All-Stars with no Winners?

[Denver]

Starting to look likely that no winners will enter so how can they have an All-Stars cast with no winners?

[MB.]

All Stars casts don't usually include winners, bar a few exceptions like UBB

[Maxxie.]

I think British all stars shows should include winners, they shouldn't exclude then just because americans do. American reality shows are a lot more about competitiveness like Big Brother, Survivor, Apprentice, Amazing Race etc. They see it as if you've won before there's not a point doing it again as it's considered taking a risk, potentially turning a winner into a loser sort of thing. Bret Michaels who won Celebrity Apprentice one year was basically criticised for doing all stars and Trump fired him first.

We see all stars as just characters we'd love to see again, whether they won or not and it doesn't really matter whether they win again or not. Although since this is half all star, half new star, I kinda get it that they don't have any winners as it wouldn't exactly be fair, and would probably make it predictable.

[Black Dagger]

Like 95% of CBB winners are ****ing garbage anyway. And the 5% that aren't won't even go near it again, so whatever.

[Wizard.]

Because one you've won already you're kind of setting yourself up for failure in doing it again. People who can second like Colleen, Speidi and Austin will be desperate to win because they were so close last time.