James topped the vote btw - 2% was between Marnie and Bear

[Yaki da]

No one who was that far ahead on the polls could not have topped that vote. Even Jason was closer to Hughie than Bear or Marnie were to James.

He was never going anywhere.

[thisisdanny]

Why are you interested I thought you were writing your letter to Ofcom about tonight's eviction

[Withano]

Your logic is a bit weird.

[Beso]

easy shout really, thank you marmite.

[rusticgal]

You don't know that...no particular order..:shrug:

[Vanessa]

Hope Marnie goes. :hehe: I like Chloe more.

[Marcus.]

Hope Marnie goes. :hehe: I like Chloe more.

really why :conf:

[Amy Jade]

You don't know that...no particular order..:shrug:

Yaki Dar knows all :umm2:

[Shaun]

Considering Saira was about 10% ahead of Bear and 17% ahead of Lewis in the same poll, I am hesitant to believe this. :(

[rusticgal]

Yaki Dar knows all :umm2:


Ooooops...silly me :laugh:

[Yaki da]

Your logic is a bit weird.

How so? Emma said there was 2% between the 2 who were vying for the other space in the bottom 2.

Chloe was almost certainly already there. Every poll and facebook likes and twitter retweets suggested James topped the vote and the 2% would have therefore been between Marnie and Bear.

[thisisdanny]

How so? Emma said there was 2% between the 2 who were vying for the other space in the bottom 2.

Chloe was almost certainly already there. Every poll and facebook likes and twitter retweets suggested James topped the vote and the 2% would have therefore been between Marnie and Bear.

She didn't say that at all she just said between 2 housemates, she didn't specify which order these 2 housemates were.

[Yaki da]

She didn't say that at all she just said between 2 housemates, she didn't specify which order these 2 housemates were.

It's perfectly obvious. If 2 people are going to be in danger she will only mention that if there's 2% between the housemates in 2nd and 3rd position, as that is relevant to who might end up in that bottom 2.

Now every poll, the facebook likes, and the twitter retweets had James top by a big margin, Chloe bottom and it very close between Marnie and Bear. As such it is easy to deduce that the 2% for the second spot in the bottom 2 was between Marnie and Bear.

[Withano]

How so? Emma said there was 2% between the 2 who were vying for the other space in the bottom 2.

Chloe was almost certainly already there. Every poll and facebook likes and twitter retweets suggested James topped the vote and the 2% would have therefore been between Marnie and Bear.

She never said that, she said just a minte ago there was just 2% between two of the housemates so your vote counts, remember you're voting to save. No indication at all which posistion or housemates this was in reference to.. Thats why your logic is a bit weird.

[chuff me dizzy]

Said in no particular order

[thisisdanny]

It's perfectly obvious. If 2 people are going to be in danger she will only mention that if there's 2% between the housemates in 2nd and 3rd position, as that is relevant to who might end up in that bottom 2.

Now every poll, the facebook likes, and the twitter retweets had James top by a big margin, Chloe bottom and it very close between Marnie and Bear. As such it is easy to deduce that the 2% for the second spot in the bottom 2 was between Marnie and Bear.

Facebook is your source? oops

[Yaki da]

She never said that, she said just a minte ago there was just 2% between two of the housemates so your vote counts

Yes, between second and third. No other reason to mention it.

No indication between at all which posistion or housemates this was in reference to.. Thats why your logic is a bit weird.

She would not mention it unless it was relevant to who ended up in the bottom 2. So the 2% was between the 2nd and 3rd place and every poll had it very close between Marnie and Bear. Therefore one can assume James topped the vote, Chloe was bottom and the 2% Emma was referring to was between Marnie and Bear.

[Beso]

yaki is correct...........yet again.

[reece(:]

Legend James wins

[Yaki da]

Facebook is your source? oops

The polls, facebook likes and twitter retweets which collectively can give you a very good idea of how the voting is going.

