Lesbian couple 'shocked' when barman calls them lesbians on bill!

[Christmas Dynasnow]

http://dailym.ai/2wIhLw9

A rough looking lesbian couple were horrified when they got drinks receipt from a bar they had been celebrating in as it had lesbians printed on it to identify their tab.

[bots]

he wasn't lying :clap1:

[RileyH]

mess

[Northern Monkey]

Maybe it was busy and they don't have table numbers so they had to put a brief description on the bill for the waitress to identify them?

[Smithy]

Maybe it was busy and they don't have table numbers so they had to put a brief description on the bill for the waitress to identify them?

Table: 117, it says in the article...

[Firewire]

Maybe it was busy and they don't have table numbers so they had to put a brief description on the bill for the waitress to identify them?

So it's ok to use "lesbians" to describe them?

Would it be okay to say "muslims" or "gypsies"?

[Northern Monkey]

So it's ok to use "lesbians" to describe them?

Would it be okay to say "muslims" or "gypsies"?

Well if you used muslims it probably wouldn't narrow it down much as there'd more than likely be a third of the tables occupied by muslims.
Gypsies might work though.

[Northern Monkey]

Table: 117, it says in the article...

Well that pissed on my parade then:laugh:

[Gusto Brunt]

I was expecting a couple of rough, tattooed-faced, short-haired lesbians in trousers and hob-nailed boots. I was wrong.

[Christmas Dynasnow]

So it's ok to use "lesbians" to describe them?

Would it be okay to say "muslims" or "gypsies"?

You can't say gypsies anymore, I think pikies also.

Muslims is fine

[Tinsel Toes]

Its disgraceful ! who does this 'person' think they are ? GOD

Can they make they cheque out to the ' wanker behind the bar ?

[Tinsel Toes]

You can't say gypsies anymore, I think pikies also.

Muslims is fine

What about diddies?
Not that they'd ever get through the door of this hole.

[Parmy]

I was expecting a couple of rough, tattooed-faced, short-haired lesbians in trousers and hob-nailed boots. I was wrong.

They are all too busy moderating the forum..lol.:joker:

Dats a joke btw.

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Its disgraceful ! who does this 'person' think they are ? GOD

Can they make they cheque out to the ' wanker behind the bar ?

No it must be to the bar business name

[Christmas Dynasnow]

What about diddies?
Not that they'd ever get through the door of this hole.

No it would be travellers

[Greg!]

I would scream if I was a lesbian and was given a bill that said "LESBIANS" on it but I can see why they would be annoyed

[ChristmasNeeve]

Its disgraceful ! who does this 'person' think they are ? GOD

Can they make they cheque out to the ' wanker behind the bar ?

:laugh2:

But yeah ignorant prick

[Wizard.]

Poor Mel C and her girlfriend being outed like that!

[RileyH]

I would scream if I was a lesbian and was given a bill that said "LESBIANS" on it but I can see why they would be annoyed

this tbh :laugh:

[user104658]

You're not supposed to use things like that or negative physical description to identify customers you're writing about... That's day 1 stuff. You can't write "Big fat bob kicked off again" for example.

That said, a colleague of mine (a woman in her 60's) does it constantly and I have to admit some of them crack me up. We have customer logs for certain things, and amongst many, she has written down "skeletor" as the name of a very tall, bald pale man and my personal favourite - "Mummy's Boy" for a guy who is always on the phone to his mum :joker:. We've also had "Rosie and Jim", "The Clampetts" and "Worzel Gummidge" :facepalm:

[Tinsel Toes]

You're not supposed to use things like that or negative physical description to identify customers you're writing about... That's day 1 stuff. You can't write "Big fat bob kicked off again" for example.

That said, a colleague of mine (a woman in her 60's) does it constantly and I have to admit some of them crack me up. We have customer logs for certain things, and amongst many, she has written down "skeletor" as the name of a very tall, bald pale man and my personal favourite - "Mummy's Boy" for a guy who is always on the phone to his mum :joker:. We've also had "Rosie and Jim", "The Clampetts" and "Worzel Gummidge" :facepalm:

Are we talking about doctors ? :laugh:

[arista]

he wasn't lying :clap1:


how nice.

[arista]

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/08/30/06/43B1A52800000578-4835410-image-m-15_1504071904787.jpg


Get It Framed


Feel The Force

[Christmas Dynasnow]

what is two very camp gays men had been there with the gay accent etc and the bill said 2 gays guys?

would that have been "horrific"?

[Marsh.]

You're not supposed to use things like that or negative physical description to identify customers you're writing about... That's day 1 stuff. You can't write "Big fat bob kicked off again" for example.

