LT's Shrine, post in here if you adore him

[Cherie]

Not been on for a few days :worry: hopefully he has internet issues or is busy with TL and not followed Kirk out the door :nono:

This is a fan thread so no hate posts :hee:

[Black Dagger]

Such a shame...

[Niamh.]

he's online right now

[Nicky91]

maybe the TL keeps him too busy to come online :laugh:

[Nicky91]

he's online right now

how do you know that :hehe:

[Cherie]

how do you know that :hehe:

Niamh knows everything :fist:

[Cherie]

maybe the TL keeps him too busy to come online :laugh:

:creep:

[Niamh.]

how do you know that :hehe:

Because I'm a moderator and I can see invisible people also it says so when you go into his profile, I think everyone can see that but I'm not sure? :think:

[Cherie]

Because I'm a moderator and I can see invisible people also it says so when you go into his profile, I think everyone can see that but I'm not sure? :think:

No cos I checked his profile and his rat like cunning face and it didn't say he was on so I guess if you go incognito it is not visible.

[Nicky91]

Because I'm a moderator and I can see invisible people also it says so when you go into his profile, I think everyone can see that but I'm not sure? :think:

okay, but why is he invisible anyway :laugh:

[Cherie]

okay, but why is he invisible anyway :laugh:

he wears a golden cloak of invisibility so the haters can't touch him :hehe:

[Niamh.]

No cos I checked his profile and his rat like cunning face and it didn't say he was on so I guess if you go incognito it is not visible.

Does it not say "Last Visited on ....." with the date/time on it?

[Nicky91]

he wears a golden cloak of invisibility so the haters can't touch him :hehe:

he also has broke my friendship with him apparently, i can't see his profile anymore :bawling:

[Cherie]

Does it not say "Last Visited on ....." with the date/time on it?

Nope otherwise I wouldn't have made the thread :fist:

[Niamh.]

Nope otherwise I wouldn't have made the thread :fist:

oh sorry, i thought everyone could see that :laugh:

[Cherie]

oh sorry, i thought everyone could see that :laugh:

You can mostly.....I think he has actually left :sad: if a McCann and Indy Scotland thread can't lure him back nothing will :bawling:

[Niamh.]

You can mostly.....I think he has actually left :sad: if a McCann and Indy Scotland thread can't lure him back nothing will :bawling:

He is online right now though

[Nicky91]

He is online right now though

where do you see him then :suspect:

[Cherie]

He is online right now though

maybe he hasn't left then :think:

[Niamh.]

he's logged off now, maybe it's a silent protest of some sort

[Alf]

It's so cute that everyone is missing LT already.

[Nicky91]

It's so cute that everyone is missing LT already.

yeah maybe LT and his TL are married now, and he hasn't has the time for TiBB anymore :hehe:

[arista]

He is just Busy

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

https://media.tenor.co/images/922feb6a6cc5056fd2864f2f3e9b799f/tenor.gif

[Nicky91]

He is just Busy

Busy :fist: :fist:

why has he broke my friendship with him, and also my friend Argy's friendship


i thought i was good friends with him :bawling: :bawling:

[Jordan.]

he's logged off now, maybe it's a silent protest of some sort

I fully back him on this protest http://cdn.thisisbigbrother.com/customavatars/avatar65979_8.gif

[Withano]

So to sum up

He deleted all his friends and wanted people to know this
Hasnt posted in a few days and wanted people to notice this
But is continuing to come online in invisible mode and probably didn't expect people to learn this

based off the clues that you guys have gave me, this is the exact thread he wanted.

[Nicky91]

So to sum up

He deleted all his friends and wanted people to know this
Hasnt posted in a few days and wanted people to notice this
But is continuing to come online in invisible mode and probably didn't expect people to learn this

based off the clues that you guys have gave me, this is the exact thread he wanted.

so basically LT wants attention :hehe:


i actually wonder what his real name is :suspect:

[Livia]

LT is chairman of the escape committee. Maybe he's got sick of waiting for the rest of us to go and decided he should go now...? Throught the tunnel, past the dogs - you've all seen the Great Escape you know how it works.

[Nicky91]

LT is chairman of the escape committee. Maybe he's got sick of waiting for the rest of us to go and decided he should go now...? Throught the tunnel, past the dogs - you've all seen the Great Escape you know how it works.

i will never leave TiBB i promise :hee:

[ebandit]

Busy :fist: :fist:

why has he broke my friendship with him, and also my friend Argy's friendship


i thought i was good friends with him :bawling: :bawling:

nicky91..........................you're the bestest

i don't have space in my life right now for friends.............but if i

did i would ask ya 1st...........................

Mark L

ps why is LT so oppressed? he always appears to be taking a break

[Nicky91]

nicky91..........................you're the bestest

i don't have space in my life right now for friends.............but if i

did i would ask ya 1st...........................

Mark L

ps why is LT so oppressed? he always appears to be taking a break

thank you :blush:


i don't know, i thought LT really liked me, now i feel like being stabbed in the back by him :(

[Cherie]

So to sum up

He deleted all his friends and wanted people to know this
Hasnt posted in a few days and wanted people to notice this
But is continuing to come online in invisible mode and probably didn't expect people to learn this

based off the clues that you guys have gave me, this is the exact thread he wanted.

im glad I made it then :hee:

[Cherie]

so basically LT wants attention :hehe:


i actually wonder what his real name is :suspect:

thank you :blush:


i don't know, i thought LT really liked me, now i feel like being stabbed in the back by him :(



:rolleyes:

[Withano]

so basically LT wants attention :hehe:


i actually wonder what his real name is :suspect:

Oop, I never said that :hehe:

[/B]

im glad I made it then :hee:

I'm not sure if he'd want it now that he got busted within it
https://cdn.meme.am/cache/instances/folder457/64799457.jpg

[Alf]

thank you :blush:


i don't know, i thought LT really liked me, now i feel like being stabbed in the back by him :(Well you know the old saying Nicky? "Never trust a Scotsman"

[Vicky.]

So to sum up

He deleted all his friends and wanted people to know this
Hasnt posted in a few days and wanted people to notice this
But is continuing to come online in invisible mode and probably didn't expect people to learn this

based off the clues that you guys have gave me, this is the exact thread he wanted.

Niamh outing invisible users :hehe:

[Niamh.]

Vicky is online atm too :hee:

[arista]

i will never leave TiBB i promise :hee:

how nice

[Babayaro.]

he's online right now

So that's that on THAT

[Nicky91]

[/B]


:rolleyes:

oh please don't go rolling your eyes to me, i really like you sweetie :hee:

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

I fully back him on this protest http://cdn.thisisbigbrother.com/customavatars/avatar65979_8.gif

:joker:

[Black Dagger]

I fully back him on this protest http://cdn.thisisbigbrother.com/customavatars/avatar65979_8.gif

:joker:

[Greg!]

he's online right now

Lmao expose ha!

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

the level of attention seeking is so me

[T*]

em b a r r a s s i ng

[Cherie]

oh please don't go rolling your eyes to me, i really like you sweetie :hee:

:hehe:

[reece(:]

Welp

[Marsh.]

I can see invisible people

*calls Gav with my concerns*

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

*calls Gav with my concerns*

:joker::joker:

[Niamh.]

*calls Gav with my concerns*
:fan:

[Smithy]

Oh no, tragic...what a loss etc etc

[Cherie]

*calls Gav with my concerns*

:joker:

[thesheriff443]

Should this thread not be in SD, in other news I had a dump.

[Kazanne]

LT better come back,even if it's just to make me laugh ,plus do people always log out when they go off Tibb ? I stay logged in most of the time ,even when I am not on the site .

[Ashley.]

So to sum up

He deleted all his friends and wanted people to know this
Hasnt posted in a few days and wanted people to notice this
But is continuing to come online in invisible mode and probably didn't expect people to learn this

based off the clues that you guys have gave me, this is the exact thread he wanted.

:laugh2:

Spot on post, Withano.

[Kizzy]

Hope I'm not implicated in this disappearance :idc:

[Cherie]

LT better come back,even if it's just to make me laugh ,plus do people always log out when they go off Tibb ? I stay logged in most of the time ,even when I am not on the site .

Indeed

:laugh2:

Spot on post, Withano.


Couldn't he just read as a guest :suspect:

[Cherie]

Hope I'm not implicated in this disappearance :idc:

We know you have Kirk tied up in your basement, what's to say you haven't done the double :suspect:

[Marsh.]

We know you have Kirk tied up in your basement, what's to say you haven't done the double :suspect:

Kizzy is Tuesday Lady?