[thisisdanny]

She would not mention it unless it was relevant to who ended up in the bottom 2. So the 2% was between the 2nd and 3rd place and every poll had it very close between Marnie and Bear. Therefore one can assume James topped the vote, Chloe was bottom and the 2% Emma was referring to was between Marnie and Bear.

Next week she could say there's 1% in it, but might not specify a place - it's just so people will pick up the phone so they get more money.

[Yaki da]

Next week she could say there's 1% in it, but might not specify a place - it's just so people will pick up the phone so they get more money.

Doubtful. All evidence points to James topping and it being close between Bear (2nd) and Marnie (3rd)

[thisisdanny]

The polls, facebook likes and twitter retweets which collectively can give you a very good idea of how the voting is going.

An idea is not fact

[Yaki da]

yaki is correct...........yet again.

Of course. But try explaining this to these people.

[Yaki da]

Confirmed. Thank you.

[Withano]

Yes, between second and third. No other reason to mention it.



She would not mention it unless it was relevant to who ended up in the bottom 2. So the 2% was between the 2nd and 3rd place and every poll had it very close between Marnie and Bear. Therefore one can assume James topped the vote, Chloe was bottom and the 2% Emma was referring to was between Marnie and Bear.

The complete opposite is true really, if it was between 2nd a 3rd she would have said that it was as an incentive to vote.

[Yaki da]

The complete opposite is true really, if it was between 2nd a 3rd she would have said that it was as an incentive to vote.

What are you on about?

Look, James topped the vote. Chloe came bottom. The 2% was between Marnie and Bear who were competing for 2nd place. Every poll suggested this would be the case, facebook likes did as well and twitter also.

[Beso]

eggy faces.

[Withano]

What are you on about?

Look, James topped the vote. Chloe came bottom. The 2% was between Marnie and Bear who were competing for 2nd place. Every poll suggested this would be the case, facebook likes did as well and twitter also.

Yes we know the positions, we dont know who was separated by 2%. Just making a reasonable assumption that it wasnt between 2nd and 3rd as Emma would most likely tell us that it was as an incentive to vote

[thisisdanny]

Emma confirmed the position of the voting.

Emma did not confirm who the 2% was between. It might have been 1st/2nd, 2nd/3rd, or 3rd/4th. You are making an assumption.

Thank you.

[thisisdanny]

Yes we know the positions, we dont know who was separated by 2%. Just making a reasonable assumption that it wasnt between 2nd and 3rd as Emma would most likely tell us that it was as an incentive to vote

Precisely, she'd have said if it was between 2nd/3rd. I think it was between James and Bear tbh controversial opinion in this thread since Yaki is a confirmed truther

[rusticgal]

Fantastic news...so glad they made that publif knowledge too. Bear would have convinced himself he topped the vote :laugh:

[Yaki da]

Emma confirmed the position of the voting.

Emma did not confirm who the 2% was between. It might have been 1st/2nd, 2nd/3rd, or 3rd/4th. You are making an assumption.

Thank you.

No reason to mention it unless there was something at stake between those two people who had 2% between them. Chloe was bottom and Marnie and Bear were competing to not be in that bottom 2 with her. That's why it was mentioned.

They wouldn't mention anything if the vote was Chloe 10% Marnie 12% and Bear 38% and James 40% as the bottom 2 would have been clear.

[Yaki da]

Precisely, she'd have said if it was between 2nd/3rd. I think it was between James and Bear tbh controversial opinion in this thread since Yaki is a confirmed truther

She would not have mentioned it at all unless a place in the bottom was at stake between those who had 2% between them.

What am I dealing with here.

[thisisdanny]

No reason to mention it unless there was something at stake between those two people who had 2% between them. Chloe was bottom and Marnie and Bear were competing to not be in that bottom 2 with her. That's why it was mentioned.

They wouldn't mention anything if the vote was Chloe 10% Marnie 12% and Bear 38% and James 40% as the bottom 2 would have been clear.

No reason? So the extra votes/money is not a reason ok eek