...would you object if she went in for the last week

[Gusto Brunt]

And still be able to win?:shocked::shocked::shocked::shocked:

[JerseyWins]

Obv

[RileyH]

I'd rather have Rach

[Morgan.]

Yes because she was evicted by the public. And because it was Head to Head VTS, it technically meant VTE because anyone wanting her outncould vote Jonny.

Now with Maggie and Rachel I wouldn't object because they were never picked by the public to be evicted, but instead had the least votes to save.

[rph]

OH YES I WILL OBJECT!

I wanted her gone and for her to stay off the CBB Hashtag
Now Rachels gone whos she gonna moaning about next?

[Gusto Brunt]

Thanks. Interesting.

[Christmas Lights]

And still be able to win?:shocked::shocked::shocked::shocked:

Literally another Kinga then from BB6 ?? :bored: . And that was a daft idea .

[Gusto Brunt]

Literally another Kinga then from BB6 ?? :bored: . And that was a daft idea .

Well they'll do anything to spice it up...

[Christmas Lights]

Well they'll do anything to spice it up...

How exactly would that spice things up?? :facepalm: , why evict them just to throw them back in again??. In BB7 they did the same thing with Nikki :sleep: .

[joeysteele]

Yes.

[Lilac hills]

No she’s interesting three dimentional and I feel like she had way more to give to this husk of a series

[Patricia4]

No thanks

[poppsywoppsy]

Never in a month of Sundays.

[smudgie]

No thanks, she was dire first time.

[bots]

i paid good money to get rid of her so its an objection here

[Cherry Christmas]

Why would they bring her back specifically, and yes I would object