Scotland can name the Celeb couple in Threesome

[arista]

Lucky Scotland


http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/660/cpsprodpb/920A/production/_89168373_sunmon.jpg

[Denver]

He has already been named in the US and my opinion has changed of him

[Kizzy]

Who cares?... bore off with this non story because you don't want to dis your tory pals Murdoch.

[arista]

Who cares?... bore off with this non story because you don't want to dis your tory pals Murdoch.


Many in England
What to know the Celeb couples name


That Paper Front page
helps tell this story

[Firewire]

The answer is on Twitter

[arista]

The answer is on Twitter


can you PM it to me?

[Firewire]

Done

[Ninastar]

Oh I wanna know too FireWire!! Plz x

[Tom4784]

Spill the tea (over PM of course so James doesn't get sued xx)

[Ninastar]

Not as interesting as I thought tbh

[Saph]

im so conf.. is this the dark ages? threesome isnt even juicy news..

[Ross.]

what is this

[arista]

Done


Thank You
Very Kind of You

[arista]

what is this


A Legal Problem
that England / Wales can not name them


Money paid to Lawyers
have stopped any names going public in England /Wales.


On the Wright Stuff
they said someone in Scotland
could get a Train down to England
but leave their Newspaper on thew train
for all to see
with the name of the Celeb.

[Niamh.]

These injunctions are so stupid and pointless :laugh:

[Morgan.]

Could someone PM the answer to me please?

[arista]

Could someone PM the answer to me please?


Done

[Samm]

who is it, they're hardly gonna sue tibb if it gets spilled here

[Joe.]

Please someone pm me the answer am dying to know!

[Shaun]

If you can't get the answer from Twitter/google, let alone the song clues in here, then you're not really trying.

That said, this isn't remotely interesting.

[arista]

Please someone pm me the answer am dying to know!



I have sent the PM

[user104658]

im so conf.. is this the dark ages? threesome isnt even juicy news..
No no, from what I can gather it's one member of the celeb couple (the lesser celeb) who has been being the "third man" in regular threesomes with another couple, without his partner's knowledge.

Slightly more interesting. However... Still not VERY interesting, I agree.

[Samm]

Found out, really boring

[coffee]

Can i get a sneaky PM?

[Marsh.]

Yeah, I don't think you can get done for talking about it online.

The junction just prevents it from being published/discussed by the press?

[MB.]

If the injunction specifically prevents anyone from suggesting they audition for The Voice then I'm buggered

[user104658]

Yeah, I don't think you can get done for talking about it online.

The junction just prevents it from being published/discussed by the press?

It's a tricky one, technically TiBB is publishing everything we say if it's allowed to stay up.

I got legal threats from the author of a "baby training" child abuse manual when people were "slandering" her on the forum I used to run. Nothing tends to come of it, though.

[James]

Don't put the name on here. Or put up clues, which is the same thing.

I already had to delete one thread about it.

[Marsh.]

It's a tricky one, technically TiBB is publishing everything we say if it's allowed to stay up.

I got legal threats from the author of a "baby training" child abuse manual when people were "slandering" her on the forum I used to run. Nothing tends to come of it, though.

Oh. :laugh: Can't bloody breathe these days.

[Rob!]

Oh someone PM me so I can be against the law, thanks :)

[kirklancaster]

Who cares?... bore off with this non story because you don't want to dis your tory pals Murdoch.

:laugh: It is boring, I agree.

[waterhog]

He has already been named in the US and my opinion has changed of him

I hope its not billy boy - I remember him so clearly holding up his hand and saying - I did not have sexual relations with miss mionica L :shrug:

[user104658]

It's not bait hun, you shouldn't be trying to get James sued or this forum shut down.

Neh, the only risk of that is if the Admin is contacted by the person involved / their legal representatives and told to remove the comments and then they fail to or refuse to do it...

These injunctions are pretty meaningless in the digital age, because they can't reasonably expect every blog / forum / social media site to monitor every single comment, or to be aware of every single injunction or piece of potential slander in the first place. The celeb sections (and probably the debates section) of TiBB are both chock full of comments that could be considered slanderous, but forum owners aren't expected to remove them UNLESS requested by someone with the authority to make such a request.

