Are you in favour of scripted reality 'stars'...

[Stevep]

...continuing to enter the house or would you prefer there to be a limit on the number entering the house or perhaps even exclude them entirely?

[sampvt]

none, they ruin the show

[bots]

absolutely, they make it the fine show we see today

[Tom4784]

I think Gemma's the only one I've ever liked. The rest have been either dull or beyond irritating.

[Vicky.]

Not generally no

[smudgie]

No.
If all these so called reality starts want to intermingle on a show then get one of their own.

Perhaps be honest and just call it 'Chav Wannabees'...or maybe 'Desperate Chavs'.

[Niamh.]

No, you can't trust the show to be anywhere near "reality" anymore because of reality "stars"

[Northern Monkey]

B

[RhysJones]

I don't think that you should get more than two reality stars. The TOWIE and Geordie Shore lot are dire apart from Gemma but reality stars like Tiffany and Renee are worth it

[MB.]

Generally no, but with exceptions (e.g. the GC)

[ebandit]

...if we must have reality stars...they require guidance of a script

Mark L

[Jan S]

i'd like to see a much broader spectrum of celebrities... where are the athletes, the politicians (well, maybe not so much them, lol), the authors or film stars, the singers, the magicians, the tv presenters and more? you know, actual real celebrities.... CBB used to be more exciting because of the diversity. they put more and more crappy people in, ply them with booze and allow revolting behaviour and they wonder why they can't get the calibre of celebs that's make for massive ratings.

and i don't mean paul daniels, but the likes of Dynamo... he's amazing!

[Cherie]

No Sams reaction to being nominated was far better telly than Lewis's five year plan