That said, a colleague of mine (a woman in her 60's) does it constantly and I have to admit some of them crack me up. We have customer logs for certain things, and amongst many, she has written down "skeletor" as the name of a very tall, bald pale man and my personal favourite - "Mummy's Boy" for a guy who is always on the phone to his mum :joker:. We've also had "Rosie and Jim", "The Clampetts" and "Worzel Gummidge" :facepalm:

Omg, you work in a bookies too don't you?

We were all told to change all of our descriptors that might have offensive/negative connotations and try to put names where appropriate after one of the customers overheard the fact they were being "monitored" and asked to see the computer screen. :joker:

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Marsh gets a Starbucks

http://justsomething.co/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/mispelled-starbucks-names-ann-louise.jpg

[user104658]

Omg, you work in a bookies too don't you?

We were all told to change all of our descriptors that might have offensive/negative connotations and try to put names where appropriate after one of the customers overheard the fact they were being "monitored" and asked to see the computer screen. :joker:

Yeah, they can request to see any information held about them, which is why you can't put any physical descriptions at all really, other than the absolute basics. Actual incident from last weekend...

Note in the official electronic logs:

"Tall gentleman with light coloured hair, attempted to remove gaming machine from the shop after a variation of Blackjack declared the dealer's 22 as a "push", which he felt was unfair. Gentleman was asked to leave the shop and to not return until he felt that he was able to conduct himself in a more positive manner."

Note scribbled on a piece of paper for the staff member opening the shop the next morning:

"[Customer's nickname] was pissed off his face, had no idea what game he was playing, tried to drag a machine out the door whilst declaring that he was "going to knock **** out of the cheating b******. Told him to **** off and not come back until he had sobered up."

:joker:

[Marsh.]

Yeah, they can request to see any information held about them, which is why you can't put any physical descriptions at all really, other than the absolute basics. Actual incident from last weekend...

Note in the official electronic logs:

"Tall gentleman with light coloured hair, attempted to remove gaming machine from the shop after a variation of Blackjack declared the dealer's 22 as a "push", which he felt was unfair. Gentleman was asked to leave the shop and to not return until he felt that he was able to conduct himself in a more positive manner."

Note scribbled on a piece of paper for the staff member opening the shop the next morning:

"[Customer's nickname] was pissed off his face, had no idea what game he was playing, tried to drag a machine out the door whilst declaring that he was "going to knock **** out of the cheating b******. Told him to **** off and not come back until he had sobered up."

:joker:

:laugh2:

I love it when you get the ones who are deadly serious that all of the dogs are chipped and the managing director is controlling the winning dog.

Or they think I am operating the gaming machines from behind the counter and making them lose depending on how much we have in the shop to pay them out. :joker:

[Peppermint]

Mess, this is something the people would've done where I used to work

[user104658]

:laugh2:

I love it when you get the ones who are deadly serious that all of the dogs are chipped and the managing director is controlling the winning dog.

Or they think I am operating the gaming machines from behind the counter and making them lose depending on how much we have in the shop to pay them out. :joker:

I like to encourage their paranoia when it's quiet by watching the machine logs, and then having the exact money sitting ready when they come up to collect :laugh:. Or to start offering them coffee, snacks, and friendly conversation if they look like they're winning big to encourage tips. Hahaha. If they're losing they're getting nothing :hmph:.

Also to be fair to this guy... I was totally confused about why his hand wasn't a win, too, then checked the rules of the specific game he was playing against the rules on the standard blackjack. Standard blackjack had 19 rules. The one he was playing had 20. The first 19 were identical - rule 20 stated that if the player has 20 or less and the dealer hits 22, then the stake is refunded. That's not ****ing blackjack??? I would have kicked off too!

[Underscore]

This is disgusting and homophobic.

[Marsh.]

I like to encourage their paranoia when it's quiet by watching the machine logs, and then having the exact money sitting ready when they come up to collect :laugh:. Or to start offering them coffee, snacks, and friendly conversation if they look like they're winning big to encourage tips. Hahaha. If they're losing they're getting nothing :hmph:.

Also to be fair to this guy... I was totally confused about why his hand wasn't a win, too, then checked the rules of the specific game he was playing against the rules on the standard blackjack. Standard blackjack had 19 rules. The one he was playing had 20. The first 19 were identical - rule 20 stated that if the player has 20 or less and the dealer hits 22, then the stake is refunded. That's not ****ing blackjack??? I would have kicked off too!

I always call into question the "100% random" label myself too tbf when I play on demo mode. I always win big but if it was real money not a chance.