In the case of my forum back in the day, the reason we ended up being asked to remove a thread was, due to a large discussion using relevant keywords and (if I do say so myself) some pretty darn fine search optimisation... we ended up being the top google result for both the phrases "Is [person's name]'s advice dangerous?" and also simply "[person's name] dangerous"... with the content of said thread being rather, err, scathing of said individual :joker:.

Also, injunctions don't apply globally and so anyone who wants the info can just google it and it'll be on any non-UK news site :shrug:. I don't know why celebs bother taking them out in the first place these days. It's like they think it's still the 80's and banning it from paper print will mean no one knows :joker:.

tl;dr - there's no real risk in leaving any comment up including names so long as you keep a close eye on your admin inbox and a finger on the delete key.

[Amy Jade]

The national Enquirer latest issue has it front page just Google ha

[hijaxers]

All of this really is a joke - who really bloody cares - not me , they can all shag each other to death for all i care - joke

[Josy]

Who seriously gives a **** about this stuff.

Meanwhile there's been massive ongoing rallys in England calling for Cameron to resign and not one bit of it has had any media courage at all.

[arista]

Who seriously gives a **** about this stuff.

Meanwhile there's been massive ongoing rallys in England calling for Cameron to resign and not one bit of it has had any media courage at all.


Yes a few thousand.
Not enough to get a Big Reaction.

[Crimson Dynamo]

the story is not really about the 3 some but about the silly fact its been hidden, that is the story

[arista]

the story is not really about the 3 some but about the silly fact its been hidden, that is the story


Thats it LT



Bang On Right

[Amy Jade]

Idk why he's bothered blocking it at all - it was never going to stay hidden by just stopping English papers from reporting about it.

If anything he's made things worse by doing this

[user104658]

Idk why he's bothered blocking it at all - it was never going to stay hidden by just stopping English papers from reporting about it.

If anything he's made things worse by doing this
Yep, drawn attention to it so that it becomes ongoing gossip rather than something people would have seen in the paper one morning, and forget about the next.

[Smithy]

No tea no shade but why would anyone want a threesome with them

[Kazanne]

Thanks for the PM, not who I thought it was at first.

[Denver]

The injuction has now been lifted

[Kizzy]

Yes a few thousand.
Not enough to get a Big Reaction.

150,000 to be exact.
Personally I'm much more interested in that than who some old singer is getting his rocks off with :idc:

[Niamh.]

The injuction has now been lifted

It's lifted but pending appeal so it's still not allowed just yet :nono:

UPDATE: On April 18, Court of Appeal judges ruled that the injunction will be lifted but said media in England/Wales can’t identify the couple involved pending appeal.

[billy123]

The injuction has now been lifted Oh fgs dont tell the couple of members on here that were so prissy that they wanted people on here banned for bringing up the subject :joker::joker::joker:

[arista]

It's lifted but pending appeal so it's still not allowed just yet :nono:

UPDATE: On April 18, Court of Appeal judges ruled that the injunction will be lifted but said media in England/Wales can’t identify the couple involved pending appeal.


Yes Strange Judge

[arista]

Yeah, I don't think you can get done for talking about it online.

The junction just prevents it from being published/discussed by the press?



Go Ahead Punk.........

[sleleen]

Can someone PM it to me.

[Kizzy]

Can someone PM it to me.

Nice try Mr ... :idc:

[James]

This injunction has not been lifted yet. Stop putting up clues to the identity.

[arista]

Well in another 2 days
the Judge reviews it.

[Alf]

Do they have facial hair?

Do they wear glasses?

Is it a man?

Do they wear a hat?


Is it Alex?

http://myrottingbrain.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/vlcsnap-2011-04-22-00h31m08s154.png

[James]

An injunction banning the media in England and Wales from reporting the identity of a married celebrity who allegedly took part in a threesome has been lifted.

Court of Appeal judges accepted the Sun On Sunday's bid to lift the injunction, but said the celebrity could still not be named pending a possible appeal.....


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36073383

[Smithy]

Tsk bloody hell

[JoshBB]

A quick google search and a canadian newspaper is reporting on it.. lol. It's funny how the internet guarantees freedom of the press nowadays

[Red Moon]

This is becoming all so stupid and pointless. James living in Scotland knows who it is while the rest of us in UK don't officially know but we can all go one the internet and look it up.

The ban achieves nothing, like JoshBB said "It's funny how the internet guarantees freedom of the press nowadays"

We seem to need a new law for a new age.