Shooting in Orlando (Florida)

[Will.]

Multiple fatalities. :(

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/40162989

[Lee.]

Not terror related apparently?

[Niamh.]

Not terror related apparently?

I read it was a disgruntled employee

Their gun laws are a much bigger issue than terrorism but no one seems to be shouting about that ever, very odd

[Lee.]

I read it was a disgruntled employee

Their gun laws are a much bigger issue than terrorism but no one seems to be shouting about that ever, very odd

Agree.. it's mental :crazy:

[Anaesthesia]

I read it was a disgruntled employee

Their gun laws are a much bigger issue than terrorism but no one seems to be shouting about that ever, very odd

Oh no, Mr Trump himself has tweeted about gun laws in the wake of this weekend's attack:

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/871331574649901056

https://s11.postimg.org/tk3yqe1df/Capture.png (https://postimg.org/image/yvivb3nfz/)image hosting 15mb (https://postimage.io/)

[Lee.]

Oh no, Mr Trump himself has tweeted about gun laws in the wake of this weekend's attack:

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/871331574649901056

I share Ben David Grabinski's sentiments

[Niamh.]

Oh no, Mr Trump himself has tweeted about gun laws in the wake of this weekend's attack:

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/871331574649901056

What a ****ing moron

[Anaesthesia]

I share Ben David Grabinski's sentiments

Hear hear.

[Niamh.]

There would have been alot more killed if they'd had guns rather than knives, does he not realise that?

[Anaesthesia]

There would have been alot more killed if they'd had guns rather than knives, does he not realise that?

I think this is one of the most sickening tweets I've ever seen from the *******wit. He doesn't have a clue.

[Rob!]

Oh no, Mr Trump himself has tweeted about gun laws in the wake of this weekend's attack:

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/871331574649901056

http://i65.tinypic.com/29vcboj.png

You beat me to it. ****ing moron.

[Niamh.]

I think this is one of the most sickening tweets I've ever seen from the *******wit. He doesn't have a clue.

Well it's the type of stuff you'd expect to see someone like Katie Hopkins post not the the President of America

[Nicky91]

omg so sad :(

[King Gizzard]

Oh no, Mr Trump himself has tweeted about gun laws in the wake of this weekend's attack:

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/871331574649901056

https://s11.postimg.org/tk3yqe1df/Capture.png (https://postimg.org/image/yvivb3nfz/)image hosting 15mb (https://postimage.io/)

And we're still going to let this piece of **** into this country with open arms

Does he not realise how pathetic he sounds, if the terrorists in London had been allowed to openly obtain guns it'd have been much, much worse

[Shaun]

Orlando has really been through the mill this past year :( the anniversary of the Pulse shooting is very soon.

[Northern Monkey]

I think the Whitehouse needs its internet access taking out while Trump's incharge for his own good :laugh:

[Anaesthesia]

I think the Whitehouse needs its internet access taking out while Trump's incharge for his own good :laugh:

Not until he's done the drunken dick pic...although Russia probably have that covered.

[Alf]

There would have been alot more killed if they'd had guns rather than knives, does he not realise that?You could also say, there would have been a lot less deaths were people armed and able to stop them.

[Lee.]

You could also say, there would have been a lot less deaths were people armed and able to stop them.

Ordinary folk, out enjoying themselves with guns in their pockets? Untrained, scared and maybe full of the drunk? I'm sorry it'd have been a lot worse!

[Anaesthesia]

You could also say, there would have been a lot less deaths were people armed and able to stop them.

I guess you could...but would you?

[jaxie]

I read it was a disgruntled employee

Their gun laws are a much bigger issue than terrorism but no one seems to be shouting about that ever, very odd

I do sometimes. Many seem completely blinkered when it comes to the right to bear arms though. The NRA have done a great brain washing job. Big bucks, no conscience, the NRA.

You'd have thought the first time someone gunned down children in a school it would have been enough to take a good look at the right to bear arms, but no apparently a lot more children have to die first.

[Anaesthesia]

I do sometimes. Many seem completely blinkered when it comes to the right to bear arms though. The NRA have done a great brain washing job. Big bucks, no conscience, the NRA.

You'd have thought the first time someone gunned down children in a school it would have been enough to take a good look at the right to bear arms, but no apparently a lot more children have to die first.

:clap1:

[Alf]

I guess you could...but would you?I'm just giving you the case of what the people on the other side of the debate are saying.

I'd just go by the laws of the land I live in.

[Anaesthesia]

I'm just giving you the case of what the people on the other side of the debate are saying.

I'd just go by the laws of the land I live in.

Fair enough.

And as such, I think a rapid armed police response was all that was needed.

[Northern Monkey]

I do sometimes. Many seem completely blinkered when it comes to the right to bear arms though. The NRA have done a great brain washing job. Big bucks, no conscience, the NRA.

You'd have thought the first time someone gunned down children in a school it would have been enough to take a good look at the right to bear arms, but no apparently a lot more children have to die first.

What could possibly be done though?

It would be the biggest bloodbath since WW2 if the army went door to door trying to seize weapons.
The second amendment is to rise up against corrupt government.That would be a corrupt government in American law.
The US is stuck with guns.

[Niamh.]

Ordinary folk, out enjoying themselves with guns in their pockets? Untrained, scared and maybe full of the drunk? I'm sorry it'd have been a lot worse!

Yup, bizarre suggestion imo

[Niamh.]

I do sometimes. Many seem completely blinkered when it comes to the right to bear arms though. The NRA have done a great brain washing job. Big bucks, no conscience, the NRA.

You'd have thought the first time someone gunned down children in a school it would have been enough to take a good look at the right to bear arms, but no apparently a lot more children have to die first.

Exactly because we all know who really runs the world, the big corporations it's all about the money. It's pretty sad really

[Toy Soldier]

You could also say, there would have been a lot less deaths were people armed and able to stop them.

Not really. If it was in America, these people could legitimately have been armed with AR15's and wearing full body armour. It has happened in the US, multiple times.

A civilian with a handbag-gun isn't taking down someone in that gear. For one, the guns simply aren't guaranteed to do much damage even if they do hit their target, and for two, civilians with handguns generally have only ever fired them on a range and not in a real life live fire situation. In other words, they'll probably simply miss completely, and end up being one of the first ones shot for their efforts.

[jaxie]

What could possibly be done though?

It would be the biggest bloodbath since WW2 if the army went door to door trying to seize weapons.
The second amendment is to rise up against corrupt government.That would be a corrupt government in American law.
The US is stuck with guns.

Well I think for a start they could stop selling semi automatic weapons to the general public. Why does any member of the public need a semi automatic weapon? So that would be a start. They could offer a hand in on them and stop selling any more to the public.