Starker praises terror legislation Corbyn abstained on.

[Brillopad]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4580438/Starmer-praises-terror-legislation-Corbyn-abstained-on.html

Corbyn has a shameful record of supporting legislation to counteract terrorism. What is that man's problem? How can anyone say he doesn't sympathise with terrorists and the lengths they go when challenging the system. With his history how did he ever get to be leader of a main political party in Britain nevermind potentially PM. Something is very wrong.

[Kizzy]

Still banging away at this? You've been given links to reasonings and other MPs that have a similar voting record if not view ...may for instance.

[user104658]

Corbyn has a shameful record of supporting legislation to counteract terrorism. What is that man's problem? How can anyone say he doesn't sympathise with terrorists.

What you seem to be failing to consider, Brillo, is that different people have different opinions on how to best tackle terrorism. You appear to believe that there is only one path, only one solution, and that anyone who doesn't cheer for that solution "doesn't want to stop terrorism". This seems quite a blinkered approach, in my opinion.

[Brillopad]

What you seem to be failing to consider, Brillo, is that different people have different opinions on how to best tackle terrorism. You appear to believe that there is only one path, only one solution, and that anyone who doesn't cheer for that solution "doesn't want to stop terrorism". This seems quite a blinkered approach, in my opinion.

Well I guess that could be said whatever approach you support.

[user104658]

Well I guess that could be said whatever approach you support.

Yes it could. That has no bearing on this thread, though.