[Ashley.]

Couldn't he just read as a guest :suspect:

You don't have to be logged in to read as a guest.

He'll be back.

[Niamh.]

LT better come back,even if it's just to make me laugh ,plus do people always log out when they go off Tibb ? I stay logged in most of the time ,even when I am not on the site .
Well presumably LT does cos he was online earlier and then offline

[Smithy]

Couldn't he just read as a guest :suspect:

Cant see private chat threads with offline, he's a nosey sod clearly :idc:

[Marsh.]

Oh, right. Do you appear "online" all of the time if you don't log out?

Even if I don't have the forum open?

[Niamh.]

Oh, right. Do you appear "online" all of the time if you don't log out?

Even if I don't have the forum open?
No i dont think so

[Kizzy]

We know you have Kirk tied up in your basement, what's to say you haven't done the double :suspect:

I may have...they don't call me loony lefty for nowt :fan:

[Amy Jade]

I don't much get on with him and I think he strays into trolling a lot but he's a well liked member of the forum s I hope he returns or restarts posting etc

I still miss Kirk :(

[Vicky.]

Oh, right. Do you appear "online" all of the time if you don't log out?

Even if I don't have the forum open?

No you 'time out' after like 20 mins of doing nothing

[Marsh.]

I may have...they don't call me loony lefty for nowt :fan:

I thought lefty referred to a malfunctioning breast. :think:

[Cherie]

I may have...they don't call me loony lefty for nowt :fan:

:joker:

[Cherie]

:fan:

[Black Dagger]

dire

[Cal.]

Sad.

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

i never log out either but i get logged out sometimes after i clear my history when i've been on myvidster

[Jake.]

I fully back him on this protest http://cdn.thisisbigbrother.com/customavatars/avatar65979_8.gif

:joker:

[Marsh.]

i never log out either but i get logged out sometimes after i clear my history when i've been on myvidster

:joker:

[T*]

i never log out either but i get logged out sometimes after i clear my history when i've been on myvidster

use incognito mode you messy bitch

[ebandit]

..............i'm the same after cookie clean up to cover up search for interesting facts

about............................................. .....................five star

Mark L

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

i didn't understand any of that ^ :worry:

[Josy]

Oh, right. Do you appear "online" all of the time if you don't log out?

Even if I don't have the forum open?

Nope, you have to be active or you are timed out.

[arista]

I look Forward to LT's Return

He has removed his PM
the Bugger

[Cherie]

I look Forward to LT's Return

He has removed his PM
the Bugger

Keep kneeling at the shrine, your prayers will be answered.

[Toy Soldier]

Wait wait wait...

So LT has stopped posting, went into invisible mode so that people would think he had left, but secretly was on all the time lurking and reading, then saw this thread where Niamh outed him as a lurker, and immediately went offline completely?

:joker::joker::joker: ****ing creased. LT you are a legend.

[Kizzy]

Well just to let you all know I'm working 5 nights from tonight...just to save any shrine construction.

[Toy Soldier]

Well just to let you all know I'm working 5 nights from tonight...just to save any shrine construction.
What sort of n00b doesn't Tibb from work?

[Cherie]

Wait wait wait...

So LT has stopped posting, went into invisible mode so that people would think he had left, but secretly was on all the time lurking and reading, then saw this thread where Niamh outed him as a lurker, and immediately went offline completely?

:joker::joker::joker: ****ing creased. LT you are a legend.

We don't know when LT went incognito though :think:

[Cherie]

What sort of n00b doesn't Tibb from work?

Kizzy

[Ronald.]

That's a shame I am fan of leather . He always makes me giggle with his posts . Him and Marsh always have me in stitches . R.

[Kizzy]

Kizzy

Hey! I could if I wanted, but I'm a profesh besides I don't need to be here monitoring you all 24/7 do I? I leave my lovely mods in charge when I'm at work :idc:

[Cherie]

Hey! I could if I wanted, but I'm a profesh besides I don't need to be here monitoring you all 24/7 do I? I leave my lovely mods in charge when I'm at work :idc:


There won't be much to moderate soon as everyone will be singing from the same political hymnsheet. :hee:

[Toy Soldier]

There won't be much to moderate soon as everyone will be singing from the same political hymnsheet. :hee:
You say that like it's the fault of those who will remain, and not the weakling quitters who couldn't hack the pace.... :hmph:

[Cherie]

You say that like it's the fault of those who will remain, and not the weakling quitters who couldn't hack the pace.... :hmph:

You say that from the point of never having been banned, I'd imagine most people would throw in the towel at some point if they were banned every five minutes. What would be the point in remaining?

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

maybe if he didn't keep breaking the rules he wouldn't get banned

https://media.tenor.co/images/ca4c8da18036edbda236f367933fdb6a/tenor.gif

[reece(:]

You say that from the point of never having been banned, I'd imagine most people would throw in the towel at some point if they were banned every five minutes. What would be the point in remaining?
You'd only get banned every 5 minutes if you fail to abide by the rules each time you come back... :think:

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

You'd only get banned every 5 minutes if you fail to abide by the rules each time you come back... :think:

https://media.tenor.co/images/ca4c8da18036edbda236f367933fdb6a/tenor.gif

[Tom4784]

We have mods with a variety of views and outlooks, if you get banned and it isn't taken back it's not a mistake and the other mods agree with it.

It's foolishness to blame other people for your own actions, the rules haven't changed in years and most people who are frequently banned should know better.

[Cherie]

well whatever, well done in killing off SD though, job done.

[Tom4784]

well whatever, well done in killing off SD though, job done.

Again, you're blaming other people for your friends' actions. Did anyone force them to be insulting towards other people? To troll and bait? To generally break the rules they agreed to follow when they signed up years ago? No, they made the choice to do so and SD hasn't been affected at all by people leaving in a flounce because they can't accept responsibility for themselves.

[Jordan.]

well whatever, well done in killing off SD though, job done.

Most Active Forums
Private Chat Threads, TiBB Big Brother game, Big Brother Canada, Serious Debates & News, The Voice, TV Chat

https://media.giphy.com/media/NORFfJzhC6iPe/200.gif

[Cherie]

We have mods with a variety of views and outlooks, if you get banned and it isn't taken back it's not a mistake and the other mods agree with it.

It's foolishness to blame other people for your own actions, the rules haven't changed in years and most people who are frequently banned should know better.

:joker:

[Niamh.]

We don't know when LT went incognito though :think:

No we don't and I wasn't trying to out him, I just didn't want people to worry something had happened to him. I like LT and I hope he returns

[Cherie]

No we don't and I wasn't trying to out him, I just didn't want people to worry something had happened to him. I like LT and I hope he returns

I know you would never do that :love:

[reece(:]

well whatever, well done in killing off SD though, job done.
Or maybe some users will feel more welcomed to debate now than before

[arista]

No we don't and I wasn't trying to out him, I just didn't want people to worry something had happened to him. I like LT and I hope he returns


Yes I also hope LT returns

[Cherie]

Or maybe some users will feel more welcomed to debate now than before

Who are you speaking for, yourself? Has LT or anyone else made you feel unwelcome in SD ?

[thesheriff443]

Look a sneaky police Sargent once shouted at me to get off my phone while stuck in traffic i shouted at him to go f his mother i went on a course and it cost me 97 pound but that was the best 97 pounds i have ever spent.
Lt has been on the wind up for a while now, if you cant take it don't give it.
I think this is great forum, full of different people, if you stay within the rules you wont get banned.

[thesheriff443]

From me who was always getting banned.

[Josy]

You say that from the point of never having been banned, I'd imagine most people would throw in the towel at some point if they were banned every five minutes. What would be the point in remaining?
People don't get banned for nothing, surely you can see that regardless of how friendly you are with him...

[Cherie]

People don't get banned for nothing, surely you can see that regardless of how friendly you are with him...

Banning isn't the problem, its when it isn't consistent across the board that an issue arises, and I am not even that friendly with LT, I enjoyed his posts and he made me laugh, he will be a big miss as is Kirk and BOTs

[Withano]

Who are you speaking for, yourself? Has LT or anyone else made you feel unwelcome in SD ?

Raise your hand if you've ever felt personally victimised by LT

https://68.media.tumblr.com/9bac9fb57c0260ccb7ee7c4c76417eef/tumblr_oem0hej9f41sxr2d1o1_400.gif

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

i have

[Tom4784]

Banning isn't the problem, its when it isn't consistent across the board that an issue arises, and I am not even that friendly with LT, I enjoyed his posts and he made me laugh, he will be a big miss as is Kirk and BOTs

Members get automatically banned when they reach a certain number of infraction points, breaking the first threshold will get you a day ban and then they get more severe as they go on. The amount of points you get per infraction depends on what you've done and whether or not you break the rules on a regular basis. Someone who is constantly breaking the rules will hit those ban thresholds in a short amount of time as opposed to someone who only rarely breaks the rules. There's some exceptions to that of course but they tend to be rare.

