The SPice Girls were way better than Little Mix

[Crimson Dynamo]

Just looking at their discography

I would say if you rated what the SG produced and gave it say 85% you would look at LM to date and rate that at around 45%

I cant see them catching up either?

http://www.antimusic.com/_img/17/July/10/SpiceGirls.jpg
http://ksassets.timeincuk.net/wp/uploads/sites/55/2015/03/2011LittleMixXFactorITV071211.jpg

[Kazanne]

Just looking at their discography

I would say if you rated what the SG produced and gave it say 85% you would look at LM to date and rate that at around 45%

I cant see them catching up either?

http://www.antimusic.com/_img/17/July/10/SpiceGirls.jpg
http://ksassets.timeincuk.net/wp/uploads/sites/55/2015/03/2011LittleMixXFactorITV071211.jpg

I would say you are right,not keen on either of them but did like Sporty Spice and baby Spice they had good voices, as for LM, they are ok for the kids my daughter loves them,I took her to a concert once,lol never again,her dad can take her.

[Nicky91]

Little Mix have better songs though :hmph:

[Morgan.]

Nahnthe spice girls were manufactured ****, LM have good discography and actually relatable members instead of nicknames that the band members act like.

[Nicky91]

Nahnthe spice girls were manufactured ****, LM have good discography and actually relatable members instead of nicknames that the band members act like.

Perrie :flutter:

Jade :lovedup:

[Niamh.]

Was never a big fan of either tbh but The Spice Girls were more influential as they were something new and fresh at that time

[Kazanne]

Nahnthe spice girls were manufactured ****, LM have good discography and actually relatable members instead of nicknames that the band members act like.

It's all a matter of taste really,but LM are just as manufactured as the SG were, and they were the first of the 'girl power' groups.

[Brother Leon]

Yeah. And 2Pac was so much better than 21 Savage...

I mean, no **** :laugh:

[Crimson Dynamo]

plus the SP had characters

look at the state of LM, all plain and forgettable. At best the blonde one got some promo by being dumped by ZM

:umm2:

[reece(:]

Holler > anything by ****ty Fix

[Morgan.]

LM have terrible management though so

[Morgan.]

LM would be bigger than the Spice Girls with eight management.

[smudgie]

I much prefer LM.:dance:

[y.winter]

And it's not even close!

[caprimint]

Spice Girls have some really great songs, Little Mix are just annoying

[RileyH]

I love LM but yeah Spice Girls were way better

[rusticgal]

No contest...the Spice Girls were brilliant.many great songs and hits. They were well managed and their individuality was a clever ploy.
No girl group will ever top them...

[Amy Jade]

Both are better than the beatles so thats fine

[Marsh.]

Nahnthe spice girls were manufactured ****, LM have good discography and actually relatable members instead of nicknames that the band members act like.

Little Mix are manufactured.

They're all pop, so in terms of how they're created let's not pretend one is different from the other.

The major difference is that the Spice Girls were a global phenomenon in the 90s. Little Mix.... not so much.

[Jase.]

"The SPice Girls were way better than Little Mix"

In other news, bears **** in the woods!

[LaLaLand]

Obviously!

SG literally took over the planet, at one time they could do absolutely anything it seemed.

Not to mention that people of all ages loved SG, young and old... LM seems to be just for little girls/teens.

[Eddie.]

I like both...but Spice Girls are a bit better...but I'm obviously giving Little Mix a chance...