View Full Version : Teacher of 5 to 7 year olds sacked because she modelled knickers
arista
26-03-2016, 02:43 PM
The Teacher has said she felt dirty
after the Head said its wrong?
In today papers
from LBC radio live
Must be a Up Market School , I guess
Northern Monkey
26-03-2016, 06:09 PM
Dirty beatch
Jessica.
26-03-2016, 06:12 PM
What exactly happened? :umm2:
RichardG
26-03-2016, 06:37 PM
Huh was she walking around with no pants on or something, why did she think that was a good idea
user104658
26-03-2016, 08:50 PM
Pics or it didn't happen.
Actually, the thought of my daughter's teacher modelling underwear is giving me the dry heave. :umm2:.
user104658
26-03-2016, 08:51 PM
That said, if my daughters teacher DID model underwear, that would be entirely her own business. Its not like it's porn. I have no idea why she would be fired for it.
Cherie
26-03-2016, 09:56 PM
That said, if my daughters teacher DID model underwear, that would be entirely her own business. Its not like it's porn. I have no idea why she would be fired for it.
I can't see the issue, it was underwear, we all wear it, OTT reaction
arista
27-03-2016, 03:33 AM
I can't see the issue, it was underwear, we all wear it, OTT reaction
Yes it could be that it got in the Papers
Parents then phone the Head.
The head then has to sack the Teacher.
Some schools
have high moral grounds.
I agree it's OTT
arista
27-03-2016, 03:47 AM
Pics or it didn't happen.
Actually, the thought of my daughter's teacher modelling underwear is giving me the dry heave. :umm2:.
The LBC Radio presenter said its
from the Newspaper
I am very sorry I have no link
John Stapleton on LBC was reading a Newspaper
I do not know why he did not name the fecking paper TS.
http://tvnewsroom.site/images/news-staff/john-stapleton/john-stapleton-Image-016.jpg
Back in the day
when he was on TV
Mystic Mock
27-03-2016, 04:15 AM
People are so prudish seriously.
As long as she's not trying to seduce these 5 to 7 year olds, or wear that outfit in the classroom, and that she's actually good at her job as a Teacher and not the lazy bastards that I had for Teachers, then I don't see the issue?
..I'm not sure if this is the same lady...
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/503733/gemma-laird-sexy-modelling-pics-school
..but I would say that it's probably not quite as it's being reported../the reasons for her losing her job...
arista
27-03-2016, 06:22 AM
..I'm not sure if this is the same lady...
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/503733/gemma-laird-sexy-modelling-pics-school
..but I would say that it's probably not quite as it's being reported../the reasons for her losing her job...
That may be the one
that site says its from DM
arista
27-03-2016, 06:24 AM
People are so prudish seriously.
As long as she's not trying to seduce these 5 to 7 year olds, or wear that outfit in the classroom, and that she's actually good at her job as a Teacher and not the lazy bastards that I had for Teachers, then I don't see the issue?
Yes thats the case
as a Teacher for 5 to 7 year olds no problem.
Maybe as it went to the Local Paper
then National Papers
it got worse for her future
..or maybe she breached her agreement with the school over what she was allowed to post on social sites, which would be a very silly thing to do....
..I think there is too little information on this to be able to judge her employers...
Mystic Mock
27-03-2016, 07:26 AM
Why is letting children know that they can become Models when they get older if they wanted to being classed as such a bad thing by the School anyway?
Children should have some basic knowledge of all walks of life imo.
I honestly feel that letting the children not know much outside of a certain bubble probably frustrates them and helps turn them into the little brats that so many of them become later on in life.
arista
27-03-2016, 07:47 AM
..or maybe she breached her agreement with the school over what she was allowed to post on social sites, which would be a very silly thing to do....
If she did
Sack her
Teachers Sign a Agreement
Rules Are Rules
what I heard on LBC
was she was a Model for these clothes
and no kids knew it.
arista
27-03-2016, 07:49 AM
Why is letting children know that they can become Models when they get older if they wanted to being classed as such a bad thing by the School anyway?
Children should have some basic knowledge of all walks of life imo.
I honestly feel that letting the children not know much outside of a certain bubble probably frustrates them and helps turn them into the little brats that so many of them become later on in life.
I am not sure those 5- 7 year olds knew
the head sacked her
because it gave that school bad press
Why is letting children know that they can become Models when they get older if they wanted to being classed as such a bad thing by the School anyway?
Children should have some basic knowledge of all walks of life imo.
I honestly feel that letting the children not know much outside of a certain bubble probably frustrates them and helps turn them into the little brats that so many of them become later on in life.
...hmmm, I'm not sure that it's that black and white Mock...I'm always sceptical about these stories anyway but there would have been several things to consider...whether she breached her agreement with the school's policy over what staff members can post on social sites...also her 'credibility' as a staff member where part of her role would be to talk to children about 'appropriate' images to post on social sites and the potential 'dangers' of the internet/online safety etc...there just really isn't that much information given here to be able to judge the school's decision on this...it's not even clear what her role was within the school, whether she was a trainee teacher or a teaching assistant...it's all a bit sketchy and mostly from her perspective...great pics of her in the Star though..:laugh:...
Interesting that she has deleted everything from fb now :fist:
http://cdn.images.dailystar.co.uk/dynamic/1/photos/810000/620x/laird-503733.jpg
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.