Your friends get banned more often because they maintain a high infraction score while other SD regulars aren't really that close to being banned because they don't break the rules as frequently. The system is consistent, you just didn't understand it.

[Denver]

We have mods with a variety of views and outlooks, if you get banned and it isn't taken back it's not a mistake and the other mods agree with it.

It's foolishness to blame other people for your own actions, the rules haven't changed in years and most people who are frequently banned should know better.

I was banned the other day for build up of infractions though but my infraction was reversed but not the ban?

[caprimint]

This thread :worship:

[Kizzy]

He's probably on holiday or something, jeeze :/

[Ronald.]

Come back leather! R.

[Cherie]

Raise your hand if you've ever felt personally victimised by LT

https://68.media.tumblr.com/9bac9fb57c0260ccb7ee7c4c76417eef/tumblr_oem0hej9f41sxr2d1o1_400.gif

i have

:joker:

[Cherie]

Members get automatically banned when they reach a certain number of infraction points, breaking the first threshold will get you a day ban and then they get more severe as they go on. The amount of points you get per infraction depends on what you've done and whether or not you break the rules on a regular basis. Someone who is constantly breaking the rules will hit those ban thresholds in a short amount of time as opposed to someone who only rarely breaks the rules. There's some exceptions to that of course but they tend to be rare.

Your friends get banned more often because they maintain a high infraction score while other SD regulars aren't really that close to being banned because they don't break the rules as frequently. The system is consistent, you just didn't understand it.

Thank you for explaining all that so eloquently it still doesn't explain why you have never been banned though :laugh:

[Cherie]

He's probably on holiday or something, jeeze :/


:oh: wash your mouth out Lady LT doesn't agree with holidays

[Toy Soldier]

Members get automatically banned when they reach a certain number of infraction points, breaking the first threshold will get you a day ban and then they get more severe as they go on. The amount of points you get per infraction depends on what you've done and whether or not you break the rules on a regular basis. Someone who is constantly breaking the rules will hit those ban thresholds in a short amount of time as opposed to someone who only rarely breaks the rules. There's some exceptions to that of course but they tend to be rare.

Your friends get banned more often because they maintain a high infraction score while other SD regulars aren't really that close to being banned because they don't break the rules as frequently. The system is consistent, you just didn't understand it.
Yeah and there's a great skill in taking it right to the brink and then backing off, then going back in again, and each time you get that little bit closer to a ban, and then you back off again, and it can be frustrating, but in that good way y'know? So on you go, back and forward, sometimes pushing it so close to the limit that you worry you've passed the point of no return so you have to grip that little bit harder, back off for that little bit longer, because you know that the pay off - when you finally do get banned - it'll be the most explosive ban yet.

I think they call it "edging" or something like that.

[Cherie]

Yeah and there's a great skill in taking it right to the brink and then backing off, then going back in again, and each time you get that little bit closer to a ban, and then you back off again, and it can be frustrating, but in that good way y'know? So on you go, back and forward, sometimes pushing it so close to the limit that you worry you've passed the point of no return so you have to grip that little bit harder, back off for that little bit longer, because you know that the pay off - when you finally do get banned - it'll be the most explosive ban yet.

I think they call it "edging" or something like that.

That doesn't apply on TiBB as there is no set amount of infractions that lead to a ban, so how would you know how close you were to a ban?

[Cherie]

I was banned the other day for build up of infractions though but my infraction was reversed but not the ban?


What we need is Dezzy to go on Mastermind with "how rules breaks on TiBB are applied" as his specialist subject :hehe:

[Toy Soldier]

That doesn't apply on TiBB as there is no set amount of infractions that lead to a ban, so how would you know how close you were to a ban?
You just sort of feel it building Cherie, like a sort of muscle tension. Like you're going to get a cramp but at the same time, you have that excited feeling like butterflies in the stomach? It's hard to explain and it takes practice. I mean, God knows we've all pushed just that little bit past the point of no return before and had a weak, unsatisfying ban! It's disappointing at the time but it's all part of the learning process.

[Kazanne]

I know you would never do that :love:

Well I would miss him,not many you can have a good old laugh with now,they left or got banned ,but he was one, Tibbs dying a slow death , it's definitely not the place it used to be :wavey:

[Kazanne]

Thank you for explaining all that so eloquently it still doesn't explain why you have never been banned though :laugh:

Whoops :laugh: I love this bold Cherie

[thesheriff443]

I would like to know how dezzy gets away with calling people dear! Its clearly a dig!
He also said to me ok Jan another dig and accused me of spewing my bile about the homeless which is a disgusting thing to say

Cherie like the rest of us want one rule for all including mods.
This is not an attack but freedom of speech on a public forum.

[Toy Soldier]

Well I would miss him,not many you can have a good old laugh with now,they left or got banned ,but he was one, Tibbs dying a slow death , it's definitely not the place it used to be :wavey:

Neh. It's a mirror of the country / world and it's been since Brexit sooo.

[Livia]

Well I would miss him,not many you can have a good old laugh with now,they left or got banned ,but he was one, Tibbs dying a slow death , it's definitely not the place it used to be :wavey:

I couldn't agree more Kaz. I was going to write a whole paragraph on why I think that's so... but I don't want to be infracted. Again. For ****-all.

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

i think the forum is quiet at the moment because it's primarily a BBUK forum and the show ended months ago/doesn't start again for months maybe, it's hardly dead

[Denver]

When i first joined the off season of 2014 was really busy copared to now then people just stop appearing over off season

[Alf]

Don't worry, there's good news

I'll always be here, I ain't going nowhere.




I'm sure that's made peoples days?

[thesheriff443]

Don't worry, there's good news

I'll always be here, I ain't going nowhere.




I'm sure that's made peoples days?

Its made mine, its your bloody round.

[Tom4784]

I would like to know how dezzy gets away with calling people dear! Its clearly a dig!
He also said to me ok Jan another dig and accused me of spewing my bile about the homeless which is a disgusting thing to say

Cherie like the rest of us want one rule for all including mods.
This is not an attack but freedom of speech on a public forum.

'Dear' is an insult now? I'll remember to take offense the next time anyone dares insult me with a term of endearment then. How dare anyone be called something as offensive as 'dear'!

I was commenting on your opinions on the homeless and how dismissive you were of them, like with your 'dear' comments, it's ultimately reaching in order to try to get someone you dislike in trouble for no good reason.

If that's what Cherie wants then that's what she's got. Everyone gets treated the same to say that they don't is ignorant since you have no idea about how many infraction points anyone else has, to say that things are unequal is an assumption based on nothing but your own bias against me.

Everyone is treated equally as it is, from friends to other members, I infract all the same and the mods can back me up on that like I can back up their decisions since every infraction and report automatically causes a thread to be made in Tibb Towers which allows us to discuss them all individually. It's impossible for one mod to make biased decisions without drawing the ire of the rest of the mods.

The truth of the matter is that I'm just used as a proxy for people to blame for their own actions because the idea that I spend my days plotting how to best oppress certain groups of people for no apparent reason or benefit is much more plausible than people simply being infracted because they chose to disregard the rules.

It's always someone else's fault isn't it?

[arista]

Don't worry, there's good news

I'll always be here, I ain't going nowhere.




I'm sure that's made peoples days?


how nice

[arista]

"Everyone is treated equally as it is,"


Good on Dezzy


Now if possible LT
can you return please ...........

[thesheriff443]

'Dear' is an insult now? I'll remember to take offense the next time anyone dares insult me with a term of endearment then. How dare anyone be called something as offensive as 'dear'!

I was commenting on your opinions on the homeless and how dismissive you were of them, like with your 'dear' comments, it's ultimately reaching in order to try to get someone you dislike in trouble for no good reason.

If that's what Cherie wants then that's what she's got. Everyone gets treated the same to say that they don't is ignorant since you have no idea about how many infraction points anyone else has, to say that things are unequal is an assumption based on nothing but your own bias against me.

Everyone is treated equally as it is, from friends to other members, I infract all the same and the mods can back me up on that like I can back up their decisions since every infraction and report automatically causes a thread to be made in Tibb Towers which allows us to discuss them all individually. It's impossible for one mod to make biased decisions without drawing the ire of the rest of the mods.

