"No discussing of nominations to evict" - (How about groups of three?)

[nodisharmony]

We all know that the discussing of nominations for eviction is against the rules of Big Brother, don't we?

Should it stay the same for BB8?

Or should it be laxed a bit?

Perhaps they could share the information in groups of three, so each group of three enter the Diary Room together in turn so all three know who each has voted for, but cannot divulge to any other of the other housemates. Also in groups of three.

There would need to be trust amongst the three!

Then, they could split the original three up when it comes to the next nominations and switch everyone around and make up different groups of three, containing different housemates, "mixing things":spin2:

This would mean that, each of the original three, will know what each of them voted from the original nominations, from the first group of three. So, when the switching around of housemates is done, a new threesome is made, but each of the housemates from the previous threesome, will have insider knowledge of what some of the other housemates nominated last time, but still has to keep the information private. It could change things.

How about it?







nodisharmony :angel:

[dupin]

What if they wanted to nominate one of the other two? It would probably unfairly make them change their decision...I'd keep it as it is...

[nodisharmony]

Originally posted by dupin
What if they wanted to nominate one of the other two? It would probably unfairly make them change their decision...I'd keep it as it is...

I understand what you say dupin.

But this year, they might want a real change and let us just say that there was 15 housemates and that means 5 groups of three.

Now to start with, each threesome walks into the Diary Room and makes their Nominations. three by three, until they have all done it.

None of each of the three can vote for each other naturally!!

But, when it comes to the next set of nominations, the groups of three are all mixed up again and new threesomes are formed.

Once again, they enter the Diary room and make their nominations, for a second time. three by three, once again...

It would totally change the whole original system and there could be tension, much tension:laugh:





nodisharmony :angel:

[Stu]

Originally posted by nodisharmony
We all know that the discussing of nominations for eviction is against the rules of Big Brother, don't we?

Should it stay the same for BB8?

Or should it be laxed a bit?

Perhaps they could share the information in groups of three, so each group of three enter the Diary Room together in turn so all three know who each has voted for, but cannot divulge to any other of the other housemates. Also in groups of three.

There would need to be trust amongst the three!

Then, they could split the original three up when it comes to the next nominations and switch everyone around and make up different groups of three, containing different housemates, "mixing things":spin2:

This would mean that, each of the original three, will know what each of them voted from the original nominations, from the first group of three. So, when the switching around of housemates is done, a new threesome is made, but each of the housemates from the previous threesome, will have insider knowledge of what some of the other housemates nominated last time, but still has to keep the information private. It could change things.

How about it?







nodisharmony :angel:
Sorry but that sounds incredibly convoluted and downright terrible. Just leave it as it is , or comepletely abolish it , which would make so much sense its scary not to see the logic in it.

[nodisharmony]

Originally posted by Stu

Sorry but that sounds incredibly convoluted and downright terrible. Just leave it as it is , or comepletely abolish it , which would make so much sense its scary not to see the logic in it.

We have just cross-posted Stu:thumbs:

I have just explained in more detail to dupin.

Humour the idea, but BB8 may surprise us:wink:




nodisharmony :angel:

[Stu]

Originally posted by nodisharmony
Originally posted by dupin
What if they wanted to nominate one of the other two? It would probably unfairly make them change their decision...I'd keep it as it is...

I understand what you say dupin.

But this year, they might want a real change and let us just say that there was 15 housemates and that means 5 groups of three.

Now to start with, each threesome walks into the Diary Room and makes their Nominations. three by three, until they have all done it.

None of each of the three can vote for each other naturally!!

But, when it comes to the next set of nominations, the groups of three are all mixed up again and new threesomes are formed.

Once again, they enter the Diary room and make their nominations, for a second time. three by three, once again...

It would totally change the whole original system and there could be tension, much tension:laugh:





nodisharmony :angel:
Sorry but it STILL sounds incredibly convoluted. I wont say downright terrible though - because I will end up hurting someones feelings [you know the people I am reffering to :wink:].

[nodisharmony]

Originally posted by Stu

Sorry but it STILL sounds incredibly convoluted. I wont say downright terrible though - because I will end up hurting someones feelings [you know the people I am reffering to :wink:].


I think I understand what you mean:puzzled:

But this idea is just another one which comes out from our amazing minds that may cause us to rethink the nominations secrecy.

I am sure you remember the CBB episode, where they split the house and had servants and the other housemates got waited on and didn't lift a finger.

Big Brother shocks us:colour::colour::colour:





nodisharmony :angel:

[Cody™]

its fine the way it is.

[nodisharmony]

Originally posted by Cody™
its fine the way it is.

Big Brother don't do (Fine) all the time.

The Daily Star keeps telling us some unlikely stories:mad:





nodisharmony :angel:

[Matt08]

I think that nominations should still be kept private, I think we would see repeats of CBB5's bullying and BB5's fight night if people could discuss nominations, things that Big Brother don't want to happen again.

[Mike]

Keep things as they are. It would certainly make things interesting if they could discuss nominations in groups but it's not really fair, much better them nominating when it's for their own reason and not someone elses.

[Stu]

Originally posted by bbmadmatt07
I think that nominations should still be kept private, I think we would see repeats of CBB5's bullying and BB5's fight night if people could discuss nominations, things that Big Brother don't want to happen again.
God forbid we get some cracking TV!!!

[Matt08]

If things like the Fight Night and Bullying happen again then Big Brother could just end up being banned altogether in the UK, and that's something that me and probaly all of the other bb fans don't want.

[Stu]

Originally posted by bbmadmatt07
If things like the Fight Night and Bullying happen again then Big Brother could just end up being banned altogether in the UK, and that's something that me and probaly all of the other bb fans don't want.
Racial bullying yes. But what are the chances of that happening again. And big bro will subdue it if it does. Everything else - no - big bro thrives on controversey , its not gonna be shut down due to fight night repeats.