set their charges based on the services they want to provide. I would argue that councils are deliberately targeting services considered controversial to make a point
kirklancaster
09-02-2016, 05:49 PM
Yes I understand that. But Councils make the decision about where to make cuts and they can raise council tax if they need to. Children, the sick and the elderly should be ring-fenced in my opinion. And when you look at the amount of money councils waste on crap it's easy to see where the money goes.
So glad you're back. (Even though you only went to AVOID being my Batchelor girl)
joeysteele
09-02-2016, 05:52 PM
Oddly enough Cameron is also against the childrens centres closing and such. Even though he has caused this to happen. The mind boggles, truly :laugh:
What he says and promises Vicky are 2 different things. No wonder Nigel Farage describes him as someone who you cannot believe a word he says.
He also says he wants all children to get the care his son got from the NHS, yet again under his policies many children with special needs are having operations cancelled and put off.
He is a man very good at paying lip service to important issues while doing or allowing to be done, the opposite to what he claims to stand for.
Not lifting a finger to stop such things either.
He may say he believes it wrong to close children's centres but he is then content to sit back and let it take place.
No matter how it happens that they close.
Kizzy
09-02-2016, 06:31 PM
What an utter crank, give councils autonomy over where they spend their budget and then reduce the budget... It's not 'my' fault it's the nasty council! I would never cut the thing for those urchins...er! um! I mean lovely kiddies.... pffft!!!!
hijaxers
09-02-2016, 06:48 PM
Now poor David's aunty is chipping in ! he's well out of favour with his family - hope they disown the turd
DemolitionRed
09-02-2016, 06:49 PM
Now poor David's aunty is chipping in ! he's well out of favour with his family - hope they disown the turd
She is?
DemolitionRed
09-02-2016, 06:52 PM
Economists are predicting that four and a half years from now, British government spending is going to be 1% lower than it was in 2010. George Osborne who’s been trying to find wiggle room on all these controversial cuts is rationing our local councils more and not surprisingly, they are really feeling the pinch. Osborne wants a 77% cut in grants over a period of 10 years (it began 6 years ago) and that’s precisely why children’s centres, sheltered housing and social care homes are falling into sink holes. Local councils have had to increase the council tax in an attempt to fund social care.
This all comes back to policy decisions. This unnecessary desperation to show us all a budget surplus at the end of this current parliament regardless of creating long standing problems that our next government are going to inherit, is nothing other than bonkers.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.