The truth of the matter is that I'm just used as a proxy for people to blame for their own actions because the idea that I spend my days plotting how to best oppress certain groups of people for no apparent reason or benefit is much more plausible than people simply being infracted because they chose to disregard the rules.

It's always someone else's fault isn't it?
Yes dear is an insult, and so is calling someone, Jan what relevance has Jan got with me? its you way of having a dig, how is it that so many people have a problem with same mod over and over?

Add to the fact of not had an infraction for two years, the old trouble making line wont wash.

[Kizzy]

I would like to know how dezzy gets away with calling people dear! Its clearly a dig!
He also said to me ok Jan another dig and accused me of spewing my bile about the homeless which is a disgusting thing to say

Cherie like the rest of us want one rule for all including mods.
This is not an attack but freedom of speech on a public forum.

LT invented ok Jan to be fair, and spewing bile is just another term for speaking disparagingly about something, it's not really offensive as such.
Debates can get heated, I'd say when comments are personal or accusatory they are acted on, and with good reason. You are right though there should never be one rule for one and one for another.

[Jamie89]

My grandma'a always called me dear... I never realised she was actually being a shady bitch

[Jamie89]

:fan:

[Tom4784]

Yes dear is an insult, and so is calling someone, Jan what relevance has Jan got with me? its you way of having a dig, how is it that so many people have a problem with same mod over and over?

Add to the fact of not had an infraction for two years, the old trouble making line wont wash.

There's not many people that do have a problem with me, in fact it's just the one friend group that consistently attacks me, the last time I remained silent but I noted the amount of support I received and that it was only the group I mentioned before that took issue with me. I won't remain silent here though, I'm not going to be blamed for other people's choices because they can't accept that actions have consequences nor will I be blamed by their friends who have accepted their tales without question just because they think it gives them the right to attack me.

The people that have left have not been hounded off the forum, they've not been banned. They chose to leave because they couldn't handle getting infracted for something they were guilty of. There's no greater conspiracy at hand here, there's no one else to blame.

[Tom4784]

My grandma'a always called me dear... I never realised she was actually being a shady bitch

Drag ha for filth!

[Kizzy]

There's not many people that do have a problem with me, in fact it's just the one friend group that consistently attacks me, the last time I remained silent but I noted the amount of support I received and that it was only the group I mentioned before that took issue with me. I won't remain silent here though, I'm not going to be blamed for other people's choices because they can't accept that actions have consequences nor will I be blamed by their friends who have accepted their tales without question just because they think it gives them the right to attack me.

The people that have left have not been hounded off the forum, they've not been banned. They chose to leave because they couldn't handle getting infracted for something they were guilty of. There's no greater conspiracy at hand here, there's no one else to blame.

The myth is still being perpetuated in the 'people you miss' thread, I 've reported it twice.
Like you I refuse to be victimised fo the actions of others.

[Cherie]

There's not many people that do have a problem with me, in fact it's just the one friend group that consistently attacks me, the last time I remained silent but I noted the amount of support I received and that it was only the group I mentioned before that took issue with me. I won't remain silent here though, I'm not going to be blamed for other people's choices because they can't accept that actions have consequences nor will I be blamed by their friends who have accepted their tales without question just because they think it gives them the right to attack me.

The people that have left have not been hounded off the forum, they've not been banned. They chose to leave because they couldn't handle getting infracted for something they were guilty of. There's no greater conspiracy at hand here, there's no one else to blame.


Where were you blamed? did I mention you until you took it upon yourself to explain the extremely fluid TiBB infraction rules? I don't know why you feel you have to shoulder the blame for the moderation of the forum ? This started off as a fun thread, nothing more, nothing less, just because it evolved into something along the way doesn't alter the original intent.

[Cherie]

The myth is still being perpetuated in the 'people you miss' thread, I 've reported it twice.
Like you I refuse to be victimised fo the actions of others.

again your name was never mentioned Kizzy, you came into the thread and asked if you would be blamed I thought you were actually joking, but now I see you weren't,not everything is about you :laugh: also I have no idea what you found to report in the "People you miss thread" :umm2:

[Tom4784]

Where were you blamed? did I mention you until you took it upon yourself to explain the extremely fluid TiBB infraction rules? I don't know why you feel you have to shoulder the blame for the moderation of the forum ?

You were suggesting that moderating wasn't consistent although you had nothing to go on to make that claim, I explained the infraction system so you would stop trying to spread misinformation about it.

[Kazanne]

I think we all have certain friends on here ,it's like life, we will like some people and not others, it's no big deal ,as a forum it should reflect real life,I think some people know my feelings towards them also I get their feelings about me, that is why I do not respond very much to some people, not everyone will get on, but saying that I think the way you feel about people MUST have some knock on reaction when you are in charge of something , obviously you will be kinder to people you like than those you don't, it's just the way it is,people communicate and sometimes infractions given seem quite petty considering what others get away with, I do not think you have to be 'nice' just because someone is a mod,they are no different to us,just have more power on here.

[Cherie]

You were suggesting that moderating wasn't consistent although you had nothing to go on to make that claim, I explained the infraction system so you would stop trying to spread misinformation about it.

It's not fair and consistent, I am not spreading anything, I am expressing my views on the matter. You could have let Josy respond as I was replying to her comment. You didn't need to step in at all. But you have decided this is all about you for some reason best known to yourself.

[Kazanne]

This is actually a good thread,let people get things out in the open,wont be long before it's closed.

[Tom4784]

It's not fair and consistent, I am not spreading anything, I am expressing my views on the matter. You could have let Josy respond as I was replying to her comment. You didn't need to step in at all. But you have decided this is all about you for some reason best known to yourself.

How so?

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

i did get infracted for calling someone sweaty once and it still hasn't been reversed

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showpost.php?p=9036013&postcount=14 :nono:

[Withano]

LT invented ok Jan to be fair.

Wait really?! I assumed it was from a telly programme or something, pretty sure I've said it in real life too to trick people in to thinking I was cool ffs

[Withano]

My grandma'a always called me dear... I never realised she was actually being a shady bitch

:joker:

[Niamh.]

Wait really?! I assumed it was from a telly programme or something, pretty sure I've said it in real life too to trick people in to thinking I was cool ffs

Sure Jan is from the Brady Bunch

[Kazanne]

http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showpost.php?p=9036013&postcount=14 :nono:

Is LT sweaty ? that's a bit of an insult:hehe:

[Withano]

Sure Jan is from the Brady Bunch

Oh good, i probably did come across as very cool after all

[Tom4784]

i did get infracted for calling someone sweaty once and it still hasn't been reversed

You only have one active infraction so the one you're talking about probably expired ages ago :fist:

[Niamh.]

Oh good, i probably did come across as very cool after all

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRcyZ6J7CH2PjZeZ-Wc_e8gUH61PRM7rQJ_U8d-H3EiAYuE0jF9fZKLm48


RHN-b6Yj8wA

[Withano]

Why dont people just stop making friends with the rulebreakers to avoid all disappointment?

Did I just solve everything?

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

You only have one active infraction so the one you're talking about probably expired ages ago :fist:

but it expired, it didn't get reversed

https://media.tenor.co/images/ca4c8da18036edbda236f367933fdb6a/tenor.gif

so now i get 1 infraction worthy post for free

[Withano]

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRcyZ6J7CH2PjZeZ-Wc_e8gUH61PRM7rQJ_U8d-H3EiAYuE0jF9fZKLm48


RHN-b6Yj8wA

Hahaha thanks

[Jamie89]

I think we all have certain friends on here ,it's like life, we will like some people and not others, it's no big deal ,as a forum it should reflect real life,I think some people know my feelings towards them also I get their feelings about me, that is why I do not respond very much to some people, not everyone will get on, but saying that I think the way you feel about people MUST have some knock on reaction when you are in charge of something , obviously you will be kinder to people you like than those you don't, it's just the way it is,people communicate and sometimes infractions given seem quite petty considering what others get away with, I do not think you have to be 'nice' just because someone is a mod,they are no different to us,just have more power on here.

I don't know if it has to have an effect in terms of infractions. I used to manage a team of people as my job and there were some I liked and others I didn't, and there were numerous times I'd have to discipline people I liked and I never looked for reasons to discipline the people I didn't like, it was just formalities of the job but then when chatting with people it would probably show who I was friendlier with, and I assume it's a similar kind of thing with moderating, they have a mod side that the rest of us don't see where they give out infractions etc, but then they have a poster side where friendships will probably show and who they like/don't like etc which is fair enough... I think the problem is that people assume from looking at their posts and who they're friendly with how they must be acting as a moderator but noone actually sees that except the other mods, and I'd assume that if someone was moderating unfairly it would be pretty apparent to the others and something would be done about it.

[Withano]

but it expired, it didn't get reversed

https://media.tenor.co/images/ca4c8da18036edbda236f367933fdb6a/tenor.gif

so now i get 1 infraction worthy post for free

Calm your tits, sweaty.

[Kazanne]

Why dont people just stop making friends with the rulebreakers to avoid all disappointment?

Did I just solve everything?

I think we can make our own minds up as to who we like as friends don't you? If we didn't speak to anyone whoever broke a rule we'de be friendless.so NO you've solved nothing :hee:

[Tom4784]

but it expired, it didn't get reversed

https://media.tenor.co/images/ca4c8da18036edbda236f367933fdb6a/tenor.gif

so now i get 1 infraction worthy post for free

https://31.media.tumblr.com/b6de12025844441b46db5e6d54af1a51/tumblr_inline_nb4zyfbBZa1sclkhz.gif

[Withano]

I think we can make our own minds up as to who we like as friends don't you? If we didn't speak to anyone whoever broke a rule we'de be friendless.so NO you've solved nothing :hee:

Oh right, my super serious suggestion didnt solve it. I'll keep working on it.

[Kazanne]

I don't know if it has to have an effect in terms of infractions. I used to manage a team of people as my job and there were some I liked and others I didn't, and there were numerous times I'd have to discipline people I liked and I never looked for reasons to discipline the people I didn't like, it was just formalities of the job but then when chatting with people it would probably show who I was friendlier with, and I assume it's a similar kind of thing with moderating, they have a mod side that the rest of us don't see where they give out infractions etc, but then they have a poster side where friendships will probably show and who they like/don't like etc which is fair enough... I think the problem is that people assume from looking at their posts and who they're friendly with how they must be acting as a moderator but noone actually sees that except the other mods, and I'd assume that if someone was moderating unfairly it would be pretty apparent to the others and something would be done about it.

I accept that Jamie89,but hand on heart I find it easier to approach some mods than others as they seem neutral ,I may be wrong,but that is how I feel.

[Kazanne]

Oh right, my super serious suggestion didnt solve it. I'll keep working on it.

That's the spirit :laugh:

[Toy Soldier]

A few people are convinced that moderating isn't impartial because I don't get infractions and bans. What they seem to be failing to notice is that I'm just rly rly nice :shrug:

[Cherie]

How so?

For a start some members can't be arsed reporting posts even if they see them as a rulebreak so many infraction worthy posts are possibly missed, whilst others seem to have the report button on speed dial so some posters are reported time and time again so that's inconsistent for a start :idc:

[Withano]

For a start some members can't be arsed reporting posts even if they see them as a rulebreak so many infraction worthy posts are possibly missed, whilst others seem to have the report button on speed dial so some posters are reported time and time again so that's inconsistent for a start :idc:

How could you possibly have that information

[Niamh.]

For a start some members can't be arsed reporting posts even if they see them as a rulebreak so many infraction worthy posts are possibly missed, whilst others seem to have the report button on speed dial so some posters are reported time and time again so that's inconsistent for a start :idc:

Everyone on the forum has equal reporting rights, it's not our fault if they all don't use them at the same rate :fist:

[Cherie]

How could you possibly have that information

Everyone on the forum has equal reporting rights, it's not our fault if they all don't use them at the same rate :fist:

:smug:

I'm going to have my finger on that report button from now on, avalanche incoming Niamh :hehe:

[Niamh.]

:smug:

I'm going to have my finger on that report button from now on, avalanche incoming Niamh :hehe:

http://i.imgur.com/ha2kzKS.jpg?1

[Withano]

:smug:

I'm going to have my finger on that report button from now on, avalanche incoming Niamh :hehe:

I wasnt expecting to lose that argument at all, let alone in under two minutes!

[Cherie]

I wasnt expecting to lose that argument at all, let alone in under two minutes!

Reported for doubting me :nono:

[Withano]

Reported for doubting me :nono:

:joker:

[Josy]

I'm replying to a posts from a few pages back...

Cherie the thread took a turn away from being fun when you started having a sly pop about LT being constantly banned or something along those lines.

If someone is constantly getting infracted or banned and by all staff at different times not just 1 mod then there's only so many times thier friends can blame us before realising it isn't us that's the problem and I like and get in with LT but let's not pretend he's an angel on the forum.

[Josy]

Also 'sure jan' is from the Brady bunch :/

[Tom4784]

For a start some members can't be arsed reporting posts even if they see them as a rulebreak so many infraction worthy posts are possibly missed, whilst others seem to have the report button on speed dial so some posters are reported time and time again so that's inconsistent for a start :idc:

How could you possibly know people's reporting habits? We get a variety of reports from different people and we can tell the difference between genuine reports and someone reaching to get another person in trouble. If a person is reported but we don't believe they've done anything wrong then we won't do anything. Plus you aren't taking into account that not all moderation is prompted by reports, if we see rule breaks we'll respond whether it's reported or not.

People don't get banned because they get reported a lot, people get banned because they frequently break the rules.

[Toy Soldier]

Also 'sure jan' is from the Brady bunch :/

LT actually was Marcia Brady in the movie, though.

[Brillopad]

How could you possibly know people's reporting habits? We get a variety of reports from different people and we can tell the difference between genuine reports and someone reaching to get another person in trouble. If a person is reported but we don't believe they've done anything wrong then we won't do anything. Plus you aren't taking into account that not all moderation is prompted by reports, if we see rule breaks we'll respond whether it's reported or not.

People don't get banned because they get reported a lot, people get banned because they frequently break the rules.

None of that counts for anything as long as there is one rule for some an another for others. Can't see that changing anytime soon.

[Tom4784]

None of that counts for anything as long as there is one rule for some an another for others. Can't see that changing anytime soon.

How do you know this? Please enlighten us all on how you seemingly have in depth knowledge of everyone's infraction history to make this statement. I'm very interested to know.

Nobody is ever unfairly infracted or banned, sometimes they are by means of mistake but those infractions are always reversed. The whole 'One rule for some' argument is a hypocritical complaint by people who want special treatment because they aren't happy with being treated like everyone else.

[RichardG]

if you get an infraction then will you always get a pm to let you know

[Cherie]

How could you possibly know people's reporting habits? We get a variety of reports from different people and we can tell the difference between genuine reports and someone reaching to get another person in trouble. If a person is reported but we don't believe they've done anything wrong then we won't do anything. Plus you aren't taking into account that not all moderation is prompted by reports, if we see rule breaks we'll respond whether it's reported or not.

People don't get banned because they get reported a lot, people get banned because they frequently break the rules.

Niamh :joker: I didn't say it was the only way members got infracted, you added that in youself, I said it was an area where there could be inconsistency

[Cherie]

I'm replying to a posts from a few pages back...

Cherie the thread took a turn away from being fun when you started having a sly pop about LT being constantly banned or something along those lines.

If someone is constantly getting infracted or banned and by all staff at different times not just 1 mod then there's only so many times thier friends can blame us before realising it isn't us that's the problem and I like and get in with LT but let's not pretend he's an angel on the forum.

Can I call members sly without punishment Josy? I don't think anyone anywhere has ever accused LT of being an angel :unsure:

[Josy]

None of that counts for anything as long as there is one rule for some an another for others. Can't see that changing anytime soon.
There isn't though

[Josy]

if you get an infraction then will you always get a pm to let you know
Yeah

[Jordan.]

All of LT's friends need to do the right thing and join his silent protest

[Josy]

Can I call members sly without punishment Josy? I don't think anyone anywhere has ever accused LT of being an angel :unsure:
I know they haven't cherie the point I was making was that people don't get bans for nothing if they are building infractions and the bans are happening more and more then they are repeat rule breakers...

Not sure what the sly comment is about, your dig was at us not other members

[thesheriff443]

I know they haven't cherie the point I was making was that people don't get bans for nothing if they are building infractions and the bans are happening more and more then they are repeat rule breakers...

Not sure what the sly comment is about, your dig was at us not other members

Dezzy needs to stop spewing his bile as he said to me, there are no angels on Tibb and that includes mods.

[Withano]

So many guests are viewing this thread haha. This all must look so crazy from the outside looking in.

[Amy Jade]

http://rs293.pbsrc.com/albums/mm73/thegreat_rakshanna/rwuctz.gif?w=480&h=480&fit=clip

[Kizzy]

The myth is still being perpetuated in the 'people you miss' thread, I 've reported it twice.
Like you I refuse to be victimised fo the actions of others.

again your name was never mentioned Kizzy, you came into the thread and asked if you would be blamed I thought you were actually joking, but now I see you weren't,not everything is about you :laugh: also I have no idea what you found to report in the "People you miss thread" :umm2:

I was accused of hounding jesus and kirk off the forum, I was preempting the pointy fingers for LT too. :umm2:

Take a close look again at that thread, focus on the word 'hounded'.

[Brillopad]

There isn't though

There most definitely is. Mods baiting and then removing said posts.

[Josy]

There most definitely is. Mods baiting and then removing said posts.
No there most definitely isn't, with respect I see every infraction and ban given out, you don't.

Your second comment is nothing to do with what you first posted about, if you report something like this it'll be looked into.

[Toy Soldier]

So many guests are viewing this thread haha. This all must look so crazy from the outside looking in.
I dunno, this seems pretty standard for every forum I've ever been a member of :joker:. Though the first one had about 600 active members and only one mod. That was pretty hilarious.

[Josy]

Dezzy needs to stop spewing his bile as he said to me, there are no angels on Tibb and that includes mods.
Look, some were saying yesterday 'oh it won't be long til this thread is closed' etc.. well constructive criticism is perfectly fine and also welcomed but your posts have been getting progressively ruder and more insulting each time, I won't warn you about this again, post your opinion without baiting for a reaction or you will end up infracted.

I've mentioned in another thread in the past that I won't have a group of members attacking dezzy at every opportunity they get and here we have the same members doing the exact same thing again, we don't allow this to happen to other members and the same goes for staff.

IF anyone has a genuine problem with a mod they can pm another mod or myself and James.

[Cherie]

I know they haven't cherie the point I was making was that people don't get bans for nothing if they are building infractions and the bans are happening more and more then they are repeat rule breakers...

Not sure what the sly comment is about, your dig was at us not other members

I was asking why you could call me sly Josy, when I would be infracted if I called another member sly. I don't believe I have been sly in the least, I have always been open and honest on the forum, I have the utmost respect for most of the Admin and moderation team, most are respectful and treat members well and in return they are respected by the members. In response to your post about PMing you and James if there are any issues, I've done it before, James didn't even respond, though in fairness you always reply, nothing changes though so it's a bit pointless.

[Brillopad]

No there most definitely isn't, with respect I see every infraction and ban given out, you don't.

Your second comment is nothing to do with what you first posted about, if you report something like this it'll be looked into.

I did . I never heard a thing back.

[Cherie]

I was accused of hounding jesus and kirk off the forum, I was preempting the pointy fingers for LT too. :umm2:

Take a close look again at that thread, focus on the word 'hounded'.


There isn't a hope in hell LT left the forum because of you Kizzy :joker: so don't worry.

[Josy]

I did . I never heard a thing back.
Then try another member of staff
I was asking why you could call me sly Josy, when I would be infracted if I called another member sly. I don't believe I have been sly in the least, I have always been open and honest on the forum, I have the utmost respect for most of the Admin and moderation team, most are respectful and treat members well and in return they are respected by the members. In response to your post about PMing you and James if there are any issues, I've done it before, James didn't even respond, though in fairness you always reply, nothing changes though so it's a bit pointless.
I wasn't calling you sly Cherie, I called one of your comments a sly dig at us which it was.

[Withano]

I only disagreed with one of my infractions.. I asked for clarification, it was given to me, and apperently it was read by many in a different tone than I intended it.
Maybe I'm just super grownup but I didnt start a tantrum or leave the forum about it, it was carelessness on my behalf.
In 5 days, I'll be infraction-free, so I'll probs be given mod privaleges or sumin.

[Brillopad]

LT speaks his mind and doesn't shy away from controversy - that's a good thing.

[Niamh.]

I dunno, this seems pretty standard for every forum I've ever been a member of :joker:. Though the first one had about 600 active members and only one mod. That was pretty hilarious.

Oh God, I hope that mod was actually getting paid :laugh:

[Toy Soldier]

Oh God, I hope that mod was actually getting paid :laugh:

They were, it was the OFFICIAL forum of a TV show. The whole thing was hilarious. He worked 9-5 Monday to Friday. Evenings and weekends were straight up anarchy :joker:. I miss that place so much...

[Niamh.]

They were, it was the OFFICIAL forum of a TV show. The whole thing was hilarious. He worked 9-5 Monday to Friday. Evenings and weekends were straight up anarchy :joker:. I miss that place so much...

Imagine the carnage he'd have to clean up Monday morning :laugh:

[Toy Soldier]

Imagine the carnage he'd have to clean up Monday morning :laugh:

I was on that forum for about 9 years, I think I was permanently banned after about 3. But it was only moderated while I was out at school anyway! My daily log-in was making a new account in the evening (they didn't even have email verification :facepalm: ) and then every morning at 9am it would get banned. I think at one point he made my username and anything related to it an "unacceptable term" when creating an account :laugh:... so I had to start just using random names and putting my username in my signature.

Ahh I'm getting all nostalgic now.

Really though. I was a ****ing horror on that site. But not even the worst :hehe:

[Niamh.]

I was on that forum for about 9 years, I think I was permanently banned after about 3. But it was only moderated while I was out at school anyway! My daily log-in was making a new account in the evening (they didn't even have email verification :facepalm: ) and then every morning at 9am it would get banned. I think at one point he made my username and anything related to it an "unacceptable term" when creating an account :laugh:... so I had to start just using random names and putting my username in my signature.

Ahh I'm getting all nostalgic now.

Really though. I was a ****ing horror on that site. But not even the worst :hehe:

:laugh2:

Why didn't they just make some evening/weekend mods?

I couldn't imagine you being a horror TS

[Toy Soldier]

:laugh2:

Why didn't they just make some evening/weekend mods?

They had something majorly against the idea of having volunteer mods, and they didn't want to pay more than one person! It was back in the late 90's / early 2000's, the internet was much more "niche" I think. A professional company would just never be associated with a shambles like that these days. There would probably be legal issues! There were at least three 40+ year old guys constantly on talking to 14/15 year old girls :umm2:. Quite openly and blatantly flirting.

I couldn't imagine you being a horror TS

:hee:

To be fair I was mostly active on there between the ages of 13 and 17. I'm are an grown-up now.

[Niamh.]

They had something majorly against the idea of having volunteer mods, and they didn't want to pay more than one person! It was back in the late 90's / early 2000's, the internet was much more "niche" I think. A professional company would just never be associated with a shambles like that these days. There would probably be legal issues! There were at least three 40+ year old guys constantly on talking to 14/15 year old girls :umm2:. Quite openly and blatantly flirting.



:hee:

To be fair I was mostly active on there between the ages of 13 and 17. I'm are an grown-up now.

Oh God, that has happened atleast one time in my time on here though ( a while back and no one who posts now just to be clear :laugh: )

I'd say pedos didn't know their luck when the internet took off

[Cherie]

Then try another member of staff

I wasn't calling you sly Cherie, I called one of your comments a sly dig at us which it was.

oh right, thanks for the clarification Josy, I'm many things but sly isn't one of them :fist:

[Smithy]

All of LT's friends need to do the right thing and join his silent protest

:joker::joker::joker:

[Livia]

Look, some were saying yesterday 'oh it won't be long til this thread is closed' etc.. well constructive criticism is perfectly fine and also welcomed but your posts have been getting progressively ruder and more insulting each time, I won't warn you about this again, post your opinion without baiting for a reaction or you will end up infracted.

I've mentioned in another thread in the past that I won't have a group of members attacking dezzy at every opportunity they get and here we have the same members doing the exact same thing again, we don't allow this to happen to other members and the same goes for staff.

IF anyone has a genuine problem with a mod they can pm another mod or myself and James.

With respect, Josy... I have been incfracted twice in the last couple of weeks for posts that were mild compared to Dezzy's. And he's a moderator. And I did PM James. If moderators are going to be allowed to infract people then they should try to be above reproach themselves.. ir at least not ****ing rude. I've never seen any other moderator act in this way. And I have to say it's all been very out of character for him. Furthermore, It's often the case that people are infracted for reacting to baiting posts that are overlooked by the mods. If you're going to have an system where one person can infract another, then it has to be consitent and fair. And it just isn't. And a word on the overuse of the report button... tell me again why the appeals system was removed?

[Brillopad]

With respect, Josy... I have been incfracted twice in the last couple of weeks for posts that were mild compared to Dezzy's. And he's a moderator. And I did PM James. If moderators are going to be allowed to infract people then they should try to be above reproach themselves.. ir at least not ****ing rude. I've never seen any other moderator act in this way. And I have to say it's all been very out of character for him. Furthermore, It's often the case that people are infracted for reacting to baiting posts that are overlooked by the mods. If you're going to have an system where one person can infract another, then it has to be consitent and fair. And it just isn't. And a word on the overuse of the report button... tell me again why the appeals system was removed?

Completely agree with this. I certainly feel that any mods actively involved in a discussion/disagreement should not be able to infract their 'opponent' Talk about conflict of interests.

[bots]

Look, some were saying yesterday 'oh it won't be long til this thread is closed' etc.. well constructive criticism is perfectly fine and also welcomed but your posts have been getting progressively ruder and more insulting each time, I won't warn you about this again, post your opinion without baiting for a reaction or you will end up infracted.

I've mentioned in another thread in the past that I won't have a group of members attacking dezzy at every opportunity they get and here we have the same members doing the exact same thing again, we don't allow this to happen to other members and the same goes for staff.

IF anyone has a genuine problem with a mod they can pm another mod or myself and James.


Interesting. I have stopped posting on this site, but I really can't let this pass without comment.

I wrote to you and James about a certain moderator, i tried to be constructive about it, but was met with a brick wall from both of you.

I've never been banned, that's not my issue. I do have a problem with bias and unfairness though, and its not happened once, it's repeated time after time after time.

If people are not posting on this site, its because they are being driven away in frustration. While some posters might like to test boundaries and stir things up a bit for a bit of controversy and dare I say it entertainment, there is a clique on here that use passive aggressive tactics to belittle others. The may not have broken any specific rules, but their intentions are clear as are there motives.

I've heard so often that everyone is fair etc etc, its just not true, and if you try and say anything against it you are hit with a break wall or threatened with a ban or whatever. Its laughable, it really is.

[Kazanne]

With respect, Josy... I have been incfracted twice in the last couple of weeks for posts that were mild compared to Dezzy's. And he's a moderator. And I did PM James. If moderators are going to be allowed to infract people then they should try to be above reproach themselves.. ir at least not ****ing rude. I've never seen any other moderator act in this way. And I have to say it's all been very out of character for him. Furthermore, It's often the case that people are infracted for reacting to baiting posts that are overlooked by the mods. If you're going to have an system where one person can infract another, then it has to be consitent and fair. And it just isn't. And a word on the overuse of the report button... tell me again why the appeals system was removed?

Totally agree,sometimes it's not what you say it's the way you say it, I can get on with most people but not when they are just rude and cocky.There is a post amongst this thread already that is inflammatory and by someone who wasn't exactly enamoured with TIBB a while back themselves ,i haven't reported it I shouldn't have to,I'de rather ignore it.that's what I don't like aswell, falseness.:wavey:

[Kazanne]

Interesting. I have stopped posting on this site, but I really can't let this pass without comment.

I wrote to you and James about a certain moderator, i tried to be constructive about it, but was met with a brick wall from both of you.

I've never been banned, that's not my issue. I do have a problem with bias and unfairness though, and its not happened once, it's repeated time after time after time.

If people are not posting on this site, its because they are being driven away in frustration. While some posters might like to test boundaries and stir things up a bit for a bit of controversy and dare I say it entertainment, there is a clique on here that use passive aggressive tactics to belittle others. The may not have broken any specific rules, but their intentions are clear as are there motives.

I've heard so often that everyone is fair etc etc, its just not true, and if you try and say anything against it you are hit with a break wall or threatened with a ban or whatever. Its laughable, it really is.

You need to come back bitontheslide:wavey:

[Tom4784]

With respect, Josy... I have been incfracted twice in the last couple of weeks for posts that were mild compared to Dezzy's. And he's a moderator. And I did PM James. If moderators are going to be allowed to infract people then they should try to be above reproach themselves.. ir at least not ****ing rude. I've never seen any other moderator act in this way. And I have to say it's all been very out of character for him. Furthermore, It's often the case that people are infracted for reacting to baiting posts that are overlooked by the mods. If you're going to have an system where one person can infract another, then it has to be consitent and fair. And it just isn't. And a word on the overuse of the report button... tell me again why the appeals system was removed?

Do you have evidence of this because I can't imagine where you got this idea from since you don't have any knowledge of anybody else's infractions aside from your own so how do you know that these baiting posts are overlooked? You can't know because you are drawing conclusions based on nothing.

The appeals section was removed because most people misused it to insult the mods or would waste everyone's time trying to appeal infractions that they obviously deserved. Very few people used the Appeals section correctly.

[Tom4784]

Completely agree with this. I certainly feel that any mods actively involved in a discussion/disagreement should not be able to infract their 'opponent' Talk about conflict of interests.

I make a point of not doing so.

Again, these are conclusions based on bias against me rather than anything factual.

[Brillopad]

I make a point of not doing so.

Again, these are conclusions based on bias against me rather than anything factual.

I'd say experience rather than bias.

[Cherie]

Interesting. I have stopped posting on this site, but I really can't let this pass without comment.

I wrote to you and James about a certain moderator, i tried to be constructive about it, but was met with a brick wall from both of you.

I've never been banned, that's not my issue. I do have a problem with bias and unfairness though, and its not happened once, it's repeated time after time after time.

If people are not posting on this site, its because they are being driven away in frustration. While some posters might like to test boundaries and stir things up a bit for a bit of controversy and dare I say it entertainment, there is a clique on here that use passive aggressive tactics to belittle others. The may not have broken any specific rules, but their intentions are clear as are there motives.

I've heard so often that everyone is fair etc etc, its just not true, and if you try and say anything against it you are hit with a break wall or threatened with a ban or whatever. Its laughable, it really is.


Hello :amazed: I hope you stay, suspect you won't but your input is spot on as usual

[Tom4784]

I'd say experience rather than bias.

How could you have any experience of me infracting someone mid debate when you don't know a thing about who is actually infracting you? Like I've said a few times already, the only thing you know for certain is your own infractions, not who gave them to you or the details of other people's infractions.

Thus these are all conclusions based on bias because they aren't based on anything factual.

[Niamh.]

Interesting. I have stopped posting on this site, but I really can't let this pass without comment.

I wrote to you and James about a certain moderator, i tried to be constructive about it, but was met with a brick wall from both of you.

I've never been banned, that's not my issue. I do have a problem with bias and unfairness though, and its not happened once, it's repeated time after time after time.

If people are not posting on this site, its because they are being driven away in frustration. While some posters might like to test boundaries and stir things up a bit for a bit of controversy and dare I say it entertainment, there is a clique on here that use passive aggressive tactics to belittle others. The may not have broken any specific rules, but their intentions are clear as are there motives.

I've heard so often that everyone is fair etc etc, its just not true, and if you try and say anything against it you are hit with a break wall or threatened with a ban or whatever. Its laughable, it really is.

It's a shame you don't post anymore, I always enjoyed your contributions BOTS :love:

[Nicky91]

LT, i miss you so much :(

[Ronald.]

LT, i miss you so much :(

Same Nicky. Good to know the Netherlands are behind him, so is Wales. R.

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

this thread's a heaving mess

[Cherie]

Same Nicky. Good to know the Netherlands are behind him, so is Wales. R.

:joker:

[Brillopad]

How could you have any experience of me infracting someone mid debate when you don't know a thing about who is actually infracting you? Like I've said a few times already, the only thing you know for certain is your own infractions, not who gave them to you or the details of other people's infractions.

Thus these are all conclusions based on bias because they aren't based on anything factual.

I know a clear-cut case of baiting when I see it and I know double standards when I see them. As I said I have experience. That's all I need to know. It seems several others have had similar experiences.

[Niamh.]

Niamh :joker: I didn't say it was the only way members got infracted, you added that in youself, I said it was an area where there could be inconsistency
Hey I never said that I was just commenting on your post and tbe idea that we're responsible for how much or little people report stuff

[Nicky91]

this thread's a heaving mess

yeah i know, and LT having a lot of attention now :hehe:

[Livia]

Do you have evidence of this because I can't imagine where you got this idea from since you don't have any knowledge of anybody else's infractions aside from your own so how do you know that these baiting posts are overlooked? You can't know because you are drawing conclusions based on nothing.

The appeals section was removed because most people misused it to insult the mods or would waste everyone's time trying to appeal infractions that they obviously deserved. Very few people used the Appeals section correctly.

I have had posts removed and been warned/infracted, whilst the gloating post to which I reacted has been left there for all to see. That's how I know. I remember a joke being made about my husband aftger he died. I went lost it and my post was removed. The offending post was left there ALLLL day until I begged a mod to remove it - it was Marc, actually, who finally removed it. I have the evidence of my own experience, I don't need anecdotal evidence from anyone else. This isn't the only experience I've had of this either. And I won't be alone... So there's my evidence. Other people will have theirs too. I could find plenty of evidence of your own posts breaking forum rules and being overlooked.

If the appeals section was abused the answer is not to remove it, it is surely to put an end to its abuse. As I've said before, give people, say, 300 words max for a plea of mitigation to be look at but the mods. Once a decision has been made no other correspondence will be entered into on fear of a ban. You don't remove something for everyone because a handful of people abused it. If you don't have an appeals section then allowing one set of forum members to infract and ban another set of forum members, but not be open to any kind of punishment themselves, is ridiculous. Unless you feel that you, as a moderator on this forum, are entitled to refer to people as "dear" knowing that it's aggravating, and being personal and thoroughly unpleasant to the point of baiting... and then handing out infractions to people doing the same, is acceptable.

I think those same people who abused the appeals section are the same ones who abuse the report button... of course, I only have anecdotal evidence about that... but I'm sure plenty of people are in a like mind.

[Amy Jade]

Liv that's disgusting someone went that low, whoever it was is scum idc if they're still on the forum either.

[Nicky91]

Liv that's disgusting someone went that low, whoever it was is scum idc if they're still on the forum either.

:clap1: :clap1: :clap1:

good one Amy

[Toy Soldier]

I think those same people who abused the appeals section are the same ones who abuse the report button... of course, I only have anecdotal evidence about that... but I'm sure plenty of people are in a like mind.

Nah, I used the appeals section to insult mods a couple of times but I've never misused the report button. Unless not using it at all counts as misuse...

[Tom4784]

I have had posts removed and been warned/infracted, whilst the gloating post to which I reacted has been left there for all to see. That's how I know. I remember a joke being made about my husband aftger he died. I went lost it and my post was removed. The offending post was left there ALLLL day until I begged a mod to remove it - it was Marc, actually, who finally removed it. I have the evidence of my own experience, I don't need anecdotal evidence from anyone else. This isn't the only experience I've had of this either. And I won't be alone... So there's my evidence. Other people will have theirs too. I could find plenty of evidence of your own posts breaking forum rules and being overlooked.

If the appeals section was abused the answer is not to remove it, it is surely to put an end to its abuse. As I've said before, give people, say, 300 words max for a plea of mitigation to be look at but the mods. Once a decision has been made no other correspondence will be entered into on fear of a ban. You don't remove something for everyone because a handful of people abused it. If you don't have an appeals section then allowing one set of forum members to infract and ban another set of forum members, but not be open to any kind of punishment themselves, is ridiculous. Unless you feel that you, as a moderator on this forum, are entitled to refer to people as "dear" knowing that it's aggravating, and being personal and thoroughly unpleasant to the point of baiting... and then handing out infractions to people doing the same, is acceptable.

I think those same people who abused the appeals section are the same ones who abuse the report button... of course, I only have anecdotal evidence about that... but I'm sure plenty of people are in a like mind.

Just because a post doesn't get removed doesn't mean that the member who posted doesn't get infracted, it may shock you to know this Livia so please sit down just in case but the mods are actually, get this, human. It's shocking I know but sometimes when we've got multiple posts to delete or clean up then we occasionally miss one. It doesn't mean that post wasn't punished, especially if it was as you said it was.

Appeals just didn't work, people saw it as a free way to get their infractions reversed and they would always respond badly when that wasn't the case. It was a melting pot and it rarely worked as intended. If you get infracted and you disagree with it then there's nothing stopping you from PMing a mod but a lot of people don't bother. When I get a PM about an infraction, I'll always look into it and then either try to clarify it if the infraction is unclear or simply offer a second opinion as a mod. It's basically an appeal without the hassle that the section brought to the forum. I don't see the need in bringing it back when it was a huge failure to begin with.

[Ronald.]

I have only reported someone once. I think it was Cal when I joined because he made a joke about my daughter. I was new and didn't know that he was joking now I think he's lovely and a great poster. I would probably laugh if I read it again now. R.

[Ross.]

Let's be real LT is reading this offline and is loving the attention!

[Brillopad]

I have had posts removed and been warned/infracted, whilst the gloating post to which I reacted has been left there for all to see. That's how I know. I remember a joke being made about my husband aftger he died. I went lost it and my post was removed. The offending post was left there ALLLL day until I begged a mod to remove it - it was Marc, actually, who finally removed it. I have the evidence of my own experience, I:fist: don't need anecdotal evidence from anyone else. This isn't the only experience I've had of this either. And I won't be alone... So there's my evidence. Other people will have theirs too. I could find plenty of evidence of your own posts breaking forum rules and being overlooked.

If the appeals section was abused the answer is not to remove it, it is surely to put an end to its abuse. As I've said before, give people, say, 300 words max for a plea of mitigation to be look at but the mods. Once a decision has been made no other correspondence will be entered into on fear of a ban. You don't remove something for everyone because a handful of people abused it. If you don't have an appeals section then allowing one set of forum members to infract and ban another set of forum members, but not be open to any kind of punishment themselves, is ridiculous. Unless you feel that you, as a moderator on this forum, are entitled to refer to people as "dear" knowing that it's aggravating, and being personal and thoroughly unpleasant to the point of baiting... and then handing out infractions to people doing the same, is acceptable.

I think those same people who abused the appeals section are the same ones who abuse the report button... of course, I only have anecdotal evidence about that... but I'm sure plenty of people are in a like mind.

What a terrible experience Livia - I'm lost for words that that could happen. I do believe that there is an unfair system on here that needs to be looked into , but your experience was unforgivable. Much as I like to consider myself Wordly-wise I am still amazed and dumbfounded by the depths some people will sink to.

[Josy]

Interesting. I have stopped posting on this site, but I really can't let this pass without comment.

I wrote to you and James about a certain moderator, i tried to be constructive about it, but was met with a brick wall from both of you.

I've never been banned, that's not my issue. I do have a problem with bias and unfairness though, and its not happened once, it's repeated time after time after time.

If people are not posting on this site, its because they are being driven away in frustration. While some posters might like to test boundaries and stir things up a bit for a bit of controversy and dare I say it entertainment, there is a clique on here that use passive aggressive tactics to belittle others. The may not have broken any specific rules, but their intentions are clear as are there motives.

I've heard so often that everyone is fair etc etc, its just not true, and if you try and say anything against it you are hit with a break wall or threatened with a ban or whatever. Its laughable, it really is.
You weren't hit with a brick wall at all in fact if I remember correctly you ended up being quite rude in your last replies to myself and James when we were replying to you in a respectable manner with suggestions, I'm sure I still have the messages which I will look back at later.

If someone chooses to leave the site then that's up to them but we certainly won't be given or agree to any ultimatums to keep that person here, that's not the way it works tbh

[Kizzy]

Do you have evidence of this because I can't imagine where you got this idea from since you don't have any knowledge of anybody else's infractions aside from your own so how do you know that these baiting posts are overlooked? You can't know because you are drawing conclusions based on nothing.

The appeals section was removed because most people misused it to insult the mods or would waste everyone's time trying to appeal infractions that they obviously deserved. Very few people used the Appeals section correctly.

Sorry not sorry.

If I'm infracted I now know I deserved it, and if it was due to a any nasty comments based on me personally, or where I live for instance I report that post and then we both get infracted.
That is fair.

[Marsh.]

Let's be real LT is reading this offline and is loving the attention!

We're lying in bed together with hobnobs and tea and loving it.

[Ross.]

We're lying in bed together with hobnobs and tea and loving it.

Oh hi Tuesday Lady?

[Marsh.]

Oh hi Tuesday Lady?

:smug:

[Cherie]

Hey I never said that I was just commenting on your post and tbe idea that we're responsible for how much or little people report stuff

Yeah I know what you meant

[Babayaro.]

We're lying in bed together with hobnobs and tea and loving it.

You wearing one of his lumberjack shirts and nothing else?

[Babayaro.]

:conf2:

[Ross.]

Everyone needs to chill and appreciate that I'm here

[Marsh.]

You wearing one of his lumberjack shirts and nothing else?

:joker: :joker: :joker:

[Cherie]

Let's be real LT is reading this offline and is loving the attention!

I think you are missing the point Ross, this is not just about LT, and even if he is loving it, let him enjoy :hee: